President Donald Trump hosts a bilateral dinner for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Monday, July 7, 2025, in the Blue Room.
Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok

EU and Canada Impose Sanctions on Israel Over Settlements

Jerusalem is increasingly isolated, with Washington as its main defender.

21

Comments

BBC (“UK announces sanctions on West Bank settlements prompting furious Israeli response“):

The UK has announced sanctions on illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, accusing Israel’s government of turning a blind eye to the “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinians by settlers.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said the move marked the “beginning of a new approach” to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which “not only calls out injustice and suffering but acts”.

Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Saar responded by accusing him of spreading an “outrageous lie” and announced counter-measures including shutting the UK’s consulate in East Jerusalem.

The UK sanctions will ban settlement goods but also act against companies and individuals providing services for settlement expansion.

The sanctions were launched alongside France and Canada, which in a joint statement with the UK said the action “marks a further turning point in our approach to protecting the two-state solution”.

Settlements are illegal under international law, and there has been a rise in violence towards Palestinians in the West Bank by settlers in recent months.

In a statement to MPs, Miliband said: “The British government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank, perpetrated by settler terrorists.

“And all too often the Israeli government has turned a blind eye to this and worse, members of it have made statements and taken actions to support the forced displacement of Palestinians.”

He said ethnic cleansing was defined by the UN as a “purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent means another ethnic or religious group from certain areas”.

Miliband said the official view of the government was that the Israeli occupation of the West Bank was unlawful because of the “entrenchment of its control, its intention to extend permanent sovereignty, and its expansionist agenda via illegal settlements”.

He said this position, which is in line with a 2024 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice, should be reflected in the UK’s “economic relationship” with the occupied West Bank.

Le Monde (“11 European countries and Canada sanction products from Israeli settlements in West Bank“):

A milestone was reached in relations between Israel and its European allies on Tuesday, September 8, with the joint announcement by the United Kingdom, France and nine European countries (Denmark, Spain, Finland, Ireland, Iceland, Norway, Poland, Portugal and Sweden), as well as Canada, of sanctions against products originating from Israeli settlements in the West Bank. The implementation of these measures, which still needs to be defined by each country, resulted from the inability of the 27 member states of the European Union to agree on a joint action. Nonetheless, the announcement is significant. It signals a shift toward sanctioning all settlements – not just a handful of violent actors and organizations – while rejecting the gradual normalization on which Israel had long relied.

Reuters (“Israel tells Britain to close East Jerusalem consulate within 30 days, officials say“):

Israel has told Britain it must close its East Jerusalem consulate within a month, Israeli officials said on Wednesday, as a retaliatory step against sanctions that Britain, France and Canada have announced against settlements.

The sanctions are among the strongest collective actions taken by major Western allies of Israel over Israeli settlements, and have prompted intense ‌pushback in Israel weeks before it holds a general election.

While the effect of the sanctions may be mostly symbolic, they highlight Israel’s growing isolation among countries it once counted as close allies over its war in Gaza and expansion of settlements in the West Bank. The U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, a staunch supporter of Israel, has condemned the sanctions and accused the British government of “Jew hate”, but neither the White House nor the State Department issued strong criticism of the move.

Two Israeli officials and two other sources familiar with the matter said London had been given 30 days to close the consulate, which represents Britain in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza on Palestinian issues. Israel has also barred 12 British politicians from visiting the ⁠country, told British officials and diplomats in the West Bank and a Gaza coordination centre in Israel to leave, and said Britain can no longer train Palestinian security forces in the West Bank.

It has not yet announced actions against France or Canada, which joined Britain in saying they will halt trade with settlements, or against nine other countries that endorsed the UK sanctions. Although the UK sanctions were widely anticipated, Israeli parliamentary opposition leader Yair Lapid said on Tuesday that “no one knew” the other countries were going to endorse the move.

The rift between Israel and the West has been growing for decades, with the United States often serving as Israel’s only defender. It has become clear in the last several months that even US support is fragile, with young Democrats in particular vehemently opposed to Israeli policies. Lingering sympathy from the Holocaust—and even the horrific massacre of October 7, 2023—is exhausted in most quarters.

I see no prospect of this changing any time soon. Even if Netanyahu’s party is defeated (and the polls seem to show that as a strong possibility), there’s broad support in Israel for continuing to attack Hamas and to expand Jewish control of the West Bank and expelling the Arab population. I suspect sanctions will just strengthen their resolve.

