Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine conduct a press briefing on Operation Epic Fury at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., March 10, 2026.
DoW photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Eric Brann

Hegseth Survives First Impeachment Attempt

No Republicans joined Massie. Not enough Democrats bothered to show up.

16

Comments

NYT (“Republicans Turn Back Effort to Impeach Hegseth“):

House Republicans banded together on Tuesday to shelve an effort to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, shielding him from a damaging rebuke and a potential ouster after their party suffered crippling losses in an election that turned on voters’ discontent about the Iran war.

The action spared Republicans a vote on whether to impeach Mr. Hegseth on eight separate charges, including violating the Constitution to wage war in Iran and elsewhere without congressional authorization, flouting laws to mitigate civilian casualties and abusing his power by retaliating against a senator for public statements.

This was a surprising result, because there was almost universal expectation that some Republican Members—including some who had lost their jobs partly as a result of the unpopular war effort—would join Democrats.* Aside from Thomas Massie, who brought the charges, none did.

The vote was 211 to 204 to refer the charges to a committee, which would allow Republicans to slow the process indefinitely. Only one Republican, Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who spearheaded the effort, voted with Democrats against doing so.

Naturally, a procedural vote to defer voting on the merits is being spun as something else.

President Trump said the vote was an “exoneration” of Mr. Hegseth and warned that Democrats “must be stopped” from what he said was weaponization of government.

Regardless,

The outcome was an unexpected reprieve for Mr. Hegseth, one of President Trump’s most outspoken and combative cabinet members and the public face of the war with Iran. Democrats could still move to impeach him next year when they assume power, but have so far not indicated whether they will try to do so.

His conduct has, at times, drawn bipartisan criticism from members of Congress, and his standing in the administration was further thrown into question following sweeping Republicans losses in the midterm elections, in which voters’ discontent about the war was a major factor. It had not been clear whether G.O.P. lawmakers, including several who were unexpectedly defeated or won re-election far more narrowly than they anticipated, would rally to support him.

Alas, they did.

Party leaders had also been concerned that low attendance by their members could doom their chances of saving Mr. Hegseth. In the end, though, more Democrats than Republicans missed the vote.

The 11 Democrats who did not vote were Representatives Julia Brownley, Lou Correa and Nancy Pelosi, all of California; Laura Gillen of New York; Steven Horsford of Nevada; Jonathan L. Jackson of Illinois; Brittany Pettersen of Colorado; Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico; Haley Stevens of Michigan; Marilyn Strickland of Washington; and Frederica Wilson of Florida.

The Republicans who did not record a position were Representatives Monica De La Cruz of Texas; Neal Dunn of Florida; Russell Fry of South Carolina; Julia Letlow of Louisiana; Tom Tiffany and Derrick Van Orden, both of Wisconsin; and Rudy Yakym III of Indiana.

Considering how many Republicans were defeated last Tuesday or didn’t even bother to run for re-election, I’m surprised only 7 missed the vote. That Pelosi was one of 11 Democrats who didn’t bother to show up is surprising. That Stevens was, not so much.

Asked whether pursuing the failed impeachment effort had been worth it, Mr. Massie said it “absolutely” had been, because it provided proof that his party was still in thrall to Mr. Trump.

“What I found out tonight is they still haven’t broken from the spell of Donald Trump,” Mr. Massie said. “He still controls this conference.”

So it would seem.

Some Republicans who had expressed dissatisfaction with Mr. Hegseth’s performance ultimately concluded that impeachment was not the appropriate remedy, noting that cabinet secretaries serve at the pleasure of the president and that any decision to fire him rested with Mr. Trump.

Others had privately raised concerns that the articles of impeachment, which include wide-ranging allegations of misconduct when overseeing military operations to policy disputes within the Pentagon, could also implicate the president in his role as commander in chief.

Indeed. While the politics are obviously different, in terms of “high crimes,” there’s zero justification for impeaching Hegseth and not Trump for policies that could not have been executed save for a presidential order.

UPDATE (1025): A Hill report (“House Democrat rips colleagues who missed Hegseth vote: ‘Shameful’“) provides additional context:

Democratic Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (Calif.) on Tuesday evening decried the 11 members of her party who missed a House vote to advance impeachment proceedings against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

House Republicans effectively tabled the measure, with the chamber voting 211-204 to refer the resolution to committee. No Democrats voted against advancing the measure in the Tuesday vote.

“There’s no reason why we should have lost this vote because of attendance issues,” Kamlager-Dove told MeidasTouch’s Pablo Manríquez. “This is what the people have been talking about … so shame on folks who were not here because these people lost.”

She added that several GOP lawmakers “lost and they still found a way to show up to table this bill.”

[…]

Other Democratic lawmakers also expressed frustration over the missed votes. “I don’t know if anyone had any real health issues or anything significant to that respect, so I want to leave room for that, but that being said, at the end of the day we’re here to do a job,” New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D) told CNN’s Manu Raju on Tuesday evening following the vote.

“And the same way I had to clock in when I worked at a restaurant, we got to clock in and do our work here,” she added.

That does not seem an unreasonable expectation.

Some of the excuses were better than others.

Some of the Democratic lawmakers who missed the Tuesday evening vote — including Reps. Melanie Stansbury (N.M.), Jonathan Jackson (Ill.) and Laura Gillen (N.Y.) — said they were blocked from reaching the Capitol before the vote closed because of traffic.

“Like other Members of Congress, Rep. Stansbury was blocked from entering the Capitol to vote due a traffic incident and a police escort of a bus during the vote,” the New Mexico Democrat said in a statement on social media after the vote.

