Thursday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a retired Professor of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. James Joyner says:

    Just a note to readers that I’m headed out of town shortly, sans laptop, and won’t return until Sunday evening. Posting from me has been light owing to peak period toward the end of the academic year and a long bout of COVID. I hope to be back in swing after next week

    12
  2. Scott says:

    @James Joyner: Enjoy your disconnection!

    3
  3. charontwo says:

    Krugman

    So Big Law has just discovered what it should have known all along: Giving Trump what he wants doesn’t buy you lenient treatment. All it does is signal weakness, which leads to even more onerous demands.

    And the fact that Trump never, ever keeps his promises is why he will lose his trade war, why the dollar may lose its status as a global currency, and why America may eventually face a debt crisis.

    Yesterday I wrote about why China probably has the upper hand in the developing trade war. One important factor, I argued, is that U.S. efforts to build an anti-China trade alliance are doomed to failure. Why? Because nobody with any sense trusts the Trump administration to honor the terms of any deals it makes, whether they’re deals about pro bono work with law firms or tariff deals with other governments.

    And as more and more people realize that Trump and his minions can’t be trusted, the damage will spread from trade to finance. The international role of the dollar and, eventually, America’s ability to service its debt are very much at risk.

    Why can’t Donald Trump be trusted? Partly because he’s Donald Trump. But even if he weren’t, absolute monarchs — which is what Trump is trying to become — are fundamentally untrustworthy. The ruler may sometimes choose to honor his promises, but it’s always his choice — a choice that can be changed at any moment. And his untrammeled power makes the nation he rules weaker, not stronger.

    Let me step away from current events for a moment and ask what may seem like an odd historical question: Why did absolute monarchy disappear from the Western world in the 18th and 19th centuries? How did republics or constitutional monarchies that basically functioned as republics become the norm?

    9
  4. Scott says:

    Students sue Defense Department over book bans in military schools

    The American Civil Liberties Union along with a group of military students and family members sued the Defense Department on Tuesday over book bans and curriculum changes instituted in recent weeks to comply with President Donald Trump’s efforts to root out diversity and equity programs within federal agencies.

    The lawsuit, filed in federal court in the Eastern District of Virginia, states that moves by Department of Defense Education Activity leaders have unnecessarily harmed learning opportunities for students. The case involves 12 students from six families who attend military-run schools in Virginia, Kentucky, Italy and Japan.

    “Learning is a sacred and foundational right that is now being limited for students in DoDEA schools,” said Natalie Tolley, one of the plaintiff parents in the lawsuit.

    “The implementation of these executive orders, without any due process or parental or professional input, is a violation of our children’s right to access information that prevents them from learning about their own histories, bodies, and identities.”

    Not sure how far this can go but glad to see some pain being inflicted back on this administration.

    6
  5. Jon says:

    @James Joyner: Travel safe and have fun!

    2
  6. Scott says:

    This kind of made me laugh:

    ‘The Mandalorian’ was actually about a burned-out NCO trying to get his kid to daycare

    When “The Mandalorian” first dropped on Disney+, fans saw it as a bold new chapter in the Star Wars universe: a lone warrior traversing the galaxy, balancing brutal fights with a mysterious new mission.

    Veterans, on the other hand, saw something else entirely.

    They saw a burned-out noncommissioned officer with a dependent he didn’t expect to have, operating on zero support, questionable gear, and a timeline no one bothered to explain.

    Because let’s be honest — Din Djarin isn’t some elite space assassin. He’s a tired E-6 just trying to get a kid to daycare before everything around him collapses.

    9
  7. CSK says:

    @James Joyner:

    Very sorry to learn about the Covid.

    3
  8. CSK says:

    Per the NYT, the IRS is threatening to end Harvard’s tax-exempt status.

    2
  9. Scott says:

    @CSK: Also:

    DHS threatens to revoke Harvard’s eligibility to host international students unless it turns over disciplinary records

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is threatening to strip Harvard University of its ability to enroll international students if it doesn’t turn over records on international students’ “illegal and violent activities,” the agency said Wednesday.

    Noem “wrote a scathing letter demanding detailed records on Harvard’s foreign student visa holders’ illegal and violent activities by April 30, 2025, or face immediate loss of Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification,” DHS said in a news release.

    The certification allows universities to issue forms to admitted international students that they can then use to apply for visas to enter the United States, according to DHS.

    When Republicans continually complained about “weaponization”, you just had to know that “Every accusation is a confession”.

    You would think that Harvard would have the legal fire power at its fingertips at its law school. Heck, my attorney daughter said that law students would probably enjoy working on these cases and that’s free labor.

