Monday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. Jon says:

    Happy Lundi Gras to all!

    I miss Ozark.

    7
  2. de stijl says:

    I’m retired. Quite often have a nap mid-afternoon.

    Earlier I woke up groggy, saw the sky, saw the clock at 6:20 and my brain assumed pm not am. It took me a minute or so to figure out it was morning, not evening.

    That flip of perspective was kinda freaky.

    4
  3. charontwo says:

    Here is Julie Roginsky with a lengthy recapitulation of Trump interactions with KGB/Russia:

    Link

    A “short” excerpt:

    A few years before the Newsweek article ran, the KGB determined that its ability to recruit foreign assets based on ideological sympathy was waning. Instead, the Soviets would turn what they perceived to be the hallmarks of capitalism — avarice and moral relativism — against the West, much as Putin would later use the First Amendment as a weapon to spread misinformation in the United States.

    Politico picks up the thread:

    The KGB also distributed a secret personality questionnaire, advising case officers what to look for in a successful recruitment operation. In April 1985 this was updated for “prominent figures in the West.” The directorate’s aim was to draw the target “into some form of collaboration with us.” This could be “as an agent, or confidential or special or unofficial contact.”

    The form demanded basic details—name, profession, family situation, and material circumstances. There were other questions, too: what was the likelihood that the “subject could come to power (occupy the post of president or prime minister)”? And an assessment of personality. For example: “Are pride, arrogance, egoism, ambition or vanity among subject’s natural characteristics?”

    The most revealing section concerned kompromat. The document asked for: “Compromising information about subject, including illegal acts in financial and commercial affairs, intrigues, speculation, bribes, graft … and exploitation of his position to enrich himself.” Plus “any other information” that would compromise the subject before “the country’s authorities and the general public.” Naturally the KGB could exploit this by threatening “disclosure.”

    Finally, “his attitude towards women is also of interest.” The document wanted to know: “Is he in the habit of having affairs with women on the side?”

    At the time, Trump was married to his first wife, Ivana Zelníčková, a Czechoslovak immigrant who had once been on the Czechoslovak junior ski team. His marriage to a woman from the Eastern Bloc would also have interested intelligence operatives. The Czechoslovak authorities had allowed Ivana to immigrate after she married her first husband, an Austria ski instructor. In the 1970s, moving abroad from behind the Iron Curtain without defecting or working for the government was almost unheard of and yet Ivana was able to shuttle back and forth between the United States and her native country, visiting her parents when other immigrants were banned from setting foot back home. More from Politico:

    As Trump tells it, the idea for his first trip to Moscow came after he found himself seated next to the Soviet ambassador Yuri Dubinin. This was in autumn 1986; the event was a luncheon held by Leonard Lauder, the businessman son of Estée Lauder. Dubinin’s daughter Natalia “had read about Trump Tower and knew all about it,” Trump said in his 1987 bestseller, The Art of the Deal.

    Trump continued: “One thing led to another, and now I’m talking about building a large luxury hotel, across the street from the Kremlin, in partnership with the Soviet government.”

    According to Natalia Dubinina, the approach to Trump actually happened six months before the Lauder lunch, when Dubinin first arrived in the United States as the Soviet ambassador to the United Nations. She had already been living in New York with her family as part of the U.N. delegation.

    Dubinina said she picked up her father at the airport. It was his first time in New York City. She took him on a tour. The first building they saw was Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue, she told Komsomolskaya Pravda newspaper. Dubinin was so excited he decided to go inside to meet the building’s owner. They got into the elevator. At the top, Dubinina said, they met Trump.

    The ambassador—“fluent in English and a brilliant master of negotiations”—charmed the busy Trump, telling him: “The first thing I saw in the city is your tower!”

    Dubinina said: “Trump melted at once. He is an emotional person, somewhat impulsive. He needs recognition. And, of course, when he gets it he likes it. My father’s visit worked on him [Trump] like honey to a bee.”

    (Let us pause here for one moment to reflect on the absurdity of this story. As anyone with a basic knowledge of New York architecture and geography can attest, Trump Tower is a mid-sized building that has never particularly stood out either aesthetically or vertically. Are we really to believe that a newly arrived ambassador was so floored by Trump Tower — and not by the many more remarkable buildings that dominated the skyline in the 1980s — that he would have barged his way into a meeting with its owner on his way in from the airport, even before greeting his own staff at the Soviet mission ten blocks north? The only way this tale makes any sense is if there had been an ulterior motive for Dubinin casing Trump’s building as the first order of business upon landing in New York.)

