More of the Grift

P. T. Barnum would be proud.

So, the other day I noted that there were ivermectin advertisements in inserts of Trump rallies on one of the right-wing cable channels (see the image above).

In scrolling through Aaron Rupar’s Twitter feed of clips from Trump’s lastest rallies I noticed it again.

I was initially simply struck hat a symbol of the scam that was Trump’s governance (the idea that ivermectin was our savior from COVID and now, apparently, against contagions in general) alongside Trump asserting how his loss would damage the country. Basically, it is Opposite Day in a “Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra” kind of way.

But wait, there’s more!

This one is especially interesting:

It is worth noting the 1488 is a known pro-Nazi symbol. The ADL notes:

1488 is a combination of two popular white supremacist numeric symbols. The first symbol is 14, which is shorthand for the “14 Words” slogan: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.” The second is 88, which stands for “Heil Hitler” (H being the 8th letter of the alphabet). Together, the numbers form a general endorsement of white supremacy and its beliefs. 

Reports the Times of Israel: Trump ally says $14.88 sale price for pillows not intended as pro-Nazi symbolism.

So, here’s the deal. If someone points out that you might be using a pro-Nazi symbol and you then claim to not be doing do on purpose, you’d think you’d stop using it.

And, I would note, that I have received e-mail adverts from MyPillow and noticed the $14.88 price in the subject line. I noted it in passing as I spammed it, because as all red blooded Americans know, the normal “discount price” used $x.99. It is truly the American way! I thought I was an attention-grabbing number, having forgotten about 1488’s significance.

Then I saw some stories about it (like the the one linked above). I then noticed that the adverts were sayin 14.98.

Now, I don’t know for sure what is going on. Maybe someone who works for Lindell is Nazi sympathizer or maybe they are an Edge Lord who just thinks this kind of 4Chan nonsense is funny. Maybe Lindell knows full well what he’s doing. Or maybe it is all just a coincidence.

Here’s what I do know: once this was brought to their attention, they should have ceased. Instead, it looks like they are willing to play these games and that, at a minimum, they think the RSBN audience doesn’t care or, worse, might be attracted to the symbolism.

When people continually tell you who they are, believe them.

One thing is for certain about all of this: RSBN is clearly using a grift-based revenue model. Free programming from the Trump with scam adverts in the corner. It certainly tells you what they think of their audience.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum, , ,
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a retired Professor of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter

Comments

  1. Kathy says:

    I think there’s a Rule of Acquisition that states “the sheep want to be fleeced.”

    ReplyReply
    7
  2. Kylopod says:

    This gets to the old question of why the Dems never produced a Trump-like figure. Republican gullibility relative to that of Dems was noticeable for years before Trump entered the political scene. Scam ads were a staple in GOP-aligned media for a long time. This was discussed at length by historian Rick Perlstein, and, in fairness, by one National Review writer (I can’t remember who at the moment). There were Fox advertisers who stated it openly when asked why they preferred to put their ads on Fox compared with other networks, and a great deal of right-wing commentary was often connected directly with get-rich-quick companies, as in Glenn Beck’s gold-hawking.

    The supposed 1998 Trump quote about wanting to run as a Republican because they’re the dumbest voters around is an urban legend, but I don’t have any doubt that’s what he privately believes, and is the main reason he chose the GOP as his home.

    ReplyReply
    7
  3. charontwo says:

    Flooding the zone with shit, grabbing people’s attention.

    ReplyReply
    2
  4. charontwo says:

    @Kylopod:

    and is the main reason he chose the GOP as his home.

    Where he would find the sort of people who would produce the adulation he craves – rally crowds, Trump kitsch displays etc.

    ReplyReply
    3
  5. MarkedMan says:

    Is belief in Ivermectin* any different than belief in all those supplements sold in the supermarket?

    *Belief in Ivermectin as an anti-Covid drug. It’s prescribed for other things, and not just “horse medicine”. My wife has had a prescription for years for a skin condition, and had a helluva time getting it during the crazy era.