    9
  10. Jen says:

    I hope Harvard stands firm and kicks butt.

    Any Republican cheering this should remember that churches–particularly those evangelical megachurches–should probably have their nonprofit status revoked, as they’ve been openly campaigning for decades.

    Go get ’em Harvard.

    8
  11. @Scott: Well, the good news is that soon no international students will want to come here, so it is kind of an empty threat! (He said, snarkily but kind of seriously).

    10
  12. CSK says:

    @Jen:

    Make that “Right Fiercely, Harvard.”

    5
  13. @Jen: I had a similar thought. What if the next president revokes the First Baptist Church of Dallas’ tax-exempt status on the grounds that Jim Jeffress has engaged in political activity?

    9
  14. Flat Earth Luddite says:

    @CSK:

    Posted this late last night/early am EDT. Apparently the IRS is jumping in at warp speed. Another feature/bug of living in the PNW.
    @Flat Earth Luddite: .

    Trump administration asks IRS to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status

    Source: The Washington Post
    https://search.app/pBLLw

    2
  15. CSK says:

    @CSK:

    I shouldn’t post before having coffee. Make that “Fight Fiercely, Harvard.”

    @Flat Earth Luddite:

    Damn, I missed that. Sorry.

    1
  16. CSK says:
  17. Kathy says:

    I wrote a story years ago called Golden, about a kind of synthetic person on a long, long, long interstellar voyage, who gets treated more like a machine than a woman. It was totally a trans allegory*, mixed with shades of The Bicentennial Man**. It wasn’t much good, though some people who read it commented the opening was a great hook. The opening goes “My name is Golden. I am a human being.”

    Anyway, form time to time I wonder what to do with that idea. A throwaway line in the story stated signals from Earth stopped reaching the interstellar ark 73 years into the voyage, but the people were so preoccupied with their internal squabbles about what the ark should do upon reaching its destination, about 127 years later, that they didn’t much care about it.

    Yesterday I was thinking about it, and another idea I had about a planet populated solely by robots (not Mars), and something clicked. I immediately wrote a short outline, only a few lines long, and saved it for later use.

    Amazing what can come when mindlessly fixing an excel document that should have been done in word…

    * I had a few others I never wrote down. One is well overdue for a revisit, because it contains a rather original idea on how aliens might explore the galaxy over time.

    ** Just about any story where a robot, android, synthetic person (see Heinlein’s Friday), innie etc. is sentient and evidently a person, and should have their rights recognized and respected, will be taken as a rip off of Asimov’s novella.

    Although offhand I can’t recall this claim being made when TNG aired The Measure of a Man

    3
  18. JKB says:

    @CSK:

    Well, there is 8-1 SCOTUS decision to back up removing Harvard’s tax-exempt status for discriminatory behavior

    Bob Jones University v. United States, 461 U.S. 574 (1983)

    The Court’s holding was unambiguous:

    The IRS’s 1970 interpretation of § 501(c)(3) was correct. It would be wholly incompatible with the concepts underlying tax exemption to grant tax-exempt status to racially discriminatory private educational entities. Whatever may be the rationale for such private schools’ policies, racial discrimination in education is contrary to public policy. Racially discriminatory educational institutions cannot be viewed as conferring a public benefit within the above “charitable” concept or within the congressional intent underlying § 501(c)(3).

    And if you don’t believe the antisemitism is sufficient. Harvard has already been found to discriminate on the basis of race

    Hasn’t the Supreme Court already found, in Students For Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, that Harvard engages in illegal race discrimination? Yes.

    So the question is, has Harvard stopped discriminating of the basis of race or have they just been hoping for a Democrat win to ratify their practices?

    2
  19. Michael Reynolds says:

    I found this interesting. Forward a couple minutes to a rather elaborate musical parody attack on billionaires. I’m seeing small indications that the Left is coalescing around a class-based, eat-the-billionaires message. Colbert isn’t exactly on the cutting edge, but that’s why I find this bit encouraging. We may be coming to a place where the millionaires are leading an assault on the billionaires. This is a good thing.

    My modest proposal is for a national cap on wealth. 10,000 x median net worth (190K at the moment). Let Republicans make the argument that 2 billion isn’t enough. Or that 10,000 times more than a typical household isn’t enough. Let them cry socialism. So long as our message is not anti-success, or even anti-rich but rather that we are opposed to the mentally and morally defective money-hoarders like Musk, Bezos, Thiel et al. Talk about ‘all the good they could do,’ but also de-norm these hoarders as being the equivalent of people who fill their homes with old newspapers and jars of pee.

