“Vladimir Putin” by Global Panorama via the Kremlin is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0

NATO Stopped Russian Sabotage of Undersea Cables

Putin is increasingly targeting critical infrastructure and risking war with the West.

7

Comments

Reuters (“NATO allies foil Russian subsea cable sabotage plot“):

Deep in Arctic waters near the remote Svalbard archipelago this spring, NATO allies caught Russian subs training to unleash a secret weapon designed to disable critical undersea cables without leaving any fingerprints.

The clandestine Russian operation, described to Reuters by two Western officials, was carried out by Moscow’s GUGI undersea warfare directorate, which used deep-sea submersibles to simulate the deployment of the sophisticated and destructive technology.

A joint operation involving Britain, Norway and the United States tracked and confronted the Russian vessels at sea, said the two officials, speaking ​on condition of anonymity. The vessels were prevented from completing their exercise and eventually left the area.

Britain and Norway disclosed in April that they had uncovered a covert Russian operation in Arctic waters. But the discovery of the new weapon, the ‌location of the operation and the U.S. involvement have not been reported.

The deep-sea face-off comes at a time when some Western intelligence officials fear the Kremlin is ramping up sabotage operations in Europe and preparing for a conflict with NATO.

Some U.S. intelligence analysts are increasingly concerned Russia may test NATO’s mutual defence pact, known as Article 5, three U.S. officials said. If it does, destroying subsea cables could be a critical part of that effort, the Western officials said.

Cables no thicker than a garden hose, lying on the seabed or buried just below, are critical to global internet connectivity and financial transactions. Their economic and strategic importance has made them targets in past conflicts, including ​in the First and Second World Wars, when they were critical to delivering orders by telegraph or telephone.

Two 1,400 km subsea fiber-optic cables linking Svalbard to mainland Norway lie as deep as 2,700 metres below the sea’s surface. They carry vast amounts of satellite ​data downloaded at the SvalSat satellite ground station, the world’s largest and part of NASA’s Near Space Network.

[…]

At the same time as the confrontations at sea, British and Norwegian officials took their findings to Moscow to show they were aware of the new technology – hoping it might make Russia hesitate to use it, the two Western officials said.

Russia didn’t damage any cables. The exercise focused on simulating the deployment of the technology in the event of a conflict with NATO, the officials said. They declined to detail how the technology works.

Asked for comment, NATO referred Reuters to Norwegian and UK authorities.

“Through our joint operation, we ​sent a clear message to Russia that they cannot operate covertly,” Norway’s Defence Minister Tore Sandvik said in a statement. “We have made it unequivocally clear to Russian authorities that any attempt to target our critical infrastructure will be detected and met with consequences,” he said. “It is in no ​one’s interest to escalate tensions in the High North.”

Britain’s Defence Ministry pointed to April 9 statements acknowledging attempted covert activities in and near Norwegian and British waters by Russia’s Main Directorate of Deep-Sea Research, known by its Russian acronym GUGI. Washington and London have both imposed sanctions on the secretive directorate.

It’s great that we foiled the sabotage this time. But this is a further escalation of a tactic Russia and China have increasingly used over the past two years or so.

It’s hard to overstate how much the global economy relies on undersea cables. They carry some 98 percent of international internet traffic and facilitate approximately $10 trillion in daily financial transactions. Granting considerable redundancy, this is a critical infrastructure that has been protected under international law since 1884.

Deliberately targeting them during peacetime is just wildly irresponsible. It very much risks escalating to armed conflict. And, of course, war with Russia would be waged under a nuclear shadow.

,

7 responses to “NATO Stopped Russian Sabotage of Undersea Cables”

  1. Not to worry. Trump is best buds with Putin, Xi and most of the other autocrats. If they attack the cables they wont cut the ones going to America in deference to Trump.

    Steve

  2. Is this when I’m supposed to put in a reminder that the fundamental protocols are still the ones that were intended to route around enormous damage to the network in real time?

    1
    1. If you also have information about how much capacity the network has, and whether it can absorb that much additional traffic, then yes.

      (And ideally an understanding of the various regional choke points.)

    2. Limited degradation can be worked around.
      If Russia takes out the “Fat Pipe” cables between Europe and the US, the satellites are not capable of substituting.
      This is a fundamental threat to key UK financial sector operations.
      It’s just not something acceptable.
      If Russia keeps this up, their is going to be a kinetic response to Russian sabotage attempts.

  3. If Russia keeps this up, sooner or later it’s going get a response, then cry about it.

    1. Yeah right. Russia’s been up to this for nearly 15 years. MH17 was shot down in 2014, same year Crimea was invaded. We know Russia operates troll/bot farms and online influence operations to propagandize our electorates and subvert our democracies — hence the MAGA and Brexit disasters which have crippled the US, the UK, and the West.

      Putin assasinates people on Western soil, has helped arm and train Iran and thus also Hamas and Hezbollah, and even sends militarized drones into NATO terrority — not to mention the “accidental” missle incursions. And now this.

      Our collective response has been a bunch of weak excuses on why we still haven’t gotten Ukraine the weapons they need to defeat Putin’s imperalistic, genocidal warmongering.

      He knows the US/Canada, the UK, and Europe won’t do anything but shake our fists and say “If y’all keep this up [insert loud impotent noises here].” Ten+ years of fecklesness in the face of the hybrid war Russia is already waging on NATO and the West proves it.

      We aren’t responding with jack squat. And that’s exactly why Russia keeps pressing the issue.

      1. I appreciate your view, but the point is from the major western governments pov, a lot of it was “implausible deniability”, that while obviously Russian, and designed to intimidate, did not impact key factors and could be passed over as “Russia being Russia”.
        Foolishly imho, but there we go
        Hitting the “Fat Pipe” cables, or the main gas/oil infrastructure is another matter entirely.
        There is a point at which Russia will provoke a response, and it’s getting close.

        Of course, Europe can’t rely on an a US under Trump to support a response.
        That also has been obvious for years to anyone paying attention.