Thursday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a retired Professor of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. Jim X 32 says:

    1 month in and I’d say Musk and Trump are still in the driver’s seat. They continue to drive the narratives of their choosing at their timing. It looks like the scripted playbook is complete but will be repeated in other areas of the Government and against other allies. You will know the right people are in charge when $Trusk are responding to stimuli outside of their script. Right now the response playbook from Dems are simply rehashes of Maga-developed influence vectors (e.g. egg prices). Vectors only have so-much mileage and rehashes even less. True to form, Dems have no everyday resonating vectors that can undermine the confidence of soft Republican voters. For instance # of Farmer bankruptcies since January 20. I see the new DNC chair is supposedly pushing the Party to get out of DC and meet voters. Great mover, if used to also discover, test, and bulletproof lines of attack. Trust me–Price of Eggs does not make it to Fox and in GOP congressmen’s mouths by accident or guessing. 80% of influence peddling is saying what people are thinking. You have no idea what they are thinking if aren’t on the street. I’ll have a better idea if Martin is the real deal over the next 90 days.

    By now, it should be clear who in Congress is really up to compete in this environment and who are legacy talking heads their for the insider trading and prestige. I saw yesterday that Schumer was threatened with an investigation– I wonder if he’s still looking for areas of bipartisan solutions and common ground?

    Voters should continue contacting their representatives and make clear they want new leadership if the current ones aren’t up for the task at hand. Being a Senator or House member comes with an incredible amount of prestige, status, and attention most of these people can get nowhere else. Many will simply try to survive and keep their seats–regardless of what happens in the real world–if allowed to. Chuck Grassley is trial ballooning ‘Hey, these are Executive Branch decisions– we can’t do anything’ We’ll see if Republicans in Congress can pull that bait and switch off if the rumored DOD firings start.

    5
  2. Gustopher says:

    If we take the $55B “savings” that Musk and the Muskrats have allegedly found as true… that’s a 1.25 Twitters, where a Twitter is roughly what Elon Musk will spend on a whim that he immediately regrets, but which doesn’t affect his total money in the slightest.

    I think he could pay more taxes.

    9
  3. Scott says:

    @Jim X 32: It’s funny but I have no clue what drives “the people” these days. I cannot understand nor cope with the irrationality and ignorance and cluelessness of the majority of Americans these days. Everyday it is “What the hell are you talking about”? with so many people. My cares and concerns are not theirs. I rage at my Senators and Congressman on defense and Ukraine but not sure that matters any more.

    Maybe I need anti-depressants.

    5
  4. charontwo says:

    https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ldb6hx3aef2vhrctg2xdepjw/post/3likwyromgs2i

    Denmark Boosts Arms Spending Over 70% After Trump Scolds Europe

    Copenhagen steps up its defense budget amid Trump’s campaign to buy Greenland and determination to strike deal with Russia

    Denmark plans to significantly increase its military spending as the Russian threat to Europe grows and President Trump demands allies pay more for their security, signaling a trans-Atlantic military rebalance in the wake of peace talks over Ukraine.

    Denmark’s $5 billion annual defense budget will get a $7 billion injection over two years, according to the plan, making the country the first European nation outside Poland and the Baltics to commit to spending more than 3% of gross domestic product on its military. Copenhagen will also issue waivers and restructure the defense ministry so it can procure weaponry faster.

    North Atlantic Treaty Organization members, including Denmark, have committed to spending at least 2% of GDP on defense. Trump has said the level should be as high as 5%. The U.S. last year spent almost 3.4% of GDP, according to NATO. Wednesday’s announcement takes Denmark to 3.2%.

    Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said Denmark was in a hurry to strengthen its military to defend itself and avoid a war amid threats from Russia

    The Scandinavian nation has been forced to further stretch its military resources in the Arctic, where Trump has said Copenhagen’s ability to defend Greenland, the world’s largest island, is insufficient. The island serves as a buffer between Russia and North America but is poorly surveilled and protected due to its large territory, which measures nearly a quarter of the U.S.

    Last month, Denmark said it would spend $1.9 billion to upgrade Greenland’s defense, an amount separate from Wednesday’s announcement.