    4
  20. Scott says:

    @JKB: So, did you agree with that ruling? Or is this about “turnabout is fair play”? One is principled, the other is MAGA.

    7
  21. charontwo says:

    Perhaps all those big law firms that capitulated to Trump put their tits in the proverbial wringer:

    Robert Hubbell

    Five law professors come to the aid of law firms targeted by Trump. Five preeminent law professors from Boston University, Cornell, and Georgetown, all of whom are experts in ethics, have filed a brief in support of Wilmer Hale (one of the Trump targets that refused to capitulate). All I can say is, “Shut the front door! Do not provoke ethics experts.” Joyce Vance (of Civil Discourse on Substack) ably summarizes the arguments made by the five law professors.

    In short, the capitulating law firms face ethical conflicts whenever they represent a client in a case involving the government. Worse, as summarized by Joyce Vance, “Those firms may have violated federal anti-bribery laws. “[T]he law firms may fall within what counts as bribery under federal law: offering or promising something of value to a federal official in hopes of influencing an official act—here, withdrawing the executive orders against the firms.”

    It appears the Capitulating Firms did not carefully consider the ramifications (or legality) of giving Trump a political victory in exchange for forestalling official government action. This story is discussed in a bit more detail below.

    Joyce Vance

    They make three simple, but devastating, arguments:

    The law firms that gave in to Trump’s demands to avoid his executive orders have created a conflict of interest for their lawyers. Those lawyers are required to zealously represent their clients, but now, they have to “weigh the potential costs to their firms of displeasing the administration” against that duty. There is a conflict of interest in every case where the government is a party—every criminal case and many civil ones. Even when the government isn’t formally a party, the government (or this president) may have interests at stake. In other words, it’s a lose-lose situation for the lawyers, who are prohibited from participating in cases where they have a conflict of interest, but who will be unable to avoid such conflicts. “Lawyers at firms that have entered into agreements with the President…will be placed in an ethical catch-22: duty-bound to speak honestly and fully to the court under threat of sanctions, on the one hand, and facing severe consequences that may imperil their firm and the interests of their clients, on the other.”

    Those firms may have violated federal anti-bribery laws. The brief points out that the law firms may fall within what counts as bribery under federal law: offering or promising something of value to a federal official in hopes of influencing an official act—here, withdrawing the executive orders against the firms. The brief concludes that “Notwithstanding that the Department of Justice is unlikely to investigate firms that enter into deals crafted by the President, the fact that firms are being pressured—arguably extorted—to engage in behavior that could be perceived as violating federal bribery law further emphasizes the magnitude of the ethical problems these orders create.”

    Trump’s gamesmanship threatens the historic independence of the legal profession and the rule of law. The judicial branch can’t do its job of checking the other two branches of government without lawyers to bring cases before it. “To accomplish this, the judiciary needs an independent bar comprising lawyers willing and able to freely and fiercely advocate for every party to a dispute.” At bottom, if lawyers are afraid to represent certain clients, then the rule of law is undercut. The brief points out that “In recent years, autocratic leaders in Belarus, Turkey, and Iran have attacked lawyers to cement and maintain authoritarian regimes.” The independence of the judiciary depends upon the independence of the lawyers who appear in front of it. Trump’s executive orders are an effort to damage, if not destroy, it.

    Trump’s efforts to take away independence from lawyers are, in truth, an effort to undercut the effectiveness of the judiciary as a check on the executive branch. This is just the beginning. As we discussed Sunday night, where it starts is not where it ends. A law firm may agree to certain conditions today, but that doesn’t mean Trump can’t come in with more demands down the road—demands that if unmet will result in imposing the sanctions he threatened them with in the first place. The amici write, “A firm that can survive only by staying in the President’s good graces has incentives that conflict with its lawyers’ stringent fiduciary duties to remain loyal to the interests of their clients, exercise independent judgment, and be truthful and candid in all dealings with the courts. These ethical issues will persist as long as the executive orders are enforceable: however a firm responds to the administration’s demands, the President can always declare a firm noncompliant and impose further sanctions.”

    3
  22. charontwo says:

    @charontwo:

    These ethical issues will persist as long as the executive orders are enforceable: however a firm responds to the administration’s demands, the President can always declare a firm noncompliant and impose further sanctions.”

    Once you show weakness by giving in to Trump he never stops pressuring you for more concessions.

    3
  23. charontwo says:

    @charontwo:

    I didn’t include it in the blockquote from the Krugman link upthread, but this problem is common to Louis XIV “L’Etat c’est moi” and authoritarian leaders in general, not just Trump – they can always change their mind, agreements with them can not be relied on.

