Monday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. Scott says:

    Starting off the week with something trivial: a movie recommendation.

    We watched “The Life of Chuck” on Prime Saturday. Based on a Stephen King novella the movie is about the title describes. It starts with Act 3 and moves back in time. Engages in a bit of magical realism (I hope I’m using the term correctly). Small, not much action but life affirming. Just the kind of movie that we needed. Some critics loved it and gave it high marks and some hated it. Go figure.

    2
  2. Michael Reynolds says:

    Question: Should the Democratic Party vow, in the event that we take the White House in 2028, to undo whatever Trump has done regarding Greenland?

    5
  3. Scott says:

    @Michael Reynolds: That seems rather trivial compared to the project they need to undertake. That being the reconstruction of the foundations of our republic. The scrubbing of old laws (like the Insurrection Act, Alien Enemies Act, etc.) that are being dredged up and used to abuse our system. The hard work of writing laws that don’t leave discretion to the executive branch (yes, that will make us even more bureaucratic and creaky but you can’t leave it to norms or discretion anymore). Bottomline, I just don’t think Greenland will excite the population to rise up and ‘throw the bums out’.

    8
  4. Scott says:

    Capitol agenda: Trump tests GOP with Fed probe

    President Donald Trump is once again forcing a tough fealty test on GOP lawmakers — this time over the fate of the Federal Reserve and Chair Jerome Powell.

    The Fed chair’s Sunday night revelation of a DOJ probe into the central bank immediately rattled a number of Capitol Hill Republicans and raised serious doubts about the confirmation of Trump’s upcoming pick to succeed Powell.

    “Will they stop at nothing to force their way on everything?” one senior House Republican granted anonymity told POLITICO. “The administration is setting a standard they cannot achieve themselves and will haunt us all for a generation.”

    The answer is no, they will not stop at nothing and two, the problem is cowardly anonymity in Congress.

    13
  5. Neil Hudelson says:

    @Scott:

    The director, Mike Flanagan, has made a few Stephen King based series as well as some other horror-inspired projects. They are all quite good and thought provoking. I recommend ‘Midnight Mass,’ a reimagining of ‘Salems Lot.’

    2
  6. Scott says:

    @Scott: Sen Tom Tillis on same subject:

    If there were any remaining doubt whether advisers within the Trump Administration are actively pushing to end the independence of the Federal Reserve, there should now be none. It is now the independence and credibility of the Department of Justice that are in question.

    I will oppose the confirmation of any nominee for the Fed—including the upcoming Fed Chair vacancy—until this legal matter is fully resolved.

    Only now is the independence and credibility of the Justice Dept in question? Do these Senators just go through life on drugs?

    10
  7. Sleeping Dog says:

    @Michael Reynolds:
    @Scott:

    They should promise to reverse any Greenland action, but Scott’s right it won’t move voters. But that and tearing down his ballroom and the proposed Arc de Trump will be visible indicators of moving on. Much of the stuff Scott mentions will take several administrations to complete.

    3
  8. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Scott:
    It’s not about throwing the bums out, and there is nothing any more consequential than the matter of whether we are going invade a NATO ally. Trump is threatening to start a war with a long-standing ally. If we state clearly that we will undo whatever he does, maybe we can head this off.

    4
  9. gVOR10 says:

    @Michael Reynolds: Threatening war on ally, yes, but the Fed has been kind of a third rail. The Roberts Court had been in a mode of allowing Trump to run amok through the bureaucracy, but not the Fed. Corporate types hate other regulators, but the Fed is the priesthood of the sacred markets. This may be an agency too far for Trump.

    5
  10. Kathy says:

    @Scott:

    I just don’t get it. his term ends in May this year, and then El Taco can nominate whatever ass-kissing sock puppet he wants. A criminal probe won’t land him in court sooner than that.

    I suppose it might be a means of pressuring him to resign, but that would be as damaging as if El Taco had Vance shoot Powell in the oval office.

    3
  11. gVOR10 says:

    @Kathy: It does seem odd. But Trump is big on performative hostility and short on planning. On the other hand, Powell is pretty popular with the corporate set and Trump may feel he needs this to support not reappointing Powell.