    ReplyReply
    1
  6. CSK says:

    @Kylopod:

    Jared Kushner is supposed to have expressed the same sentiments.

    ReplyReply
  7. Scott says:

    @MarkedMan:

    Is belief in Ivermectin* any different than belief in all those supplements sold in the supermarket?

    Yes, the anti-vax movement has a following (maybe even part of the origins) in the brain dead Marin County leftist community as well as the yoga studio crowd in California.

    Can anyone say JFK Jr?

    ReplyReply
    2
  8. Kathy says:

    @MarkedMan:

    A little.

    Certain conditions require taking supplements regularly. the question is whether the unregulated stuff sold in the supermarket contains the stuff it claims to, and whether it will get absorbed as required.

    Past that, most people don’t need supplements if they eat a varied diet. In such a case, supplements would be, as Sheldon Cooper put it, ingredients for expensive urine. But the only harm would be wasting money.

    Relying on ivermectin instead of vaccination and actual treatments like Paxlovid or even antibody infusions, is actually risky for things like death or long term disability.

    ReplyReply
    1
  9. Kylopod says:

    @MarkedMan: I tend to think there’s some level of randomness, and some trial-and-error, in the popularity of specific miracle cures. Frankly, I think the main reason invermectin became more successful than the earlier cure-all, hydroxychloroquine, is simply that the name is easier to remember and pronounce. Yes, it’s that dumb.

    A lot of people have forgotten that Lindell in 2020 was briefly hawking oleander as a miracle Covid cure. The reason he stopped, and that it didn’t catch on more broadly in the quack community, is probably the same as why a lot of viruses become less deadly over time: they won’t have anyone to infect if the hosts are all dead.

    ReplyReply
  10. Kylopod says:

    @CSK:

    Jared Kushner is supposed to have expressed the same sentiments.

    Yes. I believe it was someone here, maybe you, who first brought it to my attention.

    ReplyReply
  11. Kylopod says:

    Fun bit of historical trivia. The quack doctor who was partly responsible for President Garfield’s death from a very survivable shot wound, literally had the first name Doctor. His full name and title was Dr. Doctor Willard Bliss.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Willard_Bliss

    ReplyReply
  12. MarkedMan says:

    @Kathy:

    But the only harm would be wasting money

    I respectfully disagree. People buy supplements instead of seeking treatment for real life problems. For example, patients may avoid high blood pressure medication and instead take a “natural” supplement. We are so used to seeing supplements sold that we assume they can’t be a bad thing. But they can, and they are. At BEST they are a waste of money. But they can be much worse.

    Certain herbs or nutritional supplements are associated with kidney injury, even among healthy people. With such a wide variety of supplements available, the best way to know if a supplement is safe is to ask your doctor to review all the ingredients.

    Dietary supplements aren’t regulated by the Food and Drug Administration as drugs, but as food. Since all ingredients may not be listed on the label and they can interfere with the prescription medications you’re taking, consult your doctor before taking dietary supplements.

    Researchers have reviewed 17 dietary supplements that have been associated with direct kidney injury, though in a very limited numbers of cases.

    And, as you alluded above, they frequently contain significantly more or less of what they are labeled for, and as the NYTimes found out, may contain other, directly harmful things. As an example several of the supplements they tested were contaminated with gluten or nut oils.

    ReplyReply
    2
  13. MarkedMan says:

    @Kylopod: Just an aside, but as I mentioned above, my wife has had an ivermectin prescription for a skin condition for years. And I took chloroquine for two years while in the Peace Corps in Africa. Both of us have had Covid, my wife more than once. And Chloroquine can cause severe tachycardia in a small percentage of those taking it, up to and including fatal arrhythmia.

    ReplyReply
    1
  14. @MarkedMan: A couple of quick thoughts:

    1. I am specifically referencing problems wit ivermectin as it pertains to COVID and as part of a “contagion emergency kit”–I fully allow it has a number of real and significant applications to humans as medication.

    2. I would say that, as a general matter, many (most? all?) supplements are good example that it is not just a certain kind of conservative who can be gullible. It is a human frailty as a general matter.

