Tuesday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a retired Professor of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter

Comments

  1. Jen says:

    And now there’s this:

    Top Trump Aide Accused of Asking for Money to ‘Promote’ Potential Appointees

    President-elect Donald J. Trump ordered the investigation by his legal team into Boris Epshteyn, a powerful figure in the transition. Mr. Epshteyn denies the allegations.

    President-elect Donald J. Trump’s legal team found evidence that a top adviser asked for retainer fees from potential appointees in order to promote them for jobs in the new administration, five people briefed on the matter said on Monday.

    Mr. Trump directed his team to carry out the review of the adviser, Boris Epshteyn, who coordinated the legal defenses in Mr. Trump’s criminal cases and is a powerful figure in the transition. Several people whom Mr. Trump trusts had alerted him that Mr. Epshteyn was seeking money from people looking for appointments, three of the people briefed on the matter said.

    This is what happens when you start making headlines of your own and picking fights with Elon Musk, I guess.

    6
  2. Scott says:

    @Jen: Shocker! Corruption in a Trump administration? How many people had to resign for corruption in the first Trump administration? It was the worst since Warren G. Harding.

    3
  3. Kingdaddy says:
  4. Kathy says:

    At long last I’m done.

    Well, I may add a small bit or two, and I’m sure any feedback I may get will engender more changes. In particular I think I went too minimalist in the last scene. I find it satisfying, but can’t help but think it should contain more. After all, it’s where the story’s title makes sense.

    I’d appreciate any volunteers willing to subject themselves to my attempts at prose. It will be a password protected PDF that does not allow changes. I just need to figure out how to distribute the link for downloading it from my shared folder on Onedrive, and how to distribute the password…

    The story’s title is “Ours.” Short premise: a transgender woman in the year 2159 finds herself in a parallel universe only slightly different from her own. It’s about 15,000 words long.

    More as I figure things out. I may rant about titles in the meantime….

    2
  5. Beth says:

    @Kathy:

    I’d be happy to take a look.

    1
  6. Franklin says:

    @Kathy: I may not be a literary critic, but would love to see what you’ve put together!

    1
  7. charontwo says:

    Martin Longman re Bluesky:

    https://progresspond.com/2024/11/25/can-bluesky-help-lead-a-left-wing-comeback/

    This is one of the links in the piece, a list of Bluesky users:

    https://bsky.app/starter-pack/booman23.bsky.social/3lbat5qqiha2v

    I’m not paranoid, but I did notice that just as I was getting a surge of Bluesky followers coming over from Twitter, my database here at Progress Pond got badly corrupted leading to several days of downtime. It didn’t help that my son had a two-day soccer tournament in Lancaster County this weekend that made it difficult for me to address the problem. In the end, we had to use a backup of the database, which probably erased some people’s recent comments. I apologize for that, but nothing else worked to fix the problem. I still don’t know what caused the crash, so it’s possible it will recur.

    In the meantime, I encourage you to try Bluesky for your social media needs. I have a couple of Starter Packs you can use. One includes people who were prominent parts of the progressive blogosphere and the other is made up of folks who were part of the early days of the Philadelphia chapter of Drinking Liberally. Unsurprisingly, if you know your history, there is some overlap.

    The main advantage of Blue Sky over X/Twitter is that it doesn’t have an algorithm that prevents you from actually seeing posts from people you follow. That’s a big problem on Twitter since Elon Musk took over. It works both ways, too. Only a tiny percentage of my followers on Twitter will ever see my tweets. Meanwhile, right-wing content producers are boosted by the algorithm. At Blue Sky I get much more engagement even with a fraction of the followers, and it’s not filled with hate and propaganda, so that’s nice, too.

    snip

    Here is a gift link to Julia Angwin’s New York Times article on how “the red tide that swept across the nation in our recent election marked many things. One of them was a right-wing triumph over social media.” Here’s a taste:

    Under heavy pressure from the right, and with the help of X owner Elon Musk, the leading tech platforms opened the floodgates for propaganda to spread unchecked. The result was a flood of lies and distortions flowing through our social media feeds. That led to possibly the most misinformed electorate we’ve ever seen.

    Many voters headed to the polls convinced that border crossings are higher than ever before (they are not), violent crime rates are rising (untrue) and inflation is soaring (ditto). We will never know how much this garbage may have swayed voters, but we do know it influenced one side significantly: conservatives.

    As Nate Cohn details in the New York Times, this all helped move most demographics against the Democrats and the left, particularly among the working class of all races.

    This, BTW, is me on Bluesky. I very seldom post, but I do frequently repost others.

    https://bsky.app/profile/charontwo.bsky.social

    2
  8. Kathy says:

    @Beth:

    Thank you! I was hoping you would.

    @Franklin:

    Thanks!