    Indeed, the frustrations of Louis XIV are a case in point. Circa 1700 France seemed to be by far the most powerful nation in Europe. Yet it was fought to a standstill by England, with its newly constitutional monarchy, and the Dutch Republic, which even in combination had many fewer people and probably considerably smaller GDP. Why?

    A large part of the answer is probably that rule of law was a source of strength. That’s the argument of a classic paper by Douglass North and Barry Weingast, “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” North and Douglass argued that the reduced power of the king and the enhanced power of Parliament “allowed the government to commit credibly to upholding property rights” — including the right of people who bought government bonds to be repaid. Over the long term this was good for economic growth, but even in the short term it meant that England could borrow cheaply to finance its war effort, while France couldn’t

    3
  24. Franklin says:

    So I went to the University of Michigan, and typically donate to my old school every year. Thus far, to the chagrin of most students amd professors, it seems their strategy is to kowtow to the Trump administration. I’m wondering if I should redirect my donation this year to Harvard or some other school that has a spine.

    7
  25. Neil Hudelson says:

    Astronomers Detect a Possible Signature of Life on a Distant Planet

    “While inspecting K2-18b, Dr. Madhusudhan and his colleagues discovered it had many of the molecules they had predicted a Hycean planet would possess. In 2023, they reported they had also detected faint hints of another molecule, and one of huge potential importance: dimethyl sulfide, which is made of sulfur, carbon, and hydrogen.

    On Earth, the only known source of dimethyl sulfide is life. In the ocean, for instance, certain forms of algae produce the compound, which wafts into the air and adds to the sea’s distinctive odor. Long before the Webb telescope was launched, astrobiologists had wondered whether dimethyl sulfide might serve as a sign of life on other planets.

    Last year, Dr. Madhusudhan and his colleagues got a second chance to look for dimethyl sulfide. As K2-18b orbited in front of its star, they used a different instrument on the Webb telescope to analyze the starlight passing through the planet’s atmosphere. This time they saw an even stronger signal of dimethyl sulfide, along with a similar molecule called dimethyl disulfide.

    “It is a shock to the system,” Dr. Madhusudhan said. “We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal.”

    No matter how the scientists revisited their readings, the signal stayed strong. They concluded that K2-18b may in fact harbor a tremendous supply of dimethyl sulfide in its atmosphere, thousands of times higher than the level found on Earth. This would suggest that its Hycean seas are brimming with life.”

    5
  26. Kathy says:

    @Franklin:

    I’d go with some other school. Harvard has an endowment, made up of thousands of funds, of around $50 billion. Giving them money, IMO, seems like donating a few buckets of water to the ocean.

    Give Harvard all the moral support you can, by all means. but they hardly need any more money.

    3
  27. Kathy says:

    Oops! Double post. Sorry about that.

  28. Scott says:

    @Franklin: Since UM is a state university, wouldn’t Whitmer and co have some influence responding to Trump demands or pressure? Or is everyone in a abusive relationship?

  29. Kathy says:

    @Neil Hudelson:

    As per Kathy’s First Law of Astonishing Finds (First, temper your expectations. Second, temper your expectations. Third, remember to temper your expectations), I will await further developments. I think the same system, when studied with Hubble or some other instrument, showed signs of water vapor, which later turned out to be ammonia.

    It’s astonishing we can do spectroscopy on exoplanet atmospheres, but we are in the infant days of such technology. To be sure, it’s a very promising lead which should be followed up, and I think the planet is in the habitable zone of its star (ie at a temperature range that allows for liquid water).

    So, wait and see what further observations bring up.

    3
  30. steve says:

    10% of Harvard’s undergrad class is Jewish. 37% are Asian. About 2.5% of US is Jewish and 7% Asian. About 1.5% of Bob Jones students are black. About 14% of US is black. The reality is that Harvard along with 50 or 10 other schools can pick pretty much whatever students they want. They could accept only left handed redheads and still fill the class with qualified students. The difference between a student with an 800 SAT who went to a private school and had extensive test tutoring vs a kid with a 740 who went to a poor rural school is hard to determine but there is a good chance the latter makes a better student/person in the long run.

    So when you are taking in students at a rate 4 times what exists in the population it’s a lot harder to claim racism, especially given the ability to select who they want. Bob Jones OTOH, is not a selective school and accepts blacks at a much lower rate than exists in the population. (Also, a Bob Jones daughter was one of my Sunday school teachers. They really were racist.)

