data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9cbd/a9cbd9167ea4e57cadb4c3be25833ab445a9aafb" alt="President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris participate in a virtual bilateral meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2021, in the Roosevelt Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0f63/c0f6340669153fd0a02014b48f0123de8d49f06e" alt="President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris participate in a virtual bilateral meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2021, in the Roosevelt Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz)"
Liberals Upset Biden Foreign Policy is Biden’s
Those expecting Bernie Sanders’ agenda are sorely disappointed.
Those expecting Bernie Sanders’ agenda are sorely disappointed.
The House of Representatives passed a defense spending bill that seeks to limit Presidential authority when it comes to striking Iran and aideing the Saudi war on Yemen.
Having lost to him, she’s an ineffective voice on the matter of Donald Trump.
The Wall Street Journal tries, and fails, to defend President Trump’s indefensible veto of the Congressional resolution regarding the war on Yemen.
President Trump has not surprisingly vetoed a Congressional resolution to limit American support for the Saudi war on Yemen. His defense for doing so is utterly absurd.
The Constitution’s invitation to struggle over foreign policy continues.
Instead of merely seeking to block the President’s declaration of an “emergency” at the southern border, Congress should instead significantly amend the National Emergencies Act.
In a rare display of assertiveness in the foreign policy arena, the House voted yesterday to bar U.S. assistance in Saudi Arabia’s genocidal war on Yemen.
Without Congressional authorization, any attack on Syria would be illegal, but don’t expect Congress to do anything about it.
Yet more troubling news about the proposed citizenship question on the 2020 Census.
Continuing a long-standard tradition, the Trump Administration claims it doesn’t need to get legal authorization to keep American troops in Syria.
With the Administration set to commit the United States to a forever war in Syria, it’s time for Congress to act.
Nearly 200 Members of Congress and the Senate have filed suit against President Trump alleging that he is violating the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution.
Yesterday, the British Parliament debated the expansion of that nation’s military strikes against ISIS. For more than a year, our cowardly Congress has failed to even hold one debate or vote on America’s role in that conflict.
As things stand right now, there is no legitimate legal authorization for the President’s war against ISIS, and that’s largely because Congress has failed to act.
The war against ISIS continues to silently escalate, with little input from the people’s representatives in Congress.
The Obama Administration’s legal justification for war against ISIS is laughably flimsy.
As talk begins of expanding the war against ISIS into Syria, it is becoming long past time for Congress to exercise its Constitutional function.
Your tax dollars, not at work.
A clash over Separation Of Power and the Imperial Presidency, coming soon to a Federal District Court in Washington, D.C.
If President Obama does decide to use military force in Iraq, he should be required to seek Congressional approval beforehand.
John Boehner explains quite succinctly why nothing big is getting done in Congress.
A proposed Syria authorization being considered in the Senate places several limits on Presidential authority to act, but it’s unclear if those limits can actually work.
Presidents have gotten away with ignoring Congress when it comes to foreign military adventures for a very long time.
The U.S. is now confirming that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons. What’s next?
Like the men who came before him, Barack Obama has vastly increased the powers of his office. Someone should have asked him about that last night.
Rand Paul calls Mitt Romney out over his comments about Presidential War Powers.
Yes, it is too hard to amend. A few quick thoughts on the subject.
Charlie Savage documents a major shift in Barack Obama’s philosophy of presidential authority.
Not surprisingly, most of the Republican candidates for President aren’t too keen on reducing the excessive growth in Executive Branch power.
Gaddafi is dead, but it was still wrong for the United States to get involved in Libya.
Where should we look to understand the failings of the government?
Giving the President the unchecked power to kill American citizens raises some serious red flags.
Success in Libya does not make the American mission any less unjustified than it was on the day President Obama announced it.
Steve Benen has coined the phrase “Thank America Last” to describe those avoiding praise of President Obama for success in Libya.
While the Constitutionality of the War Powers Act is indeed dubious, the fact that it was passed over Nixon’s veto isn’t the reason.
Contrary to what Senator McCain, seeking realism in military policy does not make one an isolationist.
President Obama overruled his top legal advisors in deciding that the Libya operation does not amount to “hostilities” under the War Powers Act.
The White House’s assertion that Libya isn’t covered by the War Powers Act isn’t being accepted on Capitol Hill.
The Obama Administration tells Congress that it doesn’t need to comply with the War Powers Act because the Act does not apply to the mission in Libya.
Dennis Kucinich and nine other Members of Congress are suing the President. They won’t get very far.
Sandy Levinson suggests that there is a key lesson from the Founders that we ignore.