Tuesday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a retired Professor of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter

Comments

  1. Jim Brown 32 says:

    No one:
    JB32 reading a 19th century slang dictionary at 3am:

    ‘Strumpet: a whore, used throughout the century.’

    They knew all along—

    ReplyReply
    4
  2. Scott says:

    Jan. 6 defendant accused of soliciting minor released despite Harris County request for hold

    Days before Andrew Taake was pardoned for his role in the Jan. 6 riot the U.S. Capitol, the Harris County Sheriff’s Office requested he be held so he could be transferred back to Texas over a 2016 felony charge of online solicitation of a minor. The transfer never happened.

    Taake was released from federal prison on Jan. 20, after being the beneficiary of the mass pardon granted to Jan. 6 defendants by the newly inaugurated President Trump. He is now considered a fugitive, and is still wanted by Harris County authorities. He was not in custody as of Monday afternoon.

    ReplyReply
  3. Scott says:

    Someday the real world will return to our consciousness.

    Sweden seizes vessel suspected of ‘sabotage’ after undersea data cable rupture in Baltic Sea

    Swedish prosecutors announced Sunday night that they have opened a preliminary investigation into suspected aggravated “sabotage” and ordered the detention of a vessel in the Baltic Sea suspected of damaging an underwater fiber optic cable connecting Latvia and the Swedish island of Gotland earlier that day.

    The Swedish Coast Guard confirmed to the newspaper Expressen that they were on site near the vessel which the paper identified as the Malta-flagged Vezhen, at anchor near the port of Karlskrona.

    According to data from Vesselfinder, the vessel departed from the Russian port of Ust-Luga several days earlier and was navigating between Gotland and Latvia at the time the damage was suspected of having occurred.

    ReplyReply
    4
  4. Scott says:

    It seems as though the Chinese are on the edge of kicking our butt technologically.

    I view this as the result of several decades of favoring financial engineering over real engineering.

    ReplyReply
    14
  5. MarkedMan says:

    Trump:

    “The United States Military just entered the Great State of California and, under Emergency Powers, TURNED ON THE WATER flowing abundantly from the Pacific Northwest, and beyond,” he wrote. “The days of putting a Fake Environmental argument, over the PEOPLE, are OVER. Enjoy the water, California!!!”

    Just to state the obvious, this has no connection with the actual world. Trump has disconnected completely from reality

    ReplyReply
    6
  6. Thomm says:

    @MarkedMan: it doesn’t matter. The media organs will quote these ramblings with nary any pushback (if any at all); magas will drop the thesis of the statement to their low information friends and relatives repeatedly until it becomes, in short order, conventional wisdom.

    ReplyReply
    4
  7. MarkedMan says:

    @Thomm: The US came in on a Mad King, and it looks like we may be going out with one

    ReplyReply
    11
  8. charontwo says:

    @MarkedMan:

    Trump has disconnected completely from reality

    Some clown in the Washington Post opinion section wrote this yesterday:

    Opinion

    Shadi Hamid

    Trump has become normal. That could be a good thing — really.

    Democrats made a big mistake treating Trump as an aberration instead of just a politician.

    January 27, 2025 at 6:15 a.

    ReplyReply
  9. Jax says:

    Carryover from yesterday

    @DrDaveT: This is the recipe I use for piroshki’s. The bread itself is pretty amazing, I’ve made cinnamon rolls with it, as well.

    https://natashaskitchen.com/baked-piroshki-recipe-2-filling-options-sweet-or-savory/

    ReplyReply
  10. Sleeping Dog says:

    @charontwo:

    You need to consider the source, Bezo’s WaPo, where the journalists have left the building.

    ReplyReply
    2
  11. steve says:

    Jax- Thanks! I like doing filled brads and pastries. I made about 100 rugelach for our church business meeting on Sunday and they all disappeared quickly, except for one. No one ever wants to eat the last one. How long do these keep? These soft, enriched breads seem, to me, really should be eaten the first day or two.

    Steve

    ReplyReply
  12. Thomm says:

    @steve: I know the ones my Polish grandmother made took to freezing well, either baked or unbaked.

