No, Obama Isn’t Seeking ‘Regime Change’ in Iraq
The United States is, in fact, doing the exact opposite.
The United States is, in fact, doing the exact opposite.
Does Hillary Clinton remember that she was Secretary of State for four years?
It’s hard for a party to win four straight presidential elections. The Democrats may pull it off.
President Obama doesn’t seem to have any idea what he wants to do in Iraq.
End game? Or the potential spark of a wider war?
Americans have become deeply cynical about government. To some extent that is a good thing, but it’s reaching unhealthy levels.
For the second time in just over ten years, the United States is involved in military action in Iraq.
Fairly or not, the President has created the impression that he is not a good leader, and there’s not much he can do about it at this point.
Add Libya to the list of the world’s trouble spots.
My latest for War on the Rocks: “Don’t Believe Everything You Read in the Papers.”
Relying on the policies of a man who was President in a very different time is not a substitute for a rational foreign policy.
George Will has come under criticism for pointing out what seems to be an undeniable fact.
Crisis seems to be brewing all over the world, but the American people aren’t persuaded that it’s necessary for the United States to act.
Basically, the answer is that nobody really thought there was much of a risk that a plane could be shot down.
A lot of Republicans dislike the President enough to think that he should be removed from office, but will that make impeachment more likely to happen?
Rick Perry and Rand Paul are highlighting what looks to be a coming battle inside the GOP over foreign policy.
In a new survey, Americans cite politics and the news as the biggest sources of stress in their lives.
Iraq continues to fall apart.
A new poll shows that Americans don’t buy into the idea of “American exceptionalism” as much as they used to. That’s a positive development rather than a negative one.
More than any other language, English words are being adopted, and transformed, by other languages.
Americans disapprove of how the President is handling Iraq, but they don’t like what his critics are proposing either.
The First World War played an intriguing role in the birth of the radical Islam we are dealing with today.
Public faith in government institutions is at all all time low.
For some reason, President Obama wants to arm so-called “moderate” Syrian rebels.
Is ISIS about to make the situation in the Levant even worse?
When it comes to Iraq, the media only seems to be giving Americans one side of the story.
My latest for The National Interest, “Neoconservatives, the Iraq Debate and Ad Hominem Attacks,” has posted.
The evidence is clear. When it comes to the ability to handle foreign crises, the President has lost the public’s confidence.
The Kentucky Senator and former Vice-President are at the front of a battle that will unfold inside the GOP as we head toward 2016.
My latest for The Hill, “Why all VA executives are above average,” has posted.
Some questions for the Republicans who would be President about the actions of the last Republican President.
Recent events in Iraq have opened up old domestic political arguments in the United States.
More bad poll numbers for the President.
Not surprisingly, Bill Clinton is the most admired recent President according to a new poll, but his predecessor seems to be underrated.
If President Obama does decide to use military force in Iraq, he should be required to seek Congressional approval beforehand.
Iraq’s Prime Minister seems to be responding to the uprising in his country in a way guaranteed to make it worse.