    As soon as I hear from James I’ll post the link and password here. Otherwise it’ll have to be through Bluesky or Fakebook.

    Meantime I need to decide what to work on next. One is an interstellar political thriller in a setting I made up that has only humans but not Earth humans (it’s a long complex backstory). The other is another exploration story about finding the perfectly preserved remnants of an extinct alien civilization.

    Both feature a transgender woman as protagonist.

    2
  9. Bill Jempty says:

    From the ‘It takes all sorts of people to make up the world and if you live long enough you will meet every single one of them’ department

    I was just at the eye doctor. The waiting room I was in was crowded and cramped. It is not hard to hear what somebody is saying on their cell phone.

    The man across from me, maybe around my age, was talking religion on the phone. What the gospel says, sometimes the Jews etc. Nothing noteworthy till…

    He said anyone who asks you to pray for them is a Satan worshiper.

    I told my devout Roman Catholic Filipina wife who works at a church office this. Her reply-

    OMG

    1
  10. gVOR10 says:

    @charontwo: A small thing, I have an X account that I normally look at only occasionally when there’s a notification I have something from someone I follow. I never followed Musk, but I kept seeing crap from him, so I unfollowed him. Then I kept getting the same crap from “Not Elon Musk” with a picture of Musk. So I had to unfollow him again. I expect Musk thought Not Musk was really clever. I’ll look for you on Bluesky.

    3
  11. Scott says:

    To me, worse than all the other bilge coming out of Trump’s mouth, this is the most dangerous.

    I don’t know whether this will rise to the level of a constitutional crisis but Trump and his Schutzstaffel plan to challenge the constitutionality of the Impoundment Act:

    How Trump Plans to Seize the Power of the Purse From Congress

    Donald Trump is entering his second term with vows to cut a vast array of government services and a radical plan to do so. Rather than relying on his party’s control of Congress to trim the budget, Trump and his advisers intend to test an obscure legal theory holding that presidents have sweeping power to withhold funding from programs they dislike.

    “We can simply choke off the money,” Trump said in a 2023 campaign video. “For 200 years under our system of government, it was undisputed that the president had the constitutional power to stop unnecessary spending.”

    His plan, known as “impoundment,” threatens to provoke a major clash over the limits of the president’s control over the budget. The Constitution gives Congress the sole authority to appropriate the federal budget, while the role of the executive branch is to dole out the money effectively. But Trump and his advisers are asserting that a president can unilaterally ignore Congress’ spending decisions and “impound” funds if he opposes them or deems them wasteful.

    How Trump wants to cut spending.

    President-elect Donald Trump wants to use a little-known tool called presidential impoundment to deliver on his promise of big cuts in government spending. Impoundment is when the president holds back money that Congress has approved for a specific purpose. On Friday, he announced his pick for the person to wield that power: Russ Vought, a key architect of Project 2025. He has been tapped to lead the White House Office of Management and Budget.

    Trump and his allies argue that a president has — or should have — the right not to spend those funds. This has raised alarms across D.C. that Trump may try to overstep his power, NPR’s Franco Ordoñez says. A 1974 law called the Impoundment Control Act could stand in the way of his plans as it requires a president to spend money as Congress directs. During his first term in office, Congress objected when Trump impounded foreign aid for Ukraine. Things could be different this time around with a Republican-controlled Congress.

    Vought is a far right radical of the worst kind, a Christian Nationalist

    3
  12. Skookum says:

    Hem your blessings with gratitude lest they unravel.” Unknown author.

    I’ll be taking a break from the world over Thanksgiving. Yesterday the election and its aftermath–and perhaps events since 2016–just became too overwhelming. I’m okay. Just need to relax, regroup, and refocus on small joys and how best to help future generations of all of Life’s children.

    One of my small joys is creating a garden for backyard wildlife. It’s been humbling to see the diversity of lifeforms that come to visit when an ecological web takes hold. Also I’m slowly gathering information for a family history. With the exception of one Swiss branch, all of my ancestors were European colonists from the 1600s, and my research gives me much to ponder upon.

    Wishing everyone a Happy Thanksgiving from my small place mark in the story of the United States of America.

    8
  13. CSK says:

    Gee, and I was gonna give everyone I know a Lauren Boebert pep talk for Christmas. 🙁

    http://www.rawstory.com/lauren-boebert-cameo-2670011211/

  14. Kathy says:

    @Beth:
    @Franklin:

    Ok, here it is: link to the story

    Once you go there, you need a password to open the file, This is it: G7#kL9!vQ2@wX5

    Many thanks to all for your feedback and for taking the time.

    1
  15. Gustopher says:

    @CSK:

    Gee, and I was gonna give everyone I know a Lauren Boebert pep talk for Christmas.

    You’re giving everyone you know a Lauren Boebert Pep Talk?