    Steve

    7
  31. Paul L. says:

    I remember when the Free Abrego Garcia, Karmelo Anthony and “Just Latin Passion against Gringos” Jose Ibarra and Victor Antonio Martinez-Hernandez crowd cheered the imprisonment of Gonzalo Lira.

  32. Matt Bernius says:

    I remember when someone would constantly post about the excesses of US Federal Law Enforcement and their violations of the US Constitution, only to turn around and (once again) lick its boots when the person they support is in the White House.

    Choosing to consistently publicly demonstrate one’s absolute lack of consistency on deeply held beliefs is a choice.

    17
  33. Mister Bluster says:

    @Matt Bernius:..thumbs up

    Attempted to reply to your comment but didn’t see a reply prompt.
    Clicked on Thumbs Up but it didn’t register however the Reply key appeared. So this is my reply: Thumbs Up.

  34. Kurtz says:

    @Mister Bluster:

    Hmm. Is this a clever attempt to discourage responding to jackassery?

  35. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Kathy:
    These aliens are clearly blood-thirsty enemies who in time will come after us. Our only hope is to begin preparing now, and consider pre-emptive attacks. Get them before they get us. Let’s see, 120 lightyears, OK, I can’t do math, but if we shoot now we’ll show them – in several millennia – that we cannot be fucked with.

  36. Neil Hudelson says:

    @Kathy:

    I read a great book, whose title escapes me, about Columbus’s first journey to the Americas, using both Columbus’s and some of his crews’ journals as sources. There was a particular part about crew seeing some drift wood and having to temper their excitement–driftwood is more likely to be found closer to land, but its not unheard of to find it in the middle of the ocean. A few days later, The Bahamas.

    Neil’s first law (:-) ): be a skeptic, but be an optimistic one.

    3
  37. Matt Bernius says:

    @Mister Bluster:

    Attempted to reply to your comment but didn’t see a reply prompt.
    Clicked on Thumbs Up but it didn’t register however the Reply key appeared. So this is my reply: Thumbs Up.

    Thanks for the heads up about that. I’m having issues with some of the comment controls too. What browser are you running?

    And is anyone else having issues with things not showing up (like the quote button)?

    @Kurtz:

    Hmm. Is this a clever attempt to discourage responding to jackassery?

    It’s largely my best attempt at engaging without engaging. Ultimately, it’s also about pointing out the underlying problems with an individual’s behavior patterns (which isn’t, for the record, an “Ad Hominem” because it’s directly relevant to the underlying argument.. which itself was a non sequitur because the person we are alleged to not care about was in the custody of another country for violating the laws of said country, so the US Consitutional right to due process doesn’t apply).

    2
  38. Kurtz says:

    @Matt Bernius:

    No, I meant the upvote requirement for the reply button to appear.

    2
  39. Gromitt Gunn says:

    @Franklin: Perhaps take the money you would have donated to U of M and donate that money instead to a local food bank or other social services organization that has lost funding. And do it on behalf of the U of M Alumni Association, so they get the nice card in the mail thanking them for their donation.

    4
  40. Kathy says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    I hear the rapist has already ordered them deported.

    @Neil Hudelson:

    Some new finds get trumpeted too early along with a lot of speculation these days. Mostly in discoveries with possible practical applications, but not necessarily. So, FTL neutrinos! room temperature super conductors! cold fusion! (ok, that’s an older one and atypical for its day).

    What gets me is the speculation. About 15 years ago I heard of an experiment on antibiotic resistant bacteria. If fed antibiotics, they didn’t notice. If fed carbon nanotubes, all was well. If fed antibiotics inside carbon nanotubes, they died faster than FTL neutrinos (ha ha).

    Those were facts. The speculation was that we’d have new, more effective drug delivery methods, or we could vanquish resistant bugs altogether.

    15 years later, we haven’t. Why? No idea. the publications that trumpet the Next GREAT Thing seldom do any follow up.

    Ergo Kathy’s First Law of Astonishing Finds.

    1
  41. Mister Bluster says:

    @Matt Bernius:..browser

    When I replied to your above comment that begins: I remember when someone…
    I was using my iPhone using the Safari browser.
    This post is on my MacBook Air using the Chrome browser and I am finding another digital disparity. None of the comments have a reply key until I drag my cursor over the comment. Then the reply key appears and is functional.
    My next test will be to see how this works on Safari on my MacBook Air.

  42. Kathy says:

    @Mister Bluster:

    I just saw the same thing on Chrome on a Windows PC

  43. Mister Bluster says:

    @Matt Bernius:..MacBoom Air Safari

    Looks and acts the same as the Chrome browser.
    Also it is taking extended time for comments to post. At least a minute.

