Army Shuns 75 Percent of Age Eligible Recruits
According to a shocking Associated Press report, the United States military is discriminating in recruiting against a whopping 75 percent of those of eligible age.
Uncle Sam wants YOU, that famous Army recruiting poster says. But does he really? Not if you’re a Ritalin-taking, overweight, Generation Y couch potato — or some combination of the above. As for that fashionable “body art” that the military still calls a tattoo, having one is grounds for rejection, too.
With U.S. casualties rising in wars overseas and more opportunities in the civilian work force from an improved U.S. economy, many young people are shunning a career in the armed forces. But recruiting is still a two-way street — and the military, too, doesn’t want most people in this prime recruiting age group of 17 to 24. Of some 32 million Americans now in this group, the Army deems the vast majority too obese, too uneducated, too flawed in some way, according to its estimates for the current budget year.
Of course, it makes perfect sense for the military–a business that involves trusting people with firearms, explosives, tanks, and other lethal equipment–to shun the mentally unstable, the stupid, and the lazy. The tatoo exclusion is rather silly, especially since a large portion of NCOs have traditionally had them, although I presume this remains waiverable for those with art that would be covered by the uniform.
Related posts below the fold.
________
Elsewhere: James Joyner, “Backdoor Draft?” TCS, 11 January 2005.
OTB: Military Personnel, General
-
Don’t Dumb Down the Army
Join the Army or Go to Jail?
Reserve Captain Fulfills Contract, Can’t Resign
Army Stop-Loss Program Forces 50,000 into Extended Duty
Pentagon Report: Army Near Breaking Point
Pentagon Weighs Guard and Reserve Cuts
Myth of the Underprivileged Soldier
9th Circuit Won’t Stop Guardsman’s Deployment
Soldiers Sue over Extended Enlistments
A Military Stretched Thin
All-Volunteer Force?
NON-VOLUNTEER FORCE
OTB: Military Recruiting
-
Counter-Recruiting Efforts Anger Pentagon
Military Recruiting Shortfall Hits Key Jobs Hardest
Military Attracting Fewer Black, Urban Recruits
Army Doubles Idiot Quotient
Army Recruiting High School Dropouts without GED
Defense Department Seeks to Raise Enlistment Age to 42
Pentagon Creating Student Database for Recruiting
Army Keeping Problem Soldiers to Keep Troop Levels Up
Army Using Video Game as Recruiting Tool
Army Offers 15-Month Enlistment Option
Army Taking Recruiting Holiday
Blue to Green Moving Slowly
Army Recruiters Say They Feel Pressure to Bend Rules
Recruiting Soldiers During Wartime Difficult
Military Recruiters Target Friends and Family
Recruiting During Wartime
RECRUTING AND MORALE
RECRUITING WOES?
OTB: IRR
-
Army Not Punishing AWOL IRR Members
Backdoor Draft? Reservists May Face Longer Tours of Duty
IRR Call-Ups Slow to Report
Army to Call Up Recruits Earlier
Reserve System Needs Change
Further IRR Call-Up Expected
IRR Call-Up Redux
IRR Call-Up Scam III
IRR Call-Up Scam II
IRR Call-Up Scam
IRR Call-Up?
Leaving the Military Reserves
And the argument is it would be a better army, if these people were accepted? (although I agree the tatoo thing doesn’t say much about a person’s capability to perform their job well).
The funny thing is if the military was shunning all those standards and taking anyone, how much you want to bet there would be an article all about the Army compromising its standards in desperation for new recruits.
The Tattoo policy was greatly over exaggerated by the quoted article. The Air Force Policy, which is similar to the Army’s, is that a tattoo must not cover more than 25% of the exposed body area, and must not be obscene in nature. And even this policy is typically waived for new recruits.
It sure is reassuring to know that some overweight, couch potato army reject is building my next car or refrigerator, or house, or making the medications I take. That’s just the kind of individuals our countries corporations are looking for to fill their low paying jobs.
It’s kind of funny in a way that the Army don’t want these guys and they are usually made out to be the nations dumping ground for the low end of society.
My experience is that the tattoo policy covers things that are racist or offensive in nature, or that which is visible while wearing the class b uniform.
The doc looks you over at MEPS, and if the tattoos are within the guidelines, no waiver is required.
The tat policy goes a little further. A very large problem in the military is that of street gang members enlisting. Easily identifiable gang tattoos are a starting point for exclusion in that respect.
Posting gang members in charge of an armory scares the crap out of me a lot more than fat kids who can barely hold a rifle (I’d prefer neither, frankly).
If Klinger had known about this policy, it would have saved him a whole lotta time and hassle running around in drag trying to get a Section 8!
If the Army is really waiving the the tatoo policy, the next thing you know they will be waiving the dont ask/dont tell policy as well and then the nation will be in REAL trouble!
oh, don’t forget also the sexual orientation — one could be highly educated, well-build and most smart and responsible person ever… but… attracted to the wrong sex and voila, NOT QUALIFIED…
I suppose it was only a matter of time before this became a ‘gay’ issue (as with everything else). When will you PCers quit driving my country into the ground?
This is all about standards- that’s it. Big surprise, the Army has them and enforces them. I guess that goes against just about everything you see on the MSM.
I spent a long time in the Army. An NCO once told me that the difference between the Army and civilians was that the Army had standards. You only have to be born to be a civilian. When people can’t meet the Army standards, they go back to where they came from. Civilians. I’m glad to see the standards are still being kept.