Wednesday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a retired Professor of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. charontwo says:

    Some of you may have noticed stocks are up again in futures trading (dollar not so much).

    Perhaps this:

    Krugman

    Hitting the road today, but I have time for a note on the news that moved markets yesterday. Bloomberg reports:

    US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told a closed-door investor summit Tuesday that the tariff standoff with China cannot be sustained by both sides and that the world’s two largest economies will have to find ways to de-escalate.

    That de-escalation will come in the very near future, Bessent said during an event hosted by J.P. Morgan Chase in Washington, which wasn’t open to the public or media. He characterized the current situation as essentially a trade embargo, according to people who attended the session.

    Investors liked this report, but it was, if you think about it, deeply disturbing on two levels.

    First — and why aren’t more people saying this? — what the hell was the Treasury secretary doing giving a closed-door briefing on a significant policy change that hadn’t yet been officially announced? Isn’t that a setup for large-scale insider trading? Indeed, attendees at that conference surely made market bets before Bessent’s remarks became public.

    And since when are major policy announcements by government officials made off the record to closed private-sector meetings? One even wonders whether Bessent was announcing policy or making it: Did Trump back him up only after the fact?

    The content of his remarks aside, what was Bessent even doing at this event? Senior government officials aren’t supposed to be helping investment banks entertain their clients.

    Was Bessent paid for his appearance? That would have been inconceivable under any previous administration, but now God knows. Or are we now entering an era in which companies that do favors for Trump and co., either in the form of money or support for their policies, get lucrative insider briefings?

    snip

    But this is an extraordinary reversal — a capitulation equivalent to surrender. And bear in mind that the damage being done by Trump’s tariffs comes not just from how high they are but from the uncertainty they’re creating. That gigantic China tariff was announced just two weeks ago. Now Trump says, “we will be very nice and they’re going to be very nice.” How can any business make plans in this kind of environment?

    Oh, and it seems likely that Trump will announce trade “deals,” possibly with China, probably with other countries, that aren’t actually deals — just “memorandums of understanding” that offer few specifics. He and Bessent will try to spin this as a policy triumph, but all that will really have happened is a confirmation that you can’t trust anything this administration says, including its threats.

    As the same time Trump has made a humiliating climb-down on Jerome Powell.

    While news media and some investors may still be credulous enough to believe Trump’s boasts, harder-headed players will look at his U-turns and conclude that he runs away when confronted. Why would China be “very nice” now that it knows that Trump can be rolled? On the contrary, China will be even less likely than before to make concessions. And other countries will be more willing to stand up to Trump and more likely to make deals with Beijing.

    As I have pointed out before, facing off against China was stupidly absurd, derived from the delusion the U.S. was in the stronger position. In reality, the U.S. is playing poker with a busted straight while China has a real flush.

    China will be even less likely than before to make concessions.

    I expect China will force concessions from Trump.

    ReplyReply
    16
  2. Daryl says:

    @charontwo:
    Not mentioned is how they caved to Harvard.
    Trump folds like a cheap lawn chair under his enormous diaper-covered arse.
    And in the meantime he is doing to Musk what he did the the My Pillow guy and Rudy Giuliani.

    ReplyReply
    5
  3. Beth says:

    @charontwo:

    I see your insider trading and raise you one Perestroika

    In summary, both were aspiring revolutionary dictators, aiming to revive an idealized heroic national past, and both relentlessly destroyed the state capacity necessary to carry out their stated goals. Both responded to economic discontent by heedlessly making things even worse. Both abandoned allies and cozied up to long-time enemies who did not actually have their nation’s interests at heart.

    But yeah, when I saw the stock market line turn green last night I knew some insider trading shit had started. I will react with profound glee when those assholes screw up and lose everything.

    ReplyReply
    3
  4. Kylopod says:

    I never realized the stock market was this gullible. Did the traders attend Trump University?

    ReplyReply
    7
  5. Gavin says:

    It’s fun to see right-wingers once again desperately try hard to convince themselves that they’re Counter Culture.
    When I was in grad school it was We’re Politically Incorrect – and even today it’s the same thing with Andrew Schultz. “I voted for Trump because He Gotz Laid, Bro”.. Are we really saying any one of these influencers would have voted for Kamala if she included how much she enjoys her husband in rallies?
    When was the last time “conservatism” was actually cool…. Reaganism while snorting coke? Stephen Colbert when they actually thought he was on their side and not doing satire?
    Of course the only way they can “feel good” and avoid confronting the actual misogynistic backlash [and politician town halls] is to insulate themselves and tell each other They’re SO Cool.
    Patrick Bateman used to be considered a sign of sociopathy… because that character from American Psycho is pretty far down the dark triad scale. The fact that he’s now actually the conservative ideal male should tell the rest of us exactly who and what conservatism is.

    ReplyReply
    3
  6. Scott says:

    An essay from Jon Duffy, retired Navy Captain. His 30-year career included the command of two warships and a squadron of destroyers, as well as policy positions in the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill, and on the National Security Council in the White House.

    I went to the Naval Academy to defend freedom, not to dismantle it

    I didn’t join the Navy to fight for a country that bans books. I joined to defend one that never would.

    I went to the U.S. Naval Academy because I believed in the values laid out in its mission: to develop midshipmen morally, mentally and physically. I graduated proud to swear an oath to support and defend the freedoms enshrined in our Constitution. I believed that a nation leading the post–World War II global order had a responsibility to stand for liberty, not retreat from it. That’s why I served. And that’s why I am appalled by the recent decision to remove nearly 400 books—many addressing issues of race and gender—from the shelves of the Academy’s Nimitz Library.

    This is not just an overcorrection. It is a betrayal.

    Removing books on identity, race, and gender under the guise of making the institution less “woke” doesn’t just insult the intelligence of midshipmen. It undercuts the very foundation of the officer corps: moral judgment, independent thought, and the courage to act with integrity under pressure.

    What’s most painful is the silence. From too many alumni. From Navy and Academy leadership. From those who should be standing up for the values they claim to hold dear. But I’m done waiting for someone else to say something.

    To the midshipmen at Annapolis: Keep reading. Keep thinking. Challenge ideas—even your own. That’s not disloyalty. That’s courage. That’s leadership.

    And to the Naval Academy: Don’t fear discomfort. Fear the day we commission leaders who only know how to follow.

    ReplyReply
    14
  7. wr says:

    @Gavin: “Are we really saying any one of these influencers would have voted for Kamala if she included how much she enjoys her husband in rallies?”

    Of course not. Men who like sex are studs and bros; women who like sex are hos and bitches.