    2
  12. Sleeping Dog says:

    @gVOR10:

    Well the market is reacting. From the NYT

    Stocks, the dollar and U.S. government bonds all fell on Monday after federal prosecutors opened a criminal investigation into Jerome H. Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve. Gold hit a fresh record high, usually a sign of anxiety among investors on Wall Street.

    The S&P 500 opened 0.3 percent lower. The dollar was weaker against most major currencies and the yield on Treasury bonds rose, approaching 4.2 percent for 10-year government debt.

    The broad shift out of U.S. financial assets, though somewhat muted, revived a trend seen last year, called the “sell America” trade, when President Trump attacked Mr. Powell and challenged the independence of policymaking at the central bank. The Fed has been under relentless pressure from Mr. Trump and his allies to aggressively cut interest rates, as the administration seeks to promote affordability, most recently in the housing market.

    3
  13. CSK says:

    Trump has declared himself acting president of Venezuela.

    2
  14. Kathy says:

    @CSK:

    Is that necessary? Hasn’t Venezuela suffered enough?

    8
  15. CSK says:

    @Kathy:

    I’m not joking.

    1
  16. Kathy says:

    @CSK:

    Neither am I.

    1
  17. charontwo says:

    neo-Nazi’s & Minneapolis & ICE

    Excerpts:

    Early on a Friday evening in July 1938, several hundred concerned Minneapolitans streamed into a rented auditorium for what had been promoted as a gathering of “Christian American Patriots.” In a formal letter of invitation, the meeting’s organizers had called for “united action” against “the alien forces that are seeking to undermine our constitutional government, take away our right of free speech, and deprive us of our liberty.” By way of providing more specific instruction, the featured orator, a “national field marshal” named Roy Zachary, devoted a portion of his two-hour diatribe to urging his audience to “combat the Jewish conspiracy…through the organization of vigilante groups in every community to take whatever action is necessary.”
    … Soon after Hitler’s consolidation of power in 1933, Pelley had established a homegrown fascist group called the Silver Legion. It was more commonly known as the Silver Shirts, a reference to the rank-and-file’s trademark apparel.

    Both the name and the attire purposely honored Pelley’s inspiration—the Brownshirts, a paramilitary force that Hitler had deployed over the dozen years leading to his seizure of dictatorial control. Hitler himself had modeled the Brownshirts (formal name Sturmabteilung, meaning “Assault Division”) on Benito Mussolini’s Blackshirts, the bully boys of his fascist insurgency in Italy. By whatever name or hue, the operating mode of all these groups was the same, assembling and deploying an armed unit under the sole control of the strongman that could intimidate political opponents, religious minorities, and the official military and law-enforcement bodies of a weakened state.

    All of this history might appear irrelevant to the Minneapolis that most Americans have come to know. After Hubert Humphrey won the city’s mayoralty in 1945 on a civil rights platform and pushed through laws against employment and housing discrimination, Minneapolis became famous not as a hotbed of bigotry but as a beacon of progress against it. With a couple of brief exceptions in periods of conservative backlash, a straight line runs from Humphrey through liberal, inclusive successors like Arthur Naftalin, Don Fraser, Sharon Sayles Belton, R.T. Rybak, and the current occupant of City Hall, Jacob Frey.

    Tragically, however, a straight line also runs from William Pelley’s Silver Shirts and Gerald L.K. Smith’s America Firsters to the ICE forces unleashed on Minneapolis by Donald Trump, Stephen Miller, and Kristi Noem. Their version of ICE bears less resemblance to the federal agency formed under the George W. Bush administration than to exactly what Pelley yearned to produce: a paramilitary unit accountable only to a dictator. The exercise of ICE power in Minneapolis may have reached its ghastly apogee with Jonathan Ross’s murder of Renee Nicole Good, but that killing was foretold by the numerous examples in the preceding weeks and months of ICE agents brutalizing protesters and falsely arresting American citizens in Minneapolis, Chicago, and Los Angeles, among other cities.

