Tuesday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum,
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. Scott says:

    Chip Roy was my Congressman until we moved. He is a bigoted, racist, miserable human being. He is running for Texas Attorney General. A poobah in the incredibly misnamed “Freedom Caucus”.

    A big noise in Texas politics right now is campaigning against Sharia Law and Muslims in general. That is just hiding the Republicans deep seated anti-Semitism. After the Jews, it will be Mormons or atheists or Unitarians.

    We ended Reconstruction too soon.

    Texas lawmaker ignites outrage after ‘No more Muslims’ message

    U.S Rep. Chip Roy, a Republican who represents Texas’ 21st Congressional District between San Antonio and Austin, posted on X Sunday night: “No more Muslims. No more criminals. No more marxists. No more corporatists. #SaveTexas.”

    7
  2. Scott says:

    Alternative headline: Gulf States Urge United States Fight Iran to the Last American.

    Gulf allies privately make the case to Trump to keep fighting until Iran is decisively defeated

    Gulf allies of the United States, led by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, are urging President Donald Trump to continue prosecuting the war against Iran, arguing that Tehran hasn’t been weakened enough by the monthlong U.S.-led bombing campaign, according to U.S., Gulf and Israeli officials.

    After private grumbling at the start of the war that they were not given adequate advance notice of the U.S.-Israeli attack and complaining the U.S. had ignored their warnings that the war would have devastating consequences for the entire region, some of the regional allies are making the case to the White House that the moment offers a historic opportunity to cripple Tehran’s clerical rule once and for all.

    Officials from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Bahrain have conveyed in private conversations that they do not want the military operation to end until there are significant changes in the Iranian leadership or there’s a dramatic shift in Iranian behavior, according to the officials, who were not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

    1
  3. Charley in Cleveland says:

    With birthright citizenship coming up for oral argument tomorrow, DJT once again puts his bottomless ignorance on display:

    “Our incompetent supreme court did a great job for the wrong people, and for that they should be ashamed of themselves (but not the Great Three!),” he said on Feb. 23, referring to Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito. “The next thing you know they will rule in favor of China and others, who are making an absolute fortune on Birthright Citizenship[.]”

    What is it that makes Trump believe everyone is taking advantage of him? That every single occurrence of every single day has a price tag? Where are the mental health professionals? Where’s Jake Tapper? The SCOTUS justices have to love having a carnival barker calling them dumb.

    5
  4. Scott says:

    I am so glad that I’m retired from the Air Force.

    Senator stalls 3 ‘unfit’ officer promotions in retort to Hegseth

    An Oregon senator has placed a hold on unanimous consent promotions for three military officers, citing behavior — including war zone misconduct allegations and a podcast with extremist language and viewpoints — that he says make the officers “unfit” for higher roles.

    Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., placed a hold Wednesday on the promotions of Marine Lt. Col. Vincent Noble, Col. Thomas Siverts and Navy Lt. Cmdr. Thomas MacNeil, saying his objections to a process that would quickly approve the promotions as a bloc was based on “misconduct or concerning judgement.”

    In responses provided to Military Times, Wyden’s office made clear that the holds were a direct response to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s reported decision to pull two Black and two female military officers from a list of troops up for promotion to general or flag officer.

    “Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth have launched an unprecedented politicization of the military promotion process, most recently, reportedly blocking promotions for Black and female officers,” Wyden said. “I asked my staff to vet potential promotions, to ensure the Senate is doing its job to ensure the officers leading our armed forces continue to meet the services’ high standards.”

    6
  5. Scott says:

    I don’t know whether this is BS or not. But, I would point out, that we already have a massive military complex built. It is called the Pentagon.

    Trump says massive military complex to be built beneath White House ballroom

    President Donald Trump revealed on Sunday evening that the U.S. military is constructing a “massive” underground complex beneath his new $400 million, 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom.

    Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One while holding renderings of the plans, said the ballroom “essentially becomes a [shield] for what’s being built under by the military.”

    2
  6. Scott says:

    Finally! A use for AI.

    AI Voice Inspired by a Reality TV Star Calls 3,000 Pubs to Find the Cheapest Pint of Guinness in Ireland

    Over St. Patrick’s Day weekend in 2026, a friendly-sounding Northern Irish woman named Rachel picked up the phone and dialed more than 3,000 pubs across all 32 counties of Ireland. When a bartender answered, she was direct and asked a simple question: How much is a pint of Guinness?

    Rachel chatted with publicans and sometimes endured mild interrogations. She even got told to get lost. But Rachel never actually took a sip of the famous black stout. She is an AI voice agent, after all.

    American AI engineer Matt Cortland created Rachel out of frustration and deep-seated love for Ireland’s prime export. Roused by the sting of being charged €7.80 for a Guinness, Cortland decided to map the wildly inconsistent cost of Ireland’s pints. The result is the “Guinndex,” an online platform that currently serves as the most comprehensive price-of-a-pint database compiled for Ireland in over a decade.

    1
  7. charontwo says:

    Wajeeh Lion

    Financial hanky-panky, no surprise from a Trump administration.

    Excerpts:

    The intersection of executive branch policymaking, kinetic military operations, and personal financial asset management presents one of the most complex institutional vulnerabilities in contemporary global governance. The initiation of the joint United States and Israeli military campaign against the Islamic Republic of Iran on February 28, 2026, profoundly altered the geopolitical and macroeconomic landscape of the Middle East. However, within this highly volatile framework, the nexus between national security directives and the financial maneuverings of high-ranking executive officials has precipitated intense forensic and ethical scrutiny.

