Sunday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. gVOR10 says:

    Via Balloon Juice, first comment this morning, Sunday Morning Garden Chat: Ozark Hillbilly, Irreplaceable Inspiration.

    12
  2. Scott says:

    https://outsidethebeltway.com/saturdays-forum-212/#comment-2961519 Follow up to my yesterday’s posting on a high school band being denied participation in the 2025 Super Bowl:

    ‘This is nuts’: Mayor intervenes after HISD forbids band’s Sugar Bowl trip

    After Houston ISD denied Waltrip High’s Roaring Red Ram Band the opportunity to perform at next year’s Sugar Bowl out of supposed fear that the Big Easy would be too dangerous for students, Mayor John Whitmire—a Waltrip grad—has offered the band a personal Houston police escort to make the trip.

    The Houston mayor said that when he saw Chron’s Friday night story about the legendary Waltrip High marching band being forbidden from performing at the College Football Playoff game in New Orleans early next year, he could not believe his eyes.

    “This is nuts,” the mayor told Chron in a call Saturday morning. “It’s very fixable. This should have never happened. It was a big mistake. Some grown-up made a mistake,” Whitmire said of HISD North Division Superintendent Orlando Riddick’s decision not to approve the trip.

    Sanity prevails.

    6
  3. Scott says:

    Cards Against Humanity sues Elon Musk’s SpaceX over alleged damage to land near U.S.-Mexico border

    The maker of Cards Against Humanity, the popular adult party game, has sued Elon Musk’s SpaceX, alleging the company has trespassed on its land in Cameron County and caused damage.

    The suit, filed Thursday against Space Exploration Technologies Corp., accused the company of clearing the vegetation on the lot, putting down gravel and allowing SpaceX and contractors “to run and park its vehicles all over the property.”

    “SpaceX has treated the Property as its own for at least six months,” the suit alleges, disregarding Cards Against Humanity’s property rights and the safety of those on “what has become a worksite.”

    Cards Against Humanity, known for its “humorous and irreverent” content, as described in the suit, purchased the vacant land in 2017 “to take a stand against the building of a Border Wall” and against President Donald Trump.

    The company used a supporter-funded campaign to pay for the land, the suit said, and the purchase was an effort by the company “to draw attention to another example of injustice and hubris on the part of a high-profile billionaire who was more interested in his own aggrandizement than in the good of the people.”

    9
  4. becca says:

    @Scott: Elon makes it a habit to ignore all laws and shit all over anyone anywhere. He leaves a trail of pollution and filth behind like a slimy slug. He should be in jail.
    No wonder trump lusts for him.

    11
  5. CSK says:

    Melania is now peddling Christmas ornaments! Only $75 to $90 apiece!

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/who-gives-a-f-about-christmas-melania-trump-does-now?ref=home?ref=home

  6. Michael Reynolds says:

    Well, I won’t back down, no I won’t back down you can stand me up at. . . Okay, I’ll back down.

    Elon Musk backs down in his fight with Brazilian judges to restore X
    The platform agrees to appoint a legal representative in Brazil, pays fines and takes down user accounts that the court had ordered removed.

    X, Musk’s social media platform, has backed down in its fight with the Brazilian judiciary, after complying with court orders that had blocked users in the country from accessing X.

    The platform bowed to one of the key demands made by Brazil’s supreme court by appointing a legal representative in the country. It also paid outstanding fines and took down user accounts that the court had ordered to be removed on the basis that they threatened the country’s democracy, the New York Times reported.

    And there’s also this:

    Hollywood Can’t Ditch Its Teslas Fast Enough: “They’re Destroying Their Leases and Walking Away”

    Elon backing down, and Hollywood walking away.

    10
  7. Mister Bluster says:

    Yesterday’s Gone
    Autumn Equinox September 22, 2024 7:44am cdt
    space.com

    (This is also the first time that I have seen the narrow EDIT window.)

    1
  8. Sleeping Dog says:

    @becca:

    Vance maybe on to something with his talk of de-naturalization. Harris/Walz should pick up that idea when the enter the WH and make the musk rat the first and only one to be sent packing. Send him back to South Africa.