    “Denmark is in a relatively precarious situation, and has an enhanced responsibility due to Greenland,” said Jon Rahbek-Clemmensen, associate professor with the Royal Danish Defense College. “Denmark’s immediate vicinity is huge. It has a job to do in Eastern Europe, in Greenland and in the Greenland-Iceland-U.K. Gap,” he said, referring to a strategically important part of the North Atlantic Ocean.

    If the U.S. genuinely disengages from Europe to focus more on the Indo-Pacific, China and defense of the homeland, European countries will need to replace some of the “connecting tissue” in the defense of the continent that Washington currently provides, said Giuseppe Spatafora, research analyst at the European Union Institute for Security Studies.

    “There is a role for the European Union now to show that it can support collective projects to replace U.S. capabilities,” said Spatafora.

    5
  5. Scott says:

    What the ???

    According to the daily calendar, Trump is hosting at 1500 reception honoring Black History Month.

    After making government agencies cancel their Black History Month activities?

    https://rollcall.com/factbase/trump/topic/calendar/

  6. Scott says:

    Two thoughts:

    • They probably are getting what they voted for.

    • The article only has quotes from Democratic Senators (Blumenthal and Duckworth). Why are there not comments from the Republican majority on the Veterans Affairs committees?

    ‘On the backs of veterans’: Senators rail against federal workforce purge as vets hit hard by cuts

    Marine Corps veteran Andrew Lennox was wrapping up his last day of online orientation as a newly hired administrative officer at Ann Arbor VA Healthcare System in Michigan, when his cell phone pinged alerting him to incoming email.

    He was among more than 1,000 workers across the VA new to their jobs who received similar notices of termination based on performance. The mass firings were part of a larger federal workforce reduction announced by President Donald Trump’s administration to downsize the government.

  7. charontwo says:

    Trump/Zelenskyy thread:

    https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ip72i3qq2vq6qrjh3dky4vhb/post/3lijw3o33322f

    Trump is aiming to oust Zelensky. He said as much publicly, backchannel noises are even worse

    Its unlikely to play out the way he wants in Ukraine

    Conclusion – this is not a realistic demand. That suggests:
    1) US team is so inexperienced they don’t get what is happening
    2) it is meant as a threat and to create chaos
    3) there’s a deal with RU (and not in US favor)

    Personally – leaning to 2

    https://bsky.app/profile/ki-insights.bsky.social

    3
  8. SC_Birdflyte says:

    The depths of Trump’s ignorance are so unfathomable, I’d be willing to bet he couldn’t tell you who said the following quote if you stuck a gun to his head. “Caesar had his Brutus, Charles I had his Cromwell, and George III may profit by their example.”

  9. Scott says:

    @SC_Birdflyte: I have to admit that I had to Google the quote.

  10. Kathy says:

    @SC_Birdflyte:

    I don’t know, either. Sounds like Mark Twain, but that’s a chronotemporal* impossibility. So I’d guess it was Franklin, who’s the next best aphorism source to Twain.

    Now see what Bing says… Ah, Patrick Henry. I’d no idea.

    *Not a real word, but I bet over 3/4 of the commentariat knew what I meant.

  11. Paul L. says:

    Free Speech needs boundaries.

    Too many young lives have been lost to knife crime.

    That’s why this Labour Government is taking action with the toughest-ever restrictions on online knife sales—closing loopholes and keeping dangerous weapons off our streets.

  12. JohnSF says:

    @Paul L.:
    Beg pardon, but what relation do restriction on sales of combat knives have to free speech?

    10
  13. Paul L. says:

    @JohnSF:
    Because Rule, Britannia! More authoritarian nonsense from Europe.
    Combat knives? Really?

  14. JohnSF says:

    Yes, really.
    And Under 18’s have been banned from buying knives with blades longer than 3″ for decades.
    That law is now being enforced more firmly on online retailers.

    And yes, the UK, like many other European states, is somewhat authoritarian, and always has been.
    It happens to be the prefence of the majority of the British people, who, in contrast to many Americans, are not inclined so much towards liberalism.

    8
  15. charontwo says:

    Here is a depressing thought from The New Republic, I had not thought of.

    Probably paywalled though.