    Certainly the ads we all see at the bottom of some websites about “one weird trick” and promises of rock hard abs via doing practically nothing similarly illustrate the point.

    ReplyReply
  15. Lounsbury says:

    @Kylopod: PArtisan self-congratulation is rather silly. Your partisan self-congrats would be better amended to “not yet” – as the snobbery of the professional class Democrats is rather poorly informed by history.

    Pr Taylor was quite right in the past to highlight weak party apparatus / barrier to entry is the problem – that the opposition caught the virus first is an accident of history (whatever intellectualised snobbery as self-flattery might pretend, Mr Kennedy rather reflects populist woo-ism can easily go Leftwise)

    ReplyReply
    2
  16. Argon says:

    The modern day GOP is run by people that learned their ABGs… Always Be Grifting.

    ReplyReply
  17. Jack says:

    Seriously, people? RSBN. That’s John Oliver level propaganda. Choose a whackjob sight and portray it broadly as Republican?

    How about Raw Story. Mother Jones. HuffPost. Bulwark. MSNBC. All crazed left loons. The most bizarre of the bizarre.

    I pity you people that this is what you have to resort to. Wow. Just wow.

    ReplyReply
    1
  18. Stormy Dragon says:

    @Kathy:

    Rule of Acquisition #217: you can’t free a fish from water

    ReplyReply
  19. Kathy says:

    @MarkedMan:

    Well, yes. taking supplements instead of a prescribed treatment would be the same as taking ivermectin for the trump disease.

    Taking supplements as supplements because one thinks it’s somehow “good,” might lead merely to wasting money.

    ReplyReply
  20. Jen says:

    @Jack: It’s good to hear you acknowledge that a network set up to exclusively stream all of Trump’s speeches is nothing but propaganda.

    ReplyReply
    5
  21. MarkedMan says:

    @Steven L. Taylor:

    I am specifically referencing problems wit ivermectin as it pertains to COVID

    Understood. I’m just a little sensitive to when my wife had to tell doctors that she is taking ivermectin and she initially gets “that look”. At this point, an entirely rational reaction to finding out someone is taking it, but not always justified.

    ReplyReply
    2
  22. MarkedMan says:

    @Steven L. Taylor:

    I would say that, as a general matter, many (most? all?) supplements are good example that it is not just a certain kind of conservative who can be gullible.

    @Kathy:

    Well, yes. taking supplements instead of a prescribed treatment would be the same as taking ivermectin for the trump disease.

    That was my (obviously, poorly phrased) point to begin with. It’s easy to laugh at people taken in my the ivermectin/Covid nonsense, until you realize that the supermarkets give up huge amounts of valuable shelf space over to supplements, which pretty much guarantees it’s not just trumpers falling for them. Hell, I think Whole Foods has proportionately more supplement placement than Walmart.

    ReplyReply
    4
  23. wr says:

    @Lounsbury: “PArtisan self-congratulation is rather silly. Your partisan self-congrats would be better amended to “not yet” – as the snobbery of the professional class Democrats is rather poorly informed by history.”

    That’s right, fools! All humans are too stupid not to fall for such a conman. Except for your infinite superior, the Great and Brilliant Lounsbury! All bow down before his majestic intelligence!

    Remember, the only thing standing between him and total global domination is his inability to write a coherent sentence in English! But that’s only because language is too far beneath him…

    ReplyReply
    3
  24. just nutha says:

    @Kathy: I use supplements on the advice of my primary care physician (who monitors the levels of the effect the have on my blood work). My outlay for them amounts to about $25 for each 90 day supply. The Vitamin D3 and magnesium supplements appear to be working, but the iron supplement’s jury is still out. And you’re absolutely right about almost nobody knowing how either supplements or nutrients from a balanced diet get absorbed on any level beyond extremely rudimentary ones.

    Just call me one of the mindless buffoons, I guess. Overall though, my urine is still pretty inexpensive. Roughly 20¢/day more than yours.