“When she reached the chamber, the vote had just gaveled out,” the statement continued. “She immediately filed a report of her vote of ‘NO’ to the motion meant to kill the impeachment articles and refer them to the Judiciary Committee, as documented in the Congressional Record. Pete Hegseth must be impeached now.”

DC traffic is indeed a thing. But the vote was around 6pm; the Members should already have been at the Capitol.

Several retiring Democrats were also among the lawmakers who missed the vote, including Reps. Julia Brownley (Calif.), Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Frederica Wilson (Fla.).

Given how many retiring or defeated Republicans showed up, that’s hardly an excuse.

On the other hand:

Additionally, California Rep. Lou Correa (D) said he “vehemently” supported the impeachment resolution but shared a statement disclosing that he would miss votes while he underwent a “medical procedure here in Orange County.”

Seems like a reasonable justification to miss a vote.


*Indeed, a POLITICO report (“Hegseth has a Senate Republican problem“) just hours before the vote suggested that enough Senate Republicans might well vote to convict to oust him.

,

16 responses to “Hegseth Survives First Impeachment Attempt”

  1. I really appreciated how Hegseth, in his press conference, basically said that a campaign and vote against him was a campaign and vote against the troops. What a leader!

    2
    1. Might as well get used to it. I expect Trump will continue to fumble on Iran. He hasn’t got a clue how to “win” (whatever that might mean) and he hasn’t got the guts to quit. But any effort to pressure him into quitting will be met with charges of undermining the troops. And a chunk of the voting public, who just voted D from frustration with the war, will buy it.

  2. Charley in Cleveland Avatar
    Charley in Cleveland

    When guys like Hegseth, JD, and Ron DeSantis act like Trump (insulting reporters, doubling down on obviously unjustifiable decisions) they underscore the fact that only Trump can get away with such BS and boorish behavior. The rest of them come off as charisma-free asshats trying desperately to be something they are not.

    2
  3. This comes at a rather bad time for Jeffries. Did he fail to herd his cats, or did he not even want to?

    1
    1. It’s an absolutely inexcusable fuck-up by Jeffries and he Democrats. Shame on Nancy Pelosi for no-showing, but at the same time one has to note that Speaker Pelosi would not have allowed this to happen.

      2
  4. because there was almost universal expectation that some Republican Members—including some who had lost their jobs partly as a result of the unpopular war effort—would join Democrats.* Aside from Thomas Massie, who brought the charges, none did.

    By this point any Repub Congress Member, even ones that had been defeated because of Trump, will prostrate themselves in the end. The most they will do is grumble off the record to reporters, or maybe “have concerns” in public. But they are essentially a Vichy government, still there only because they do as they are told

    2
  5. Eh. It was a symbolic vote because Massie is gone in January. They’ll impeach him then.

    1. It was a PR failure, a signal of incoherence and lack of seriousness by Democrats. And it casts reasonable doubt on Jeffries’s job performance. Not good.

      1
      1. Counter-point on PR: this was the outgoing Reps defending Hegseth and the war.

        1
  6. The missing Democrats issue is a bit baffling. If Jeffries was misled by members of the Republican caucus as to who might peel off and vote with Massie, well, lesson learned: do not trust them.

    If it’s not that, I don’t really know what is going on here, other than perhaps they didn’t want to give Massie a win, and will revisit this in January when they can really push. Massie has said that his impeachment articles were less punitive than the ones Democrats were considering, so perhaps that’s behind this.

  7. I will confess, on the one hand, that the absences are frustrating and baffling.

    On the other hand, if folks want a real Senate trial done properly, wait for the D majority. It isn’t like this killed it for all time.

    On the third hand, this is just getting the Rs on record, again, supporting Hegseth and this war. They keep showing us how they are. Let them.

    1
  8. Wait a minute. Notorious disciplinarian and Queen of Vote Counting Nancy Pelosi didn’t show up?

    Lol. Well. Mentally checked out and over it all, like a 12th grader after Spring Break. Senioritis strikes again.

    1. She was apparently headed back to her district to attend a prior commitment, which I find a bit dodgy.

      I’m okay with the Rep. who had previously scheduled surgery missing the vote. The several who were blocked in traffic returning to the House from an event…that’s either inexcusable on their part, or House Republicans timed the vote specifically because they knew certain members had commitments and weren’t present.

      That, unfortunately, is not an unusual tactic.

  9. I think I’ve mentioned that in person proposals must be presented at a certain time, and there’s no grace period. Either you’re there at the appointed time and you can present your proposal, or you’re not and you can’t.

    Since most proposals represent a huge chunk of income, we are very punctual in such matters. This means if the proposals are due at 10 am, you arrive at 8 am*. 9 am is considered reckless.

    A congressional vote doesn’t necessarily have a firm deadline. Just the same, if it is something important, you should be on hand to cast a vote regardless of other considerations. I take it the time for the vote may not have been known in advance. If so, then you cancel all events and wait for the vote.

    *The places for such presentations vary a lot. Some are within walking distance of a nice place to have breakfast or coffee, some are in industrial areas without as much as a convenience store for kilometers.

  10. Jeffries is not made for what’s coming in this country. All he had to do is get people show up to vote against the existence of Pete Hegseth. That’s it: not difficult.

    I suspect that fucking this up was a multi-stage event, because everyone who supports and funds this vague idea of somehow being a moderate and not a DSA-extremist has lost their mind and is in the process of crashing out. Like they couldn’t just do the obvious political concession of taking four seconds to realize that Pete Hegseth deserves but contempt and proceed accordingly. Instead, they lost their minds in a labyrinth where the real problem turned out to be critics of the Iran war, corporations, and AI data centers.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.