    TNR

    Musk and Trump Are Cutting Popular Programs. That’s Deliberate.

    This is how you sever the positive relationship between people and government—ensuring there’s nothing left to defend.

    One particularly sadistic aspect of Elon Musk’s and Donald Trump’s rampage through our government is that they’re cutting programs that are popular. To some observers, that might seem like bad politics, in line with the juvenile, amateur-hour image of this administration. But the unpopularity of some of these cost-cutting moves does not represent a goofy misstep on this administration’s part. Rather, it’s exactly the point.

    Some examples follow, Inflation Reduction Act, EPA, Department of Education, CFPB. Congress is being bombarded by calls from constituents complaining.

    Sure, no one likes “government waste,” a powerful frame used to justify Musk’s interventions. And not everyone loves all federal government programs—not many are going to call their senators’ offices on behalf of the CIA or the IRS. But why pick on so many of the most popular ones?

    Most likely, their popularity is precisely what the Trump-Musk administration dislikes about them. For anti-government ideologues, it’s important that people not have good experiences with the government. Every clean energy investment in your community, every Social Security check, every child enrolled in Head Start, every improvement in air and water quality, is a threat to right-wing ideological dominance. They know it, and they want to stop Americans from having those positive associations.

    In Franklin D. Roosevelt’s time, the conservative elements in business class hated the New Deal—which was so popular that FDR was reelected three times—for the same reason. They knew that it would give rise to generations of Americans who felt fondly about the government programs that had fed their hungry families during the Depression, put their unemployed young people to work, and built beautiful public buildings and parks. The ruling class began mobilizing against the New Deal’s most beloved programs; an industry group called the Liberty League, as historian Kim Phillips-Fein wrote in her 2009 book, Invisible Hands: The Making of the Conservative Movement From the New Deal to Reagan, “took special pleasure in attacking Social Security.” And while some business interests used popular persuasion to try to fight what they saw as essentially a socialist consensus—using radio, billboards, and newspaper editorials to evangelize about “free enterprise”—many realized they couldn’t win that way. Instead, they relied on court challenges to labor protections and prepared for class conflict by stockpiling tear gas and machine guns in their factories. Like our current-day oligarchs, most New Deal opponents didn’t expect to win what they wanted through the democratic process.

    The ruling class of the 1930s and ’40s would have loved to be in Elon Musk’s position. Although he and his young minions may seem merely like nihilistic psychos, they’re also conservatives doing something that makes rational sense for their political movement. By going after the most popular government programs, they are thinking long-term, planning for a world where no one defends government agencies because these agencies don’t do anything that we value. Elon Musk isn’t just trying to bypass all checks and balances, ignore popular will, plunder our public goods, and wreck the world, though he is doing all that. As we protest this vandalism, we need to remember that he aims to build a future in which we have nothing left to defend.

    6
  16. Kathy says:

    @charontwo:

    I’ve been wondering about this. No one likes it when the government stops providing a service they want or need, or distributing goods or supports they want or need. That can be bad politics and lead to electoral losses. Like losing both the House and Senate in 2026.

    I see two ways this can go:

    1) The chief nazi and the felon will hand out subsidies and other goodies to their base. As the felon did with subsidies to agribusiness hurt by his tariffs in his first term

    2) Some form of mass suppression to either suspend or rig the midterm elections. Given how local US elections are, suspension seems far more likely.

    2.1) especially in states with a legislature dominated by the GQP, elections can be rigged by the sola legislatura “theory” republiqans love to think is real and reasonable. However they go about it, especially when they overturn legitimate results, will be struck down by all courts, until they reach the Crow & Leo court. Then it won’t be quite Carte Blanche if anything remains of Roberts’ conscience, but it may as well be.

    3
  17. Jax says:

    @charontwo: Thanks for that link. That thought had not occurred to me. 😐

    1
  18. just nutha says:

    @JohnSF: Years ago, Luddite and I went to a pro wrestling show in Seattle. In those days, I worked in warehousing and carried a 4-inch folding knife on a belt scabbard. I had come directly from work that day and was a little surprised when one of the police officers working security stopped us and asked me if I would be so kind as to take my knife off my belt before I entered the arena.

