Obama Libya Speech Post-Mortem
Ten days after sending American forces into kinetic military action in Libya, President Obama addressed the nation to explain “what we’ve done, what we plan to do, and why this matters to us.”
Ten days after sending American forces into kinetic military action in Libya, President Obama addressed the nation to explain “what we’ve done, what we plan to do, and why this matters to us.”
Senator Joe Lieberman said today that we should intervene in Syria using the same rationale we did for Libya. Because, you know, what’s the big deal about a fourth war?
President Obama’s grand coalition against Libya is a lot less than meets the eye.
The public, and Congress, are skeptical of the mission in Libya, and the reason for that is because the President has failed to tell us exactly why we’re there and what we’ll be doing.
It has become quite apparent that neither the White House nor our coalition partners have any idea what the path to an endgame in Libya even looks like. That’s not good.
Newt Gingrich on Libya: “This is as badly executed, I think, as any policy we’ve seen since WWII, and it will become a case study for how not to engage in this type of activity.”
When America’s leaders make the decision to engage in military action abroad, has the time for debate ended, or is it more important than ever that those with doubts about the policy speak out?
Operation Odyssey Dawn has resurrected the eternal battle over what limits there are, and should be, on the President’s ability to use military force without Congressional authorization.
The antiwar movement has been strangely silent despite the fact that U.S. foreign policy hasn’t really changed that much since Barack Obama became President.
There must be a predisposition against war and we should only engage in just wars.
There are many opportunities to go to war. Here’s a guide for choosing between them.
America is about to enter a third war in the Muslim world with no clear idea of the end game.
Public support for the war in Afghanistan continues to plummet, but will that hurt the President when 2012 rolls around?
John Kerry’s Washington Post op-ed supports U. S. leadership in establishing a no-fly zone in Libya.
We’re heading towards a future of higher food prices and more hunger.
While there are doubtless flaws with the journalistic values and culture of the New Media, we too often contrast today with a Golden Age of Media that never existed.
The top ranks of the military are whiter and decidedly more male than the country as a whole. Should that change?
Former French president Jacques Chirac is being tried on corruption charges stemming from misconduct as mayor of Paris.
Pfc. Bradley Manning faces twenty-two new charges, including one that could put him before a firing squad, but investigators still can’t prove any direct links between him and Wikileaks.
Intervening to “help” the Libyan revolt is very tempting, but it’s a temptation we ought to resist.
The Supreme Court rules that “offensiveness” does not trump the First Amendment. And they’re right.
It’s not the size of your government that counts — it’s what you do with it that matters.
While the prestige outlets of the halcyon days of the last millennium still hold some cachet for those of us old enough to remember that era, they mean next to nothing on the Web.
Nine years into a war that seems to be without end, it’s time to declare victory and go home.
Is Saudi Arabia the next domino to fall in the Middle East? The Royal family is hoping that money will be enough to make sure that doesn’t happen.
It’s a Republican meme that President Obama has “apologized” for America repeatedly. The one problem with the meme is that there aren’t any facts to support it.
Calls are coming from both sides of the aisle for the U.S. to do “something” about the situation in Libya. It would be better if we didn’t get involved.
Prominent commentators on the Left and Right are amused by an outrageous assault on CBS reporter Lara Logan.
It turns out the Iraq War was indeed based, in part at least, on a lie.