
Via Reuters: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri.
The department under Blinken in early January 2023 had switched to Calibri, a modern sans-serif font, saying this was a more accessible font for people with disabilities because it did not have the decorative angular features and was the default in Microsoft products.
[…]
A cable dated December 9 sent to all U.S. diplomatic posts said that typography shapes the professionalism of an official document and Calibri is informal compared to serif typefaces.
“To restore decorum and professionalism to the Department’s written work products and abolish yet another wasteful DEIA program, the Department is returning to Times New Roman as its standard typeface,” the cable said.
This is, of course, an insanely minor matter. But I think it is worth noting the way any hint of diversity or mildly compassionate choices from the past have to be denigrated. How was it “wasteful” to have been using the default font in Word? Granted, the latest update shifted the default to Aptos, so maybe that is why no one noticed. Indeed, from an efficiency point of view, is not making everyone take the time to use any font other than the default a waste of time?
I just find the need to make things like font selection somehow an ideological issue to be telling about this administration, to include Rubio’s need to fit into that mold, as he clearly looks towards a 2028 run. Can’t let J.D. have the anti-woke lane all to himself, I guess.
And let me stress: the “wasteful DEIA” aspect of this was making it more readable for people with certain visual impairments and certain learning disabilities. I mean, making a costless move to maybe help someone? Can’t have that!
I will acknowledge again: insanely minor, but it says something about these people that they have to make even the insanely minor into ideologically-driven tiny cruelties if they can.
You know, it would have been possible to just say that they like Times New Roman better than Calibri (as do I) or that they are old people who are used to the older font (which likely describes me as well). No need to say they are taking away something, at least in part, because it might be helping someone.