    It turned out that I was carrying a concealed weapon and needed to secure it better. (I agree. People like Luddite and me go to wrestling matches. I don’t want crazies grabbing my knife off my belt so they can run up and stab the “heel” during the main event. 🙁 )

  19. Kathy says:

    About the Adams case, can the judge dismiss the charges with prejudice?

    That would be the next best thing to not dismissing the charges at all, given the DOJ cannot be forced to stage ana equate prosecution and all. But if they can’t bring the charges up again if Adams misbehaves or insults the felon or changes his mind, the DOJ may not want to go along.

  20. Argon says:

    @Jim X 32:

    1 month in and I’d say Musk and Trump are still in the driver’s seat.

    On the plus side, Susan Collins is ‘concerned’. So we’ve got that going for us.

    2
  21. CSK says:

    Mitch McConnell has announced that he’s retiring.

  22. Just Another Ex-Republican says:

    Thanks for nothing Mitch. I hope the leopard eats your face on the way out.

    4
  23. Mikey says:

    @CSK: He could have stopped all this. He could have been the one to save America. Instead, he chose his own self-interest, and instead of saving America he has damned it.

    I wonder if he has any sense of shame, watching what he could have prevented unfolding in front of us. Do his far-too-little and far-too-late “No” votes on Trump nominees indicate he may?

    I doubt it, and what difference would it make anyway? Again, far too little, far too late.

    He’ll probably shuffle off this mortal coil before long, so he won’t have to suffer with the rest of us. Too bad. He deserves more of the suffering than anyone.

    6
  24. Jay L Gischer says:

    This is fun: Judge asks if ‘unadulterated animus’ is driving Trump’s trans troop ban

    “We’re dealing with unadulterated animus,”[Judge Reyes] said. “We are dealing with the president of the United States calling a group of people who have served their country … liars.”

    More fun later.

    1
  25. Rob1 says:

    Tom Homan’s obsession with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a political miscalculation

    “The Trump administration understands that it does not have absolute power and that it must rely on creating a false illusion of power to create a chilling effect to get everyday people to respond to fear, comply in advance, and censor their own free speech. Ultimately, in clear scenarios such as these, the best way to handle paper tigers is to call their bluff,” Ocasio-Cortez said Wednesday in written responses to my questions about the Trump administration and Homan’s tactics.
    Homan “can baselessly threaten duly elected legislators with jail and throw around schoolyard taunts all he wants. The very fact that he is tripling down publicly is because he knows he has nothing else,” she added.”

    4
  26. Daryl says:

    President Doughboy has jumped on the DOGE rebate bandwagon, suggesting 20% of the savings go back to taxpayers. Not the $5000 Elmo talked about, but still.
    Actual estimates of DOGE savings based on real analysis seem to be somewhere in the $2-8B range.
    So benefit of the doubt…let’s say $10B.
    $10,000,000,000 x 20% = $2,000,000,000.
    $2B/153,000,000 taxpayers = $13.00
    Not enough for a 12-pack.
    Enjoy.

    Let’s say the DOGE claim of $55B is accurate…laughable but let’s just say. That works out to $71.80. It would likely cost more to process the checks. Assuming there’s anyone to process them after DOGE is done.

    Elmo’s promise of $5,000 per…about 3/4 of a trillion dollars.

    Please feel free to check my math.

    1
  27. Scott says:

    @Rob1: This is what is at the heart of MAGA. They are “Punch down, suck up people”. Like all bullies, they are cowards. And Trump is the most cowardly of all. Punch back is the only response that will work.

    3
  28. Sleeping Dog says:

    Is anyone else having trouble reaching Memeorandum? I’ve tried on 2 devices and 3 browsers starting last night and it keeps timing out with the message that the server is taking too long to respond.

    2
  29. Rob1 says:

    @Scott:

    What the? He was just finishing his orientation. What performance?

    It would be really great to establish a online “termination letters for performance” for Trump, Vance, Johnson, Musk, Hegseth, Bondi, Homan et.al.” Add a provision for people to sign in agreement.

    Marine Corps veteran Andrew Lennox was wrapping up his last day of online orientation as a newly hired administrative officer at Ann Arbor VA Healthcare System
    [..]

