Thursday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. Bill Jempty says:
  2. Kathy says:

    The main lesson of Windows 8* is: Don’t radically change the desktop interface to what seems trendy.

    Back then it was touchscreens, now it’s voice.

    So many comments come to mind:

    I sense a disturbance in the Force.
    Be afraid. Be very afraid.
    I have a bad feeling about this.
    How could it possibly get any worse?
    Warp core breach imminent.
    New Coke.
    Ford Edsel.
    Texla Xybertruck.
    Colgate lasagna

    *I called it WINDOS: Windows 8 Is Not a Desktop Operating System.
    Don’t make me recycle it for Windows 12.

    3
  3. Scott says:

    4 out of 5 US troops surveyed understand the duty to disobey illegal orders

    With his Aug. 11, 2025, announcement that he was sending the National Guard – along with federal law enforcement – into Washington, D.C. to fight crime, President Donald Trump edged U.S. troops closer to the kind of military-civilian confrontations that can cross ethical and legal lines.

    When a sitting commander in chief authorizes acts like these, which many assert are clear violations of the law, men and women in uniform face an ethical dilemma: How should they respond to an order they believe is illegal?

    Troops who are ordered to do something illegal are put in a bind – so much so that some argue that troops themselves are harmed when given such orders. They are not trained in legal nuances, and they are conditioned to obey. Yet if they obey “manifestly unlawful” orders, they can be prosecuted. Some analysts fear that U.S. troops are ill-equipped to recognize this threshold.

    U.S. service members take an oath to uphold the Constitution. In addition, under Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the U.S. Manual for Courts-Martial, service members must obey lawful orders and disobey unlawful orders. Unlawful orders are those that clearly violate the U.S. Constitution, international human rights standards or the Geneva Conventions.

    Service members who follow an illegal order can be held liable and court-martialed or subject to prosecution by international tribunals. Following orders from a superior is no defense.

    Our poll, fielded between June 13 and June 30, 2025, shows that service members understand these rules. Of the 818 active-duty troops we surveyed, just 9% stated that they would “obey any order.” Only 9% “didn’t know,” and only 2% had “no comment.”

    There is a lot more in the article. And I have my doubts. The military relies on its lawyers to correctly interpret law. And to convey that law clearly and unequivocally. It also relies on lawyers being honest. I have my doubt about that in the age of Trump.

    5
  4. Jax says:

    Welp, it’s official. My health insurer sent out a notice yesterday that they are pulling out of the Wyoming health insurance market. That leaves Blue Cross Blue Shield, and God only knows how high their premiums will be.

    3
  5. Scott says:

    @Scott: Here’s an example of the complexity.

    National Guard rehearsed show of force against immigration raid protesters, general testifies

    Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who commanded Guard troops in Los Angeles, was testifying at a trial to determine whether the Trump administration violated the Posse Comitatus Act when it deployed the soldiers and U.S. Marines to Southern California this summer. The 1878 law generally prohibits a president from using the military to police domestic affairs.

    On one side:

    California Deputy Attorney General Meghan Strong told the court the Trump administration the troops went beyond providing protection to federal agents and federal buildings. The troops, she said, set up roadblocks and perimeters that restricted civilian movement, blocked access to public streets, detained civilians and engaged in a militaristic display of force in a public park.

    The Trump administration, she said, broke the law and used the army to illegally enforce civilian law, and operate as a single force with federal immigration officers who often don military garb.

    “Defendants have used that army to pervade the activities of civilian law enforcement and strike fear into the hearts of Californians,” Strong said. “In doing so, defendants have disregarded America’s deep-rooted policy against military execution of the laws and the Posse Comitatus Act prohibitions.”

    On the other hand:

    Eric Hamilton, a deputy assistant attorney general, said in his closing statement Tuesday that the troops did not break the Posse Comitatus Act because they were not enforcing federal law and were deployed “for a purely protective function.”

    “The president federalized guardsmen and also deployed the Marines after multiple days of violent attacks on federal law enforcement officers and federal property. The deployment was a response to that violence and a recognition that federal law-enforcement officers and federal buildings needed additional protection,” Hamilton said.

    What are the troops supposed to do? Debate it? This system all depends on the honesty of leaders. Honesty is in short supply in this country of late.

    8
  6. Scott says:

    As the economy turns:

    Inflation shock: Core producer prices hit 3-year high in July in ‘head-scratching’ inflation surge

    Producer prices in July rose faster than forecast across the board, giving investors and the Federal Reserve an inflation surprise just over a week out from Fed Chair Jay Powell’s crucial Jackson Hole speech.