    Then,more, etc.

    Note this above:

    Trump continued: “One thing led to another, and now I’m talking about building a large luxury hotel, across the street from the Kremlin, in partnership with the Soviet government.”

    This is the carrot the Russians keep dangling in front of their donkey, I think it unlikely the donkey ever gets to eat the carrot.

    13
  4. Scott says:

    Uh-Oh!

    How Trump’s 25 percent aluminum tariff could hurt craft beer

    How does the actions of one trickle down to the folks operating a local business—say a craft brewery? On Feb. 11, President Donald Trump announced he will impose a 25 percent tariff on steel and aluminum imports into the U.S. starting March 12.

    t’s honestly been a tough couple of years for the small craft brewer in America,” Amherst Brewing Company head brewery Caleb Hiliadis told CNN recently. “But post-Covid, aluminum, specifically cans, has become incredibly important to us and every other small, independently owned craft brewer in the nation. Aluminum cans are a massive part of our business.”

    According to the Brewers Association of America, aluminum canned beer accounts for about 75 percent of all packaged volume and revenue in the craft beer industry. Much of the aluminum for those cans comes from Canada and Mexico. This means small craft breweries, whose margins are already razor thin, will have to pay more money to can their beer. Or they can go with a U.S. manufacturer, but America has fallen as a leading aluminum producer.

    We can always buy Bud Light.

    6
  5. Scott says:

    America is going down’: China can capitalise on damage caused by Trump, former PLA colonel says

    The damage caused by Donald Trump to the United States’ reputation is creating opportunities for China, particularly with regards to Taiwan, according to a retired senior colonel from China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

    Speaking to the Guardian in Beijing, Zhou Bo said that Trump was damaging the US’s reputation “more than all of his predecessors combined”.

    “By the end of his second term, I believe America’s global image will simply become more tarnished, its international standing will just go down further,” Zhou said. The people of Taiwan “know that America is going down”, which “might affect their mentality” with regards to China.

    4
  6. Jim X 32 says:

    I await with baited breath and popcorn our resident typing apes to appear and point out how dumb we are for not wholeheartedly adopting a Russian style politico-economics system that produces a whopping $700/mo average citizen salary.

    Tell us apes—how do you plan to spend your $700, or what’s left after you’ve bought eggs.

    9
  7. Grumpy realist says:

    We’ve just received another “what five things did you do last week” email from OPM. Luckily we’ve also immediately received follow-up instructions from our agency which are the same as last time.

    Can someone please explain to Musk “chain of command”?

    5
  8. Scott says:

    This just seems to me to be unilateral disarmament.

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has paused cyber offensive against Russia

    Multiple U.S. officials tell CBS News that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has issued a directive to U.S. Cyber Command to pause planning against Russia, including offensive digital actions.

    The duration of the pause is unclear, and the reasoning behind it is unknown at this time. The change comes amid President Trump’s efforts to negotiate an end to the Russia-Ukraine war, and just two days after Mr. Trump sparred with Ukrainian President Volodmyr Zelenskyy in a heated Oval Office exchange.

    The directive was first reported by The Record, a cybersecurity news publication.

    Asked for comment, a senior U.S. defense official said, “Due to operational security concerns, we do not comment nor discuss cyber intelligence, plans, or operations. There is no greater priority to Secretary Hegseth than the safety of the Warfighter in all operations, to include the cyber domain.”

    This is just planning. The Pentagon plans all kinds of operations whether likely to use them or not. Considering how Russia (and others) are conducting offensive operations of their own, this just seems to be stupid.

    For a deeper dive, here is rather long article on offensive cyberoperations:

    Is Cyber Revolutionary or Barely Relevant in Modern Warfare?

    8
  9. charontwo says:

    @Grumpy realist:

    Note that OPM is run by Russell Vought, the mastermind of Project 2025 and, with Musk/Trump, the rest of the triumvirate running the country now.

