No House Vote On Syria Resolution If Votes Aren’t There?
Would House Republicans really defer from voting on a Syria resolution to prevent embarrassing the President on the world stage?
Would House Republicans really defer from voting on a Syria resolution to prevent embarrassing the President on the world stage?
The President has admitted that there is no imminent threat to the United States in Syria.
Things aren’t looking good for President Obama in the House of Representatives.
Bombing Country B to “send a message” to Country A is not a valid argument for bombing Country B.
President Obama seems to have forgotten the words of a certain Illinois State Senator back in 2002.
President Obama has decided not to enforce a law. This is most unusual and somewhat disturbing.
A proposed Syria authorization being considered in the Senate places several limits on Presidential authority to act, but it’s unclear if those limits can actually work.
Not surprisingly, Congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle are lining up behind the President in the debate over Syria.
Some questions that the Administration needs to answer before attacking Syria.
Presidents have gotten away with ignoring Congress when it comes to foreign military adventures for a very long time.
Some Members of Congress are calling for a debate before any strikes on Syria. They’re absolutely right.
The IRS will allow all married gay couples to file joint returns, but that still leaves couples in most of the country with more hoops to jump through.
And Republicans wonder why they have problems with minority voters.
The White House confirmed today that the goal of any military intervention in Syria would be very limited. Which makes one wonder what the point of doing anything actually is.
Three counties in New Mexico are under orders to issue licenses to same-sex couples.