Marine Le Pen Barred From 2027 Election

The courts have ruled the far-right leader ineligible to run.

Malaysia Today CC BY 4.0

Le Monde (“French far-right leader Marine Le Pen barred from running for public office after conviction in fake EU assistant jobs trial“):

A Paris court on Monday, March 31, sentenced far-right leader Marine Le Pen to a five-year ban on running for office with immediate effect, throwing into doubt her bid to stand for president in 2027. She was also given a four-year prison term but will not go to jail, with two years of the term suspended and the other two to be served outside jail with an electronic bracelet, the court ruled.

Including Le Pen, nine current or former MEPs from the RN were convicted. Twelve assistants were also convicted of concealing a crime, with the court estimating the scheme was worth €2.9 million. All the RN officials including Le Pen were banned from running for office, with the judge specifying that the sanction should come into force with immediate effect even if an appeal is lodged.

The three-time presidential candidate was accused of having hired four fictitious assistants when she was a member of the European Parliament (2004-2017). In reality, they were working for her party, the Front National (FN, now Rassemblement National, RN). The assistants, who were paid by the European Parliament, carried out tasks linked to the management of the party rather than work related to European parliamentary activity, as is normally required of such positions.

[…]

The Kremlin on Monday was the first to react to Le Pen’s conviction, saying more and more “European capitals are going down the path of violating democratic norms,” according to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov who was speaking to reporters in a briefing.

“Je suis Marine!” wrote Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, one of her main allies in the EU, on X in support, in French.

RN party leader Jordan Bardella, just 29, said French democracy was being “executed” with the “unjust” verdict.

Reuters (“Marine Le Pen Verdict Live: French far-right leader banned from public office“) adds:

The “provisional execution” ban will not see Le Pen removed from her seat in parliament until her mandate ends, though it will prevent her from running in any fresh electoral contest.

The five-year provisional execution ban will block her 2027 run.

Typically in most cases in France, sentences are not applied until any appeals process has run its course. However, if judges apply a provisional execution – as they have now done – the sentence begins immediately.

National Rally party (RN) leaders had said they did not expect Marine Le Pen to be barred but that if she were, then 29-year-old party president Jordan Bardella would be their 2027 candidate.

The verdict delivers a massive blow to Le Pen, a three-time presidential contender who has previously said the 2027 vote would be her final tilt at top office.

Le Pen’s best hope of running will rest on the sentence being overturned on appeal before the 2027 election.

[…]

‘An attack on democracy’ – Europe’s right-wing

Geert Wilders, Dutch far-right leader:

“I am shocked by the incredible tough verdict against (Marine Le Pen). I support and believe in her 100% and I trust she will win the appeal and become President of France.”

George Simon, hard-right Romanian presidential candidate:

“Targeting or annihilating your political opponent by any means is straight out of the instruction manual of totalitarian regimes. This happened today in (France).”

Tom Van Grieken, leader of Belgium’s far-right Flemish separatist party Vlaams Belang:

“When nationalist politicians gain popularity, the system seeks other non-democratic ways to silence them. What is happening in France today is an attack on democracy. (Marine Le Pen) can continue to count on our support!”

Santiago Abascal, President of Spain’s far-right Vox party:

“They will not succeed in silencing the voice of the French people.”

AP (“French far-right leader Marine Le Pen is barred from seeking public office for embezzlement“) adds:

The court ruling was a political as well as a judicial temblor for France, hobbling one of the leading contenders to succeed President Emmanuel Macron at the end of his second and final term, scheduled to last into 2027. So broad were the political implications that even some of Le Pen’s political opponents reacted by saying that court had gone too far.

[…]

Hungary’s populist Prime Minister Viktor Orbán quickly took to social media to express his support, posting “Je suis Marine!” — I am Marine — on X.

Among political opponents of Le Pen who expressed unease was conservative lawmaker Laurent Wauquiez, who said the court ruling put “a very heavy weight on our democracy.”

