The President’s War Is Lacking A Convincing Plan
The Administration’s policy in the President’s war against ISIS has no coherent plan, and that virtually guarantees escalation.
The Administration’s policy in the President’s war against ISIS has no coherent plan, and that virtually guarantees escalation.
The war against ISIS continues to silently escalate, with little input from the people’s representatives in Congress.
As we head into a new conflict, perhaps we ought to give more thought to fiscal issues than the President is to overall strategy.
The sixth year of a presidency leads to some predictable commentary (and some comparative notes).
While the world pays attention to Syria and Iraq, Yemen is once against lurching into chaos.
President Obama has opened a new front in his “war” against ISIS
President Obama is still insisting that his war against ISIS will not require American ground troops. He’s not being honest with the American people.
Everyone knows that Israel has had nuclear weapons for decades. Don’t tell anyone—it’s a secret.
Iran and the United States are on the same side in the fight against ISIS, whether they like it or not.
After keeping his distance from them for three years, President Obama is placing much misplaced hope in the “moderate” Syrian rebels,
Despite the President’s assurances of an international coalition, the rest of the world doesn’t seem all that interested in joining the fight.
The Obama Administration’s legal justification for war against ISIS is laughably flimsy.
If the President is going to increase American involvement in the Middle East, he needs to address some fundamental questions first.
Congress seems ready to avoid having to vote on expanded attacks against the Islamic State
As talk begins of expanding the war against ISIS into Syria, it is becoming long past time for Congress to exercise its Constitutional function.
American journalist James Foley has been beheaded by the terrorist network calling itself the Islamic State.
The United States is, in fact, doing the exact opposite.
Does Hillary Clinton remember that she was Secretary of State for four years?
President Obama doesn’t seem to have any idea what he wants to do in Iraq.
For the second time in just over ten years, the United States is involved in military action in Iraq.
Tea Party backed candidates may have lost most of the GOP primary battles, but they’ve won the war for control of the Republican agenda.
Fairly or not, the President has created the impression that he is not a good leader, and there’s not much he can do about it at this point.
Crisis seems to be brewing all over the world, but the American people aren’t persuaded that it’s necessary for the United States to act.
Rick Perry and Rand Paul are highlighting what looks to be a coming battle inside the GOP over foreign policy.
In a new survey, Americans cite politics and the news as the biggest sources of stress in their lives.
Iraq continues to fall apart.
Trying to make sense of a very complicated issue.
Americans disapprove of how the President is handling Iraq, but they don’t like what his critics are proposing either.
The First World War played an intriguing role in the birth of the radical Islam we are dealing with today.
For some reason, President Obama wants to arm so-called “moderate” Syrian rebels.
Is ISIS about to make the situation in the Levant even worse?
When it comes to Iraq, the media only seems to be giving Americans one side of the story.
The evidence is clear. When it comes to the ability to handle foreign crises, the President has lost the public’s confidence.
The Kentucky Senator and former Vice-President are at the front of a battle that will unfold inside the GOP as we head toward 2016.
More bad poll numbers for the President.
If President Obama does decide to use military force in Iraq, he should be required to seek Congressional approval beforehand.
Iraq’s Prime Minister seems to be responding to the uprising in his country in a way guaranteed to make it worse.