    4
  10. Charley in Cleveland says:

    One problem with the kompromat theory – Trump’s shamelessness. If nothing else, Trump has shown that there is no situation he will not lie about, and that he will tell the same lie consistently and endlessly, and whine that he is being picked on by political enemies. What would embarrass and humiliate a normal person is just “another day at the office” for Trump, so how would Putin’s kompromat keep him beholden? I tend to agree that dangling the possibility of a Trump Tower Moscow would be more effective.

    4
  11. CSK says:

    Headline of townhall.com article: “Trump’s First Six Weeks Have Saved the Union.”

    1
  12. de stijl says:

    @CSK:

    From what?

    2
  13. de stijl says:

    Define “Great”. And when was that, exactly?

  14. CSK says:

    @de stijl:

    He made English our official language.

    1
  15. de stijl says:

    @Charley in Cleveland:

    A useful idiot can be a Russian asset.

    Plus, they’re super cheap! They do it, basically, for free!

    And they’re so dumb, they don’t even realize they’re doing it!

    Win-win-win!

    6
  16. Kathy says:

    Yesterday I set the instant pot on high for 25 minutes. After about ten minutes or so, it hadn’t pressurized, which was really odd. The float valve was up, but it would release steam now and then.

    So I turned it off and opened the other valve. Once it let all the steam out, I opened it and inspected the float valve on the lid. it seemed ok. I closed it back up, set it again, and this time it pressurized normally.

    WTF?

    the end result was a chicken stew with white beans, barley, and chickpeas. The liquid was mostly bullion with a little chipotle sauce and about 2/3 of a can of green salsa (the rest I mixed with onions caramelized separately).

    This was the fourth iteration of this dish and I think I’ve done all I can with it. Next I think I’ll try cooking the chicken in salsa with some broth and use it for enchiladas or chilaquiles.

  17. Kathy says:

    @CSK:

    Not the King’s English?

    Weird.

    1
  18. Jay L Gischer says:

    Have we discounted the possibility that Trump is afraid of Putin? I mean, perhaps at some point, at some visit to Trump Tower, some high Russian official stood with Trump looking out a window, and said something about what a beautiful view it was, and such a long way down!

    Or maybe there was a completely coincidental discussion of polonium-210.

    5
  19. Scott says:

    @Kathy: It probably was a seal issue. If you ran your hands over the sides of the IP, you probably would’ve felt a bit of steam coming out the sides. Best thing to do is to run the seal under cold water (it’ll shrink it a bit) and reinstall seal and put the lid back on.

    2
  20. Kathy says:

    @Scott:

    I saw steam issuing from the floating valve now and then, I didn’t think to check the sides of the lid. Though I did confirm it was locked.

    We’ll see next time.

    @Jay L Gischer:

    Seeing what the rapist’s cognition (or lack thereof) is like, maybe Mad Vlad told him he implanted a bomb in his scrotum, which will go off if the felon disobeys him.

    Beep-beep!

    1
  21. de stijl says:

    @CSK:

    A foreign language? Here, we speak American!

    1
  22. CSK says:

    @Jon:

    Ozark and Teve. Two stalwarts.

    3
  23. CSK says:

    @de stijl:

    There’s an old joke about England and America being two countries divided by a common language.

    1
  24. Slugger says:

    I wish someone would help me understand the strategic crypto reserve. I understand the strategic petroleum reserve that stores a bunch of crude oil against some disastrous interruption in supplies; although, the cynic in me thinks that it also acts as a price support mechanism to insure the profitability of Big Oil. So what’s with crypto; isn’t it just some computer stored data? If the Yellowstone pluton erupts or Mexico and Canada simultaneously attack, we will still have the bitcoins in the cloud. If all known crypto is somehow subverted, we can just create new crypto ex nihilio like Trumpcoin was created. Anyway, Trump started talking about a strategic crypto reserve, and Bitcoin jumped 7.5% in two days. I don’t get it and suspect a scam.

    3
  25. Jen says:

    @Charley in Cleveland: The one thing that Trump is consistently sensitive about is his net worth. I think it’s entirely possible that he’s more beholden to the Russian mob than is even generally understood, which could be a sticking point.

    7
  26. Kathy says:

    So, amid the worst measles outbreak in decades, Texas’ lieutenant governor is worried about he name of a steak?

    Figures.

    How about renaming measles as Texas fever instead.

    9
  27. de stijl says:

    @Slugger:

    The crypto reserve exists so we can buy pizza delivery and our fave Only Fan subs in case of a nuclear apocalypse.