  44. Jay L Gischer says:

    @Franklin: One suggestion would be to send, instead of your usual donation, a dollar bill to UM with an explanation why, and what your normal contribution might be.

    Don’t know if it would help, but it couldn’t hurt.

    3
  45. Mister Bluster says:

    MacBoom™
    Just in case Apple gets any ideas…

    2
  46. just nutha says:

    @Matt Bernius: The reply button doesn’t show up until I touch the post–usually for an up vote, but also if I press the blank space where the reply button should be. I also only get an edit button and timer (since just today, not earlier) if the comment posts quickly–say, almost immediately.

    ETA: Correction! I got an edit button for this post, only my 3rd button today over several more posts, even though the post took 30 or 40 seconds. (My screen “timed out” three times during posting.)

    I’m on my Android phone so the browser is Google via whatever T-Mobile uses for systems. No visible “reply” button. But I do see reply buttons on SOME, but not all, thread comments.

  47. restless says:

    @Matt Bernius:

    If I click anywhere in the white space at the bottom of the comment, the reply button appears.

    Once I get the reply button, I can click the up button and have it register.

    The comment count on the front page still isn’t updating, though.

    iOS 18 18.3.2

  48. DK says:

    I would say donate to Harvard still, despite their $53+ billion endowment. Courage when financially rewarded is contagious.

    Does Costco need more of our money? No. But it’s still important right now to drive up Costco’s traffic and profits, signaling to the spineless Trump-sellout cowards at Target, Walmart, McDonald’s etc. that they went with the wrong horse.

    We can donate to and shop at more than one place.

    5
  49. Paul L. says:

    Kathy, Choke with hatred on this outrage. I don’t understand how the evil rapist Trump had the self control to not bash all of his Sexual Assault victims heads in with a rock when he was in the throes of “Latin Passion” like Jose Ibarra.

    Because Trump is far more evil than Ibarra and deserves a far worse punishment like execution. Jose Ibarra was found by a court to be not guilt of rape.
    Only Aggravated battery.
    Aggravated assault with intent to rape. False imprisonment.

    1
  50. Kathy says:

    First this seemed funny. The nazi in chief will blow up other people’s rockets? Without building them? Preposterous 😀

    But then there’s this bit: “…build and launch 400 to more than 1,000 satellites circling the globe to sense missiles and track their movement, sources said.

    A separate fleet of 200 attack satellites armed with missiles or lasers would then bring enemy missiles down, three of the sources said.”

    Uh-hu. Wasn’t this the Star Wars Program (aka Strategic Defense Initiative), pursued on and off since St. Ronnie’s first term over 40 years ago? Are there even lasers which can fit a satellite and take down missiles flying at hypersonic speeds?

    Ah, but then we find: “One of the sources familiar with the talks described them as “a departure from the usual acquisition process. There’s an attitude that the national security and defense community has to be sensitive and deferential to Elon Musk because of his role in the government.”

    Oh, it’s a payoff to donor! How much will the rapist take in kickbacks?

    5
  51. Daryl says:

    @JKB:
    Wow…you got the Bob Jones talking point from the cult office really quite quickly.
    Harvard compared to Bob Jones U…what’s next? Comparing the fraudulent Trump U to MIT?
    I believe Harvard’s Jewish population is about 4x the general population.
    Try again, troll.
    (so much for my ignorer-status)

    3
  52. Jax says:

    When my youngest daughter was little and just started saying big words that she would occasionally get wrong, she came up to me and said our new kitten had “angry shoes” and showed me a scratch on her arm. It took me a minute, then I realized “anger issues” is what she meant. The kitten has anger issues. Angry shoes is much funnier, though. 😉

    Somebody around here has some angry shoes.

    5
  53. Daryl says:

    @Kathy:
    I wish some smart journalist would create a database with all of Musk’s income streams from the US Government.
    From what I read many of the agencies he has cut are now contributing to his bottom line.
    Eg: DOGE made cuts at FAA and Musk is now providing services for the FAA.
    But as the Stepford Wife Press Secretary said;

    “If Elon Musk comes across a conflict of interest with the contracts and the funding that DOGE is overseeing, then Elon will excuse himself from those contracts.”

    Of course he will.

    4
  54. Beth says:

    So, I’ve managed to fuck myself pretty badly.

    There is already Equality Act guidance which allows for women-only spaces, such as toilets, changing rooms and hospital wards in certain circumstances.
    But under the new ruling a person who was born male but identifies as a woman does not have a right to use a space or service designated as women only.
    That includes transgender women who have legally changed their gender and hold a GRC.