    8
  9. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Sleeping Dog:
    Don’t forget this nation’s worst immigrant: Rupert Murdoch.

    8
  10. just nutha says:

    @Sleeping Dog: Absolutely! Nothing says “respect for the ‘rule of law’ and even handed justice” than taking the opponent’s cynical and publicly-criticized stance and using it against a political enemy.
    @Michael Reynolds: Or two.

    2
  11. Jen says:

    The AP has a piece out about how scant GOP door to door efforts are in swing states. If Trump manages to lose this race, despite the obvious tilt towards the GOP in the electoral college, it’s going to be because of stupidity like stripping out the party’s GOTV capabilities by putting his clueless daughter in law in charge.

    Over the past week, there were complications for America PAC, the most high-profile of the groups helping Trump in 2024.

    America PAC fired Nevada-based canvassing company September Group, according to two people familiar with the matter. America PAC had paid the company almost $2.7 million a month ago, according to FEC reports. The people familiar with September Group’s dismissal spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private business decisions.

    1
  12. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Jen:
    A good opportunity to remind people that GOTV doesn’t show up in polls. And if folks here have a few spare bucks, go on ActBlue and send some to state Democratic parties in swing states. Chuck Schumer just threw a bunch of money to the candidates, so they’re fine on ad buys. At this point GOTV is the thing.

    2
  13. Kathy says:
  14. gVOR10 says:

    Democrats are making Project 2025 a centerpiece of their campaigning. A Republican might object that Trump has disowned 2025, so why is it a legit issue? Ezra Klein (gift link) has an excellent answer at NYT.

    Veterans of Trump’s administration believe personnel was their biggest problem. They could not act ambitiously or swiftly enough because they were at constant war with the government they, in theory, controlled. Part of this reflected Trump’s erratic leadership style and the constant conflict between the warring factions inside his White House: the traditional Republicans clustered around Mike Pence and Reince Priebus; the MAGA types led by Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller; the foreign policy establishment that spoke through H.R. McMaster and Nikki Haley; the corporatists led by Jared Kushner and Gary Cohn. Read any book on the Trump presidency, and you will be buried in examples of Trump’s top appointees trying to foil each other — and him.

    This (personnel) is the problem groups like Project 2025 set out to solve. Behind the policy playbook sits a database of around 20,000 applicants ready to be part of the next Trump administration. And that database is still growing.

    By all accounts, Trump and his campaign are furious that Project 2025 has been hung like a millstone around his neck. But there are two reasons their disavowals have counted for little. The first is that the campaign has treated Trump’s policy plans like a secret the public can only be let in on after his victory. His issues page is a joke, his official platform a Delphic collection of all-caps aphorisms backed up by the occasional bullet point. (And they accuse Harris of not having an explicit program.)

    Trumpism is whatever Trump says it is, but MAGA is whatever his movement becomes. This is why JD Vance has been a political liability to Trump’s campaign: Vance represents MAGA as it has evolved — esoterically ideological, deeply resentful, terminally online — unleavened by Trump’s instincts for showmanship and the winds of public sentiment.

    He (Trump) is denying a reality of his second term that everyone else can plainly see. Project 2025 is not a perfect guide to that second term, but it the closest thing we have to one. It was all so much easier when the deep state was something Trump could complain about, rather than something he had to manage and own.

    5
  15. Mister Bluster says:

    @Kathy:
    When I was in high school (class of 1966) one of the courses that was required for graduation was The Arts. I remember first hearing this composition in my sophomore and junior years as the music came through the walls of classrooms adjacent to the mini auditorium where The Arts was taught. I finally sat for the class in my senior year. I know we covered other works that semester however Pictures at an Exhibition is the only one that has stuck with me all these years.

    1
  16. CSK says:

    Trump told Sharyl Attkison today that he doesn’t see himself running in 2028 if he loses this November.

    Who knows what that means?

    1
  17. anjin-san says:

    Picking up on yesterday’s discussion about fusion power, last year I saw LLNL Director Kim Budil at an event where she spoke extensively about LLNL’s “fusion ignition” – it was very impressive.