    He was among more than 1,000 workers across the VA new to their jobs who received similar notices of termination based on performance.

    1
  30. Rob1 says:

    @charontwo:

    In Franklin D. Roosevelt’s time, the conservative elements in business class hated the New Deal—which was so popular that FDR was reelected three times

    That “magic” somehow dissipated this last election.

  31. Jay L Gischer says:

    @Rob1: I don’t agree with every policy initiative AOC supports, but man, she understands people and politics and how to message so very well.

    I endorse the statement you quoted wholeheartedly. Consider how it applies to your later post about termination of someone who just finished orientation. It’s obvious bad faith, but it’s meant to “look good”. As in, “Trump fired 10,000 people!!!” I don’t think he cares at all if there are lawsuits and reinstatements, etc. Those won’t get the headlines that “Trump fired 10,000 people!!!” did. And it isn’t his money, after all.

    3
  32. gVOR10 says:

    @CSK: A commenter elsewhere reminds me that in 2016 Obama asked McConnell to jointly disclose and condemn Russian election meddling. McConnell refused. The first of several opportunities to get rid of Trump that Democrats handed Moscow Mitch.

    There are times I wish I was religious. It would be comforting to imagine McConnell roasting in hell for eternity. Did more to destroy our democracy than anyone except Trump, and unlike Trump, McConnell knew what he was doing.

    6
  33. Rob1 says:

    Musk and Trump Are Causing the Dumbest Imperial Collapse in History
    Empires have fallen before.

    But it’s never been this purely idiotic.

    President Trump, by contrast, was handed an empire in splendid condition. The core alliance of NATO was stronger than it had been in decades, as Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine pushed Sweden and Finland to join. Thanks to President Biden’s policies, the American economy was the envy of the world, with a post-pandemic recovery that outstripped any peer nation. The dollar was still by far the most important reserve currency, and the U.S. still had control over global financial pipelines.

    No serious threats were on the horizon, either. In its war with Ukraine, Russia has burned through most of its gigantic stockpile of Soviet-era military hardware, taken perhaps 800,000 casualties, and put its economy under terrific pressure. China, while the only peer competitor the U.S. has faced since 1991, is saddled with deep economic difficulties and looking down the barrel of population collapse. [..]

    America suffered no military defeat. We were not outstripped economically by a bigger or better-organized competitor. Rather, we elected an insane tyrant who is blowing up the foundation of our international power for no reason, all while he lets a South African immigrant ultra-billionaire and his crew of teenybopper fascists tear the wiring out of the federal government—again, for no reason.

    Never underestimate the destructive power of stupidity.

    https://prospect.org/world/2025-02-19-musk-trump-causing-dumbest-imperial-collapse-in-history/

    9
  34. just nutha says:

    @Daryl: Not a half rack, no. But enough for a mocha and a marzipan croissant…

    Well, a small mocha…

    but no tip for the barista.

    1
  35. Daryl says:

    @just nutha:

    …but no tip for the barista

    That’s too bad, I understand tips are no longer taxable. Oh…wait…

  36. Daryl says:

    @Rob1:
    I wish the mainstream media would go here.
    While I largely agree with the piece, linking to the Prospect basically ends any discussion.

  37. reid says:

    @gVOR10: The kindest thing you can say about McConnell’s actions is that he was stuck in a 2003 political mindset and was too clueless to extrapolate the GOP trajectory.

  38. Slugger says:

    I don’t understand Trump’s opposition to congestion pricing in Manhattan. I have never lived nor worked there, but I have visited a lot as a pure tourist and to attend professional meetings. Congestion pricing makes tourism/meetings more pleasant. Trump’s NYC properties rely heavily on tourism. Why is he against making tourism more pleasant?
    If you live/work in Manhattan, I think that there is a good chance that accommodating us out of towners is an economic plus for the city.

    1
  39. CSK says:

    @gVOR10:

    I don’t, in a way, understand McConnell’s protection of Trump, since it’s been screechingly obvious since 2016 that McConnell regards Trump with utter contempt–and a touch of sardonic amusement. I suppose it’s party allegiance.

    But then impeaching Trump would have given McConnell President Pence, whom you’d think he would find far more palatable.