    What, do you not take bitcoin? Where’s your QR code?

    JFC, we’re fucking doomed as a species.

    2028, please come soon!

    5
  28. Kathy says:

    I’m kind of ashamed I did not know this. The ARM processor, which are still used in over half of all mobile devices, was designed by a transgender woman, Sophie Wilson.

    I did know ARM means Acorn RISC Machine (RISC: Reduced Instruction Set Computer). I even knew Acorn was an early PC pioneer company in the UK…

    2
  29. Grommit Gunn says:

    @Scott: In gaming circles, we call this a “self-own.”

    1
  30. Matt says:

    @Slugger: It’s bullshit designed to either enrich someone or play to some segment of the base (possibly both). Any such reserve would be super easy to steal and there’s basically nothing that could be done about it. If you figure out who was behind the theft you could arrest them and that’s it. Because possession is ten tenths of the law when it comes to crypto wallets. There’s no viable mechanism to get the money back.

    @Kathy: Back in the 80s RISC was the future of computing and CISC was going to be relegated to the dustbin. It’s been decades and the struggle continues.

    Despite knowing a great deal about the ARM platform I too had NO idea that Sophie Wilson is a transgender woman.

    2
  31. al Ameda says:

    @Slugger:
    … If all known crypto is somehow subverted, we can just create new crypto ex nihilio like Trumpcoin was created. Anyway, Trump started talking about a strategic crypto reserve, and Bitcoin jumped 7.5% in two days. I don’t get it and suspect a scam.
    ———————————-
    I didn’t used to be this way, but ….
    Whatever this Crypto Reserve is or will be, we can be fairly sure that Trump will grift this for his personal financial gain.

    6
  32. de stijl says:

    I have never once used a QR code. It’s a marketing ploy.

    My building instituted an AI bot. Why?

    Spammed out to all tenants.

    I spammed it back. “SAM, what is the square root of 9?”

    3

    “SAM, what is the square root of pi?”

    Never heard back.

    Why does an apartment building need an AI bot to process inquiries? Staff folks do this already. And they’re alive. 8 to 5 Monday to Friday. All emergency numbers are posted everywhere.

    Someone seriously thought that adding an AI reply bot for an apartment building resident management system was a good idea, got okayed, and it got implemented. WTAF?

    Implode them with recursive logic. Fallout 3 taught me so. ERROR. OVERLOAD. {smoke} [bzzt] (HAL voice slows considerably and ceases dramatically.)

    2
  33. charontwo says:

    So how long before Ma and Pa Kettle discover their SS check isn’t going to come because of their waste, fraud and abuse?

    https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:sgti3jsgu3luif24tokvth3a/post/3ljfzbi4lyc2f

    There it is: Speaker of the House says Elon has already started running your Social Security through his AI.

    https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3ljfyyh4kvd2y

    Mike Johnson on Elon Musk: “We meet late into the night in his office and we’ve looked at that. What he’s finding with his algorithms crawling through the data of Social Security system is enormous amounts of fraud, waste, and abuse.”

    3
  34. de stijl says:

    @CSK:

    Dude, we’re divided by an ocean! Duh!

  35. Scott says:

    @Grumpy realist: DoD sent out their instructions today:

    Last week, OPM sent an email to federal civilians asking them to provide approximately five bullets describing what they accomplished during their previous work week. Department of Defense employees received direction to initially pause responding to this request OPM.

    Following a review of Pentagon procedures and consultation with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), I am directing each member of the Department’s civilian workforce to provide five bullets on what they accomplished in their specific jobs last week to their immediate supervisors.

    1
  36. Scott says:

    @charontwo: Run his algorithms through his SpaceX and Starlink contracts and see what pops up.

    5
  37. CSK says:

    @de stijl:

    I’m a dudette, thank you very much.

    2
  38. de stijl says:

    @CSK:

    Dudette, we’re divided by an ocean. Duh!

  39. Beth says:

    @Kathy:
    @Matt:

    Lol, we are legion.

    Another really fascinating trans woman is Lynn Conway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_Conway

    A couple of choice selections from that Wikipedia:

    n the 1960s, while working at IBM, Conway invented generalized dynamic instruction handling, a key advancement used in out-of-order execution, used by most modern computer processors to improve performance. IBM fired Conway in 1968 after she revealed her intention to undergo a gender transition, which the company apologized for in 2020.