    ReplyReply
    9
  8. Kylopod says:

    @Gavin: The way I’ve heard it is that conservative has become punk rock. (That’s what Milo Y. was saying–and where is he now?) Of course, the fact that they think punk is still cool is itself a mark of how out-of-touch they are. And if there’s any punk subculture they resemble, it’s the one the Dead Kennedys had certain choice words for.

    ReplyReply
    6
  9. Eusebio says:

    @Kylopod:
    Speaking of, I don’t see conservatives thinking this is cool, and I don’t see how it’s not relevant… We’ve got a bigger problem now

    ReplyReply
  10. Mister Bluster says:

    @Kylopod:..Dead Kennedys

    Good grief! U Tube wants me to sign in to verify my age. I don’t think that I’ve ever signed in to the tube for anything before.
    I can see the title of the song Nazi Punks Fuck Off before I sign in.
    What does U Tube think it’s protecting me from?
    God Damn do gooder busybodies!

    (when I entered gooder into the New Oxford American Dictionary provided with my MacBook Air to see if it is a word it came up Goober. That fits too.)

    ReplyReply
    1
  11. Mister Bluster says:

    The above mentioned You Tube sign-in request mentions something about Community Guidelines.
    I can Google Nazi Punks Fuck Off and see at least two videos of the Dead Kennedys song without any sign in request on You Tube. The You Tube Community Guidelines chumps must be using Signal to set up their sign-in restrictions.

    ReplyReply
    1
  12. becca says:

    @Gavin: the desperation of the right to want to appear cool is one of the most pathetic aspects of this nightmare.
    I am old enough to remember when guys would wear wigs during the week to hide their long hair, not a commitment to the hippie counterculture, as much as hoping to find a hippie chick into free love on the weekend. Those posers have morphed into world class grifters.

    ReplyReply
    3
  13. Kathy says:

    This is the very definition of chutzpah.

    The felon claims the country cannot possibly give every undocumented alien subject to deportation a trial, while at the same time he’s firing immigration judges.

    Well, if you can’t afford due process for people subject to deportation, then you can’t deport them. You would not throw people in jail without due process because you can’t give every criminal a trial (the felon rapist would, because of course he would, but we’re talking about civilized people here). Even Stalin had the pretense of a trial for people already doomed to death or years of hardship and misery.

    If the US needs to reverse its founding principles and become a country of men rather than law, then Americans should at least pick better men than the felon, the chief nazi, the lush, the dog killer, and the various clueless people engaged in devising economic policy that will hold for more than three days at a time.

    ReplyReply
    3
  14. Kathy says:

    @charontwo:
    @Beth:

    The markets seem to be rising because the rapist may lower the tariffs on china “substantially.”

    We have a saying at the office: substantial is not a number*

    When the tariffs are at 145%, reducing them to 100% is substantial. To 72.5% is very substantial. Both are still insane.

    *And also: a bunch is not a number.

    ReplyReply
    6
  15. Lucy's Football says:

    @charontwo: The new reality os that insider trading is legal as long as the right people are the insiders. And the government is providing the insider info. I would assume that Trump will make billions off his presidency, some from his business interests, some from direct payments. It’s the new reality.

    ReplyReply
    2
  16. de stijl says:

    I once described my job to a friend with a Trainspotting metaphor. Every executive worth their salt wants to find the suppository opium. Well, it’s my job to build the worst toilet in Scotland.

    ReplyReply
  17. de stijl says:

    I once described my job to a friend with a Trainspotting metaphor. Every executive worth their salt wants to find the gleaming, glowing suppository opium. Well, it’s my job to build the worst toilet in Scotland.

    ReplyReply
  18. charontwo says:

    @Kathy:

    I have not been closely, but I am guessing so far just talk. I assume nothing public from China, no way to tell if they have privately offered any concessions.

    As was pointed out over at LGM, Trump has great negotiating skills.

    https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2025/04/art-of-the-squeal

    Not a lot of people know this, but a great poker strategy is to announce that you’re bluffing before the showdown, and that you’re going to fold, but first you’re going to push a lot more chips into the middle of the table, just to make your bluff more credible.

    ReplyReply
    3
  19. Michael Reynolds says:

    Trump is a pussy, a wimp, a weak-ass little bitch. The bond market says, ‘hey, knock it off,’ and Trump folds.

    I hope some true MAGAt will come along and explain why it is that whenever Trump announces a new policy the markets collapse. And every time he caves the markets go back up. Because to an outside observer it looks like Trump doesn’t know WTF he’s doing. In fact, that’s exactly how it looks.

    The only thing he’s any good at is corruption.

    Xi vs. Trump round one goes to Xi.
    And how’s that retaking of Panama coming along?
    And the take-over of Canada?
    And Greenland?
    And where’s Elon?
    And what the holy hell is going on with the drunk talk show host SecDef?
    And ole’ worm brain?

    Trump has united the entire world in contempt of the United States. The entire world. Not a single country has any respect for us. Literally the only members of the human race who still respect Trump are his MAGA cult. They’re the only ones who still can’t see that their demi-god has no clothes.

    ReplyReply
    14
  20. Charley in Cleveland says:

    @Kathy: One of the most obvious and necessary solutions to the immigration problem (i.e., immigrants who arrived at a port of entry waiting for their status to be determined) has long been to hire more immigration judges – a LOT MORE. I believe the bipartisan bill that Trump killed included increased hiring, and now Elon’s hackers have discovered that immigration judges actually get paid, dipstick facto: FRAUD/WASTE/ABUSE!

    ReplyReply
    2
  21. Kathy says:

    @charontwo:

    Some people go into negotiations assuming everything’s settled if they present their position as though the other party has already agreed to it, even without first hearing it.

    Others figure that if they announce an unspecified deal publicly, the other party will have no choice but to come to some kind of agreement, in order not to make the claimant look like a liar.

    Both tend to crash and burn against opponents that are not weak or desperate.

    ReplyReply
    3
  22. gVOR10 says:

    @Charley in Cleveland: I see Doggy Boy (I know it’s pronounced like the old Venetian ruler, but my pronunciation seems more apt) is leaving DC to spend more time with his family company. I’m getting some pleasant schadenfreude out of picturing the feelings of Tesla’s full time managers to that news.

    ReplyReply
  23. de stijl says:

    @Gavin:

    I had had an armband that said “NAZI punks / FUCK OFF” in 1979. Wore it on my jacket.

    Before there were boy bands, there were Oi! bands.

    There is a long history of right wing edge lords flirting with, or copulation with Nazism via edge punk.

    Repulsive ideas repulse people. The uptake is only amongst people primed for it.

    Reminds me of folks like Andrew Tate. Incels, “nice guys ™”, creepers, “alphas”, etc. There is a subset of RWs that wants to latch onto a counter-culture thing and make it icky.