    The Producer Price Index (PPI) for July showed inflation for businesses rose 0.9% over the prior month in July, well ahead of the 0.2% increase that was forecast data from the BLS showed Thursday. On an annual basis, prices rose 3.3%, the most since February

    Two quick thoughts:

    Trump will denounce the numbers as fake or inaccurate.

    Producer prices find their way down into consumer prices. Or alternatively, corporate profits will plummet.

    3
  7. Scott says:

    Neo-confederates are on the move in Texas.

    Christian nationalist school in Kendall County may be the site of the Lone Star State’s newest city

    A Christian nationalist school in Kendall County may become the heart of a new Texas city after an election this November.

    Patriot Academy is located about 11 miles north of Comfort and is run by former State Rep. Rick Green.

    Kendall County commissioners have agreed to put the measure to incorporate to a vote before some Kendall County residents in the upcoming November election.

    If approved, the 177-acre property would become “Constitution City.” The campus has around 200 residents. Only people living in the immediate area of the school would be able to vote on whether or not to incorporate.

    The school combines gun training with constitutional studies. The academy’s website describes its mission as “restoring America’s Biblical and Constitutional Foundations of Freedom.”

    Midland school board votes to restore school name honoring Confederate general

    The Midland Independent School District’s board of trustees voted Tuesday night to rename a school after Robert E. Lee, reversing a former board’s efforts to distance itself from the Confederate general five years ago.

    In a divided 4-3 vote, the trustees voted to return one of its schools, formerly Legacy High, back to Midland Lee High.

    Railing against what he described as toxic political correctness, Matt Friez, a board member who voted to reinstate Lee’s name, said institutions donning Confederate names have “outgrown” their controversies. In a lengthy statement, Friez said that replacing Confederate-era monikers and removing statues was an attack on the “country’s heritage.”

    3
  8. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Scott:
    Honesty and courage, doubly scarce.

    1
  9. Eusebio says:

    @Scott:

    The school combines gun training with constitutional studies.

    What a curriculum. Maybe they’ll actually read the 2nd Amendment.

    1
  10. CSK says:

    @Eusebio:

    When do they cram in the Bible studies?

  11. Jay L. Gischer says:

    @Michael Reynolds: Today’s xkcd made me think of you…

  12. Slugger says:

    About six weeks ago I saw my primary care doctor for my physical. She ordered some lab tests, and I got a bill for ten dollars for my copay after my insurance. She then wanted some more testing. I got a bill for a huge amount because my medicare and secondary insurance was not available this second time. I have been on the phone and was told that I would get an updated bill in 30-45 days. I was very interested that LabCorp was charging me $306.60 for a vitamin D, 25 hydroxy level. This is a huge amount. I googled lab costs, and Google thinks that the price is $69. The LabCorp’s price on Google is “between $47 and $1389.” Is this crazy? The price is greater than a year’s worth of vitamin D tablets. Why didn’t I get informed about the cost prior to the service? Every store has prices displayed. When I engage services like car repair or house repair, I get a price before I engage them. Medical services are the exception, no price transparency, and I didn’t engage LabCorp myself; my doctor chose them. If we are going to pretend to have a market economy medical system, we should insist on the pricing mechanism of the free market that means the customer knows the price before engaging the service.

    3
  13. Daryl says:

    @Scott:
    Also, the stated excuse for tariffs – out of balance trade deficits – are getting worse, not better.

    2
  14. Scott says:

    @Slugger: I had a D-3 lab test done in July. Quest charged Medicare $276.99. Medicare paid $29.60. If you order the test yourself, Quest charges $70.00.

    1
  15. Michael Cain says:

    @Jax: Been an ongoing problem in rural Colorado counties. Short of a public option, I don’t know of any way to deal with insurers simply don’t want to take on the hassles of dealing with rural providers.

    1
  16. dazedandconfused says:

    @Scott:

    If that push comes to shove, IMO the deciding factor for enlisted will be whether or not they want to do it.

  17. CSK says:

    According to The Guardian, Trump called Jens Stoltenberg today to badger him about getting the Nobel Peace Prize

  18. Kathy says:

    Remember when Spirit couldn’t get acquired by JetBlue?

    They should have taken the first offer Frontier made, because things look bleak for Spirit’s continued existence.

    I find it hard to feel any sympathy for the airline. For the employees, yes. But overall I’ve this feeling ultra-low cost outfits have dragged down the service and quality of air travel for years. On the other hand, they’ve made air travel cheaper, thus affording more people the opportunity to travel.

    Maybe there’s a shakeup coming. Other low and ultra-low cost airlines in the US are having issues. That’s why Frontier and JetBlue both attempted to merge with Spirit. On the other hand, in Europe they’re doing better.

    We’ll see.