Two Federal Courts Hand Trump Defeat On Border Wall
Two Federal Courts have blocked the Administration from diverting Defense Department funds to pay for the President’s border wall
Two Federal Courts have blocked the Administration from diverting Defense Department funds to pay for the President’s border wall
A Federal Court has struck down the President’s diversion of funds for his border wall.
The Trump Administration from projects to build on-base schools and daycare facilities to spend on his border wall.
The Supreme Court handed the President a victory last night, ruling that the Plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging his funding of the border wall did not have standing to challenge his diversion of Defense Department funds. This may only be a temporary victory, though.
Another court loss for Trump and his border wall.
A Federal Judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed a lawsuit against Trump “national emergency” to fund the border wall, but his ruling did not reach the merits of the lawsuit’s claim.
A Federal Judge has put at least a partial hold on President’s Trump’s effort to use a “national emergency” to fund his border wall.
The House of Representatives is asking a Federal Judge to block the President’s emergency declaration to fund his border wall.
Congress is doing its damned job for a change.
More polling evidence that the public does not support Trump’s emergency declaration or his wall.
Most Americans oppose the President’s use of a national emergency to get funding for his border wall, but don’t expect that to cause him to change his mind.
There appear to be enough votes in the Senate to pass the resolution disapproving President Trump’s border wall “emergency,” but there’s not enough Republican support to override an expected veto.
Instead of merely seeking to block the President’s declaration of an “emergency” at the southern border, Congress should instead significantly amend the National Emergencies Act.
The House of Representatives voted yesterday to block the President’s declaration of an “emergency” at the southern border. Now the matter goes to the Senate.
Republicans face a choice in the coming days. Do they support the Constitution, or do they support Donald Trump? You can count on them making the wrong choice.
While not subject to filibuster, it’s still subject to Presidential veto.
The House of Representatives has begin the process of challenging the President’s recent declaration of a ‘national emergency’ at the southern border.
The American Civil Liberties Union has joined the list of groups with lawsuits against the President’s declaration of a “national emergency” at the southern border.
The lawsuits against President Trump’s “national emergency” have begun. Except more.
There is a bit of a disjuncture between the terminology and the reality (but that does not excuse Trump’s current actions).
President Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border while at the same time undercutting his own case for doing so.
President Trump’s impending decision to declare a national emergency to get funding for his border wall will quickly face serious legal challenges. It may be more vulnerable than the White House suspects.
The President will sign the bill to fund the government and avert another government shutdown, but in doing so he’ll also lay the groundwork for another showdown with Congress.
Lindsey Graham is telling his fellow Republicans that they better back the President if he decides to declare a national emergency to get funding for his border wall.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has warned the President against using a national emergency to fund his border wall.
President Trump is claiming that he could use authority to declare a “national emergency” to build his wall even if Congress doesn’t authorize it.