Outside the Beltway

There was not a singular “winner” last night, so we need to stop talking like there was.

Iowa and New Hampshire voters are changing the perception of the race.

The math compelled it. But he outlasted several better-known candidates.

An amusing discovery.

Biden’s support is in decline. But it’s not clear that Buttigieg is getting an Iowa bounce.

The precise distribution of 41 measly delegates is now known. Unless there’s a recount.

How is the mayor of a modest-sized Midwestern city doing as well as he has?

There’s a campaign to encourage anti-Trump Republicans and independents to vote in New Hampshire.

Is there a new frontrunner?

The Vermont Senator is a better politician than most give him credit for.

The obsession over a singular winner ultimately makes no sense.

The caucus tallies are so riddled with errors that the DNC is calling for a recount.

The media coverage continues on script.

We’re right back where we started.

He’s tanned, rested, and ready. But it ain’t happening.

Proposed mid-stream changes could help Bloomberg, hurt Sanders, and divide the party.

Has this precedent permanently damaged the country? Or is it just politics as usual?

One side is arguing over rules while the other is focused on consequences.

The leading papers in Iowa and New Hampshire are backing Klobuchar and Warren, respectively.

Politics makes strange bedfellows.

The Republicans are playing a different game.

The paper of record endorsed both Warren and Klobuchar

Two progressives enter. One progressive leaves.

Dennis Prager makes me feel like we are living in the Upside Down.

The 2016 frontrunners at this stage won their nominations easily. But that’s often not the case.