Sydney Sweeney Ad Sparks Outrage

The Streisand Effect in action.

27

Comments

Scrolling through the AP front page, I came across the headline “Female athletes accuse Sydney Sweeney ad of sexualizing women in sports,” I had to chuckle. Sexualizing women in sports, after all, is hardly a new phenomenon.

An advertising campaign featuring American actor Sydney Sweeney has sparked widespread backlash from female athletes who say it is sexualizing women in sports.

In the ad for the sports prediction market platform Novig, Sweeney appears with little or no clothing, covering parts of her body with strategically placed footballs and other sports apparel.

Many female athletes criticized the ad on social media and called it disrespectful to women.

The ad campaign—-of which I would have been completely unaware absent the backlash (see: effect, Streisand)—is full of mild double entendres. But it’s not about women, much less women in sports. It is—shockingly, considering the sponsor—about betting on sports.

A couple of representative samples (which were hard to find in embedable form because there are so many videos reacting to them):

and

Whether this will encourage sports betting—much less on the sponsor’s platform—is anyone’s guess. Presumably, the sponsor thinks so.

The ads certainly sexualize Sydney Sweeney. Who is, by all appearances, a woman. But she seems perfectly comfortable with that and, presumably, was well compensated for her trouble.

“I can’t describe how infuriated I feel when I watch this,” four-time Olympic swimming gold medalist Ariarne Titmus wrote on Instagram. “How do we live in a world where monetizing a woman’s body and sexualizing women’s sport is still a thing?”

British sprinter Amy Hunt addressed the actor in a post-race interview with the BBC on Sunday after finishing fourth in the 200 meters at the Ultimate Championship in Budapest, Hungary.

“Sydney Sweeney, this is what women in sport look like,” she said, looking at the camera. “Muscles, hard work, sweat, blood, tears.”

Former U.S. gymnast Gracie Kramer called the ad infuriating.

“I’ve spent my entire life competing in a sport where female athletes have been oversexualized, reduced to our bodies, and forced to fight to be taken seriously for what we can actually do,” she said on Instagram.

Kramer posted stories featuring female athletes training with the caption: “What a woman in sports looks like.”

Sofie Fella, a Chinese-German rugby player, said female athletes can be role models for girls and women because they manage to “untangle” from society’s ideals of beauty and femininity.

“And that’s why that Sydney Sweeney ad is so disrespectful to every female athlete in the world,” she said in an Instagram post.

I don’t keep up with the Olympic sports much these days and have never followed rugby, so I’m not familiar with these women. (Or, indeed, their male counterparts.) I find their outrage odd, though, since Sweeney is not depicting a female athlete in these ads. Nothing in them comments one way or the other on women’s sports.

It’s noteworthy that all four have Instagram accounts. All four post photos that could be described as sexualized, whether promoting their personal brand or hawking products. Which is not at all unusual; women athletes have been doing so for as long as I can remember. But the outrage over Sweeney doing the same strikes me as weird.

27 responses to “Sydney Sweeney Ad Sparks Outrage”

  1. Now, imagine for a second that NFL games (or even betting on NFL games) would be promoted by showing nude/almost nude muscled men wearing (if anything) tiny underpants revealing a big, fat, bulging cock.

    How would you like it?

    And I’m pretty sure that there would be quite a few male athletes protesting that what they are doing is really fucking difficult, and that they worked hard enough for it, and that they are more than just a bunch of fuckable himbos. And most importantly, that they don’t want to the subject of a collective wankfest (literally speaking).

    This is not difficult.

    2
    1. …tiny underpants revealing a big, fat, bulging cock.

      How would you like it?


      ……..
      …um, haha, from the tone, I’m guessing my immediate thought was the wrong answer then?

      1
      1. Well, I assume that if one is into the same sex there that would be certain understanding that there is a time and place for everything.

        And maybe that should go for female (semi) nudity and the heterosexual male gaze, too.

