Tom Ricks points to a newish book by Howard J. Wiarda titled Military Brass vs. Civilian Academics at the National War College: A Clash of Cultures and cites these conclusions:

1. The War College was extremely authoritarian and top-down. It did not function like any college (lower case) that I’d ever seen. It was not a ‘college’ or ‘university’ at all but a military base run on a command system. It had not made the compromises necessary to be both a military institution and a serious teaching and educational institution.

2. The curriculum … was more like a manual in a technical school than a serious graduate curriculum.

3. … There was no room for new or original ideas …

8. I don’t think the military brass who run NWC … have the foggiest notion of what a college or university is all about.”

There’s just a wee problem with all this: The book is apparently a “memoir” based on his time on the faculty there. Checking the CV posted on Wiarda’s website, I find that his stint at National War College took place from 1991 to 1996! That means he started there two decades ago and left fifteen years ago.

Now, Wiarda has been busy with various fellowships, running a department, speaking engagements, and cranking out voluminous amounts of publications. So, I can see why a book tangentially related to his scholarship wasn’t on the front burner. But it’s not at all inconceivable that the National War College has changed a mite in the intervening period.