    ReplyReply
  13. charontwo says:

    Dan Nexon on Bluesky

    Dan Nexon

    ‪@dhnexon.bsky.social‬

    Trump’s old. It seems pretty clear by now that he can’t, or won’t. transfer his charisma to a successor. Without him the GOP is looking at an epic factional struggle.

    So this is their window, and they know it.

    ReplyReply
    3
  14. Kathy says:

    I tried the hyped Chinese generative AI tool, briefly. I couldn’t think of anything specific to test it with, so I just asked random questions. It answered in pretty much the same way and with the same kind of info I’ve come to expect from Copilot or Gemini or others, it took about the same time to do so.

    this doesn’t let you know whether it uses less computing power and energy than the rest. I assume it does, otherwise various techbros would be $1 collective trillion richer than they are today.

    ReplyReply
    1
  15. Rob1 says:

    Spectacle became our form of public discourse. Taking a cue from the American advertising industry — selling the sizzle not the steak.

    The loudest megaphone: how Trump mastered our new attention age

    This transformation has been a long time in the making. Before the digital age there was the TV age. In Amusing Ourselves to Death, published in 1985, the author Neil Postman argued that for its first 150 years the US was a culture of readers and writers, and that the print medium – pamphlets, broadsheets, newspapers, and written speeches and sermons – structured not only public discourse but the institutions of democracy itself. TV destroyed all that, Postman argued, replacing our written culture with a culture of images that was literally meaningless. “Americans no longer talk to each other, they entertain each other,” he wrote. “They do not exchange ideas; they exchange images. They do not argue with propositions; they argue with good looks, celebrities and commercials.”

    [..]

    Imagine, Saunders says, being at a cocktail party, with the normal give-and-take of conversation between generally genial, informed people. And then “a guy walks in with a megaphone. He’s not the smartest person at the party, or the most experienced, or the most articulate. But he’s got that megaphone.” The man begins to offer his opinions and soon creates his own conversational gravity: everyone is reacting to whatever he’s saying. This, Saunders contends, quickly ruins the party. And if you have a particularly empty-minded Megaphone Guy, you get a discourse that’s not just stupid but that makes everyone in the room stupider as well

    https://www.theguardian.com/news/2025/jan/28/the-loudest-megaphone-how-trump-mastered-our-new-attention-age

    ReplyReply
    4
  16. Michael Reynolds says:

    From an email from Bernie Sanders:

    For years and years in the corporate media, you’d only heard the word ‘oligarch’ preceded by the word ‘Russian.’ But oligarchs aren’t uniquely a Russian phenomenon or a foreign concept.

    No. The United States has its own oligarchy.

    When I first started talking about this, many people didn’t understand what I meant. Well, that’s changed.

    When the 3 wealthiest men in America sit behind Trump at his inauguration, everyone understands that the billionaire class now controls our government. They also understand that one of the major functions of government policy will be to make these incredibly rich people even richer and more powerful.

    Bernie’s right, and he’s right at the right time.

    ReplyReply
    13
  17. Eusebio says:

    @MarkedMan: Even Fox News is treating his claim with skepticism. Everything about his claim is absurd, and the appropriate reaction is relentless ridicule.

    ReplyReply
    3
  18. just nutha says:

    @Scott: This has been out for two days, yet no troll has come around chastising us for not caring “when SF, LA, or Portland” does the same thing through illegal sanctuary programs.

    Falling down on the job, trolls. Be Best!

    ReplyReply
    1
  19. Kathy says:

    @Jax:

    Thanks.

    The controversy over names reminds me of the Jinnan Tonyx bit in Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy:

    It is a curious fact, and one to which no-one knows quite how much importance to attach, that something like 85 percent of all known worlds in the Galaxy, be they primitive or highly advanced, have invented a drink called jynnan tonyx, or gee-N’N-T’N-ix, or jinond-o-nicks, or any one of a thousand variations on this phonetic theme.
    The drinks themselves are not the same, and vary between the Sivolvian ‘chinanto/mnigs’ which is ordinary water served just above room temperature, and the Gagrakackan ‘tzjin-anthony-ks’ which kills cows at a hundred paces; and in fact the only one common factor between all of them, beyond the fact that their names sound the same, is that they were all invented and named before the worlds concerned made contact with any other worlds.

