Some Random Tweets And Thoughts On The LA Protests
There's always a tweet

Earlier this morning, James covered the Administration’s federalization of the California Guard to “protect” ICE agents from ongoing protests. Rather than retreading that conversation, I wanted to highlight some tweets from Administration officials and others that struck me as noteworthy.
To start with, President Trump kicked off today (at 2:41 am) by thanking the California Guard for a job they haven’t done yet:
Full text:
Donald J. Trump Truth Social 06.08.25 02:41 AM EST Great job by the National Guard in Los Angeles after two days of violence, clashes and unrest. We have an incompetent Governor (Newscum) and Mayor (Bass) who were, as usual (just look at how they handled the fires, and now their VERY SLOW PERMITTING disaster. Federal permitting is complete!), unable to to handle the task. These Radical Left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will NOT BE TOLERATED. Also, from now on, MASKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED to be worn at protests. What do these people have to hide, and why??? Again, thank you to the National Guard for a job well done!
As James noted, the guard has just been called up and has yet to be mobilized during any protests. I’m also not sure how “masks will not be allowed to be worn at protests” unless there is a local regulation that allows that. And I’ll note that ICE and other law enforcement officers will still be able to conceal their identities.
Then we have Trump’s director of the FBI commenting:
The irony here is that before he was appointed Director of the FBI, Patel was an advocate for January 6th defendants (and ran a legal defense fund for them). And Trump himself pardoned 169 individuals who pleaded guilty to assaulting police officers and commuted the sentence of at least one January 6th participant convicted by a jury of assaulting police officers. Admittedly, Patel attempted to distance himself from those pardons during his confirmation hearings. Still, this seems like another case of “we treat our perceived allies differently than our perceived enemies.” Not to mention another example of the administration promising to protect law enforcement regardless of their actions.
And on the topic of flip-flopping, there’s always a tweet, isn’t there:
Full Text:
Kristi Noem @KristiNoem
If Joe Biden federalizes the National Guard, that would be a direct attack on states’ rights. Over the last several years, we’ve seen Democrats try to take away our Freedoms of religion, assembly, and speech. We can’t let them take away our right to defend ourselves, too. South Dakota defends the Constitution.I mean that was over a year ago, but apparently Governor Kristi Noem would really object to actions taken by Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem… or at least she should if she was ideologically consistent on any other topics than “It’s correct when we do it.”
Looking outside of LA, ICE is taking similar actions (showing up at immigration hearings to arrest people who were following the procedure) across the country. That leads us to this “my leopards are eating my face” tweet from Republican Congresswoman María Elvira Salazar of Florida:
The key portion of Representative Salazar’s tweet:
“Arrests in immigration courts, including people with 1-220’s and pending asylum cases, the termination of the CHNV program, which has left thousands exposed to deportation, and other similar measures, all jeopardize our duty to due process that every democracy must guarantee.”
I think most high level folks in the Trump administration and it’s supporters who tend to post at sites like our would fundamentally disagree with this.
As far as a final, and far more somber tweet, to understand what people are protesting, here’s one tweet that speaks to ICE’s excesses:
Granted, this is a single anecdote that has yet to be verified. At the same time, this echoes many reported and confirmed stories.
More importantly, this verified example of the excesses of ICE in Los Angeles also speaks to what people are protesting:
I suggest listening to it with the volume turned up.
And, also, the LA Police Department is contesting some descriptions of the protests as being violent:
Ultimately, I believe it’s essential to acknowledge the reasons behind these public actions. For that, I turn to our commenter Hal 10000, who also writes for one of the other few remaining OG political analysis blogs, Ordinary Times. You should read more of Hal.
Since they day he came down that elevator it’s been worse and worse and worse and worse.
Trump’s America, Round One:
chaos, insurrection, terrorism, protests, violence, riots.
Trump’s America, Round Two:
chaos, insurrection, terrorism, protests, violence, riots.
The inevitable consequences of failed, incompetent leadership by MAGA’s unqualified DUI hires and amoral, unethical, corrupt rightwing extremists.
Can we have nice quiet Sleepy Joe back?
IIRC, the infamous(!) revolutionaries known as The Black Panthers didn’t start out as violent revolutionaries until after law enforcement struck first.
But it’s richly ironic that LAPD is repudiating the actions of the Federal brownshirts (or should I call them OrangeShirts™)?
@DK: Round Three: Bodies in the streets.
It’s illegal to protest against Trump. If it’s for Trump, no worries, you’ll be pardoned. If it’s against Trump, you’ll be deported.
Rioting for a coup is a pardonable level offence. Sometimes. Depends on who you vote for. For Trump, then yes.
It’s almost as if there was a different standard.
This shrug off of the Jan. 6 violent protesters is extremely troubling. An attempted coup by idiot sychophants was wiped away by Trump’s signature. People who rioted for me are pardoned.
It’s almost as if right wing protests are patriotic and left wing protests are insurrectionist.
It’s a different standard.
Bwa haha hahahaha hahahahahaha…
If I were a simple Luddite, I’d suspect the Marshal was, er, how should I delicately put it, “brown-ish”?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ice-mistakenly-detain-us-marshal-rcna211599
There’s so much to comment on in those statements, but the thing that jumped out me first, was saying that “If the local police force won’t back our men and women on the thin blue line” … I don’t know what “the thin blue line” means anymore. I mean, I do, it’s always been this reactionary cryptofascist way to signify people who will beat up/suppress/kill the people we don’t like, but it’s supposedly always meant “THE LOCAL POLICE FORCE.”
This is the violent protest that needs the Marines sent in: https://bsky.app/profile/parickards.bsky.social/post/3lr6out2pdc2s