        But society being what it is, quite a few people don’t seem to get that.

        1
    2. You mean like this? Or going all the way back to this?

      Oh… and those are actually athletes (Pete Rose in bikini briefs is a sight I can’t unsee), not models.

    3. @drj But that’s not what’s happening here. She’s implying nothing about the difficulty of the sport. She’s using her body to capture viewer attention with the joke being “just sports,” when that’s clearly not what caught the eye.

      Half naked guys might be a weird way to advertise but I can’t imagine male players caring about it.

      1. She’s using her body to capture viewer attention with the joke being “just sports”

        Indeed. And it reinforces the idea that we should be interested in women based on how fuckable they are rather than what they can do on the field, track, or whatever.

        We don’t do that with men. And if we would, men would object:

        but I can’t imagine male players caring about it.

        If they really wouldn’t, the ending of Slap Shot wouldn’t work at all. And even though it’s an older movie, we all still get it.

        (Even though it’s actually poking fun at the idea that men can be admired for their violence, but cannot be admired for their physical beauty.)

        1. @drj As others have pointed out, we do indeed do this with men, but at a much lesser rate. But, surely, Sweeney is not the main driver of the phenomenon.

    4. I honestly have no desire to waste even a second of thought on this, now that our good host has bought it to our attention, but can’t resist linking to this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9_MaQ6UOFA

      1
  2. Was discussing this with a friend last night: is it a real controversy if the first time you hear/care was when your algorithm told you it’s something about which you should be outraged?

    I have never seen her in anything besides the famous 10-second bathroom mirror clip from Europhia. Other than that, everything I know about Sydney Sweeney, I’ve learned involuntarily. Which means her is team is genius at manufacturing controversy to generate social media chatter and publicity for her, because who the hell is she and why are we supposed to GAF?

    I’m convinced Sweeney’s publicist comes up with ideas for a “controversy” then plants articles and Twitgram/Instabook posts saying “OMG Local Lib Big Mad at Sydney for this Super Controversy” before there’s any controversy. Then the controversy starts when the terminally online, perpetually outraged left takes the bait, like we always do.

    2
    1. because who the hell is she and why are we supposed to GAF?

      Not to say that you’re wrong, but I think that ship sailed with Paris Hilton. And after her, the Kardashians and Jenners.

      1
  3. Sydney Sweeney is the poster child for today’s “stop making stupid people famous” movement. She and professional victim (and 5th place holder) Riley Gaines should be ignored.

    4
  4. Sydney Sweeney has a First Amendment right to carnival bark her message for a profit. Just like her detractors have a First Amendment right to engage in finger pointing outrage and self-righteous protest. As for myself, I prefer the carnival barker, from whom I have the option of not buying what their selling, to those who seek to limit my choices.

  5. This ad popped up a week ago for me on Youtube and for the ten seconds I watched it before clicking through, it did strike me as outdated. And as soon I saw Sweeney’s name, I knew exactly what the ‘controversy’ was going to be.

    You can’t blame Sydney Sweeney and you can’t blame the guys for checking her out. But you can’t blame women who are trying to make a living do real work for feeling very negative about the time-honored ritual of T&A. I scrolled through one of their instas, and it was just normal stuff, nothing sexual. So the idea that any images a woman posts is fodder for gratuitous objectification doesn’t help.

    Also, men seem pretty unhinged in places like social media or the Trump administration. The incel mixture of objectification and loathing is hard to swallow, and it’s difficult not to suspect that the hard-core 2nd gen feminists had the goods on what wholesome T&A really means to a lot of men. Trying to pretend it’s all good, just sex selling, does not fit into our current world.

    1. This ad popped up a week ago for me on Youtube

      Switch to the Brave browser — it gets rid of the ads on YouTube if they aren’t embedded into the video content itself. Runs on iOS, if that’s your thing.

      More people should be using better ad blockers. It solves a lot of these problems.

