Friday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. Scott says:

    Long article on the Trump/Vance/Kushner/Witkoff Ukraine treason train.

    Trump has long persuaded his acolytes that chaos and incompetence is really strategy.

    How a US-led peace plan in Ukraine is reshaping global alliances

    “The problem with this round of negotiations is that they lack all credibility,” one senior European diplomat with knowledge of the peace process told Military Times this week. “It’s just stupid.”

    The exasperation of the official, who was granted anonymity to discuss negotiations that are sensitive and ongoing, comes after weeks of what he described as an “endlessly frustrating” peace push — built around damage control, public pressure and shifting drafts — that has forced Ukraine and its European backers to “pretend to play along” even as demands circulated that are “impossible for Ukraine to accept.”

    “There is no art to this deal-making,” he added.

    ReplyReply
    11
  2. Scott says:
  3. Scott says:

    Warm and fuzzy Christmas movie recommendation.

    This is Christmas. On Prime

    Basic premise. People on London commuter train typically don’t interact with each other even though they see each other every day. Adam decides to change that by organizing a Christmas party for all the strangers. People learn each others stories. Romance happens.

    Eyes well up. Wife and I are suckers for these movies.

    ReplyReply
    2
  4. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Scott:

    Peter Zeihan has it right when he says that Trump isn’t even aware of the details. Witkoff – a credulous ignoramus – hands Trump something, anything, Trump accepts it and attacks anyone who criticizes it. That’s all he’s got.

    Some weeks back during the MTG rebellion and the Epstein tapes heating up and the health issues in the foreground, I suggested this had broken Trump. I think it has. Everything he’s doing is either playing along with someone else’s game or obsessing over his own death, which I think he sees a comin’ round the mountain. He’s done. I suspect everyone in the White House knows it and they’re jockeying for influence. Vance may want to go 25th Amendment but I imagine Rubio will fight that tooth and nail. If Vance waits and we take back the House it may actually get harder for Vance.

    I can’t even guess how this plays out. The closest parallel might be Woodrow Wilson who was evidently out of it at the end, with his wife as informal regent. But he had competent people around him, not bootlickers.

    ReplyReply
    8
  5. Scott says:

    Exclusive: Top lawyer for military joint chiefs told chairman that officers should retire if faced with an unlawful order

    How should a military commander respond if they determine they have received an unlawful order?

    Request to retire — and refrain from resigning in protest, which could be seen as a political act, or picking a fight to get fired.

    That was the previously unreported guidance that Brig. Gen. Eric Widmar, the top lawyer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, gave to the country’s top general, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, in November, according to sources familiar with the discussion.

    Seems to me that this just covers up the illegality and doesn’t resolve anything.

    ReplyReply
    10
  6. Sleeping Dog says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    Short of a chaostrophic health event in the next year, it is difficult to see Vance pulling off a 25th amendment scheme. A stroke, a collapse on the golf course something very public would need to be a predicator. Otherwise the infighting among the MAGAts that would view invoking the 25th as a coup would be huge. But if Vance wants a chance at 2 terms, he needs to act in 2026.

    Right now the Felon’s courtiers are getting what they want, they make a decision and then place an order in front of him to sign. Why would you want to mess with that?

    ReplyReply
    5
  7. gVOR10 says:

    @Sleeping Dog: I suspect Vance is very mindful of the old adage that if you strike at the king, you must kill the king. On the other hand, the odds of Trump displaying blatant incapacity seem at least fair.

    ReplyReply
    1
  8. Jay L. Gischer says:

    @Michael Reynolds: I think this is a solid take. Trump is definitely checked out. I’m not sure about the “he knows he’s dying”.

    Meanwhile, he gave a major speech on television in prime time and nobody paid any attention to it. Thing is, this could make him dangerous.

    ReplyReply
    3
  9. Slugger says:

    Trump says that the ballroom is being financed by private donations not tax revenues. If the donations are tax deductible, then the money is certainly coming from the public purse. Tax deductible dollars are taken out of the pool of money that would otherwise go into the general fund. Let’s make donations to the ballroom non deductible which would ensure that private moneys are used.

    ReplyReply
    5
  10. Daryl says:

    @Slugger:
    Since when are bribes taxable?

    ReplyReply
    3
  11. Daryl says:

    Todd Blanche, Trump’s personal attorney at the DOJ and the person in charge of the Maxwell pardon, says the complete Epstein files won’t be released today, as required by law.
    The cover-up continues.

    ReplyReply
    4
  12. Scott says:

    I think any candidate should pledge to erase any Trump images or branding on Federal property.

    This Mao/Stalin cult of personality needs to be thoroughly cleansed.

    This artist created a work-around to Trump’s face on national parks passes

    In response to the Department of the Interior’s announcement that designs on newly issued America the Beautiful passes will include President Donald Trump’s face, one artist has taken matters into her own hands.

    Jenny McCarty, an ecologist and watercolor artist in Colorado, announced on Wednesday that she is selling stickers that cover up the controversial and allegedly illegal new designs on the front of the passes, which include Trump’s face next to a painted rendering of George Washington. McCarty’s stickers are adorned with her own artwork of landscapes and animals at various parks: One features a pika standing at the famous Rock Cut overlook in Rocky Mountain National Park with an alpine flower in its mouth; another shows a wolf howling on the banks of the Snake River with the Teton Range looming in the background; the third is of a grizzly bear looking out over a vast expanse in Denali National Park and Preserve.