    ReplyReply
    1
  24. charontwo says:

    Bulwark

    THEY’LL NEVER FIGURE IT OUT!: Although Donald Trump won reelection while promising not to cut Medicaid, House Republicans have been gearing up to do just that. Reasonable minds have wondered: How would the GOP sell the swerve?

    In a Fox Business appearance Tuesday morning, Rep. Austin Scott (R-Ga.) revealed one possible strategy: Cutting the federal government’s Medicaid spending while asking individual states to make up the difference.

    “When the Dems expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, they made that percentage match 90-10. So the federal government is paying 90 percent of the Medicaid expansion. And so what we have talked about is moving that 90 percent level of the expansion back,” Scott said. “Nobody would be kicked off of Medicaid as long as the governors decided that they wanted to continue to fund the program.”

    You got that? It isn’t Congress’s fault your Medicaid is about to go up in smoke, struggling voters: It’ll be on your stingy state government!

    It’s hard to imagine voters who trusted that Trump wouldn’t touch entitlements finding this line convincing. But spending hardliners don’t need to persuade voters—just Trump himself.

    ReplyReply
    1
  25. Lucy's Football says:

    We now have two cases of insider info being provided by this administration, the tweet when there was the tariff pause (market went up 10% on a few hours), and Bessent’s little chat with business leaders (market went up 2.5% yesterday).
    I assume that there is a group of people who have access to insider info on a regular basis and are making BILLIONS off of this info. What’s Trump’s cut? Maybe this is the strategy behind the tariffs, market manipulation. Trump could care less about actual policy. He’ll fold and declare victory, and if the market rights itself it will be forgotten.

    ReplyReply
    1
  26. Kurtz says:

    From Paul’s link:

    Gorsuch asks if the books with drag queens were part of the English curriculum rather than human sexuality to influence them.

    The attorney for Montgomery County responds it is to influence them toward civility.

    Gorsuch replies, “whatever, it’s to influence them”

    Gorsuch acts like he doesn’t have a clue how a vacuum works. He knows better, but whatever, I guess.

    This is about angry parents ginned up by cynical people bastardizing ideals for a buck.

    They want to enforce a narrow conformity in service to freedom.

    Somewhere, Orwell is shaking his head.

    ReplyReply
    5
  27. de stijl says:

    We are disappearing student protesters dissenting to / objecting to another country’s war methods.

    How is a perfectly defensible and valid criticism of a foreign country’s war conduct now a reason for revocation of resident status, imprisonment, and deportation?

    This should be the story of the decade, but it’s yesterday’s news, now. This stuff is at the core.

    ReplyReply
    4
  28. MWLib says:

    @Charley in Cleveland:

    dipstick facto: FRAUD/WASTE/ABUSE!

    We have a winner!!!

    But you made coffee come out of my nose…

    ReplyReply
    1
  29. Fortune says:

    @Kurtz: Orwell would appreciate your drag queen word search…for civility.

    ReplyReply
    0
  30. Kurtz says:

    @Fortune:

    I thought you weren’t interested in my comments.

    For the sake of discussion, can you explain back to me the point I was making?

    Then can you explain how relating what was said in court is some sort of word search?

    ReplyReply
    5
  31. Rob1 says:

    Push coming to shove.

    3 ways Trump’s immigration crackdown could hit U.S. citizens

    Putting critics of the administration’s policies in jeopardy.

    Some officials say U.S. citizens who criticize administration policies could be charged with crimes, based on the notion that they’re aiding terrorists and criminals.
    “You have to ask yourself, are they technically aiding and abetting them, because aiding and abetting criminals and terrorists is a crime,” White House senior director for counterterrorism Seb Gorka said in an interview with Newsmax.
    Trump’s team also has questioned the legality of civic groups providing immigrants with “know your rights” trainings on how to respond to federal agents. Border czar Tom Homan suggested that such seminars help people evade law enforcement.

    https://www.axios.com/2025/04/23/trump-immigration-crackdown-us-citizens

    Which side are you on?

    ReplyReply
    3
  32. Mimai says:

    I arrived in France this morning, by way of Germany, by way of the US. It was the most uneventful and frictionless air travel I have experienced in a few years.

    Everything ran on time. Dare I say there appeared to be some actual efficiency happening. And best of all, there were no collisions!

    My fellow travelers were surprisingly considerate and patient. So too were the airport and flight staff. And no collisions!

    There were a few fussy children, because that is their nature. But no one seemed bothered — no stink eyes or dramatic sighs to be noticed. There’s a lesson in there somewhere.

    And now I must return to good eating, good drinking, and good collaborating.

    Is this / am I indulgent? Damn right!

    To borrow from Jack Gilbert: I’m risking delight… I’m stubbornly holding tight to gladness in the ruthless furnace of this world. I invite others to do the same.

    ReplyReply
    5
  33. just nutha says:

    @Kurtz: Orwell was looking at the top of an iceberg and thought he was looking at the mountain itself.

    ReplyReply
    4
  34. Fortune says:

    @Kurtz: My mistake, you’re supposed to look for the drag queen, not the phrase “drag queen”.

    ReplyReply
  35. Kathy says:

    Speaking of Europe, the prospects of an eclipse trip next year are looking dim. Too much instability, too many unexpected expenses I’m helping my mom with. As luck would have it, there will be another total eclipse in 2027 (and then none for a long while).

    In this one, the path of totality passes over southern Spain, and over Gibraltar. I thought that would be a good reason to visit the latter, but the prices are insane. It costs like half as much to fly to southern Spain as to Gibraltar. Apparently only British Airways and EasyJet fly there. I need to look into it, surely there are other ways to get there.

    ReplyReply
  36. Kurtz says:

    @Fortune:

    I asked two questions.

    You ignored one.

    Your subsequent comment did nothing to clarify your position.

    I am more than happy to have a discussion. I am interested in what you think, but I cannot divine it from what you are writing.

    ReplyReply
    4
  37. Kathy says:

    @just nutha:

    I bet Orwell didn’t count on Dumb Brother taking over the Party.

    ReplyReply
    6
  38. Fortune says:

    @Kurtz: I was trying to be polite, but here goes: I read your comment because it wasn’t 2000 words long and I didn’t notice it was yours. I’m not interested in a dialogue with you, and it’s up to you if you feel dissatisfied if I haven’t answered all your questions. It’s absurd when someone hides behind the word “civility” as he teaches a 3 year old about drag, and it’s Orwellian of you to cry “Orwell” when he gets challenged on it.

    ReplyReply
  39. Daryl says:

    Trump wants to give Crimea to Putin.
    https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-peace-talks-london-4f35dc70f521e2363218f4c40748caba
    Of course Doughboy is misrepresenting the course of events that led to Crimeas fall.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation

    ReplyReply
    2
  40. de stijl says:

    My drag name would be Magenta. I wear way too much olive and gray. I need to brighten up my wardrobe day to day. I’m boring in presentation. I present as gray and olive.