    These actions gave the lie to ICE’s superhero propaganda about defending the homeland from pedophiles, drug dealers, and human traffickers. Rather, ICE intends to make Minneapolis the test case for what Pelley and Smith literally prayed for decades ago—an America purged of its demographically “impure” elements. The logical outcome of ICE’s siege is the fear that now grips Minneapolis immigrants, even those with U.S. citizenship, about sending their kids to school, going to work, buying groceries, or seeing a doctor when they’re sick.

    It is intolerable to a Pelley or Smith or Trump that a city that was once nearly entirely white, Protestant, and Northern European could transform into a polyglot hub with large Somali, Mexican, Hmong, and Vietnamese populations. It is intolerable to MAGA that liberals and progressives hold nearly every elected office of consequence in Minnesota, and that they have vociferously—sometimes profanely—rejected white solidarity to defend minority communities. It is intolerable to MAGA that civil society continues to thrive in Minneapolis through liberal religious congregations, vigorous labor unions, vibrant ward politics, and engaged neighborhood associations—the very groups that have mounted the sustained, nonviolent opposition to ICE’s invasion. It is intolerable to MAGA that Minneapolis never chose Pelley’s way or Smith’s way, and now rejects the MAGA way.

    2
  18. Richard Gardner says:

    Folks are hyperventilating about Oregon voter rolls.
    Mark Hemingway “Oregon only has 4 million people. And like 20 percent of their voter registrations were bad? How many ballots were they sending to wrong addresses? It’s an all mail in ballot state!”
    Not quite. If folks do not vote in 2 consecutive Federal elections Oregon moves them to the inactive voter list and a ballot is NOT sent. Unlike some other states they are not “purged” (removed). If a voter then updates their address up to election day they can be issued a ballot, unlike having to re-register over 21 days in advance (no same day registration in Oregon).
    No voter fraud, but you’ll be hearing that.

    4
  19. Kathy says:

    @Scott:

    Bottomline, I just don’t think Greenland will excite the population to rise up and ‘throw the bums out’.

    Agreed. the brutal fact of national elections is that voters care about three and only three issues:

    1) the economy
    2) the economy
    3) the economy

    By “the economy” I mean how voters perceive their individual economic situation. This often tracks with the overall economic metrics, but not always. We saw this in 2024.

    This also does not mean the party in power will remain in power during good economic times. It’s the likely outcome, but this is when other issues can determine the election.

  20. Eusebio says:

    @Kathy:

    his term ends in May this year,…

    Yes, but he also holds a term as a Fed Governor, which does not expire until January 31, 2028. Some details are explained in this CNBC piece from January 2 — basically, Powell could retain some influence on the Fed until trump’s last year in office if he chooses to remain on the Board of Governors.

    It would be unusual for a former Fed Chair to remain on the Board, but Powell has not tipped his hand on what he will do when his Chairmanship ends in May, which is no doubt an annoyance to trump. The Fed Board of Governors not only makes up much of the rate-setting FOMC, but the Board could also theoretically fire Fed bank presidents who make up the remainder of the FOMC. And the seven-member Board now has three Trump appointees, so the loss of Powell as a Governor could tip the balance of the Board and potentially result in other strong-armed changes to the FOMC before the end of January 2028. Because after that, there would be relatively little time left in trump’s term for Fed decisions to trumpify the economy.

    2
  21. Eusebio says:

    The S&P 500 Index, which started today down about three-tenths of one percent, has now risen above its Friday close. That’s what the markets think, at least in the short term, of the administration’s ginned-up charges against the Fed Chair, and Powell’s extraordinary public statement,

    The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President.

  22. Jay L. Gischer says:

    @Eusebio: I have a somewhat darker view of this.

    I think what Trump wants is for the fed to juice the economy. He says he wants less inflation, but that’s just talk. What he wants is big growth numbers and a surge in the stock market, which can be accomplished with low interest rates. That’s my take.

    So, understanding that, you can see that people who think Trump wins this one will bet on the stock market going up.

    3
  23. Daryl says:

    @Michael Reynolds:
    Why limit it to Greenland?