    Baroness Falkner said trans people should use their “power of advocacy” to ask for facilities including a “third space” for toilets.
    “Single-sex services like changing rooms must be based on biological sex if a male person is allowed to use – it’s no longer a single sex space.”

    There appears to be some debate and confusion about how this actually plays out, but it appears to me that trans people can’t use any bathroom. My partner is making me go to a party tomorrow cause I’m suicidal and shit. I have to ask them what bathroom I can use and not get in trouble. And maybe there’s nothing they can do and I can stay as long as I can hold my bladder. I’ve sent messages to two clubs today asking what I can do or should I stay home.

    Asked if the supreme court ruling was “a victory for common sense”, she said: “Only if you recognise that trans people exist, they have rights and their rights must be respected. Then it becomes a victory for common sense.

    Like what the fuck does this mean? We’re not women, we’re not men, we’re some weird terrible third thing that deserve segregation.

    This is some horrific shit beyond what I had imagined. You’re there we see you, we can’t discriminate against you because you’re dirty little freaks, except you are dirty little freaks, so we get to segregate you. Because there’s men! There’s women! And there’s dirty little freaks.

    Just remember women, this is going to happen to you next.

    5
  55. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Beth:
    I’ve canceled our plans to live in the UK – I’m not going to live where my daughter can’t be treated like a human being. Now pursuing Spanish or Portuguese digital nomad visas because somehow Spain is more progressive than the UK.

    I have an immigration lawyer in the UK if you need a reference, not that I see what she can do for you.

    The temporary solution is going to be anathema: present as a dude when in public. That’s what they want, to shove you back in the closet.

    And fuck that demagogue JK Rowling.

    7
  56. Jen says:

    @Jax: “Angry shoes” would also work for a cat’s claws/paws.

    I love it when kids say these kinds of things that make you think “okay, that actually works better than what I was going to say…”

    4
  57. wr says:

    @Matt Bernius: ” I’m having issues with some of the comment controls too.”

    I’m finding my reply button appears only when I move my cursor near the space where it should be…

  58. wr says:

    @wr: Ugh, should have read the whole thread before replying. Sorry for the repetition!

  59. Kathy says:

    @Beth:

    I saw this piece in The Guardian earlier today, painting a less pessimistic picture:

    Fortunately, while service providers can exclude trans people – and this ruling makes it easier to do so – most do not. We do not have laws requiring that, and the discussions in the hours after the ruling with service providers did not suggest that any I spoke to are going to change their practice or instigate an anti-trans crusade.

    FWIW, the author is a lawyer and a trans woman.

    6
  60. wr says:

    @Paul L.: “Kathy, Choke with hatred on this outrage.”

    You really need to leave now.

    You have long been among the most vile and despicable of our trolls, but threatening violence against one of the regular posters is outrageous and worthy of permanent banning.

    Moderators?

    9
  61. CSK says:

    @wr:

    I could have sworn Dean Emeritus Taylor bounced Paul L. weeks if not months ago, but it seems I was mistaken.

    4
  62. Kathy says:

    @wr:

    Thanks.

    I should reiterate that I do not read the various trolls’ posts. I saw they posted, but did not read a word of it. So I’d no idea what they said until you brought it up.

    Knowing now they threatened me, I still don’t feel any need to read their ravings.

    But I really appreciate the support.

    3
  63. Paul L says:

    Interesting and progressive definition
    of threatening violence.
    Feminist Jill Filipovic

    .
    “an important [Question] meriting coolheaded analysis”… “of the seemingly growing consensus among social justice advocates that bigoted or simply emotionally triggering speech is akin to physical violence and should be regulated as such.”

    How is my wish of Choking on your own hatred a threat or violence?
    Pure commie breadtuber tankie BS Argument.

    1
  64. Flat Earth Luddite says:

    @wr:

    While I understand and to a degree agree with you, I’m against banning on the grounds that it’s easier to identify the enemy in front of you. I’ve been stabbed in the back earlier in my life, but never when I could see the blade coming.

    @Paul L.:

    You really come across as a weak, pathetic excuse for a human being. Hopefully that’s not the real you.

    @Matt Bernius:

    Last night on my T-Mobile phone and first thing this am, I was having the problem of my posts/responses not appearing until after the time to edit expired. Today’s version of Luddite’s first world problem is also the hidden reply button. But Luddite shall overcome! Thanks again for your work on the site!!!!!!!!!