    ReplyReply
    3
  13. gVOR10 says:

    @Daryl: Exactly. People keep saying it’s private money as though that makes it somehow OK. How is it a positive that it’s being paid for by people who want favors from Trump?

    ReplyReply
    5
  14. Kathy says:

    @Daryl:

    Since the fixer court allowed them as “tips”.

    ReplyReply
    1
  15. Kathy says:

    Oh, great. Now it’s “release the rest of the Epstein files”.

    ReplyReply
    1
  16. dazedandconfused says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    I’ve been confidently predicting he would wear out before long. 80, doesn’t eat right, doesn’t work out, and that job wears men half his age who take care of themselves.

    Yup, the ambitious little sneaks around him will be running things but they will prop the shell up to do so, “Weekend At Bernie’s” style.

    ReplyReply
    3
  17. JohnSF says:

    Meanwhile, in Europe:
    The EU agrees a €90bn loan to Ukraine.
    This is being viewed as a bit of a let down by some, because they did not agee to use frozen Russian assets.

    But this misses the big picture:
    1) They have instead agreed to a direct “zero-interest loan” from the EU, to be repaid only if and when Ukraine receives reparations from Russia.
    And Merz:

    “If Russia does not pay reparations we will — in full accordance with international law — make use of Russian immobilized assets for paying back the loan,”

    2) This will done via “Enhanced Cooperation” procedures ie a subset of co-operating EU states but outside the formal EU structure, using the EU as “enabler”. This means the “blocking states” esp Hungary are bypassed and have no veto.
    3) The “loan” will be funded by issuing EU bonds. Germany and the Netherlands in particular have always been wary about EU bonds usage.

    I cannot emphasise enough how significant points 2) and 3) are.
    The EU Council has crossed the Rubicon.

    It will be intersting to see if the next big move might be reviving, in modified form, the tabled European Defence Community from 1954 via “Enhanced Cooperation” and funding that via “EC” contributions and bonds.

    ReplyReply
    2
  18. dazedandconfused says:

    Fentanyl is now a WMD.

    “He who controls the language controls the world.”

    ReplyReply
    2
  19. JohnSF says:

    Meanwhile in the Mediterranean:
    Ukraine strikes a Russian “shadow fleet tanker”

    Some reports (not conclusive) are GRU General Andrey Averyanov was killed.
    If so: “Oh dear. What a pity. Never mind.”

    Between this, and other Ukrainian strikes, and the US actions re Venezuela, it’s fair bet insurance on “shadow fleet” tankers will go through the roof.

    Europeans have become increasingly annoyed and twitchy, with good reason, about “shadow ships” and Russian mechant vessels activities.

    Russia seems to have some odd delusions about being able to wage “grey-zone” sub-war operations in Europe without getting push-back.

    Also, if the US administration has the patience, it may just have found the means to collapse the Venezuelan govenment.
    And possibly really putting Iran in a vice.
    But will the Trump adminstration actually be willing to be party to shutting down the “shadow fleets”?
    There’s a lot of money at play there, and a crucial Russian interest.

    On the whole, Russian linked ships these days are not the safest mode of transport.

    ReplyReply
    3
  20. Kathy says:

    The thing about listening more to classical music, is how much the modern stuff suffers by comparison. By modern I mean just about everything in the past 120 years or so. But especially pop music. It seems awfully repetitive. I sometimes wonder why the song keeps going after like a minute or two, if all the melody has been played and now it’s just being repeated with different lyrics, and a bridge meant to break the monotony.

    It’s not that the melodies are bad, or limited in instrumentation. Some are really good. It’s just that it feels like a minute or two of music stretched into 5 minutes or more. Longer songs, like Stairway to Heaven, or Total Eclipse of the Heart, weigh heavy musically about halfway through.

    Sure, the lyrics can be good. Me, I like good lyrics. I actually listen to them, and often look them up online. I think about what the song says and how it goes about saying it. Sometimes I need an explanation (for instance, American Pie)

    At that, the repetitiveness may be more in the nature of lyrical poetry than a function of modern music. Some opera arias, and I admit I’ve not listened to many, feel repetitive now and then. The Habanera aria in Carmen particularly so. You notice it more, at least I do, when listening to an instrumental version of the aria.

    No particular reason for posting this now. I just got fed up with work and needed a break to do some active thinking for a change.

    ReplyReply
    1
  21. JohnSF says:

    @Kathy:

    By modern I mean just about everything in the past 120 years or so.

    Miles Davis?
    Rachmaninov?
    Sibelius?
    Vaughan Williams?
    Prog-rock, various?

    Pop music has always tended to be short format oriented; and that is true even for medieval “popular” tunes or folk music.
    Much of which waere either “balladry” or for dancing.

    ReplyReply
    1
  22. Kathy says:

    @JohnSF:

    “Just about”. It’s right there.

    It’s my way fo saying it’s fun when I use pedantry to needle someone, and annoying when it’s done to me 😉

    Also, the coworkers are playing loud noise they claim is music right now. I’m considering a late early retreat.

    ReplyReply
    1
  23. JohnSF says:

    @Kathy:
    Ah, if you really want something that is both repetitive, but also non-repetitive, try Wagner’s Ring cycle.
    I tend to lose focus after about 30 minutes, I must confess. 😉

    ReplyReply
    1

Speak Your Mind

*