21 responses to “EU and Canada Impose Sanctions on Israel Over Settlements”

  1. Those of us old enough to remember when Republicans defended Apartheid South Africa up until the last minute can see quite a few parallels. Chief among them: second and third class status for those outside the power-wielding group, with zero to no rights for the third class, and no access to the justice system. Their only hope for change was armed rebellion. The ANC, while not nearly as bloodthirsty psychotic as HAMAS, were on a downward spiral and could have ended up in the same place. But one fundamental difference: Nelson Mandela. A moderate who had the respect of both sides (okay, “respect” is not quite right) and who was able to head off what surely would have otherwise been a bloodbath. No such figure exists in the Israel-Palestinian conflict and we are left to pick through various shades of evil, and seemingly inevitably horrific outcomes. The US has no business picking sides here. We are constantly told Israel is our most important ally in the Middle East, when in fact they are our greatest burden, especially with an easily manipulated senile fool in the Whitehouse.

    5
  2. I sort of wonder what Israel’s endgame is supposed to be.

    Western supporters of Israel are generally much more anti-Muslim than pro-Israel, and a significant portion of those are (at least) vaguely Nazi-adjacent and tend towards antisemitism.

    Being Jewish and relying on far-right support is a rather bold strategy, IMO. Let’s see if it pays off for them.

    2
    1. Israel doesn’t have an end game for this. Bibi’s end game is stay off the dock at The Hague.

      2
  3. Charley in Cleveland Avatar
    Charley in Cleveland

    It’s nothing short of tragic to see Israel becoming an international pariah thanks in large part to its far right government and its corrupt prime minister. The country’s fierce military reaction to 10/7 went from righteous and just to “What the f**k are you doing?!” as innocent people were bombed, made homeless, and then starved. Haaretz just reported that Netenyahu had advance notice of the attack and did not share the warning with Israeli security forces. Did he want a casus belli? The mind reels.

    And memo to Mike Huckabee: it is not “Jew hate” to criticize Israeli policy regarding Palestinians.

    3
    1. Haaretz just reported that Netenyahu had advance notice of the attack and did not share the warning with Israeli security forces.

      As Haaretz reported, he received a direct and personal warning from the head of the UAE.

      But Egyptian intelligence also warned their Israeli counterparts, just a few days before the 10/7 attacks occurred:

      Israel was warned by Egypt of potential violence three days before Hamas’ deadly cross-border raid, a US congressional panel chairman [McCaul, R -Texas] has said.

      Tellingly:

      Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu described the reports as “absolutely false”.

      In light of this, it doesn’t sound particularly far-fetched anymore to assume that Netanyahu wanted something to happen, although perhaps not on the scale that it eventually did.

      2
    2. dazedandconfused Avatar
      dazedandconfused

      Even Huckabee strongly criticized Israel. If losing people like him isn’t of great concern to the Israelis they don’t give much of a damn if the US cuts its support. Or they judge finishing the ethnic cleansing more important.

      The end game? Likely they believe a few decades after there is no more Palestinians everybody will forget about it and get on with business as usual, like it went for Turkey after they slaughtered the Armenians.

  4. Milliband is Jewish and his parents fled to England during WW2, and that’s where we are regarding anti-semitism right now: a dumb American hick saying a sophisticated Jewish man is filled with ‘Jew hate’.

    One thing about terrorism is that it’s a benefit to the state’s power. To the state, Terrorism is illogical and can’t be predicted, and those who are attacked are complete innocents, and that is why it is powerful. It liberates the state.. 9/11 helped the US government; hours later, Cheney and Rumsfeld were drooling like test rats, and nobody was blamed for anything. The apartments attacks in 1999 helped Putin, and half of Russia believed he might have been behind them. 10/7 helped the Israeli state, and no one in power in that day will ever suffer for being on the watch while it took place.

    The problem is that making everything terrorism, which is what Israeli has done, makes you far more illogical, destructive, and absurd than the people you are fighting, and that’s what happened with Israel, and not only Netanyahu.

    2
  5. Within days of the Oct 7th attacks, I speculated on the end state of Israel. I thought there could be only two possible configurations: a greater Israel that would give full citizenship to Palestinians. Or two, a two state solution that would require the West Bank settlers to abandon their settlements and leave.

    I did not have ethnic cleansing on my list of options.

    1
    1. I did not have ethnic cleansing on my list of options.

      Why? It was the stated intent of actual Israeli cabinet members, and in particular, ones who were given control over the West Bank. It has been a “pretty much out in the open but not officially sanctioned” policy since Jimmy Carter was ostracized for pointing out Israel was heading towards apartheid.

      3
  6. And the Israeli governments response to sanctions that are limited, easily evaded, and largely tokenistic (for now) is to double down on outraged amour propre.

    Particularly irritating is Mike Huckabee singling out the UK for condemnation.
    Perhaps he should try to remember he’s the US ambassador to Israel, not the Israeli representative to the UK.