      (The internet promised us better, more relevant and more targeted ads, but has instead delivered people hawking grifts over and over and over)

      1. (The internet promised us better, more relevant and more targeted ads, but has instead delivered people hawking grifts over and over and over)

        Whether that’s a problem depends on who “us” is, n’est pas? Users of the Internet continually mix up who are the customers and who are the product. Always.

  6. This ad popped up a week ago for me on Youtube and for the ten seconds I watched it before clicking through, it did strike me as outdated.

    Aha! That explains why I knew nothing about the Novig website until today. (Yet another reason I don’t watch YouTubes.)

  7. Sex in advertising? Well, I never!
    OK. I have a debate topic. Sports betting, more or less harmful than selling fentanyl?

    1. Can’t be quantified. Different types of harm make it apples/oranges.
      My take. YMMV.

    2. Having been given 4 doses while passing gall stones, I actually respect fentanyl. I went from hyperventilating and grinding my teeth so I wouldn’t scream, to “oh… it’s gone” in about 1.5 seconds.

      1
    3. Only in abusing either, one isn’t likely to kill you.

    4. We don’t have encampments of people in tents in Seattle parks doing sports betting, so I’m going with fentanyl.

      I’m sure a few of the people there started with sports betting, but when they switched to fentanyl it was not an upgrade to their future prospects.

      1. Thanks for reinforcing my point. Context IS everything. In your scenario, fentanyl is worse. In other scenarios where the persons top themselves over their debt, or run into problems with Vinnie cuz they can’t pay him back, fentanyl may be irrelevant, or even a godsend. “So much depends on a red wheel barrow.”

        ETA: Still, good point.

  8. What’s interesting is how this has again become a culture war point, with conservatives crowing about how advertising has been reclaimed and for some reason saying that liberals are all against the ad because.. she is white and pretty? It’s an interesting logic chain.

    1. Her most notable life event was appearing in an ad for blue jeans while winkingly parroting eugenics talking points about “great genes”.

      I assume she brings the culture war with her at this point.

      1
  9. Who is Sydney Sweeney?
    🙂

    1
  10. I would not have ever thought that ad was presenting Ms. Sweeny as an athlete. She is exactly an eye-catcher for heterosexual males, which the sponsor believes is the core of their audience.

    I mean, objectification, oh, hell yes. She is, in these ads, not a person. She is an attention-grabber. She was paid well for this job, and one would think, happy to do it. But who would watch that and think she was an athlete? Or that the sports being bet on are primarily sports with women athletes?

    I have a long-standing objection to this sort of thing. It comes from a time when I was watching broadcast television with my 12-year-old son (Now my 35-year-old daughter, but the gender and orientation at the time of viewing are important – said child is attracted to females and always has been).

    An ad came on. A car ad. Multiple scantily clad female models are draped all over the car. Child exclaims, “Why do they do that?” I took their meaning to be “Why are they pinging my sexuality on TV? Why are they trying to give me an erection during an ad?”.

    This clued me in to what a mostrous falsehood the whole thing is. In the non-television world, someone who presents a sexual display like that to me has me in mind for it, and some specific courses of actions. I’m not talking just “they were scantily clad”. No, those ads (and the one above) feature behaviors that are very much specifically intended to be sexual invitations.

    In a situation where they can’t be followed up on. The tease.

    I don’t like it for my own sake. It’s a lie. I get no pleasure from it. I am instead reminded of how much buying said vehicle will NOT give me access to sexual escapades with women who look like that at the same time I remind myself that that isn’t the kind of sexual experience I have ever sought.

    I don’t want to dismiss the reaction of these women athletes, but I will note that I don’t understand it.

    Perhaps they are just exhausted and discouraged by all the efforts they do being completely displaced by money + sexual display. I would be too, I guess.

  11. Comments on…
    SC ruling on mail ballot EO: 11
    Sydney Sweeney ad: 26
    Drone downed over Lithuania : 2

    It seems that we have an attention economy winner.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.