    ReplyReply
  20. Jax says:

    @steve: I usually make a double batch of them, and freeze half. They hold up well for freezing. Super easy for a quick lunch! The ones I don’t freeze are usually eaten within a couple days, my kid loves them.

    I changed her recipe for the filling a bit, I like Italian sausage instead of hamburger. You can cut your own cabbage, or use that bagged coleslaw mix. Onions, garlic, peppers, and I put swiss cheese in it. Cook it down til it’s really dry, if there’s too much liquid it gets messy when you’re forming them and falls out the ends in the oven. Sometimes I end up having to strain the last half of the filling to get it dry enough.

    ReplyReply
    2
  21. just nutha says:

    @charontwo: A politician can’t be an aberration, too? News to me!

    ReplyReply
  22. SKI! says:

    @Kathy:

    this doesn’t let you know whether it uses less computing power and energy than the rest. I assume it does, otherwise various techbros would be $1 collective trillion richer than they are today.

    China is claiming that it does use less by a very large magnitude. People I know in the AI space are very skeptical and believe that the amount of chips being claimed is minimized to avoid signaling that sanctions were broken.

    It also, I’m told, isn’t revolutionary but very much derivative of the existing models out there.

    ReplyReply
    1
  23. just nutha says:

    @Jax: WA! The type you make are really small, but if you think the bread is overwhelming, you could try dividing the dough six ways instead of 5 (or use a larger scoop of filling and risk leakage*).

    *I always save the “defective” ones for myself. 😉

    ReplyReply
  24. Kathy says:

    @SKI!:

    It’s not as though the market can’t or hasn’t overreacted to spurious claims before.

    Still, how much savings in cost constitute substantial savings? If there are billions of AI queries each day, and one model uses up 2% less power, that’s pretty substantial. If it’s 25%, that’s huge.

    ReplyReply
    2
  25. Tony W says:

    In light of his recent death at the hands of law enforcement, I propose Congress immediately pass the “Matthew Huttle Act” which does the following:

    1) Specifically states that all participants in the January 6th insurrection, and specifically Donald Trump, were traitors to the United States and are thus ineligible to be elected office.

    2) Impeaches Trump.

    ReplyReply
    3
  26. al Ameda says:

    @MarkedMan:

    Trump:
    “The United States Military just entered the Great State of California and, under Emergency Powers, TURNED ON THE WATER flowing abundantly from the Pacific Northwest, and beyond,” he wrote. “The days of putting a Fake Environmental argument, over the PEOPLE, are OVER. Enjoy the water, California!!!”

    What I need to know is:
    Do we still need to rake our forests, and fire our lesbian firefighters?
    Keeping in mind, of course, that 60% of forest lands in CA are federally-owned

    ReplyReply
    6
  27. MarkedMan says:

    @Eusebio:

    s treating his claim with skepticism. Everything about his claim is absurd

    I guess my point isn’t that it’s absurd, or rather that’s not the significant thing. We can no longer imagine he’s just trolling or juicing his base. He’s completely lost it, either from senility, mental illness, decades of prescription drug abuse, or some other issue we don’t know about yet.

    ReplyReply
    2
  28. Kathy says:

    What’s in a name? Sometimes, misunderstanding, or even outright misinformation.

    Take “tariff.” This is an odd word not in common, everyday use. I assume most here know what it means, but a lot of people elsewhere don’t, not really. So they swallow the fetid bs lie that foreign governments pay them.

    Let’s see what the lie overlooks:

    1) A country’s government has control only over the country it governs. A law passed in, say, the UK forbidding imports from France, does not compel the French government to stop exports to the UK. It is enforced in the UK by retaining shipments from France, or that contain French goods (or sending them back).

