President Donald Trump hosts a bilateral dinner for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Monday, July 7, 2025, in the Blue Room.
Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok

EU and Canada Impose Sanctions on Israel Over Settlements

Jerusalem is increasingly isolated, with Washington as its main defender.

6

Comments

BBC (“UK announces sanctions on West Bank settlements prompting furious Israeli response“):

The UK has announced sanctions on illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, accusing Israel’s government of turning a blind eye to the “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinians by settlers.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said the move marked the “beginning of a new approach” to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which “not only calls out injustice and suffering but acts”.

Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Saar responded by accusing him of spreading an “outrageous lie” and announced counter-measures including shutting the UK’s consulate in East Jerusalem.

The UK sanctions will ban settlement goods but also act against companies and individuals providing services for settlement expansion.

The sanctions were launched alongside France and Canada, which in a joint statement with the UK said the action “marks a further turning point in our approach to protecting the two-state solution”.

Settlements are illegal under international law, and there has been a rise in violence towards Palestinians in the West Bank by settlers in recent months.

In a statement to MPs, Miliband said: “The British government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank, perpetrated by settler terrorists.

“And all too often the Israeli government has turned a blind eye to this and worse, members of it have made statements and taken actions to support the forced displacement of Palestinians.”

He said ethnic cleansing was defined by the UN as a “purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent means another ethnic or religious group from certain areas”.

Miliband said the official view of the government was that the Israeli occupation of the West Bank was unlawful because of the “entrenchment of its control, its intention to extend permanent sovereignty, and its expansionist agenda via illegal settlements”.

He said this position, which is in line with a 2024 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice, should be reflected in the UK’s “economic relationship” with the occupied West Bank.

Le Monde (“11 European countries and Canada sanction products from Israeli settlements in West Bank“):

A milestone was reached in relations between Israel and its European allies on Tuesday, September 8, with the joint announcement by the United Kingdom, France and nine European countries (Denmark, Spain, Finland, Ireland, Iceland, Norway, Poland, Portugal and Sweden), as well as Canada, of sanctions against products originating from Israeli settlements in the West Bank. The implementation of these measures, which still needs to be defined by each country, resulted from the inability of the 27 member states of the European Union to agree on a joint action. Nonetheless, the announcement is significant. It signals a shift toward sanctioning all settlements – not just a handful of violent actors and organizations – while rejecting the gradual normalization on which Israel had long relied.

Reuters (“Israel tells Britain to close East Jerusalem consulate within 30 days, officials say“):

Israel has told Britain it must close its East Jerusalem consulate within a month, Israeli officials said on Wednesday, as a retaliatory step against sanctions that Britain, France and Canada have announced against settlements.

The sanctions are among the strongest collective actions taken by major Western allies of Israel over Israeli settlements, and have prompted intense ‌pushback in Israel weeks before it holds a general election.

While the effect of the sanctions may be mostly symbolic, they highlight Israel’s growing isolation among countries it once counted as close allies over its war in Gaza and expansion of settlements in the West Bank. The U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, a staunch supporter of Israel, has condemned the sanctions and accused the British government of “Jew hate”, but neither the White House nor the State Department issued strong criticism of the move.

Two Israeli officials and two other sources familiar with the matter said London had been given 30 days to close the consulate, which represents Britain in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza on Palestinian issues. Israel has also barred 12 British politicians from visiting the ⁠country, told British officials and diplomats in the West Bank and a Gaza coordination centre in Israel to leave, and said Britain can no longer train Palestinian security forces in the West Bank.

It has not yet announced actions against France or Canada, which joined Britain in saying they will halt trade with settlements, or against nine other countries that endorsed the UK sanctions. Although the UK sanctions were widely anticipated, Israeli parliamentary opposition leader Yair Lapid said on Tuesday that “no one knew” the other countries were going to endorse the move.

The rift between Israel and the West has been growing for decades, with the United States often serving as Israel’s only defender. It has become clear in the last several months that even US support is fragile, with young Democrats in particular vehemently opposed to Israeli policies. Lingering sympathy from the Holocaust—and even the horrific massacre of October 7, 2023—is exhausted in most quarters.