    2
  65. Flat Earth Luddite says:

    @Beth:

    No, you haven’t fucked yourself. The fuckery is entirely the responsibility of small-minded people who are frightened of imaginary frights.

    You keep being the joy you are. The world would be immesurably poorer (& sadder) without you.

    3
  66. Michael Reynolds says:

    It’s time to put Paul on ignore. James and Steven have, I believe, made clear that they would like us to ignore the trolls. No one enjoys bitch-slapping these assholes more than I do, but I am complying on the grounds that this is James’ and Steven’s house, we are guests, they have a right to set ground rules.

    6
  67. Gavin says:

    We need to protect our children from trans people in bathrooms so that they can die from lung cancer and preventable communicable disease!

  68. Kathy says:

    @Daryl:

    I’ve come across estimates of $30-$35 billion.

    Now, some of that came from tax credits for EVs. A lot more for XpaceS contracts. As disgusting as it is, I’m compelled to say XpaceS does offer a reliable launch service. Whether or not the nazi’s company charges real prices is unknown. For all I know, he’s losing money on every launch, and needs Xtarlink to either make money or break even. Now he’s selling Xtarlink services to the government.

    As to conflicts of interest, he can’t have one. it’s not like Texla blows up rockets or XpaceS makes unsafe, shoddy EVs. Is it?

  69. Mister Bluster says:

    @wr:..Ugh
    Earlier Matt Bernius asked “…is anyone else having issues…”.
    I don’t see your comment as repetition.
    Looks like you are responding to Matt’s inquiry.

  70. Kurtz says:

    I missed all of this from a few days ago.

    Jack Dorsey said, “delete all IP law” on X

    Musk replied, “I agree”

    I think there is room for reform. But it’s not as simple as delete it.

    Dorsey, for his part, claims that there are better models for compensating artists. Fine.

    It’s clear why Musk wants this.

    But another deluded clown, Chris Messina, went full stupid:

    Jack has a point.
    Automated IP fines/3-strike rules for AI infringement may become the substitute for putting poor people in jail for cannabis possession. Delete all IP law

    Imprisoning human beings is the same as punishing companies whose ‘intelligent’ (currently) software products poach the work of human artists.

    Call me when these software/hardware products can suffer, then we can figure out at what point they should be considered the same as a biological entity.

    Aside: Messina is described as an “inventor” on wiki. What is his invention? He proposed the concept of the hashtag. I don’t consider that an invention, sorry. Useful? Yes. Groundbreaking stroke of genius? No.

    3
  71. DK says:

    @Paul L.:

    …evil rapist Trump…Because Trump is far more evil…

    When you’re right, you’re right. Credit where due.

    1
  72. Daryl says:
  73. Kathy says:

    @Kurtz:

    So, I write a novel or story or screenplay and send it to a publisher, magazine or studio. they love it, they want to publish it or produce it. So they claim they wrote it and go ahead with it, and pay me nothing because all I have is intellectual property that’s no longer protected.

    Oh, I should self publish? Sure. Then anyone who notices any success in sales can copy it and claim authorship and self publish.

    And would this include trademarks? How about putting the Texla logo on estrogen pills?

    3
  74. just nutha says:

    @Flat Earth Luddite: I had no idea what he was saying. It sounded like his usual semi-coherent gibberish only with the anger dialed up. Thanx for the clarification.

  75. Daryl says:

    @Kathy:
    When you submit something send a copy to yourself by certified mail. Establish proof.

    1
  76. just nutha says:

    @Michael Reynolds: I love how you can claim the high moral ground of declaring you compliance with the ignore pseudo-suggestion without actually complying or ignoring. You’d fit in with a lot of evangelicals and fundies I’ve known over the years.

    1
  77. Franklin says:

    @Daryl: Unless I’m missing something, the proof is worthless if there are no IP laws. That’s Kathy’s point, right?

    5
  78. Franklin says:

    Said another way, since I can’t edit my comment today: what good is proving it is your intellectual property if there are no laws about protecting intellectual property?

    4
  79. DrDaveT says:

    @Paul L.:

    Kathy, Choke with hatred on this outrage.

    Friend, seek help. It’s not too late. You can do this.

    1
  80. Gustopher says:

    Kilmar Ábrego García is not dead, and got to meet with Senator Van Hollen.

    This may be the first indication that the Trump “deport people to a hellhole to rot and die” plan is beginning to falter under public scrutiny. I like to be hopeful.

    4
  81. wr says:

    @Kathy: “But I really appreciate the support.”

    Always!

    1
  82. Michael Reynolds says:

    @just nutha:
    WTF are you talking about?

    1