    Following her transition, Conway adopted a new name and identity and restarted her career. She worked at Xerox PARC from 1973 to 1983, where she led the “LSI Systems” group. She initiated the Mead–Conway VLSI chip design revolution in very large-scale integrated (VLSI) microchip design, which reshaped the field of microchip design during the 1980s.

    While struggling with life in a male role, Conway had married a woman in 1963 and had two children. Under the legal constraints then in place, she was denied access to their children after transitioning

    @charontwo:

    Sometimes I struggle with what the GOP is doing. It’s clearly insane and stupid, but rational in it’s own defective logic. I think the problem is that in the 70s-80s they decided they could sell this crap to the rubes if they just lied about it all the time. Unfortunately for them, they started believing their own lies. I think this is one of the reasons Alito is always so pissed that people don’t love him for his nonsense. Top to bottom they all fundamentally believe ALL of this nonsense and that once it all goes through they will be beloved. Personally, I think a whole lot of them are going to die in political violence when Medicaid and Social Security are destroyed. But they are going to push ahead with this because they are fanatics.

    3
  40. Kylopod says:

    The word “dude” when used as an interjection has always been problematic in that way. I’ve often stopped myself before using the word online, realizing I didn’t know the gender of the person I was addressing–which is interesting because I’ve rarely used the word “dude” in speech. But it’s such a useful word, a way of expressing everything from wonder to condescension, that it ought to have a gender-neutral alternative. It’s a little like “you guys” (a phrase I use quite a bit in the real world), which isn’t intended to be only referring to men, but simply as another version of y’all or youse, a way of compensating for the lack of a distinct plural form of you in Standard English. “Dude,” on the other hand, is a word that only gets applied to men (in the real world, in contexts when a person’s gender is known), but it feels like it shouldn’t be.

    1
  41. Kathy says:

    @Beth:

    Fascinating indeed. Thanks for posting about her.

    1
  42. Grumpy Realist says:

    @Scott: I notice that our agencies are a) interested in keeping the chain of command and b) providing as little information as possible. Considering what Big Data can weave together from gathered data and the incompetence with which Musk’s minions are guarding our data, both seem to be sensible policies.

    1
  43. de stijl says:

    @Kylopod:

    I probably use “dude” too often in on-line discourse.

    One of my favorite bits is:

    Dude! Dude… Dude. Dude?

    “Dude!” (Yo! Pay attention)

    “Dude…” (You are kinda fucking this interchange up, breaking protocol and being at least ass-hole adjacent. Stop digging your own grave. You are line-stepping.)

    “Dude.” ({corrective}. You are actively fucking this up now.)

    “Dude?” (You fucked up hard. You need to try to fix this best you can now! If you are actually capable, you line-stepped hard.)

  44. de stijl says:

    @CSK:

    I did not mean to misgender. I’m sorry.

    1
  45. Jay L Gischer says:

    @charontwo: This is a classic Mike Johnsonism. “enormous amounts of waste, fraud and abuse” means nothing other than, “we found some waste, fraud and/or abuse”.

    I mean, I think we could find some waste, fraud and abuse of SS. I think it might amount to maybe 1 percent of the SS budget. I think it’s a good idea to look for it.

    I even think it’s a good idea to look for it with AI. And then have humans screen the cases that the AI finds, since I don’t trust the AI all that much.

    ALSO, I think it’s a good idea to look at tax returns with AI. And then have humans screen the cases that the AI finds, and then examine what is found, and prosecute the waste, fraud, and abuse and non-payment, that is found.

    Funnily enough, they aren’t doing that. Considering the likely impact that would have on the budget, why aren’t they doing that?

    3
  46. Jay L Gischer says:

    Here’s an example of someone making an argument that I certainly did not agree with going in. But he (William Spaniel) provides a lot of evidence for his argument.

    I expect that there are commenters here who will be unhappy with Spaniel and doubt his bonafides. He is, first and foremost, an academic. I’ve watched a lot of his videos and he seems like he’s relatively pro-Ukraine. He is, however, dedicated to pursuing facts. He has a motto which I endorse, “Don’t pay much attention to what politicians say. Pay attention to what they do.”

    To be fair, he has noted, in another video, that the deal with Ukraine did not get done, and this is a “do” thing, not a “say” thing.