    ReplyReply
    1
  25. Franklin says:

    @Kylopod: Doctor Doctor? Maybe Garfield would’ve had a better outcome if he had just been burning, burning!

    ReplyReply
    1
  26. Kathy says:

    @just nutha:

    I’ve no idea how supplements and nutrients are absorbed, beyond a rudimentary one 🙂

    ReplyReply
  27. @Jack: I didn’t mention Republicans in my post, I would note.

    Still, who is it you think watches RSBN? Fabian socialists? Adherents to the Green Party?

    ReplyReply
    4
  28. just nutha says:

    @MarkedMan: Last time I checked, the efficacy rate for HBT treatment using conventional medicines was about 35%. Has that number risen recently? I don’t keep track anymore because I’m still trying to convince my doctor that the reason my blood pressure goes up seasonally is because asthma and the medications used to treat it raise one’s BP.

    I had that conversation when I met my new PCP in June:

    Is your blood pressure usually this high?

    Yes, at this time of year. It always goes up in asthma season.

    [Listens to breathing] Hmmm… Your lungs sound clear…

    Yes, that’s because I’ve been taking 3 or 4 different medications several times a day for 3 or 4 weeks now.

    Hmmm…

    ETA: Wash, rinse, repeat for each new PCP

    ReplyReply
    1
  29. just nutha says:

    @Kathy: Me neither. That’s why I keep taking my doctor’s word on the needing supplements thing. I take some comfort about the brand I’m buying at the grocery store being the same one the Kaiser MC pharmacy sells, too.

    ReplyReply
    1
  30. CSK says:

    @Jack:

    The Bulwark is run by “crazed left loons”? Coulda fooled me.

    ReplyReply
    5
  31. Jay L Gischer says:

    I had Covid in June. I talked to my cardiologist on the phone. She asked me about symptoms, trying to suss out how severe I was experiencing it. It turns out, not too bad. She declined to put me on ivermectin, because I would have had to go off my statin. But she said that if it got worse, she would put me on it.

    So, it’s not a quack medicine, but probably should be administered by a doctor. And not bought in “kits” over the internet. Do you know where that’s been?

    ReplyReply
  32. DK says:

    @Kylopod:

    This gets to the old question of why the Dems never produced a Trump-like figure.

    Because the Democratic Party is a genuinely heterogenous, multicultural, big tent party. At a national level, Democrats must balance the interests of groups from very varied walks of life. This imperative is itself a moderating force, and means Democrats cannot just cater its own gullibles, morons, and dogmatic ideologues.

    The Republican Party has become increasingly homogenous and lacking in diversity. It’s therefore easier for any one extreme to gain outsized power, and it doesn’t help matters when fundamentalist religiosity and lack of education feature prominently in the party’s homogeneity. Or that the Senate and the Electoral College often allow Republicans to escape punishment for elevating its nuts.

    The GQP could benefit greatly from DEI, but too many conservatives are too ignorant to see why. The only cure I see is continual election losses. Republicans may hate gays, women, college grads, and PoC, but I’m guessing they’d hate repeatedly losing even more.

    ReplyReply
    2
  33. Mister Bluster says:

    @Jack:..bizarre.

    …grab them by the pussy!
    …children go to grade schools and come home a few days later with sex change operations…
    …I think there is a definite anti-white feeling in this country and that can’t be allowed.
    …My Admin has done more for the Black Community than any President since Abraham Lincoln,..

    ReplyReply
    4
  34. Kathy says:

    @Jay L Gischer:

    You may want to consider a different cardiologist. All I’ve read on the subject indicates ivermectin has no significant effect on recovery time, odds of hospitalization, or anything else regarding the trump disease.

    Sometime doctors with real training and experience fall for fads and misinformation, too.

    ReplyReply
    2
  35. Michael Reynolds says:

    @DK:
    Yep. We are, paradoxically perhaps, more likely to be immune to fascism because, structurally, we are a whole unruly choir singing from songbooks that are only partly aligned.