    I don’t get it. Fear of the revenge of the crazed MAGAs? It’s a legit one, I guess.

    2
  40. CSK says:

    Patel has been confirmed as FBI director. Shit. Well, we knew this was coming.

    2
  41. Kathy says:

    @CSK:

    The rapist is entitled to have the enforcer he wants.

  42. charontwo says:

    An exploration of Musk, Trump etc. NAZI bona fides:

    https://www.thehandbasket.co/p/nazis-musk-kliger

  43. reid says:

    @reid: And now that I’ve seen that McConnell voted to confirm Patel (apparently so Collins can safely get her “concern” vote in), he can… well, this is a family blog.

  44. Jay L Gischer says:

    It’s clear McConnell doesn’t like Trump, or what he stands for.

    I wonder then, if McConnell carries any regrets. I doubt he regrets shutting down the Garland nomination, he got what he wanted, which was repeal of Roe v. Wade.

    However, perhaps he regrets not voting, after Jan 6, to remove Trump from office. My guess is that he made a political calculation that Trump was finished anyway, so there was no need to stick his neck out. Boy, was he wrong abuot that. But that’s what I think. What does he think?

    3
  45. CSK says:

    @Jay L Gischer:

    I speculated on this a few posts above. Maybe he’s just alarmed by the possibility of being offed by a MAGA. Remember “hang Mike Pence” and “we’re going to find Nancy Pelosi and put a bullet in that bitch’s head”?

    1
  46. Kathy says:

    There’s a story that when Maximilian considered Napoleon III’s offer to be emperor of Mexico*, his wife argued for it by saying “Better to be the mouse’s had than the lion’s tail.”

    By siding with Mad Vlad, the felon is demonstrating he’d rather be the rat’s tail than the lion’s head.

    Weird.

    *What’s funny is he was Mexico’s second emperor.

  47. JohnSF says:

    @just nutha:
    When I worked in a warehouse, I also often had a largish knife on my person.
    Slicing of shrinkwrap, cutting of bindings, picking of fingernails, etc
    When I left said warehouse, I locked it in the desk.
    Walking down the street with it in my belt would have left Mr Policeman decidedly unamused.

    2
  48. JohnSF says:

    @just nutha:
    Also, when younger, we had about the house (hung up on the wall) a genuine Gurkha knife.

    Dad acquired it as a gift during the war from a Gurkha officer “just in case.”
    Used to have it strapped to his chest when flying over Burma; along with a pair of revolvers.

    Lol; there was a photo of his aircraft crew with their various personal weapons (iirc included two folding stock carbines, a pump action shotgun, a couple of automatic pistols, and a sub-machine gun) looking like a right bunch of pirates.
    For good reason: some others of that squadron who ended up forced down in Burma were executed by the Japanese.

    I don’t think it would ever have occurred to him that such items had any place in civilian life.
    As with most others of his, and the grandfathers, generations, who were closely acquainted with the use of weapons.

    My brother now has that knife, locked up in display case, with other memorabilia.

    2
  49. just nutha says:

    @CSK: In 2027. He’s got a year to change his mind. Call us when the filing date has passed.

  50. Mimai says:

    Revealed: NIH research grants still frozen despite lawsuits challenging Trump order

    Glad to see Nature finally reporting on this. Free archived version above.

    Sorry that we live in a world where Federal Register posts (lack thereof) are relevant topics for OTB. And yet, and yet…

    1
  51. just nutha says:

    @JohnSF: Too far to walk. Always drove home. To a garage for my car.

    And no desk (or locker). I was straight labor. No frills.

    1
  52. al Ameda says:

    @reid:

    And now that I’ve seen that McConnell voted to confirm Patel (apparently so Collins can safely get her “concern” vote in), he can… well, this is a family blog.

    Yep, only Murkowski and Collins voted ‘no.’
    Republicans said ‘yes’ to tearing apart the Federal Government.
    This is what they’ve dreamed of, this is their chance to actually see it happen.

    2
  53. Eusebio says:

    @Slugger: With respect to trump’s opposition to congestion pricing in Manhattan, I think it’s a matter of who he’s trying to pander to between now and the midterm elections. According to one outlet, Here’s What the Public Thinks of congestion pricing:

    Congestion pricing isn’t popular statewide, with 51% of New Yorkers opposing it, according to a Siena College poll from December. Importantly, that poll was conducted before the program’s launch this January. Like many controversial policies, initial opposition may give way to acceptance — or even support — as commuters judge the program based on their real experiences.