  47. Mister Bluster says:

    @Kathy:..Texas Strip
    Way back in 1983 when I was working storm damage for the local landline telephone company in Houston TX after hurricane Alicia ripped up the town I had occasion to visit a local strip club in Space City with my work crew.
    A good time was had by all!

  48. Eusebio says:

    @Matt:
    WRT to the so-called strategic crypto reserve, which is not at all strategic, you hit the nail on the head:

    It’s bullshit designed to either enrich someone or play to some segment of the base (possibly both).

    Trump pandered to the crypto crowd during the campaign, and of course acquired his own crypto stake. But cryptocurrency has become basically just a speculative device, and trump is setting up the government, and therefore the US taxpayer, to be the greater fool of last resort.

    3
  49. CSK says:

    @de stijl:

    absolutely no offense taken…dude.

    2
  50. just nutha says:

    @de stijl: I use the QR code on my grocery store data mining system occasionally and can’t say for sure that I never used one in Korea, but I general, I can’t use QR codes because the combined essential and Parkinson’s tremors make things so that I am not able to hold the phone’s sensor still enough to successfully scan the code symbol. But it’s never been much more than a curiosity to me anyway. It’ll be interesting to see what becomes of the transition in retail from UPC bar codes to QR codes.

  51. Kylopod says:

    @de stijl: Chris Rock used it during the infamous Oscar slap: “Dude, it was a GI Jane joke!”

    This is an example of what I call the condescending dude. It’s the one you invoke when you want to make it sound like the person you’re talking to is a slow-witted child who just doesn’t get it. It’s the main one that, I admit, I’m often tempted to use when I’m debating someone online.

    1
  52. Grumpy Realist says:

    @de stijl: supposedly Google is going away from two-factor authentication and going to reading QR codes instead.

    One of my tech friends is really pissed about this. As he says: Not Everyone Has A Smartphone.

    1
  53. Slugger says:

    Noah Smith has an interesting posting on his substack about the crypto reserve. He sees it as a gray market mechanism for enriching his cronies.

    2
  54. Jen says:

    Kristi Noem apparently visited a library that is split between Vermont and Canada and spent the visit doing a stupid 51st state shtick. The visit was back in late January, but the piece just ran in the Boston Globe a few days ago.

    I feel badly for the library. 🙁

    3
  55. Mister Bluster says:

    @Jon:..

    OzarkHillbilly says:
    Saturday, 21 January 2023 at
    Many years ago I was best man for a long time buddy. After accepting this onerous duty, I asked if he wanted a bachelor party (I dislike the standard type and the only one I had thrown before was a float trip and a gravel bar bonfire with wives, sisters, and girlfriends invited) This time my T just said, “Nah, I don’t need one.”

    “OK.” Less work for me. All I have to do now is show up and give a speech.

    2 weeks before the appointed date, T comes to me at a gathering. He’d had a few, and he was practically crying,

    “Tom? I changed my mind, I want a bachelor party after all. I know it’s late in the game but I really want one. I’ve never had one before (this was his 3rd time, the charm) and I just really want one. Please Tom, please? You don’t have to get any women or any of that. I just want a party. Puleeeeeeeeze???”

    I’m looking at him, tears running down his face, begging me… Can I possibly say no? No fuckin’ way.

    “OK.” I said thinking to myself, “but your gonna pay for this muthafucker.”

    Than I had an idea, a deliciously evil idea. No women? Right. Worked it out with my roommate to throw the party at his Crawford County property on the Huzzah River for the next Saturday/Sunday. Called all our caver friends to invite them, but there was a caveat: They had to come in drag.

    Then I went shopping. Got me a tight fitting black minidress, fishnet stockings, highheels, a black handbag and a blond wig to top it all off. (All but the wig and stockings I got from Goodwill) then I found this red lacy teddy for T.

    At the appointed hour they finally showed up. I was crossing the dirt drive at that very moment (I was smokin’ hot!) and I struck my sexiest pose. He gets out of the truck and says, “You are the ugliest thing I have ever seen!” I could have gotten my feelings hurt but instead I said, “Just wait until you see what you are wearing.”