    My pallette should be more encompassing.

    ReplyReply
    4
  41. ptfe says:

    @Fortune: So your position is it’s absurd to teach children not to be judgmental about the way other people dress? I just want to clarify at what point you think “here are some humans you might encounter, don’t be an asshole” no longer applies.

    ReplyReply
    11
  42. Kylopod says:

    @de stijl:

    There is a long history of right wing edge lords flirting with, or copulation with Nazism via edge punk.

    Godfather of the 4/8chan trolls and their real-life counterparts, Elon’s “Roman salute” being just one recent example.

    (And come to think of it, comparing Elon to a punk rocker is pretty hilarious. What would his punk name be? Ass Burger King? Sounds more like something out of some very niche form of porn.)

    ReplyReply
  43. Kurtz says:

    @Fortune:

    Pardon me for expecting discussion on a discussion forum. I posted with the expectation that you would ignore it. My fault, because this is not the first time you have claimed disinterest. You replied. You win, I guess.

    I am impressed that you managed to fail to understand the basic point of my post, and demonstrate your misunderstanding of Orwell in so few words.

    You win, I guess.

    Conformity is freedom!

    Run along, now.

    ReplyReply
    4
  44. Lucysfootball says:

    To repeat: The Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent told a closed door meeting with people from the investment community of future plans involving tariffs. The market has gone up more than 5% in the last two days. This might be the single most corrupt thing the Trump administration has done. If this were a CEO he/she would be going to jail (in normal times, when there is a functioning SEC). Assuming there were people from JP Morgan, Chase, Merrill Lynch, Prudential, etc at this meeting, it would be malpractice for them not to act upon this information.
    There is no possible excuse for this meeting. I take it as a given that anyone high up in the Trump administration is corrupt, but at least keep the corruption in house.

    ReplyReply
    1
  45. DK says:

    @Kurtz:

    I am interested in what you think

    .

    Bold of you to surmise this individual ever “thinks.”

    ReplyReply
    6
  46. Beth says:

    Oh Hell yeah!!!

    See ya Dick!

    ReplyReply
  47. Gustopher says:

    @Gavin:

    When was the last time “conservatism” was actually cool?

    Michael J. Fox as Alex P. Keating.

    And before that… the Nazis had really good uniforms.

    ReplyReply
    1
  48. Kylopod says:

    @Gustopher: I remember as a kid in the ’80s looking at a Mad Magazine a couple of decades old, and in one of the strips a group of college students are chatting. One guy says he’s a Republican, he’s asked why, and he answers “Because my father is a Republican.” Then this girl says she’s a Democrat, is asked why, and she answers “Because my father is a Republican.” My parents had to explain that joke to me.

    ReplyReply
    3
  49. DK says:

    @Beth: I appreciate Durbin’s language here, on passing the torch. I noted this, too, from your link:

    Durbin made headlines last month for being one of 10 Democrats who voted with Republicans to advance a GOP-crafted stopgap spending bill. Durbin drew criticism from progressive groups, who used the words “profoundly disappointed” and “cowardice” in calling out his vote.

    I’m loving how we on the left have just memory holed how subsequent events proved Schumer, Durbin and the rest substantively right in declining to help Trump/Musk shutdown government and thereby latch Democrats to the economic troubles the public now largely blames on Trump alone instead.

    The suddenly silent ‘move along, nothing to see here’ act from these “profoundly disappointed” “progressive groups” is comedy. At least on being stubbornly unable to admit when we are wrong, turns out some of us are not so different from MAGA on that score.

    ReplyReply
    2
  50. de stijl says:

    @Kurtz:

    We are now seeing actual Thought Police.

    Disagree with Trump publicly and you might be imprisoned and deported. For disagreeing on how Israeli Likud government is conducting it’s Gaza war. A war in a foreign country.

    Let me get this straight, you can be imprisoned and expelled from the US for your stated opinion about a foreign war? On what grounds?

    And you aren’t native born unless your progenitors are US born. Didn’t we pass an amendment to the the constitution about that very same situation?

    I’m living in interesting times. I dislike it, greatly.

    ReplyReply
    1
  51. DK says:

    @Daryl:

    Trump wants to give Crimea to Putin.

    Immediate Ukrainian accession to NATO seems like the only somewhat-fair trade for US recognition of Russian Crimea. I wonder what Zelenskyy and Ukrainian leaders will decide/counter.

    ReplyReply
    3
  52. Gustopher says:

    @Paul L.: I’m not sure they are Nazis, from the Nazi region of Germany and all that entails, but they are certainly Christian Nationalists, which has a significant overlap with Nazis.

    But, they aren’t trying to ban books. In this case they are trying to erase people from public existence, and they want the school system to help in that goal.

    ReplyReply
    1
  53. Kurtz says:

    @DK:

    Yeah, to the extent anything has been said at all, it has consisted of Sunday School moral stands and a checklist of buzzwords.

    Oh, damaging the finish on a Tesla is terrorism. Abortion is the equivalent of suicide bombing. The latter is the one time Fortune tried to make an actual argument, and failed miserably to use biological facts appropriately.

    I suspect the reason he is able to discuss things with Bernius is because these days, Matt tends to write mostly about the topics generating the most discussion. So there are plenty of words to repeat.

    You and I both grew up in the same state, and not the major city. I went to undergrad at an SBC affiliated college. Yet, somehow, neither of us could possibly be familiar with conservatism, as per a recent discussion.

    As a nonbeliever, I find the eschatological bent of the Christian Right offensive. They act more like Pharisees and Sadducees than Jesus. Their worldview is focused on Revelation more than the Gospel.

    ReplyReply
    2
  54. Gustopher says:

    @DK:

    I’m loving how we on the left have just disappeared how subsequent events proved Schumer, Durbin and the rest substantively right

    Have they?

    Most Americans are chugging along, blithely unaware that we are having a massive constitutional crisis that will have profound effects on their lives for decades to come. Is that better than bringing things to a crisis sooner?

    I don’t think you can really make that claim with any certainty. Let alone your speculation on whether Trump wanted a shutdown, and how the public would react.

    Keep in mind that the CR also contained language declaring the rest of the year a single legislative day, which guts the rule that any member can force a vote on the “economic emergency” declared by Trump after 30 days, and on the tariffs after 30 days.