    If I remember correcly, the process required for ignition involved generating significantly more power than the entire U.S. electrical grid generates for a fraction of a second.

    So, the challenge of fusion power is not trivial, but we have crossed a major threshold. Lots of money and sustained effort will be required to continue to move forward.

    3
  18. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @Kathy: Years ago, I saw a multimedia presentation of Pictures with what purported to be* the pictures in question. I came to the same conclusion as the presenter in your YouTube; the compositions are far greater than the sum of the pictures they represent. (I will also note that The Great Gate of Kiev is the only really lasting section of his suite and that the orchestrations are more significant than the original piano suite. There are lots of things pianos can’t do justice to; Pictures is one of those things**.)

    *”Purported” because I have no idea at all about whether the pictures were actually preserved.
    ** On the other hand, Scott Joplin rags are almost always better than orchestrations of them.

  19. JohnSF says:

    @Michael Reynolds:
    Tom Petty song ref for the win!

    1
  20. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @CSK: [Waving hand furiously] I DO! I DO!! PICK ME!!! PICK ME!!!!

    IT MEANS NOTHING. Nothing at all!

  21. Just nutha ignint cracker says:
  22. Kathy says:

    @Just nutha ignint cracker:

    I agree the composition is several grades above the paintings. However, it was a tribute to a dear friend, whom Mussorgsky liked as an artist as well. Too subjective, IMO.

    Here’s a piano version in the slower tempo. Here’s one in the original faster tempo Comparing just the first promenade in the opening of both, the slow piano tempo, IMO, gives the part an ethereal quality.

    Now, the orchestra version in the Ravel orchestration, in contrast, feel portentous. As if the music indicates something great and remarkable is about to happen.

    Really, its like three very different pieces, even if the notes are the same.

    1
  23. Michael Reynolds says:

    @JohnSF:
    If a Portuguese-speaking, B-tier power can make him cave, Elon’s just made himself every government’s bitch.

  24. CSK says:

    @Just nutha ignint cracker:

    It could mean that he’s acknowledging that he could lose this time. And thus be a…loser.

  25. Gustopher says:

    @Just nutha ignint cracker: it means Trump does not love America. If he will give up if he loses a second time… there’s no commitment there.

  26. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @Kathy: The most significant thing that I learned in 20-some years of performing music of various types was that interpretation wasn’t the most important thing, it really is the only thing.

    1
  27. JohnSF says:

    @Michael Reynolds:
    Girl from Ipanenaba beats Elon Muskdela.

    Seriously, the tech-bros never seem to calculate: f@ck the the money: who has the guns?

    The other side of the equations is ALSO true, but in the longer term.

    Which is why sensible aristocrats aim for a sensible guns/money/equity balance.
    And hence why European aristocratic and mercantile dynasty’s generally continue to live quite comfortably: because they are not, on the whole, idiots.
    There seems to be a current tendency of American “alt right” silliness to think that their current socio/political security is somehow ordained of the heavens, rather than being a contingent outcome of Western history.

  28. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @CSK: @Gustopher: Okay. If you say so.

  29. Gustopher says:

    @Just nutha ignint cracker: Let’s assume, for a moment, that the $14.88 price was an honest mistake. Do you know what would have prevented such an issue?

    A diverse workforce where people are empowered to raise issues.

    (Walmart runs into this because $X.88 is one of their common prices, for rollback items. Also, the heirs of Sam Walton are all Nazis)

    2
  30. Gavin says:

    If you’re reading this post, you’d be interested in the very excellent podcast Master Plan. It details the history and execution of the Powell Memo, the blueprint for today’s reality of corporate capture of courts and life in general.
    Powell, elected to USSC somehow with the reputation as a “centrist” even though he was initially the lead defense attorney for Philip Morris in their little case, had a problem. According to this wingnut, The Government was at that point [1971] “too responsive” to the needs of its citizens. We should be so lucky.

    The story goes that Powell saw Ralph Nader’s picture on Forbes magazine at one point, got mad that anyone anywhere was doing a thing to benefit people rather than his precious corporations, and basically wrote the country’s first 30-page Reddit thread/manifesto by hand. And today we live in a utopia because all corporations are beneficent, so problem solved!

    1