    A night of drunken debauchery unlike any other ensued. There were only about 18 of us as most begged off either because it was such short notice or because… Well you know. I suspect for most it was the former. Cavers aren’t particularly shy or retiring. But some guys…

    One such guy did show up but his dress was very conservative and his discomfort was written all over his face. Another guy we all dubbed Princess Di, because of his pearls I think. One showed up naked stating, “I didn’t have a thing to wear!” And on and on. It was great. The most fun any of us had ever had.

    At one point somebody stated, “I just hope a Sheriff’s deputy doesn’t show up.” And we all had a good laugh at the imagined look on his face and the imagined conversation that would ensue.

    These days it wouldn’t be so funny.

    4
  56. Sleeping Dog says:

    @Charley in Cleveland:

    What would embarrass him?

    The pee tape isn’t a woman peeing on him, but a man or several men.

    Video of him having sex with a lady-boy.

    2
  57. de stijl says:

    @Grumpy Realist:
    @just nutha:

    A QR code is just a visual, scannable hyperlink.

    As long as it has a web address you can direct a QR to any URL. Redirect.

    A Nigerian Prince needs your $2738USD dollars. You will receive $5m if you help. Click this link to help.

    The more I think about this, why are QRs a thing, or even allowed?

    I get it. A quick camera version of a hyperlink. BUT THERE’S NO SECURITY!!!

    You have to trust that that QR won’t point you to a bad URL. Trust us. We can’t give you an actual printed menu.

    I’ve worked in restaurants before. Most kitchens are hardcore drug dens. Literally.

    Yeah, no. Just give me a menu.

    2
  58. gVOR10 says:

    I’ve been rereading Brad DeLong’s Slouching Towards Utopia excellent economic history of what he calls the long 20th century, the era of rapid economic growth, 1870 to 2010. He talks of Mussolini’s invention of fascism:

    Mussolini was expelled from the Italian Socialist Party. The bridges had been burned. He had become an ex-socialist. He had become the leader of a movement that would be different, and stronger. But what might that movement be? Originally, Mussolini had just a placeholder, the word “fascism.” …
    Appeals to an ethno-nation rooted in blood and soil drove masses to act in ways that appeals to abstract ideals, moral principles, and universalist solidarity did not. …
    At the core of fascism as an ideology was a critique: semi-liberal industrial capitalism and parliamentary government had had its chance, and had failed. …
    The first was a macroeconomic failure: semi-liberal capitalism had failed to guarantee high employment and rapid economic growth. …
    The second was a distributional failure: either semi-liberal capitalism made the rich richer while everyone else stayed poor, or it failed to preserve an adequate income differential between the more-educated, more-respectable lower middle class and the unskilled industrial proletariat. It could not win. Depending on which aspect of income distribution was highlighted, either industrial capitalism produced an income distribution that was too unequal (rich get richer, the rest stay poor) or not unequal enough (respected lower middle classes slip into joining the unskilled proletariat). …
    The third failure was a moral failure: the market economy reduced all human relationships—or in any event many human relationships—to arms-length market transactions—you do this for me, and I will pay you. … It is more inspiring to follow a leader than to be paid to join a crowd. …
    Fourth was a solidarity-recognition failure: the pseudo-classical semi-liberal order failed to acknowledge that everyone (that is, all citizens bound together by a given culture and contained within given geographical borders) was in this together—that inhabitants of an ethnic nation had common interests that were much more powerful than any one individual’s interest. …
    The fifth failure was governmental: not only was the semi-liberal economy flawed—so, too, was the semi-liberal government. Parliaments were incompetent. Cretinous. They were composed either of timeservers with no initiative, corrupt distributors of favors to special interests, or ideological champions who focused not on the public interest but on what made their own narrow slice of supporters feel good. What the country needed was a strong leader who would say what he thought and do what was needed without paying attention to norms or niceties.

    We tend to view Trump as sui generis because we haven’t seen his like here before at the national level, except maybe Jackson. But the world has seen this movie many times. Mussolini’s version ended badly in 1943.

    2
  59. Kurtz says:

    @Kylopod:

    I noticed a few years ago that among teenagers (at the time) bro and bruh are often used as if they are gender neutral.

    If bro and bruh can be considered neutral, dude certainly can.

    4
  60. Kathy says:

    The nazi in chief is set to blow up another rocket.

    I think even if the nazi in chief had not gone full nazi and deranged, I’d have lost patience with what looks like amateurish iterative testing.