    2
  24. Jay L. Gischer says:

    In this new year we have seen:
    * Kidnapping of a foreign leader
    * Extortion of the Federal Reserve
    * Murder of a citizen by an ICE officer
    * Threats to invade Greenland
    * A presidential pronouncement that credit card rates over 10 percent are illegal

    Did someone spike his Coke with fentanyl?

    I guess the whole “Drive Epstein out of the media cycle” thing is working though.

    This stuff is the kind of ridiculous, over-the-top stuff that I once read in satires in Mad Magazine. Only now it’s real. (Hmm, I wonder if that’s his source of ideas.)

    It’s not that I don’t take it seriously. I do wonder if we can both laugh at how ridiculous this is AND take it seriously.

    3
  25. charontwo says:

    @Jay L. Gischer:

    It’s not that I don’t take it seriously. I do wonder if we can both laugh at how ridiculous this is AND take it seriously.

    Lots of stuff came out of Hollywood in the 1930’s mocking Herr Hitler’s clownishness.

    2
  26. becca says:

    I had never heard of the movie One Battle After Another until Saturday, when mr becca found it on HBO.
    Really interesting and unique. Now I want to watch Inherent Vice, another Anderson take on Pynchon.

    1
  27. Eusebio says:

    @Jay L. Gischer:
    I don’t doubt that it’s a factor that low interest rates generally favor the stock market. But there may be other things at play, as described by Paul Krugman a few months ago

    So why aren’t markets freaking out? Nations in which central banks lose their independence sooner or later suffer high inflation, especially when they are taken over by autocrats who buy into crackpot economic doctrines. And Trump, who has been demanding large rate cuts because, he claims, the economy is running hot — which almost every economist would say is a reason to raise rates, not cut them — certainly fits that pattern. Yet although there have been small tremors in the bond and currency markets, there have been no significant upheavals in financial markets that reflect the severity of the situation we are in. Throughout this episode, the stock market has remained fairly flat and bond yields haven’t spiked.

    Why not? Do financial markets doubt that Trump will get his way? Or do they reject mainstream economics and the clear examples of countries like Turkey and Argentina?

    Neither. My read of economic and financial history is that market pricing almost never takes into account the possibility of huge, disruptive events, even when the strong possibility of such events should be obvious. The usual pattern, instead, is one of market complacency until the last possible moment.

    8
  28. gVOR10 says:

    @Eusebio: Thanks for the info. I would also assume Kevin Hassett, who is expected to be Trump’s nominee to replace Powell, is telling Trump the economy would be great for the midterms if only Powell weren’t in the way. I would assume Trump has no idea how interest rates affect inflation. But as a real estate investor he hated high rates and has learned nothing since.

    3
  29. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Daryl:
    Because contra the odd assumptions in comments here, I’m not talking about electoral politics. Greenland is the end of NATO. It’s the end of trust in America. It will be terribly damaging to US power. It’s a very bad thing, a very dangerous thing. And unlike rattling off a dozen misdeeds we have to rectify, it is specific, it is limited, it can be addressed directly, not via a laundry list.

    And it will enrage Trump like nothing else.

    5
  30. JohnSF says:

    @Daryl:
    @Michael Reynolds:
    There is a good reason in international relations for such a promise by the Democrats.
    It might help to alleviate the damage to the Atlantic Alliance.
    It would never be the same again, if Trump seized Greenland; it would be very badly damaged if the administration somehow coerced Denmark into separation and US association refrendum(s) in Greenland and managed obtain both.

    In either event, the basis of the relationship would be gone.
    And Europe would perforce make a major effort for “strategic decoupling” and a new “European Defence Union” and/or removal of US from the integrated NATO commands.

    But if the Democrats made it plain that direct coercion of Europe was rejected by them, there might be a prospect for a future, albeit more cautious and far less integrated, alliance realtionship.
    Something perhaps similar to the US-Japanese alliance?

    3
  31. Gustopher says:

    @JohnSF: I don’t think it would help much — the US will always be one narrow election away from lunacy and would not be considered a reliable partner for anything.