    What’s done is done, but you can’t confidently say it was for the better unless you assume that Democrats cannot tie the shutdown to the economic chaos the Trump administration is causing. And it certainly hasn’t been proven (where is your control group”)

    ReplyReply
    3
  55. Beth says:

    @DK:

    I dunno. I’m definitely one of the lefties that was profoundly pissed at Durbin. He was fine for years, but he should have stepped aside in 2020. He’s personally responsible for allowing the judiciary get screwed up and changed the rules to block Sheldon Whitehouse from taking over the judiciary committee. That fuck up was one more step on the road to where we are.

    If he had some stones he’d get Pritzger to appoint Underwood or Stratton and retire tomorrow. I mean, IL is going to send a Dem back no matter what.

    So, I checked and I’m sure I voted for Durbin in his first senate run, which was my first election. In 1996. I just can’t remember if I voted in the primary. I know I voted for him though cause he’s like half Lithuanian and my grandma loved him for that.

    ReplyReply
    2
  56. Thomm says:

    @Fortune: I’m pretty sure I was around four when I first saw Bugs Bunny in drag as a hero to a story.
    Must have been a sad childhood not having Looney Toons…explains a lot though.

    ReplyReply
    1
  57. Kylopod says:

    These days Dems call anyone a Nazi, even a group that literally quoted Hitler! What is the world coming to? Next thing you know they’ll be applying the epithet to a man who does Nazi salutes at rallies and praises tweets declaring Jews to be pushing anti-white propaganda.

    ReplyReply
    3
  58. DK says:

    @de stijl: The Onion is having a dark humor field day with this: Trump Announces Seal Team 6 Has Eliminated Student Protestor in Daring Overnight Raid

    I felt bad for laughing.

    ReplyReply
    2
  59. Matt Bernius says:

    FYI, for anyone interested in learning more about the content in one of the books in contention: Pride Puppy, the entire contents are posted to YouTube. It’s an a read format.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sisIwl07mc4

    YMWV (Your Milage Will Vary) with it. The core content is really innocuous. The format is an A-Z book. It does feature very mild LGBTQ+ iconography. The text doesn’t really present any particular argument or acknowledgment of LGBTQ+ themes or ideas. Yes, there is what I assume to be a drag queen presented with “Q.” The entry is “Q is for Queen in a beautiful dress,” and the accompanying picture could easily be taken for a woman in a dress.

    I can understand (but not agree with) conservative objections to this–which I think are primarily based in believing being LGBTQ+ as a choice and therefore something someone can be converted to.

    And I don’t personally think that this book is in any way sexualizing the parade or, more importantly, is propagandizing being gay/queer/etc. Admittedly, if your faith is that being LGBTQ+ is fundamentally wrong, then the issue is that any move towards acceptance is fundamentally anti-faith. As with the issue of abortion, I see this as a stark binary issue where there is no middle ground or possibility for compromise.

    I don’t have kids. That said, if I did, I personally wouldn’t have any issue with them seeing or reading the book.

    I also don’t think having a parental line-by-line veto of school texts is a particularly good idea.

    ReplyReply
    1
  60. Matt Bernius says:

    @Thomm:

    I’m pretty sure I was around four when I first saw Bugs Bunny in drag as a hero to a story.

    I blame Looney Tunes and Thundercats for our ongoing furry epidemic.

    ReplyReply
    1
  61. Jen says:

    After watching Target’s foot traffic fall precipitously, I am not surprised to read that shareholders at both Goldman Sachs and Levi Strauss rejected anti-DEI proposals today.

    The vote at Goldman Sachs was 98% to 2%.

    ReplyReply
  62. Beth says:

    @Kurtz:

    They act more like Pharisees and Sadducees…

    I’m a Saddussy…

    I’ll see myself out…

    Eh, one more Miss Bashful cause she’s awesome. Fortune avert your sensitive eyes!!!

    ReplyReply
  63. DK says:

    @Gustopher:

    Is that better than bringing things to a crisis sooner?

    I don’t buy the premise. I don’t think elected Democrats should be in the business of creating crises.

    If I tell my stubborn kid not to touch the stove, but they’re determined to anyway, I may well decide not to interfere until after they are sufficiently burnt to learn the FAFO lesson on their own.

    But burn them myself? Nah.

    What’s done is done, but you can’t confidently say it was for the better

    I don’t recall any such doubt from those who screamed at Schumer on how wrong he was to not help Trump/Musk shutdown government. They were quite certain of their rightness, not lacking for confidence in their criticisms, neither admitting their views were rooted in speculative predictions about future public opinion and Trump response.

    Schumer/Durbin’s critics are not the only ones to get to confidently assert assumptions. I don’t subscribe to the asymmetrical warfare bit, where only progressive left and MAGA right get to be unapologetic, while the rest must bow, scrape, genuflect, and self-flagellate.

    So yes, based on what I’ve observed, I believe what I said and see no pressing need to hedge.

    ReplyReply
    1
  64. Jen says:

    By the way, does building a makeup studio at the Pentagon at taxpayer expense qualify as “waste/fraud/abuse”?

    If yes (and it is definitely a yes), then I have a hot tip for DOGE.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hegseth-orders-makeup-studio-installed-pentagon/

    ReplyReply
    1
  65. Kathy says:

    @Kylopod:

    Next thing you know they’ll be applying the epithet to a man who does Nazi salutes at rallies and praises tweets declaring Jews to be pushing anti-white propaganda.

    That swasticar has already driven off a cliff to the tune of a 71% drop in sales.

    ReplyReply
  66. Beth says:

    @Matt Bernius:

    I think this is going to end up being another area where the Christian Nationalists and assorted freak show conservatives are going to end up doing so much damage to the country that we’re going end up having to have multiple amendments to fix the things they are destroying. No one wants to live in their bullshit paradise and eventually they are all going to end up fighting each other because their Christianities are incompatible with each other and forget other religions.

    ReplyReply
    1
  67. Kurtz says:

    @de stijl:

    Orwell also identified himself as a democratic socialist in an essay he wrote for a leftist magazine.

    Then again, Rufo praises Gramsci, an anti-fascist Marxist.

    @Matt Bernius:

    Thank you for the info.

    I can understand (but not agree with) conservative objections to this. And I don’t personally think that this book is in any way sexualizing the parade or is propagandizing being gay/queer/etc. I don’t have kids. That said, if I did, I personally wouldn’t have any issue with them seeing or reading the book.

    I also don’t think having a parental line-by-line veto of school texts is a particularly good idea.

    On the last point, we agree. But I don’t think there is anything conservative about objecting to acknowledging existence of queer culture. It is a firmly right wing position.

    I understand you’re a bridge builder, but conceding objections to acknowledgement of the existence of queer culture as merely conservative rather than authoritarian is a bridge too far.

    The reason I invoked Orwell is because these objections are done in the name of rights. That is a perversion.

    ReplyReply
    2
  68. DK says:

    @Jen:

    After watching Target’s foot traffic fall precipitously

    @Kathy:

    That swasticar has already driven off a cliff to the tune of a 71% drop in sales.

