No Kings 3: A Field Report

From the grounds of the state capitol in Montgomery, AL.

Photo by SLT

So, like in June and October, my wife and I attended the Montgomery, AL No King Rally, which was held on the south lawn of the historic capitol building downtown (the legislature meets in another building across the road these days).

As I have noted before, I am not dispositionally a “protest” guy, but the Trump administration has now inspired me to participate in four such events (a Women’s Day march in January of 2018 and the three No Kings events in the second term). My desire to publicly express my discontent with Trump’s version of governance, as well as an interest in showing solidarity with other like-minded citizens, overcame personal and professional reticence.

Part of me, like James Joyner, wonders what all of this accomplishes. On the one hand, my appearance downtown yesterday didn’t change much of anything; on the other, it was a chance to publicly register my political opinion, which is an essential feature of democracy.

On the flip side, there is the question of what more should be coming about because of these events.

Local news reports that the crowd estimate was about 1,000. Each event has drawn more than the one before, which is at least one metric of growing discontent with the Trump administration. This was true nationally as well.

As per PBS:

U.S. organizers have estimated that the first two rounds of No Kings rallies drew more than 5 million people in June and 7 million in October. This week they told reporters they expected 9 million participants Saturday, though it was too early to tell whether those expectations were met.

This sends a signal to Trump, and to the broader public, about his growing unpopularity. None of this bodes well for Republicans this coming November.

It is also the exercise of a First Amendment right that is essential to democracy, the right to peaceably assemble. And while my personal participation is irrelevant, as is my singular vote, I would note that the cumulative effects are relevant to our broader politics. If none of this mattered, the White House and its political and media allies would not need to denigrate it.

At a minimum, I see no harm from these events and do think that mass communication of this type is better than apathy.

I noted a number of anti-war signs, a new grievance added since October. There also seemed to be more Epstein-related signs. Otherwise, the issues were pro-democracy and anti-authoritarianism. Like everything else in our politics, the event demonstrated the coalitional nature of the movement.

Here are a few images that I took (this time I took the real camera). All of the shots can be found in this album.

No Kings 3-4
No Kings 3-11
No Kings 3-20
No Kings 3-27
No Kings 3-30
No Kings 3-40
No Kings 3-13
No Kings 3-42
No Kings 3-51
No Kings 3-53
No Kings 3-54
https://www.flickr.com/photos/sltaylor/55175739984/in/album-72157605594226262
FILED UNDER: Democracy, Photography, The Presidency, US Constitution, US Politics, , , , ,
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. Jen says:

    Part of me, like James Joyner, wonders what all of this accomplishes.

    If nothing else, it shows those at home and abroad that there are millions of people who are so dissatisfied that they are protesting. It’s really the only option available until midterms. And speaking of midterms, it hopefully shows the administration that any shenanigans to mess with the voting process will not be acceptable.

    Our allies have been scratching their heads wondering why nothing is being done about this madness. I mean, the French stop the entire country if anyone suggests raising the retirement age. Meanwhile, we’re watching our democracy crumble.

    ReplyReply
    7
  2. Michael Reynolds says:

    You’d have had fun here in Vegas where Elvis impersonators reminded us that in this city there’s only one king.

    ReplyReply
    4
  3. Charley in Cleveland says:

    I attended the Cleveland protest with my wife and some friends. It was my first protest appearance since May, 1970, when the Kent State shootings simply couldn’t be tolerated. On Saturday I was heartened by both the numbers and the sentiments conveyed by the signs, especially enjoying one that read, “Orange Lies Matter.’ What difference do the protests make? As Dr. T noted above, it lets the MAGA asshats at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue know they are poking the bear.

    ReplyReply
    2
  4. Scott says:

    It is also the exercise of a First Amendment right that is essential to democracy, the right to peaceably assemble.

    Opportunities to directly express yourself are far and few between. There are extraordinarily few town halls by our elected officials (and tele-townhalls don’t count). Every appearance is carefully choreographed. Letters to elected officials are responded by a form letter most of which don’t address the issue written about. Pretty sure responses to Facebook posts are ignored and not even internally analyzed.

    At some point, frustration will result in real anger and even violence which, I believe, those is power would welcome.

    ReplyReply
    1
  5. HelloWorld says:

    I went to the No Kings Bisbee, Az and it was huge for such a small town. Met lots of great people. I will say this, though, at risk of getting roasted by some on this site: I’d like the focus to stay centered on Trumps authoritarianism. This is the first of 3 protests I’ve gone to where there was a heavy pro-Palestine presence, multiple other issues that I may or may not support. Nothing will tank the mid-terms more than liberals stacking issues that moderates and independents may not agree (aside from Trumps interference).

    ReplyReply
    2

Speak Your Mind

*