    I expect that damage is already done, and European nations are working on how to deal with the US as an unreliable partner that randomly veers into adversary territory on a regular basis, and it will take decades to get past that.

    3
  32. Gustopher says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    And it will enrage Trump like nothing else.

    There’s every chance an enraged Trump will take it as a challenge.

    I’d want to see it as part of a coordinated opposition on many fronts, but we don’t have that. We have feckless Democrats doing next to nothing. Perhaps they are secretly planning their coordinated opposition on many fronts.

    3
  33. Gustopher says:

    And in lighter, terrible news:

    Suspected arsonist targeted Mississippi synagogue for its ‘Jewish ties’, FBI says

    At least the suspect is smart enough to figure out that a synagogue has Jewish ties.

    Pittman’s father later allegedly became suspicious of burn marks on his son’s ankles, hands and face. He reportedly contacted the FBI and said that his son had confessed to setting the building on fire.

    Pittman had texted his father a photo of the rear of the synagogue before the fire, with the message, “There’s a furnace in the back.” His father had pleaded with his son to return home, but “Pittman replied back by saying he was due for a homerun and ‘I did my research,’” the affidavit said.

    I am heartened that the suspect appears to have lightly set himself on fire. And that his father turned him in pretty much immediately.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/12/mississippi-synagogue-fire-fbi-suspect-targeted

    2
  34. CSK says:

    @becca:

    OBAA won a bunch of Golden Globes last night, including Best Picture.

    2
  35. dazedandconfused says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    No, that’s a point better demonstrated than spoken, done so by extreme but non-violent efforts to block if from happening. The reversal will be a given and can be left un-said.

    1
  36. Kathy says:

    Despite being able to take the weekend off, finally, cooking didn’t go exactly as planned.

    It came out really well, though.

    First, the point was to make air fryer meatloaf. The problem is when I use the air fryer for one dish, I tend to want to cook something else in it, too. So I went with a mix of charred vegetables (green onions, celery, bell pepper, and broccoli) with pasta in olive oil and garlic sauce.

    All well and good, but 15 minutes for the onions, fifteen more for the bell peppers, 7 for the broccoli, I gave up and stuck the meatloaf in the oven….

    Also, I was going to beat an egg in a bowl, and the glaze in a separate bowl. For some reason I lost track of what I was doing, and the egg wound up with the glaze. It’s ok because everything went in to the oven and got cooked, but how did that happen?

    The egg had no noticeable effect on the glaze, which is more a sauce the way I make it. Maybe it was a bit less acidic than usual (I’m thinking I should add honey to it next time).

    The pasta was a success.

    Next week I hope I’ll find turkey pieces at the store. They tend to come up after the winter holidays.

  37. Daryl says:

    The EPA is no longer concerned with the lives of American Citizens, only business interests.
    https://x.com/nytimes/status/2010783815615058327?s=20

    4
  38. wr says:

    @becca: “Really interesting and unique. Now I want to watch Inherent Vice, another Anderson take on Pynchon.”

    I hope you enjoy Inherent Vice, but if you are interested in seeing Anderson’s two best films by far you should check out Boogie Nights and Magnolia…

    1
  39. Mikey says:

    My God. Perfidy, too? I’d say it’s unbelievable, but we all know there’s no bottom with this lawless, fascist administration.

    U.S. Attacked Boat With Aircraft That Looked Like a Civilian Plane

    The Pentagon used a secret aircraft painted to look like a civilian plane in its first attack on a boat that the Trump administration said was smuggling drugs, killing 11 people last September, according to officials briefed on the matter. The aircraft also carried its munitions inside the fuselage, rather than visibly under its wings, they said.

    The nonmilitary appearance is significant, according to legal specialists, because the administration has argued its lethal boat attacks are lawful — not murders — because President Trump “determined” the United States is in an armed conflict with drug cartels.

    But the laws of armed conflict prohibit combatants from feigning civilian status to fool adversaries into dropping their guard, then attacking and killing them. That is a war crime called “perfidy.”

    3
  40. Kathy says:

    Apple solves it’s Apple Intelligence problem by partnering with Google.