    I wouldn’t want to make too much of it, but unruly alliances have in the past outperformed more rigidly discipline groups. The Allies vs. the Axis, NATO vs. the Warsaw Pact.

    ReplyReply
    1
  36. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Jack:
    Back up even a single thing you wrote.

    ReplyReply
    1
  37. dazedandconfused says:

    @Kylopod:

    Giving your kid the first name “Doctor” is some real sneaky s&#t. Have to hand it to them on this one.

    I read once someplace the George Washington likely succumbed due to some over-zealous docs of his time. They thought bleeding was the miracle cure, and George being who he was, they did it so many times he probably was weakened to the point were the flu took him out.

    ReplyReply
    1
  38. Joe says:

    @dazedandconfused: But for those quack doctors, Washington would still be with us today!

    ReplyReply
  39. Gustopher says:

    If you can get Nazis to part with money by selling things for $14.88, that means less money for them to do Nazi shit with.

    Alas, I suspect that many of these grifters are Nazis themselves, so it’s just concentrating Nazi funds.

    I’d like the ADL or someone to secretly set up some companies to grift that money out of the Nazi community. And then let their customer list get hacked. “Hacked” as it were.

    “Genuine Donald Trump inspired body pillow, was $17.76, but get it now for $14.88 — 15% off!” — has a ring to it, no?

    ReplyReply
  40. Jay L Gischer says:

    @Kathy: OR, it could be that she doesn’t quite trust that I will take her word for it. The situation she is navigating goes between “I am here for you”, and “you probably don’t need any medical intervention”. That’s a tricky spot for a doctor, since many, many people equate interventions with somebody caring.

    ReplyReply
  41. Gustopher says:

    @Kylopod: Dr. Doctor William Bliss also treated Zachary Taylor for Malaria in 1844, a few years before his death in office.

    I really want that death to be linked to botched malaria treatments.

    No information as to whether he treated Lincoln for a headache at Ford Theater.

    ReplyReply
  42. MarkedMan says:

    @just nutha:

    I use supplements on the advice of my primary care physician (who monitors the levels of the effect the have on my blood work)

    Someone with a diagnosed deficiency treating it with supplements under a doctors care seems pretty sensible to me. And if you can get OTC supplements that are working that saves a lot in comparison to the prescription ones that Pharma companies make.
    @Jay L Gischer:

    She declined to put me on ivermectin, because I would have had to go off my statin. But she said that if it got worse, she would put me on it.

    Ivermectin is an antiviral but it has demonstrated no efficacy against Covid-19 in serious clinical trials and there have been too many, as the resources would have been better spent on other things. Here’s one, from a n=1400, double blind study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2022. At this point, if my doctor was seriously talking about ivermectin as a cure for Covid-19 I would find a new doctor. But that’s just me.

    ReplyReply
  43. Kathy says:

    @Jay L Gischer:

    There’s a medical intervention, Paxlovid. It does indicate a window of about 5 days from a positive test or onset of symptoms. Past that, apparently it may not be as effective.

    But by far the best intervention is to get vaccinated and take the anual booster as well.

    ReplyReply
  44. Gustopher says:

    @Jay L Gischer: I wonder if your doctor thought you were a Republican, and that she should head off you demanding Ivermectin by saying it wasn’t for your level of illness. (What level of illness is it good for? Whatever level you don’t have.)

    If so, you have my sympathies. People sometimes mistake me for a Republican, and it’s terrible.

    ReplyReply
  45. MarkedMan says:

    @Kylopod:

    This gets to the old question of why the Dems never produced a Trump-like figure

    At least once in the past, they did. George Wallace ran the first time as a Dem, but could make no headway with party leaders, who still had a lot of say in who got the nomination. It’s one of the reasons I think Bernie’s successful crusade to eliminate the Super Delegates is potentially disastrous. Every party should have a “break glass in case of fire” tool in their back pocket.

    I think one of the things that stops today’s Democratic party from going off the deep end is how many people have been driven into it because of GOP insanity. They want nothing to do with that nonsense and provide a brake on going too far.

    ReplyReply

Speak Your Mind

*