    Heh. A funny thing happened on the way to the vibe shift. And it was profit-mongers remembering most retail spending power is in blue states, cities, and counties.

    Go antiwoke, go broke.

    ReplyReply
    4
  69. de stijl says:

    @Mimai:

    Enjoy the efficiency. That is what governments do.

    I toyed with anarchy a tiny bit in my youth, but then decided I preferred order from the state in measure. Speed limits, traffic control, untainted food, state parks, national parks, the FDA, social security, streets, property rights, renter’s rights, accredition of health care providers, highways, lane strips on highways, a legal system, snow plowing. Etc, etc.

    A civics oriented government is better at delivering basic services and infrastructure than any self-organizing cooperative when it comes to the big stuff like aqueduct construction and maintenance.

    Civilization begets government. This is your land. Do with it as you will bound by community constraints. Maybe it’s property begets government?

    ReplyReply
    2
  70. de stijl says:

    @Mimai:

    Enjoy the efficiency. That is what governments do.

    I toyed with anarchy a tiny bit in my youth, but then decided I preferred order from the state in measure. Speed limits, traffic control, untainted food, state parks, national parks, the FDA, social security, streets, property rights, renter’s rights, accredition of health care providers, highways, lane strips on highways, a legal system, snow plowing. Etc, etc.

    A civics oriented government is better at delivering basic services and infrastructure than any self-organizing cooperative when it comes to the big stuff like aqueduct construction and maintenance.

    Civilization begets government. This is your land. Do with it as you will bound by community constraints. Maybe it’s property begets government?

    ReplyReply
  71. steve says:

    @Kurtz: Gorsuch also claims that the story highlights a sex worker. There is no one in the book who looks like or is acting as a sex worker. I also have to doubt that he remembers English class or his was very different. In my English class we didnt have books about English, we had stories about animals (we didnt call it animal studies), adventurers, other kids, superheroes, cowboys, etc. I thought Gorsuch was an as&hole but the lawyer wasn’t very sharp.

    Steve

    Steve

    ReplyReply
    2
  72. Gustopher says:

    @steve: I’m pretty sure Gorsuch believes that drag queens are sex workers. They often put on shows and get paid so worker makes sense, and if you think playing with gender norms is inherently titillating… voila, a sex worker.

    ReplyReply
    1
  73. Kylopod says:

    @Kathy:

    That swasticar has already driven off a cliff to the tune of a 71% drop in sales.

    I’ll laugh my ass off if I hear of someone trading it in for a Volkswagen. But at least the creator is dead.

    In seriousness, I know at least two people who voted for Trump and either own or once owned an EV—though not a Tesla. However, neither is hardcore MAGA, and one of them is married to a Democrat.

    Trump, after years of shitting on and mocking EVs, seems to be encouraging his supporters to buy one in order to own the libs. I suspect the number of people with both the money for that venture and the willingness to use it is a lot lower than the pissed-off former Elon fans. Who knew that burning bridges with your main customer base and suddenly trying to appeal to people fed on decades of anti-green propaganda wouldn’t be a sustainable business model.

    ReplyReply
  74. Gustopher says:

    @DK:

    I don’t buy the premise. I don’t think elected Democrats should be in the business of creating crises.

    I don’t believe they should be in the business of throwing away their ability to try to stop the fake economic emergency, or the tariffs, or the fake emergency at the border. That’s what the single legislative day lasting a year was about, and people knew it at the time.

    If it was a clean CR, I might agree with you, but it wasn’t.

    ReplyReply
    2
  75. Gustopher says:

    @Matt Bernius:

    I can understand (but not agree with) conservative objections to this–which I think are primarily based in believing being LGBTQ+ as a choice and therefore something someone can be converted to.

    You know what is a choice that someone can be converted to? Christianity. And every other religion.

    Perhaps we need to create the Holy Church of the Blessed Cocksucker (might need to workshop that name to be more inclusive of the womenfolk and trans folk)

    ReplyReply
    2
  76. Kylopod says:

    Anyone who believes being gay is a choice is not straight.

    ReplyReply
    2
  77. Kathy says:

    @Gustopher:

    You know what is a choice that someone can be converted to? Christianity. And every other religion.

    Isn’t this Christianity’s business model?

    ReplyReply
    2
  78. Gustopher says:

    Make up a saying, perhaps “bugger me with a badger”. Then go to google and search for “bugger me with a badger meaning”.

    The AI will explain it.

    The phrase “bugger me with a badger” is a British slang expression meaning to be persistently harassed or annoyed. It’s a humorous and somewhat crude way of saying someone is being bothered, often used jokingly. The term “badger,” in this context, refers to the act of harassing or pestering someone, drawing a parallel to the practice of badger baiting, a cruel sport where dogs were set upon badgers

    LLMs are great.

    There’s a thread of people enjoying this on BlueSky.

    https://bsky.app/profile/gregjenner.bsky.social/post/3lnhxkdywzc2m

    ReplyReply
  79. DK says:

    @Gustopher:

    I don’t believe they should be in the business of throwing away their ability to try to stop the fake economic emergency

    And that’s exactly what they did not do, by leaving Trump to take sole economic blame, thus increasing Democrats’ ability to win state and federal elections this year and the next.

    Of course, self-martydom and fake purity politics has often been more important to certain self-described progressives than winning elections. Hence why these kinds of progressives rarely if ever win any outside of friendly deep blue districts.

    Folks have every right to argue setting up Dems to prevail in these downballot elections isn’t a pressing consideration rn, or that a shutdown would’ve helped or not hurt our chances of winning these, or that same Trump and Republican legislators who defy a MAGA SCOTUS would’ve caved to Democratic shutdown demands (lmfao), or that the country would’ve benefitted from added shutdown chaos and disruption (of the courts now opposing Trump?), or that preservation of arcane legislative rules that might or might not be invoked later is more important, etc.

    But then they should affix their own disclaimers about assumptions and speculations, instead of just suggesting others do so.

    ReplyReply
    1
  80. Kylopod says:

    Technical OTB matter: The main page has not updated since early in the day, and still says this thread has only 8 comments.

    ReplyReply
    1
  81. Kathy says:

    @Kylopod:

    I just noticed the miniature OTB logo on the chrome tab is B&W and tilted to one side on the main page, but in color and not tilted in blog post pages.

    For all I know, it’s been always this way. I’m not usually very observant of such things.

    ReplyReply
  82. Matt Bernius says:

    @Gustopher:

    Yup. Though I think it’s worth noting that in the case of religions that overlap with ethnic groups, there is a potential genetic component. See, for example, Judaism being passed through the mother. Christianity’s baptism and confirmation processes are–to some degree–a rejection of the genetic transfer of Religion (in part, historically created by Christianity being an offshoot of Judaism).