    So a tariff on Chinese goods won’t compel the Chinese government to pay the tariff, or even to force the exporting companies to do so. The tariff will be collected from the importer in America upon entry to the country.

    2) Money is money. Even if the Chinese government paid the tariff, it would raise taxes on exporters to recoup their losses. exporters would raise their prices to recoup their losses. Importers would raise prices, well, you can see the progression along as many links int he supply chain as there may be. The end consumer or buyer can’t pass his higher cost along to anyone, so they’re stuck with the cost of the tariff, regardless of who paid it to begin with.

    So, why not simplify things and call the rapist felon’s tariffs what they really are? Consumer taxes.

    Common words in every day use that everyone understands.

    ReplyReply
    3
  29. Sleeping Dog says:
  30. Eusebio says:

    @MarkedMan:

    He’s completely lost it,…

    Yes, and my main point is that sensible people who have voices should use this opportunity* to ridicule him over it.

    *Evidence of it being an opportunity is it’s so ridiculous that even some maga/gop-friendly media aren’t backing him up.

    ReplyReply
    3
  31. Kathy says:

    @MarkedMan:

    He’s completely lost it,

    I’m not sure he ever had it.

    ReplyReply
    4
  32. Rob1 says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    The oligarchs are finally getting full attention, but they’ve been making their presence felt upon our political process for sometime. Billionaires like the Kochs, Singer, Mercers, et. al. have been deforming this democracy for sometime. Ailes and Murdoch built a public media platform for their aspirations.

    ReplyReply
    3
  33. Michael Reynolds says:

    @MarkedMan: @Eusebio:
    Democrats are still licking their wounds, too enfeebled to do much of anything but moan over each new Trump idiocy. I knew this would happen, told my wife there’d be no resistance for quite a while, but it’s still frustrating.

    I am seeing remarkably little forward thinking from Democrats. I’ve tried several times to get a conversation going here about, okay, what now, what next? What lessons have we learned and how are we going to implement them? I’m bored by the outrage-du-jour, all this was priced in, none of it is surprising.

    We need to stay on the attack on specific issues, but more importantly we need a message and a vision. A majoritarian message. We have a perfect opportunity to get back to being the party of the little guy, the party of working people. It’s a big pivot from where we’ve been for the last decade, but insofar as our previous message has been buried with a stake through its heart, it’s an opportunity.

    A very simple messaging change we can make: when Trump’s imbecility hurts MAGAs do not, FFS, start with, ‘It will disproportionally impact this or that minority.’ When that’s the message it translates to White people as, ‘not our problem.’ But it is their problem and we need to not step on that message. Big guy vs. little guy. Billionaires vs. regular people. Them vs. Us, and ‘us’ is everyone who still has to pay bills.

    ReplyReply
    2
  34. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Rob1:
    Crucially we cannot draw a line between ‘our’ billionaires and ‘their’ billionaires. Too much money and too much power in too few hands. Even Mark Cuban’s hands. It can’t be about right and wrong so much as the theft of democracy by the oligarchs.

    ReplyReply
    5
  35. Jay L Gischer says:

    @Michael Reynolds: Yeah, I am in general agreement.

    Instead of being outraged at the Greenland stuff, it’s much better to roll our eyes and say, “What do we want Greenland for?” It’s a stupid waste of money.

    Why do we want to send more expensive military aircraft to Colombia instead of cheap charter flights? The same purpose is achieved, for less money, which means lower taxes, right?

    If you are selling something, you have to use talking points that work for the person you are selling to. Preaching to the choir doesn’t do much.

    ReplyReply
    5
  36. Michael Reynolds says:

    I was just interviewed by a Wellesley grad student on the topic of morality in kidlit. I am always amused to find myself being cast as a moral teacher, but it seems quite a few people learned philosophy from me and the wife.

    ReplyReply
    3
  37. DK says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    We have a perfect opportunity to get back to being the party of the little guy, the party of working people. It’s a big pivot from where we’ve been for the last decade, but insofar as our previous message has been buried with a stake through its heart

    Of note: in the last decade Hillary, Biden, and Harris all won the poorest income groups over Trump — per exit polling.

