With President George W. Bush Looking on, Judge Samuel A. Alito Acknowledges his Nomination as Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, 10/31/2005
“George W. Bush and Samuel A. Alito” by Paul Morse/National Archives is in the Public Domain, CC0

Alito Considering Retirement

I question the timing.

13

Comments

POLITICO (“Justice Alito confirms he is considering retirement“):

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has confirmed that he is considering retirement, leaving open the possibility that he could leave after next year’s term and hand another nomination to President Donald Trump.

Alito said in excerpts of a CBS News interview released Friday that he thought about retiring this year and will do so again in 2027.

“It’s something that I think that somebody at my age has to think about every term,” the 76-year-old said in the interview scheduled to air Monday. “But I thought that I could still make a valuable contribution, which is why I became a justice and a judge in the first place.”

Alito’s interview, the first in a number of expected appearances to coincide with the release of a book about his judicial philosophy, raises the possibility that Trump, whose judicial picks shifted the Supreme Court to the right, may get an opportunity to nominate a fourth justice.

The president, who expressed regret in a recent interview about several nominees who ruled against his administration on some issues, would have a harder time getting a fourth pick through the Senate if Democrats win control in the midterms.

Alito, in the CBS interview, pushed back on concerns that the timing of his retirement and his replacement could potentially unravel his work on the bench.

“It’s too hard to predict what the political situation will be and what any president might do with respect to a replacement,” he said.

Alito, of course, has the right to stay on the job as long as he feels able to do it. And I’m sure there are many Justices who regret having retired as early as they did. There are fewer jobs that are more rewarding.

Still, Alito seems to be the most nakedly partisan of the nine justices. With Democrats taking control of the Senate after the midterms now looking likely, there’s no way they would allow a vote on a Trump appointee. Like it or not, the Merrick Garland precedent exists.

Alito is right that predicting the results of the 2026—much less the 2028—election is risky. But it Democrats retake the Senate in January and retake the White House two years thereafter, Alito will have to make it to at least 83 to avoid dying or retiring under a Democratic president.

In an ideal world, of course, Justices would be nonpartisan and not concern themselves with such a thing. We do not live in that world.

13 responses to “Alito Considering Retirement”

  1. “Alito, of course, has the right to stay on the job as long as he feels able to do it.”

    It’s a lifetime job. They can stay even if they know they are unable to do the job. (Impeachment is essentially impossible.) This is one of the major flaws in our constitution though the lack ofloimits on the executive branch outside of norms may be the worst.

    Steve

    Steve

    3
  2. Though I think many of us Democrats are confident about taking the House, gaining control of the Senate seems less likely. If that happens, the current president will get what he wants, sadly. And if the Dems do take the Senate, I’m certain that Justice Alito will simply delay his retirement. None of this is good news, alas.

    1. Alternatively, if he has reason to believe he might not make it to the next Republican administration, he might bring his retirement forward to November so Trump and Thune can rush through a replacement before Christmas.

  3. Michael Reynolds Avatar
    Michael Reynolds

    If we take the Senate we can reject anyone Trump appoints. And any Democrat who steps out of line will have ended their career.

    3
    1. Fetterman’s career has already ended for all practical purposes. All Trump would need to do would be to appoint someone who’s a fervent champion of Israel and that would get Fetterman’s vote.

  4. If the Dems take the Senate, and Alito retires, that seat remains open until 2028. 100%

    2
    1. @EddieInCA I presume Alito would make his retirement conditional on the confirmation of his successor.

  5. Should the senate flip on election night or upon voting counting in the following week, here’s plenty of time between November and January for Alito to retire and be replaced by the current senate before the new Congress is seated. Republicans have already shown they have no scruples about such things; they got Barrett confirmed in less time than that.

    4
    1. @DK Certainly true. But it sounds like Alito is planning on serving at least one more court term.

  6. We need to either do away with lifetime appointments, or the fixed number of justices — it just creates a way to game the system.

    Since the lifetime requirement is in the constitution, I think the easiest answer is to appoint one justice every two years, and let the number grow and ebb as justices die off.

    Either that or “Soylent Green Is Supreme Court Justices”…

    2
    1. Another example of why the US Constitution, though being revered by many Americans, and in many ways rather effective in sustaining a polity, really does have some rather silly precepts.
      Sorry, Americans. 😉

      1
    2. One solution would be to appoint the chief justice of each district to the Supreme Court ex officio, with a full-time Chief Justice elected by them to oversee the administration of the court. Each case could be assigned to a randomly-drawn panel of eight judges for hearing, perhaps with a proviso that a significant case could be heard by the full court if a majority of members supported it. The full court would also hear cases where the Supreme Court had original jurisdiction.

      (I favour an even numbered bench because it avoids the 5-4 decisions which bring the law and the court into disrepute. If the bench is tied 4-4, the decision of the lower court would stand until such time as a similar matter was ripe for rehearing by a different bench.)