    @steve:

    Gorsuch also claims that the story highlights a sex worker.

    Wait, what? What was that referring to? Because if it’s the drag queen, then that’s an expansion of the concept of sex worker that I do not understand.

    @Kurtz:

    On the last point, we agree. But I don’t think there is anything conservative about objecting to acknowledging existence of queer culture. It is a firmly right-wing position.

    I understand you’re a bridge builder, but conceding objections to acknowledgement of the existence of queer culture as merely conservative rather than authoritarian is a bridge too far.

    To be clear, understanding does not equal either accepting or endorsing. I’ll go back to abortion–I can understand–though not accept–the idea that life starts at conception. And if someone holds that intentionally ending a life is fundamentally wrong, I can understand objecting to abortion on those grounds. Strict Catholics win on this one for consistency in that they object to both abortion and the death penalty. US Protestants and Evangelicals tend to be much more squishy on those issues.

    I’m not taking either of those positions. And to your point, we have well-established proof that homosexuality has been part of the human condition for as long as there are historical records. And also that societal acceptance for it has waxed and waned. So pretending this is something “new” is ahistorical and not “conservative” in any historical sense.

    To be clear, I also don’t personally endorse anti-Abortion or anti-LGBTQ+ positions in general. AND I also think that acknowledging understanding someone’s position is different than endorsing it. I also believe that it’s a necessary step to trying to work towards better policy.

    @Beth:

    I think this is going to end up being another area where the Christian Nationalists and assorted freak show conservatives are going to end up doing so much damage to the country that we’re going end up having to have multiple amendments to fix the things they are destroying.

    I agree—though I sadly don’t think amendments will fix this—largely because I don’t expect the Constitution to be amended during my lifetime. That’s more due to design flaws in the document that prevent revision in the modern context than the fact that the document has it right from the outset.

    ReplyReply
    2
  83. Matt Bernius says:

    @Kylopod:

    Technical OTB matter: The main page has not updated since early in the day, and still says this thread has only 8 comments.

    Did you try clearing your cache?

    BTW, when you see stuff like that, ping me at mb******@***il.com. I’ll add it to the “to-do” list.

    ReplyReply
  84. de stijl says:

    @Kylopod:

    And replicates all of my comments.

    Twice, only, thank Odin!

    ReplyReply
  85. dazedandconfused says:

    @Kathy:

    “Piss on their heads and tell them it’s raining!” -Trump’s favorite tactic. Works splendidly on the MAGAs but seems to be running into trouble with the Supreme Court justices. Even Alito’s dissent only complains about the procedure and explicitly affirms the ruling itself.

    I suspect the SC is the last bastion. If they had gone full Trump it would’ve been, to borrow from “Aliens”, “Game over man!”

    ReplyReply
    2
  86. Kathy says:

    @Gustopher:

    Some of those might be real but obscure, and others might have featured in fiction.

    Mostly, though, the LLMs can trip without taking acid. That ought to save pennies on the millions wasted on electricity to power them…

    I still find them useful for some things. they tend to do math quite well. It took me a while to check, but most of Copilot’s answers on this seem right, or at least close. Like what average speed must a ship have to reach Alpha Centauri in 200 years? It answered 0.02185 c.

    Calculating speed from time elapsed for a given distance is easy. Dividing kilometers per second by 2 centuries gets tedious.

    And maybe if I’d had such a thing in the 80s, I’d have aced Physics in high school.

    ReplyReply
  87. wr says:

    @Fortune: “Orwell would appreciate your drag queen word search…for civility”

    Oooh, intellectual Fortune knows who Orwell is! No doubt he’s gone the extra mile and read both 1984 AND Animal Farm — because like just about every other American rightie, his entire life’s reading lists consists of books that were assigned to him in high school.

    Hey, Fortune, why don’t you move your reading standards up a little and try something adult? Read Down and Out in Paris and London and realize that Orwell would have spit on you if he’d ever bothered to notice your existence.

    ReplyReply
    2
  88. Beth says:

    @Matt Bernius:

    Wait, what? What was that referring to? Because if it’s the drag queen, then that’s an expansion of the concept of sex worker that I do not understand.

    Conservatives have been claiming that drag queens are sex workers for a while now.

    Also, for what it’s worth, I’m convinced that Gorsuch is a chaser.

    I agree—though I sadly don’t think amendments will fix this—largely because I don’t expect the Constitution to be amended during my lifetime.

    The. I don’t know how we are going to come close to fixing the present situation then. There’s not a lot of options that don’t involve bloodshed. Which, honestly, wouldn’t surprise me. The Republicans are destroying the government. At some point, it’s not going to be fixable. Well, not at least by saying woopies, let’s take that back.

    I’m fairly confident that SCOTUS is going to use Dobbs and the Skermetti case to rule Trans people illegal. The GOP is going to demand that Loving, Lawrence and Obergafell be overruled.

    Once that’s done, they are going to work feverishly to roll back women’s rights. Once the migrants don’t show up (or show up and get rounded up) to harvest shit or cut up chickens, they are going to look to prisons. What do we think is going to happen when a whole mess of Black people watch other Black people in chains picking broccoli? I suspect that’s not going to go well.

    That’s assuming these idiots don’t do something stupid accidentally. Personally, my money is on them blowing shit up with that massive stupid tax cut. Someone is going to have to finance that, and it’s not going to be foreign bond buyers. Imagine the shit storm that would happen if Trump goes on TV and demands the Fed buy up all those fucking treasuries and Powell says no.

    It seems to me that the whole place is ready to blow up and everyone’s just standing in the blast zone going “how did we get here?”

    @dazedandconfused:

    I suspect the SC is the last bastion.

    I think one of the things we need to do is disabuse ourselves of the notion that there is any substantive differences between the 6 conservatives. They all agree on the substance, they just disagree on tactics and volume. All 6 of them are fanatics. Roberts is a fanatic. The only difference between Roberts and Alito is that Alito is too loud and wants people to love him for his brilliance. Roberts is quiet and doesn’t give a shit if anyone likes him.

    ReplyReply
  89. DK says:

    Polls Show Trump’s Approval Rating on Immigration Going South (New York Magazine)

    Democrats have held an extended debate over the wisdom of focusing on Trump’s perceived strong point of immigration policy instead of refusing to speak of anything other than the economy and Trump’s unpopular tariffs. In urging Democrats not to fall prey to the “distraction” of the Abrego Garcia saga, California governor Gavin Newsom memorably referred to immigration as Republicans’ “80-20 issue,” making it dangerous turf for the opposition party.