    Democratic candidates will settle on some message for 2026 and 2028 — likely in response to Trump’s overreach — but grounded in what’s actually happening, not in overreactions to Trump winning 1.5% more votes than a black woman who had a few months to mount a campaign.

    ReplyReply
    5
  38. Kathy says:

    More on Deep Seek. It appears to censor itself on what the Chinese Republiqan Party regards as sensitive subjects.

    there are workarounds, which open up some interesting epistemological and metaphysical questions. Does the AI know the info on Tiananmen Square but lies about it? Does it know that it knows? etcetera.

    Warnings about the evil Chinese Republiqans being able to freely access your data are also starting to circulate.

    I don’t think AI bots are data mining in the way that fakebook and Xitter are. Instead they use your input for “training.” It’s likely such inputs are not shared or sold between different AI developers, which would be where they differ from traditional data mining companies. So this is slightly more credible and/or concerning.

    On other things, the case I got for my phone came with a couple of screen protectors. I’m unclear on why two are needed. Do they degrade over time? Do they break more easily than the screen? In any case, I’m not inclined to use them. For one thing, they don’t seem to match the screen exactly.

    ReplyReply
  39. Jim Brown 32 says:

    @Michael Reynolds: Too bad “oligarchy” the word, has no suction to latch its way into pop culture. It’s an academic word and concept that evokes no feeling in anyone not interested in politics or poly sci.

    That’s why the $Strumpets labeled left-leaning Oligarchs as ‘pedo’s’. Democrats must abandon the language of academia to create get some traction on the margins

    ReplyReply
    3
  40. Gavin says:

    Of course Jamie Dimon said yesterday on CNBC that we should “get over inflation.” Because didn’t you know Republicans had their fingers crossed when they said words before the election?
    Jamie gets his tax cuts, just like every Republican platform ever, and sold to you if you believed anything out of the mouth of a Republican regarding anything else. Republicans have an ideology to implement, and if they had to lie, cheat, and steal to get your vote, that’s a sacrifice they were willing to make.

    ReplyReply
    6
  41. DK says:

    @Jim Brown 32:

    It’s an academic word

    So was CRT.

    There’s no shortage of Americans who cannot be manipulated into viewing any word as dangerous and scary, academic or no. It’s just not at all clear there’s some super special *Democratic* message that can rescue such people from their rightwing mental prisons.

    As with alcoholics and druggies, you can message to them all you want, but they won’t change until they want to. The high is more compelling than anything you say. Liberals are not ever going to consistently win the “undecideds” who infantilize themselves as incapable of choosing unless Hillary pitches them the perfect message while wearing a cheesehead in Wisconsin.

    Some people are not going to be open to a Dem message until they’ve first burned themselves from touching the fascist stove. But most will figure it out on their own once burnt, an internal decision that won’t have much to do with Democrats’ messages (see, 2018 election). You can’t message your way out of global anti-incumbent wave that’s just not swinging in your favor.

    ReplyReply
    4
  42. Tony W says:

    All of this hand-wringing is great, but the biggest lesson is this: Don’t nominate a woman to the presidency. We are not ready, as a country, for that.

    We need to find a solid white guy with good ethics and excellent communication skills – particularly a guy who can land shots on the Trumpy fellow – whoever that ends up being.

    Gavin Newsom comes to mind, but there are others.

    ReplyReply
    3
  43. JohnSF says:

    @Jim Brown 32:
    Hence “blow your own strumpet”
    Possibly. 😉

    ReplyReply
    1
  44. Michael Reynolds says:

    @DK:

    You don’t win the future without an idea what that future is meant to be. This is not about MAGAs or about undecideds in past elections, it’s primarily about rising generations of voters. Every year 4 million Americans turn 18. That’s who we want and we need to offer them something other than ‘Trump is evil.’

    And, while those 4 million are becoming eligible to vote, 3 million old people are dying. Nothing is set in stone, we have plenty of room to win if we can explain what winning will do for people.