    4
  7. What’s happening on the West Bank is state-sponsored terrorism and ethnic-cleansing. But like Gaza it’s ethnic cleansing with no escape route. Egypt won’t take Gazans, Jordan won’t take West Bank folk and since a rush of Palestinians into Jordan might bring down the Hashemite dynasty there, I can’t imagine Israeli leaders see that as desirable in any case. If there’s an Israeli government strategy here aside from just greed and fanaticism in the WB, violence for its own sake, I’m not seeing it.

    What worries me is that the logical next step for Israel is real genocide. It is, after all, the final solution.

    3
    1. Ethnic cleansing with no escape route sure sounds like genocide to me.

      2
      1. If it doesn’t happen in the Genocide region of Bavaria, it’s not genocide, it’s just sparkling mass murder and war crimes.

        3
      2. I’ve always believed that Israel’s plan in pushing north to south in the Gaza strip, leaving no one alive and no building left standing, was to drive a couple of million panicked civilians to storm the Egyptian border. Either the Egyptians would have let them in, or would have killed tens of thousands or more. Israel would have been perfectly happy with either outcome.

      3. Michael Reynolds Avatar
        Michael Reynolds

        It’s genocide if you don’t care about the meaning of words. Personally I resist depriving words of their meaning just for purposes of clickbait. But I’m old-fashioned.

        It’s also a good word if you lack imagination. If you are unable to see that much worse could come, and that if it does you’ll have already called it the worst thing when it’s only 10% of the worst thing. Rather like Trump saying we’ve ‘obliterated’ what was only badly damaged.

        But I am picky about words and I have a dark imagination, so to me it seems provocative in a sophomoric sort of way which, again, is the spirit of the age and I come from a different age.

        1. We get it Michael, you’re never gonna call it genocide. You should let it go. (Unless you keep repeating yourself to keep the social climate here roiled.)

          1
        2. Ethnic cleansing (what I call genocide’s first cousin) may be more apropos but eventually the concept behind the terminology tends to merge. The Trail Of Tears and the Armenian March both started as relocation ventures but few don’t call them genocide today. The forceful displacement of peoples lead to their inevitable place.

  8. …there’s broad support in Israel for continuing to attack Hamas and to expand Jewish control of the West Bank and expelling the Arab population.

    Expelling millions of people to where? The Red Sea? Camps? Antarctica?

    Our Israeli frenemies won't tell us. They are mad at allies still pushing the two-state solution zombie, yet have no alternative plan or solution. Unless it’s a Final one. But that can’t be, since accusations of apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and genocide are so much antisemitic hysteria, no?

    So…what’s the plan?

    *** crickets ***

    And American frustration and disappointment with our MidEast cousin now extends well past the young lefty usuals:

    A recent Pew Research Center poll shows support for Israel remains higher than opposition among Republicans but has declined significantly among younger conservatives…

    …attitudes have shifted among younger Republicans, with 57% of those ages 18 to 49 now expressing an unfavorable view, up from 50% last year.

    Pew also says only 24% of young white Republicans ages 18–34 sympathize more with Israelis than Palestinians, including only 1/3 of under-30 evangelicals.

    According to YouGov and the IMEU Policy Project, 53% of Republicans under age 45 oppose military aid to Israel.

    New York Times/Siena polling says 72% of Republicans under 30 think President Trumpstein Files is too supportive of Israel.

    US aid to Israel is on borrowed time, and future bipartisan diplomatic rupture is not far-fetched either.

    Unless they tell us what they plan to do with the millions Palestinians soon-to-be-expelled from Gaza and the West Bank, since they also insist apartheid, concentration camps, genocide, and two-state are all off the table. Make it make sense.

  9. sanctions against products originating from Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

    So, slightly more teeth than the current sanctions against a few individuals, but not sanctions of Israel as a whole. As if the Israeli government is not encouraging the settlements in the West Bank*

    Like pretending that the fist is not connected to the rest of the body.

    *: I almost said the Israeli government was sanctioning the settlements… funny how the word has diametrically opposed meanings.

  10. The US and the West decoupling from Israel has been all but inevitable since Rabin was assassinated in a slow rolling coup, and his opposition gradually assumed control. If we had made it clear that there would have to be a two state solution, or a single state with 100% equal rights, or we would walk away, there might have been some hope. But, at least in the US, Israel was too convenient and delicious as symbol to the politicians, either as a “Jeebus IZ Comin’!!!” rally to the evangelicals, or a noble “Never Again” to everyone else. But no one had the balls to carry through on a real confrontation.

    Right now Israel is only behaving like Syria to the Palestinians, but that won’t last. A coming oppression of what they consider the “right kind” of Israeli citizens is inevitable, if they are to maintain control. And the definition of “right kind” will get ever smaller.

  11. Israel should put tariffs on the UK, Canada and the EU. That would show them, after all it’s what the smartest leader in the world, and their BFF, does.

    Steve