    …Immigration isn’t an “80-20 issue” for Trump; it may not even be a net positive at all. Four recent national polls now show approval ratings for the president’s handling of immigration policy underwater. It’s at 45 percent approval versus 46 percent disapproval as of April 21, per Reuters-Ipsos; 45 percent approval versus 50 percent disapproval as of April 9, according to Quinnipiac; and exactly the same 45 percent approval to 50 percent disapproval ratio as of April 22, according to Economist-YouGov. And in a big new Pew poll that closed on April 13 respondents were 48 percent positive on Trump’s handling of immigration and 52 percent negative…

    There isn’t much data available on what might have contributed to Trump’s declining popularity on immigration, but the most recent Economist-YouGov survey did ask if Abrego Garcia should be returned to the United States, and 50 percent responded “yes” as opposed to 28 percent responding “no” and the rest unsure. Interestingly enough, only 54 percent of self-identified Republicans said “no”; fully 29 percent were unsure. Unsurprisingly, independents are driving the decline in approval of Trump’s overall handling of immigration… But there was slight erosion even among Republicans.

    So it’s possible, if not certain, that the spotlight Democrats have shone on the Abrego Garcia case and the cruelty and contempt for law it reflects have actually dented Trump’s popularity on his strongest issue.

    Doesn’t basic game theory hold that one should attack an opponent’s strengths?

    ReplyReply
    2
  90. just nutha says:

    @Mimai: Enjoy your respite trip to NOT-LaLa land. It’s nice to get away from Bizarro World.

    ReplyReply
    1
  91. just nutha says:

    @Kathy: None of us saw that coming.

    ReplyReply
  92. just nutha says:

    @Fortune: If you’re not interested in a dialogue, then why respond in the first place?
    (And good job playing the victim with the “I was trying to be nice” opening. Didn’t gain any sympathy, but it was a good try.)

    ReplyReply
    2
  93. Kathy says:

    @Beth:

    I’m afraid it will take a smoking whole where the economy used to be, in order to get significant changes.

    What those changes will be, is anyone’s guess. and they may not take. A lot of what got changed after the civil war, in particular voting and civil rights, was destroyed in a relatively short span, replaced by Jim Crow and segregation.

    ReplyReply
    1
  94. Kurtz says:

    @Matt Bernius:

    To be clear, understanding does not equal either accepting or endorsing. I’ll go back to abortion–I can understand–though not accept–the idea that life starts at conception. And if someone holds that intentionally ending a life is fundamentally wrong, I can understand objecting to abortion on those grounds. Strict Catholics win on this one for consistency in that they object to both abortion and the death penalty. US Protestants and Evangelicals tend to be much more squishy on those issues.

    Those are facile analogies, if not misleading. Those are complex choices, the personal answers of which are shaped Sexuality, gender

    I’m not taking either of those positions. And to your point, we have well-established proof that homosexuality has been part of the human condition for as long as there are historical records. And also that societal acceptance for it has waxed and waned. So pretending this is something “new” is ahistorical and not “conservative” in any historical sense.

    If the default position on government is non-intervention, except in cases of harm to others, then there must be some link to an extraordinary reason for intervening on expression of one’s identity. That identity is not some contagion.

    Conflating conservatism – reluctance to intervene on the government to correct the socio-economic impacts of bigotry unless the harm meets certain criteria – with the right wing position, active denial of the very existence of those identities is no different from climate denial.

    I have specific reasons for why I think economic rights are intrinsically different from personal rights. But that is a whole other conversation.

    ReplyReply
    3
  95. Jobeth says:

    @ptfe: We stayed in a hotel hosting the local “Miss Leather” pageant contestants when my daughter was four. She was a little confused by the deep voices on the ladies and asked if they were men. Yes, we said – those are men dressed like women – they are comfortable like that and enjoy dressing up. No big deal, nothing sexual in the conversation. Why is this so hard for some people?

    ReplyReply
    3
  96. just nutha says:

    @Kurtz:

    As a nonbeliever, I find the eschatological bent of the Christian Right offensive. They act more like Pharisees and Sadducees than Jesus. Their worldview is focused on Revelation more than the Gospel.

    40 or so years ago, I read a book called Less Than Conquerors. The author’s claim was the historically, Christian sects have focused away from the Gospels and toward end-time prophecy as they moved from cultural hegemony to minority-status in their communities. That book and Elul’s argument that cultural-supremacy is not consistent with Jesus’ message in The Subversion of Christianity were formative for my worldview and understanding of how I should “live” as a believer.

    ReplyReply
    1
  97. Stormy Dragon says:

    In “gender affirming care is fine, but only for cis people” news:

    Hegseth orders makeup studio installed at Pentagon

    ReplyReply
    1
  98. dazedandconfused says:

    @Stormy Dragon:

    No. This is entirely appropriate.

    For Heggie, having a makeup studio is a must.

    ReplyReply
  99. CSK says:

    The action on this forum stopped early today, didn’t it?

    ReplyReply
  100. Mister Bluster says:

    Looking for Thursday Forum.

    ReplyReply
  101. Mister Bluster says:

    Looking for comments.

    ReplyReply
  102. Mister Bluster says:

    @CSK:..The action on this forum stopped early today, didn’t it?

    That’s what I thought. Comments stopped at 42 yesterday (Wednesday, April 24, 2025). No matter how often I checked the thread. Never did try to make a comment.
    This morning there were still 42 comments. I posted the comment “Looking for Thursday Forum”
    on my phone and when that posted there were 100 comments.
    Then I accessed the OTB site on my MacBook Air. Could only see 42 comments. Posted “Looking for Comments” and now I see 100+ comments.
    Apparently the squirrels are very busy now that spring has sprung!

    ReplyReply
    2
  103. CSK says:

    @Mister Bluster:

    Same here, with Chrome.

    ReplyReply
  104. mister bluster says:

    Comment check

    ReplyReply
  105. Mister Bluster says:

    @CSK:..Chrome

    I also run Chrome on my MacBook Air. I assume that my iPhone runs Safari.
    Just checked OTB on Safari on the same MacBook Air.
    The cover page said 104 Comments. When I opened the Wednesday’s Forum page it said 42 Comments. Then I posted “Comment check” and and when that appeared the comment counter on the Wednesday’s Forum thread tallied 104.
    Whatever can we do about all these squirrels?

    In any event I see that Thursday’s Form is up.
    Can’t wait to see how today’s Comment Circus plays out!

    ETA: This comment posted as soon as I hit the Post Comment key.
    No 60 second delay!

    ReplyReply
    2
  106. ptfe says:

    @ptfe: Testing comments. Front page says 105, this page says 42 and ends at my previous, but surely the lively discussion happening when I posted that continued apace?

    ReplyReply

Speak Your Mind

*