    ReplyReply
  45. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Jim Brown 32:

    Too bad “oligarchy” the word, has no suction to latch its way into pop culture.

    The word billionaire does. I hate billionaires and I’m not a working man, or even middle class. Elon is showing us a vulnerable backside, time to kick it.

    ReplyReply
    2
  46. Jim Brown 32 says:

    @JohnSF: I’ve worked with many a Brit in the OIF/OEF days and your sense of humor never gets old! Cheers!

    ReplyReply
    1
  47. JohnSF says:

    @Michael Reynolds:
    @Rob1:
    Interesting thing about the “tech-bros” as oligarchs: they are rather feeble ones, in certain respects.
    Certainly, they command massive wealth in terms of nominal asset values (albeit a bit less today than they did on Sunday 🙂 ) The estimated net worth of the people at Trump’s inauguration was about $1.3 trillion.
    Which ain’t chopped liver.

    But much of that is due to massive financial over-performance of “tech-stocks”
    For instance, Bezos, Zuckerberg and Musk have a joint net wealth of c. $900 billion.; the value of Amazon, Meta, and Tesla combined is about 10% of the value of total US stocks.

    BUT: the same three only represent about 1.8% of total value added to GDP.
    Even if you add in Apple, Alphabet (ie Google/Android) whose CEO’s were also at the circus, you only come to about 3.1% GDP.

    Compare that to Russia: there data from 2004 indicated a about 24 oligarchs controlled 77% of output in mining/manufacturing, which in turn was about two-thirds of the Russian economy.
    And they employed about 20% of all workers.

    Or Hungary, where the “Orban network” controls about a fifth to a quarter of GDP.

    In other words, the US is economical entirely capable of cutting the “tech-brogachs ” off at the knees, and pursuing anti-monopoly suits etc. It’s merely a question of political motivation.

    That, imho, is the one key reason for their fawning upon Trump (apart from Musk, perhaps).
    Insurance against the MAGA-populists turning on them.
    The second main reason, I suspect, being a hope that having Trump in their corner can fend off regulatory threats from the European Union.

    ReplyReply
    3
  48. Jim Brown 32 says:

    @DK: CRT (and most 3 syllable acronyms) has a good meter to it—which is why RBJ, LBJ, JFK, FBI, CIA etc latch on so easily in people’s minds.

    They started with the full name and started pouring alternate meaning into while shortening it to CRT for this exact reason. They have very high-end linguist in their stable.

    The democrats will make no headway with their own pitch(es) until they undermine the right wing pitch—that’s a different set of messaging. Of course an angel won’t believe the Devil—but they would certainly consider the opinion of another angel.

    ReplyReply
    1
  49. Rob1 says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    we cannot draw a line between ‘our’ billionaires and ‘their’ billionaires.

    There is the matter of “intent,” but
    agreed.

    ReplyReply
    1
  50. Rob1 says:

    @Gavin:

    Of course Jamie Dimon said yesterday on CNBC that we should “get over inflation.”

    Inflation! National debt! Tariffs! Windmill bird deaths! Benghazi!

    The MAGA base is now just reflexively twitching to the programmed memes.

    ReplyReply
    3
  51. JohnSF says:

    Meanwhile, in Africa:
    Rwandan backed M23 rebels (and possibly some Rwandan army support) have taken the city of Goma in n.e. Congo (population c. 2 million). That means they now control most of North Kivu Province.
    The Congolese Army has been humiliated; and the South African peacekeeping force swept aside.

    Perhaps the former Conservative government’s bright idea about Rwanda as stable and peaceful destination to transfer asylum seekers was not, in fact, all that clever?
    (Quite a few people, including me, suspect a major motivator for Rwanda was to obtain diplomatic cover for its ambitions in Kivu)

    ReplyReply
    2
  52. just nutha says:

    @Jim Brown 32: Perhaps people who have thoughts about how to go about this should start going to places where Democrats congregate and make concrete rather than abstract suggestions. As an academic (and one criticized among peers for being too abstruse at that) I have no suggestions.