    As expected, a majority of Republicans oppose congestion pricing, a Democrat-initiated and implemented policy. Opposition is strongest in the suburbs, including Nassau and Suffolk counties.

    But resistance is also high among Latino voters — many of whom work in industries that require the use of commercial vehicles for transportation.

    For white-collar workers, taking public transportation may be an inconvenience. But for working-class individuals whose jobs are physically demanding and require special equipment, both the financial and personal toll of congestion pricing may be too burdensome.

    So maybe his people see it as a way to help keep Mike Johnson Speaker of the House after 2026.

    1
  54. Rob1 says:

    Trump brings his brand of thuggery and extortion to our White House. Total Disgrace. Shameful.

    Stop criticising Trump and sign $500bn mineral deal, US official advises Kyiv

    National security adviser says Ukraine is wrong to push back against Trump’s approach to peace talks with Russia

    Waltz said Kyiv was wrong to push back against the US president’s approach to peace talks with Moscow, given everything the US had done for Ukraine. He denied accusations the US had snubbed Ukraine and America’s European allies by excluding them from talks earlier this week with Russia. This was routine “shuttle diplomacy”, he said.

    “Some of the rhetoric coming out of Kyiv … and insults to president Trump were unacceptable,” Waltz later told reporters at the White House.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/20/stop-criticising-trump-and-sign-500bn-mineral-deal-us-official-advises-kyiv

  55. Rob1 says:

    @Daryl:

    I wish the mainstream media would go here.
    While I largely agree with the piece, linking to the Prospect basically ends any discussion.

    Discussion with who? MAGA, MAGA adjacent? One could do worse than consider the content at American Prospect, especially in these times.

    1
  56. just nutha says:

    @Rob1: I see the complaint as another example of the adage that the center is where progress goes to die, but then again, I would see it that way.

  57. Rob1 says:

    @Jay L Gischer:

    My guess is that he made a political calculation that Trump was finished anyway

    I think a whole lot of people thought Trump was finished especially among Dems, liberals. If Biden had a clue on this matter, he might not have chosen Merrick Garland. This could have gone so differently.

  58. Eusebio says:

    @Rob1: Also from the Guardian article:

    Bessent visited Kyiv this week, presenting Zelenskyy with the demand for minerals and saying it was “payback” for previous US military assistance.
    [Zelenskyy] said an agreement depended on the US giving security guarantees for a postwar settlement.

    This followed Zelenskyy offering Trump mineral partnership, seeking security:

    Ukraine floated the idea of opening its critical minerals to investment by allies last autumn, as it presented a “victory plan” that sought to put it in the strongest position for talks and force Moscow to the table.

    Zelenskiy said less than 20% of Ukraine’s mineral resources, including about half its rare earth deposits, were under Russian occupation.

    But Zelenskiy emphasised that Kyiv was not proposing “giving away” its resources, but offering a mutually beneficial partnership to develop them jointly:

    “The Americans helped the most, and therefore the Americans should earn the most. And they should have this priority, and they will. I would also like to talk about this with President Trump.”

    However, trump’s counter-offer is something like, “Sure, you give us what you propose, but we don’t promise anything in return, and we get to make a deal with your enemy.”

  59. dazedandconfused says:

    @Eusebio: Zelenskyy had a good idea, appeal to Trump’s transactional soul. But it was also a sign of weakness to make any offer at all, and Trump is a person who responds to a sign of weakness with a demand for yet more weakness.

  60. Jax says:

    There is….no hope. I spent all day working cattle with people who have no idea what a trillion dollars is. They think that Elon’s gonna send them a check for that 55 imaginary billion.

    1
  61. Jax says:

    At least when I die, I’ll know that I’ve died better than Drew. I really died keeping people alive thru my cattle and my chickens.

    Imagine being Drew. Or Trump/Musk. Or JD Vance.

    Mitch McConnell. I hope he suffers. He deserves every square inch of hell.

    3