    I’ve been waiting for someone else to make a crude joke, since they might hit the right tone, but it’s a slow day and no one has stepped up, so all I have to say is: Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice!

    Also, I just flew in from wherever, and boy are my arms tired.

    2
  16. charontwo says:

    Put Natalie Harp into google, some current stories at The Cut, The New Republic, Yahoo and NYT.

    And this at Digby:

    https://digbysblog.net/2024/11/26/the-trump-gossip-train-has-left-the-station/

    The NYT link in the Digby piece to the Natale Harp story looks like a gift link.

    2
  17. Kathy says:

    @gVOR10:

    First thing I did when Xlon bought Xitter was block him.

    I never used the late Twitter much. After the sale, I would sometimes follow embedded Xitts, and look at notifications if I had any.

    On other things, I got a large bag or russet potatoes last week. I roasted some for this week’s lunch, but still have plenty left. I had thought to make twice air fried potatoes again (had good results last time), but I’m thinking of something else.

    I’ve seen a few short videos on the subjects “why it tastes better at a restaurant.” Most boil down to “use more salt/butter, cheese, fat, sugar.” Now and then, though, there’s something on technique. I caught one advising to roast the potatoes rather than boiling them (it’s supposed to preserve more of the potato flavor, which does make sense). Then instead of mashing them or using a potato ricer, to press them through a fine mesh sieve (allegedly a creamier, finer texture).

    The last looked like a lot of work, but I’ve plenty of mesh sieves and a potato ricer. So I’m willing to give that a try.

    The video showed the skins coming off easily. I’m not so sure about that. In any case I plan to scoop out most of the potato, and leave some clinging to the skins. Then I can make potato skin snacks as well.

    Now I just need to figure out an entree.

    1
  18. Jen says:

    @charontwo: Ah. That. Is. Weird.

    I can’t decide if she’s a cultie or auditioning to be Wife #4, but that is so strange.

  19. Kathy says:

    @charontwo:
    @Jen:

    Sounds like a stalker.

  20. de stijl says:

    Do Trump Republicans actually think tariffs are magical make money buttons with zero blowback? Surely, they can’t be that foolish.

    I’m pretty sure the US exports stuff. Do they honestly believe that big tariffs are a solution? And won’t increase prices / goose inflation?

    It’s so dumb I honestly believe they believe that.

    1
  21. Kathy says:

    @de stijl:

    Kathy’s first law: no matter how stupid you think the felon is, you’re probably overestimating him.

    2
  22. de stijl says:

    @Gustopher:

    Her arm got tired.

  23. de stijl says:

    @Kathy:

    Okay, personal bias, but roasted potatoes are 1000% better than boiled. I use boiled as filler carbs in curries. That’s about it.

    Instead of using roasted potatoes as a carb filler, use it as a side dish. Roasted potatoes, well seasoned, you can’t go wrong.

  24. Kathy says:

    @de stijl:

    For simplicity, I parboil my potatoes before roasting them when I make roasted potatoes. They’re ok, but pure roasting does taste better (it just takes too long). So I’m excited to try roasted mashed potatoes.

  25. charontwo says:

    @Jen:

    So this is who types his Truth Social posts as he dictates them, which explains the spelling getting cleaned up etc.

    1
  26. Kathy says:

    On the upside, Rudy’s been squirming a lot in the courtroom.

    The linked piece notes “Giuliani’s fall has been spectacular.”

    I thought, get a photo of Rudy right after the 9/11 attacks and label it “this is your brain.” Then next to it get any recent image (the one in the piece, the hair dye river, the Borat movie scene), and label it “this is your brain on trump.”

    I think I mentioned before if you see Rudy when he was US Attorney, or Mayor of NYC, or even when he was going around on consulting gigs, and you compare him with his present self, you’d be forgiving for thin king present day Rudy is like past Rudy’s drunk uncle.

    As a rule I don’t enjoy seeing people suffer, even when I hate them. But Rudy definitely deserves it.

    1
  27. Jay L Gischer says:

    @Scott: I read this bit about impoundment and thought, “Hmm, didn’t Nixon get in a fight with Congress about this?” I was right.

    Fun quote:

    The Line Item Veto Act of 1996 gave the president the power of line-item veto, which President Bill Clinton applied to the federal budget 82 times[8][9] before the law was struck down in 1998 by the Supreme Court on the grounds of it being in violation of the Presentment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

    This so much strikes me as a sort of “Hell yes, we want a line-item veto” (I remember Republicans constantly beating this drum) except not when a Democratic President uses it very deftly and deliberately. Then we don’t want it at all, and we will sue to stop it.

    That’s human beings for ya.

    1
  28. Franklin says:

    @Kathy: Got it. Way too late to read tonight, so feedback might not come back for a couple days. Thank you for sharing!

    1
  29. Kathy says:

    @Franklin:

    Thank you for taking the time to read it. I hope you like it.