    ETA: “It’s just not at all clear there’s some super special *Democratic* message that can rescue such people from their rightwing mental prisons.”

    And that’s the other catch. 🙁

    ReplyReply
    2
  53. just nutha says:

    @JohnSF:

    The second main reason, I suspect, being a hope that having Trump in their corner can fend off regulatory threats from the European Union.

    I wouldn’t be counting on this succeeding, tbh.

    ReplyReply
    1
  54. al Ameda says:

    Here’s the CNC source of Jami Dimon’s ‘get over it’ referenced here in this thread.

    Tariffs are “an economic tool” or “an economic weapon,” depending on how they’re used, said Dimon, head of JPMorgan Chase, in an interview Wednesday with CNBC from Davos, Switzerland, where the World Economic Forum is taking place. “I would put in perspective: If it’s a little inflationary, but it’s good for national security, so be it. I mean, get over it.”

    You know, this is just Trump’s opening gambit to get people to the table.

    ReplyReply
    1
  55. Scott says:

    I was just idling through the news when I came upon this article:

    Georgia Republican Says Kids in School Lunch Programs ‘Sponge Off The Government

    The article is not worth reading but it did quote Rich McCormick (R-GA). So I wikipediaed his name. The first sentence read:

    Richard Dean McCormick (born October 7, 1968) is an American dummy and liar.

    On that laugh, I think I’ll quit for the day.

    ReplyReply
    2
  56. CSK says:

    Speaking of billionaires, Bill Gates’s biggest regret, according to NBC via the London Times, is divorcing Melinda.

    ReplyReply
    2
  57. Kathy says:

    An Air Busan Airbus A320 caught fire on the runway. reports are of no fatalities, and some minor injuries.

    There are missing details in reports so far, like whether the Airbus was in motion or holding.

    ReplyReply
  58. Gustopher says:

    @JohnSF:

    Perhaps the former Conservative government’s bright idea about Rwanda as stable and peaceful destination to transfer asylum seekers was not, in fact, all that clever?

    Assuming they are roughly like American Conservatives, what happens in Rwanda, or to asylum seekers, is not a serious consideration. So, it was clever.

    ReplyReply
    1
  59. Gustopher says:

    @Scott: They have fixed the Wikipedia article.

    Richard Dean McCormick (born October 7, 1968) is an American physician and politician, who thinks it is a good time to bring back child labor to prevent 5 year olds from mooching off the federal government.

    ReplyReply
    2
  60. Gustopher says:

    @Rob1:

    Windmill bird deaths!

    Birds are a renewable resource. If the windmills have to be lubricated with the blood of birds, so be it.

    ReplyReply
    1
  61. CSK says:

    Thirty-nine years ago today, the space shuttle Challenger exploded 73 seconds after lift off.

    ReplyReply
    1
  62. Kathy says:

    @CSK:

    You’re making me feel old.

    Like the other day. I met a coworker in a different division with an uncommon last name which sounded familiar. After a while it hit me, a classmate back in elementary school had that last name. I mentioned her name to him, and he said “She’s my dad’s cousin.”

    ReplyReply
    3
  63. Scott O says:

    I heard a joke today from my 19 year old c0-worker. It goes like this.

    A group of scientist want to do some experiments on the human brain. A death row inmate volunteers on the condition that if he survives he will be allowed to live.

    First they remove the left half of his brain and ask him to count to 10. He says 2 4 6 8 10. The scientist say “Well, that’s interesting. Let’s see what happens if we put the left half back in and remove the right half”.

    They do so and ask him to count to 10. He says 1 3 5 7 9. The scientists decide to see what happens with both halves of the brain removed. Then they ask him to count to 10 once more.

    This time he says “I am a very powerful counter. Nobody knows more about counting than me. Grown men come up to me with tears in their eyes saying thank you sir for counting so beautifully”.

    ReplyReply
    7
  64. Jax says:

    @CSK: I was on page 363 of my math book when it happened. My teacher didn’t know what to do. It was all supposed to be so happy….and then it wasn’t.

    ReplyReply
    1

Speak Your Mind

*