  61. dazedandconfused says:

    @gVOR10:

    IMO the simplest way to understand the term fascist is to look at the symbol. The fasces: A lot of arrows bunched together was the Roman symbol of unapologetic raw power. Our own eagle clutches one too, btw. Everybody likes power.

    And that’s key. The power to do anything empowers the government to fix anything. In fact the most efficient form of government is a wise, benign dictatorship. That’s how it seduces, but since power inevitably corrupts…

  62. steve says:

    Just a reminder that we are coming up soon on another budget deadline and possibly shutting down the govt. I suspect that President Musk will be happy with shutting things down. It will be the job of President emeritus Trump to convince his followers it’s the fault of the Dems and ignore the fact that the GOP controls Congress, Senate, SCOTUS and Presidency.

    Steve

  63. dazedandconfused says:

    @de stijl:

    I found it something of a regional thing when I was a kid. We moved back and forth between east and west coasts when I was a child. Learned to talk in CA, but when we got to NYC, I would get laughed at by the other kids every time I said “Dude!”. Something that nobody thought a thing about in the west. Everybody said it. The word struck eastern ears differently than it did western ones.

  64. Kylopod says:

    @Kurtz:

    If bro and bruh can be considered neutral, dude certainly can.

    It can. I’m just not convinced it is used that way. When it comes up in sentences like “Dude, you’re in LA!” it’s almost never used when talking to someone the speaker knows is a woman. At least that’s been my impression.

    The reason people use it so much online is that they often assume as a matter of default that whoever they’re interacting with is a man (and that opens up its own discussion). I’m curious to know if those here who go by clearly feminine names have been duded before in online discussions.

    I’m not claiming any of this is written in stone; these are just general observations I’ve made over the years. If the term “breaking balls” can be applied to women (as it has been on occasion), I don’t see any inherent reason why dude can’t also be.

  65. Kathy says:

    @Kathy:

    How about that? It went much better this time. The launch was scrubbed. Congrats!

    @dazedandconfused:

    The fasces is made up of wooden rods or sticks, not arrows, wrapped around an axe. But yes, it’s a symbol of power.

    @steve:

    The groundwork’s being laid. A demand by Democrats that the funds appropriated by Congress be spent as intended, is being described by the GQP as a poison pill, and an attempt to prevent the felon and the nazi in chief from exercising their authority.

    1
  66. Matt says:

    @Kurtz: I’ve seen women using bro to other women along with men. It’s considered fairly generic these days. Dude is also used in such manner.

    3
  67. Mister Bluster says:

    @Kylopod:..“breaking balls”

    Just saw this post yesterday on FB by a friend who has a 2 year old son:

    Realizing I grew a boy inside of me so I did in fact grow a pair

    5
  68. just nutha says:

    @steve: And they’ll buy it. MAGA cannot fail, it can only be failed by others.

    ETA: “The groundwork’s being laid. A demand by Democrats that the funds appropriated by Congress be spent as intended, is being described by the GQP as a poison pill, and an attempt to prevent the felon and the nazi in chief from exercising their authority.” h/t: Kathy

    1
  69. Mister Bluster says:

    Fifty years ago I was walking in town and saw two friends (?) coming my way.
    “Hi guys!” I said.
    One of them smiled as the other, Jill Pope, ripped me a new one as she yelled:
    “Do we look like guys to you?”

    We’ve come a long way baby!

    1
  70. Mimai says:

    For folks who are interested:

    STAND UP FOR SCIENCE rallies are occurring around the country on Friday, March 7.

    2
  71. de stijl says:

    Dude, Where’s My Car?

    With a title like that you’d assume it’s trash, a bad movie.

    It’s a low-key pretty great movie. Is it the “Citizen Cane” of alcoholic clown movies?
    No way, that’d be Shakes The Clown. (Watch that movie, too, btw)

    Dude, Where’s My Car is a lot like Scream. Self-aware, but not gratingly so. It’s not meta. It mocks the genre and also embraces the genre.

    Don’t avoid it cuz the name is kitschy stupid. (It is not like those god-awful Scary Movie “parodies”.)

  72. dazedandconfused says:

    @Kylopod:

    The Dude begs to differ…

  73. de stijl says:

    @dazedandconfused:

    The dude abides…man

    El dudirino if you’re not into the whole brevity thing.