Tiananmen Square 25 Years Later
After two and a half decades, the images of June 4, 1989 resonate with many, unless you happen to live in China.
After two and a half decades, the images of June 4, 1989 resonate with many, unless you happen to live in China.
Good intentions aren’t an excuse for failure to follow the law.
A supposed conservative calls for massive increases in taxes on alcohol.
The Supreme Court rejected another opportunity to clarify Federal Law on testimonial immunity for journalists.
The so-called “right to be forgotten” created by Europe’s highest court is unworkable, and ultimately absurd.
Using a chemical to commit a purely domestic crime doesn’t make you an international criminal, the Supreme Court correctly decided today.
A victory for Federalism and sanity in the War On Drugs.
Sooner or later, the Supreme Court will have to rule on a challenge to state laws banning same-sex marriage.
For the first time, Edward Snowden is talking to the American media.
Two news items yesterday advanced in some small measure the protection of journalists from having to reveal sources under Court Order.
The Supreme Court, subject to revision.
One of the longest serving Members of Congress just got his political career saved.
People are still going to jail for being unable to pay their fines. And often billed for the priviledge.
Yet another Federal Judge has struck down a state’s ban on same-sex marriage.
Committing a crime is bad enough, committing a stupid crime in the dumbest way possible is orders of magnitude bad.
A 13 month string of legal victories for marriage equality reaches Oregon.
A pretty clear violation of the First Amendment.
The NBA wants to get rid of Donald Sterling’s estranged wife, too.
Is the GOP headed down a road that leads to yet another doomed impeachment and trial?
The Supreme Court has again ruled that prayers that open legislative sessions are not unconstitutional.
General Motors is headed back to court.
Innocent men have been put to death on the orders of the state.
A good idea, but do the ends justify the means?
Today’s oral argument before the Supreme Court on the issue of police searches of cell phones and smartphones left much up in the air.
One of the cases that the Supreme Court accepted for review today presents a rather unique legal question:
The Justice Department thinks police should be able to search the smart phones of anyone arrested for anything.
Contrary to popular belief, eyewitness testimony is often quite unreliable.