I see no prospect of this changing any time soon. Even if Netanyahu’s party is defeated (and the polls seem to show that as a strong possibility), there’s broad support in Israel for continuing to attack Hamas and to expand Jewish control of the West Bank and expelling the Arab population. I suspect sanctions will just strengthen their resolve.

6 responses to “EU and Canada Impose Sanctions on Israel Over Settlements”

  1. Those of us old enough to remember when Republicans defended Apartheid South Africa up until the last minute can see quite a few parallels. Chief among them: second and third class status for those outside the power-wielding group, with zero to no rights for the third class, and no access to the justice system. Their only hope for change was armed rebellion. The ANC, while not nearly as bloodthirsty psychotic as HAMAS, were on a downward spiral and could have ended up in the same place. But one fundamental difference: Nelson Mandela. A moderate who had the respect of both sides (okay, “respect” is not quite right) and who was able to head off what surely would have otherwise been a bloodbath. No such figure exists in the Israel-Palestinian conflict and we are left to pick through various shades of evil, and seemingly inevitably horrific outcomes. The US has no business picking sides here. We are constantly told Israel is our most important ally in the Middle East, when in fact they are our greatest burden, especially with an easily manipulated senile fool in the Whitehouse.

    3
  2. I sort of wonder what Israel’s endgame is supposed to be.

    Western supporters of Israel are generally much more anti-Muslim than pro-Israel, and a significant portion of those are (at least) vaguely Nazi-adjacent and tend towards antisemitism.

    Being Jewish and relying on far-right support is a rather bold strategy, IMO. Let’s see if it pays off for them.

  3. Charley in Cleveland Avatar
    Charley in Cleveland

    It’s nothing short of tragic to see Israel becoming an international pariah thanks in large part to its far right government and its corrupt prime minister. The country’s fierce military reaction to 10/7 went from righteous and just to “What the f**k are you doing?!” as innocent people were bombed, made homeless, and then starved. Haaretz just reported that Netenyahu had advance notice of the attack and did not share the warning with Israeli security forces. Did he want a casus belli? The mind reels.

    And memo to Mike Huckabee: it is not “Jew hate” to criticize Israeli policy regarding Palestinians.

    1. Haaretz just reported that Netenyahu had advance notice of the attack and did not share the warning with Israeli security forces.

      As Haaretz reported, he received a direct and personal warning from the head of the UAE.

      But Egyptian intelligence also warned their Israeli counterparts, just a few days before the 10/7 attacks occurred:

      Israel was warned by Egypt of potential violence three days before Hamas’ deadly cross-border raid, a US congressional panel chairman [McCaul, R -Texas] has said.

      Tellingly:

      Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu described the reports as “absolutely false”.

      In light of this, it doesn’t sound particularly far-fetched anymore to assume that Netanyahu wanted something to happen, although perhaps not on the scale that it eventually did.

  4. Milliband is Jewish and his parents fled to England during WW2, and that’s where we are regarding anti-semitism right now: a dumb American hick saying a sophisticated Jewish man is filled with ‘Jew hate’.

    One thing about terrorism is that it’s a benefit to the state’s power. To the state, Terrorism is illogical and can’t be predicted, and those who are attacked are complete innocents, and that is why it is powerful. It liberates the state.. 9/11 helped the US government; hours later, Cheney and Rumsfeld were drooling like test rats, and nobody was blamed for anything. The apartments attacks in 1999 helped Putin, and half of Russia believed he might have been behind them. 10/7 helped the Israeli state, and no one in power in that day will ever suffer for being on the watch while it took place.

    The problem is that making everything terrorism, which is what Israeli has done, makes you far more illogical, destructive, and absurd than the people you are fighting, and that’s what happened with Israel, and not only Netanyahu.

  5. Within days of the Oct 7th attacks, I speculated on the end state of Israel. I thought there could be only two possible configurations: a greater Israel that would give full citizenship to Palestinians. Or two, a two state solution that would require the West Bank settlers to abandon their settlements and leave.

    I did not have ethnic cleansing on my list of options.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.