The sentence could prevent her from running for president in 2027, a scenario she has previously described as a “political death.”

[…]

The judge said Le Pen had been at the heart of “a system” that her party used to siphon off EU parliament money. The judge said Le Pen and other co-defendants didn’t enrich themselves personally. But the ruling described the embezzlement as “a democratic bypass” that deceived the parliament and voters.

[…]

Le Pen, 56, was runner-up to President Emmanuel Macron in the 2017 and 2022 presidential elections, and her party’s electoral support has grown in recent years.

During the nine-week trial that took place in late 2024, she argued that ineligibility “would have the effect of depriving me of being a presidential candidate” and disenfranchise her supporters.

“There are 11 million people who voted for the movement I represent. So tomorrow, potentially, millions and millions of French people would see themselves deprived of their candidate in the election,” she told the panel of three judges.

The notion that the rule of law might trump the right of the voters to elect a criminal is an interesting one, indeed.

FILED UNDER: Democracy, World Politics, , , , , , , , , , ,
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is a Professor of Security Studies. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm veteran. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.

Comments

  1. Flat Earth Luddite says:

    The notion that the rule of law might trump the right of the voters to elect a criminal is an interesting one, indeed.

    Fascinating how this ruling came about after the French court had an opportunity to examine what happens when the voters elect a criminal.

    But I’m sure that’s just a coincidence. /s/

    9
  2. Moosebreath says:

    “The notion that the rule of law might trump the right of the voters to elect a criminal is an interesting one, indeed.”

    Pun intended?

    3
  3. Kathy says:

    Hungary’s populist Prime Minister Viktor Orbán quickly took to social media to express his support, posting “Je suis Marine!” — I am Marine — on X.

    And I fully support Marine Orban in their transition.

    15
  4. Charley in Cleveland says:

    Always a laugh when corrupt, power-drunk pols like Victor Orban howl about democracy being endangered when another corrupt, power-drunk pol gets caught, prosecuted and convicted. Le Pen’s only sin, in the eyes of Orban and his ilk, is that she didn’t get personally enriched with her ghost employee scam.

    4
  5. Scott F. says:

    @Flat Earth Luddite:
    When the history of this sorry chapter in American history is written, the story won’t be that Trump was a flimflam man, showman, and convicted felon or that he could get elected by the voters. (Dillinger and Billy the Kid had their pop culture followers.)

    In the history books, the story will be how one of our two major parties found the crook suitable to run for office and our judicial system didn’t disqualify him from running for re-election.

    3
  6. DK says:

    Lock Her Up!
    Lock Her Up!
    Lock Her Up!

    2
  7. Chip Daniels says:

    Brazilian courts defended the rule of law;
    French courts defended the rule of law;
    Korean courts defended the rule of law;
    American courts….did not.

    This is what it looks like, after the end of the American Century.

    5
  8. DrDaveT says:

    €2.9 is such a paltry amount, especially split among that many people. Pathetic.

    If there is one thing that is perfectly consistent among right-wing parties worldwide, though, it is the assertion that enforcing laws against a member of their party is an attack on democracy, weaponizing the legal system for political ends. It never seems to occur to them that the legal system was already weaponized against criminals, for purposes of governance, and that this has nothing to do with politics. Yes, it is discriminatory to only enforce the law against criminals. Yes, your party is more criminal than the others. What’s your point?

    (The Big Lie, of course, includes the lie that in the US both sides do it.)

    3
  9. Kathy says:

    @DrDaveT:

    Yes, your party is more criminal than the others.

    So much this.

    To be fair, there are criminals in several other parties, not just right wing ones. In the US, at least, when one is exposed, the reaction within the party isn’t to rally a round the accused yelling witch hunt, political persecution, etc. See Menendez or Blagojevich, even Al Franken when the creepy photos were published.

    So, no both parties DON’T do it. Only one does.

    1