    ​Documentary evidence and institutional reporting reveal that mere weeks prior to the commencement of hostilities, a Morgan Stanley broker acting in a fiduciary capacity for United States Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth initiated an inquiry with the asset management conglomerate BlackRock. The explicit objective was to execute a multimillion-dollar allocation into the iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF). This specialized exchange-traded fund is disproportionately exposed to the specific defense contractors tasked with provisioning the impending war.

    The attempted investment did not successfully execute, but the failure was entirely due to technical infrastructure limitations—the newly launched IDEF fund was not yet available on Morgan Stanley’s institutional platform. It did not fail because a compliance officer intervened or because the trade was flagged as ethically compromised. This profound temporal proximity of an attempted capital deployment to a major regional war introduces severe questions regarding informational asymmetry, revealing that the individual who advocated the loudest for military action had a broker actively shopping for millions of dollars in defense stocks before the broader market could react.

    … more,

    A pattern of arbitrage: The 2025 Tariff Sell-Off

    ​The attempt to position millions of dollars ahead of the Iranian conflict is not an isolated incident; it aligns with an established pattern of utilizing advanced knowledge of executive policy shifts to optimize personal assets.

    ​On April 2, 2025, President Trump shocked global supply chains by announcing sweeping “Liberation Day” trade tariffs, sending the broader stock market into a plunge. Forensic analysis of federal disclosure filings reveals that exactly eight days prior, on March 24, 2025, Hegseth executed a massive, highly optimized liquidation of 29 different equities.

    ​This divestiture strategy shielded between $100,000 and $550,000 in total value. Hegseth systematically dumped shares in companies highly vulnerable to global supply chain disruptions. Tech, telecom, and retail giants were offloaded in tranches ranging from $15,001 to $50,000 each, including Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, T-Mobile, and PNC Financial Services. He also liquidated assets valued between $1,001 and $15,000 in companies like Walmart, Microsoft, Lowe’s, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), and Target/Costco. When the tariff announcement hit, almost all 29 of these specific companies saw their stock prices collapse.

    … more,

    Conclusion

    ​The forensic reconstruction of executive financial maneuvering surrounding the 2026 U.S.-Iran conflict paints a stark portrait of systemic ethical vulnerability. The evidence clearly indicates that the individual who advocated most vociferously for a massive kinetic war simultaneously employed a broker to attempt a multimillion-dollar capital allocation into a financial vehicle explicitly designed to surge in value upon the outbreak of those hostilities.

    ​When viewed alongside the highly optimized liquidation of 29 market-vulnerable equities immediately prior to the 2025 tariffs, a distinct behavioral pattern emerges: the aggressive leveraging of asymmetric executive foreknowledge for private portfolio optimization. As long as archaic legal frameworks fail to account for sector-specific active ETFs and high-level institutional blind spots, the architects of American foreign policy will remain inextricably, financially tethered to the wars they wage.

    7
  8. gVOR10 says:

    @Scott:

    No more Muslims. No more criminals. No more marxists. No more corporatists. -Chip Roy

    No more corporatists? How’s he going to fund the Republican Party?

    8
  9. Neil Hudelson says:

    Are we finally seeing cracks in Trump’s base? As I (and others) have stated before, 36% (ish) seems to be Trump’s solid floor of support. Polls have gotten to 37, 36%, but never lower. Until now.

    Zeteo has the early toplines from a UMASS Amhearst poll, and it shows a big shift:
    -33% approval, 62% disapproval.

    -8% approve of sending ground forces into Iran; 30% of self-identified MAGAs approve.

    -59% believe the Trump admin is hiding Epstein information

    -And finally “immigration – Trump’s signature issue – has “quickly become one of the president’s most pressing vulnerabilities.” Only 35% say he’s handled immigration well, and 60% say he hasn’t.”

    https://zeteo.com/p/are-these-trumps-worst-poll-numbers-first-draft

    3
  10. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Neil Hudelson:
    The polls are starting to look good. Nate, 50 Plus One and RCP show net negatives in the 17 to 20% underwater range. That’s an improvement. It’s been plateaued around negative 13 to 15 for a while. But I don’t put much weight on MAGA’s supposed anti-war stance. If they’re against ground troops it’s because they don’t think Trump is going to do it. If he does, MAGA will cartwheel over to support.

    3
  11. CSK says:

    According to Nestle, 400,000+ Kit-Kat bars were stolen en route from Italy to Poland.

    3
  12. charontwo says:

    The New Republic

    I think paywalled, but some excerpts:

    There have been two big developments in Donald Trump’s war on Iran. First, he’s now threatening more war crimes. And second, we just learned that American forces may have bombed a second school in Iran, killing nearly two dozen people. Interestingly, all this arises as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is coming under fire for delivering a prayer suggesting that God sanctions overwhelming violence against the enemy. Also interestingly, this Hegseth moment was dramatically undercut by the Pope, who declared that God does not heed such prayers.

    Sarah Posner, a scholar and host of the excellent Reign of Error podcast, has been making the point that Hegseth’s extreme theology explains much of what we’re seeing here. So we’re talking about all this today with her. Sarah, nice to have you on.

    Sarah Posner: Thanks for having me, Greg.

    Sargent: So let’s start here. Pete Hegseth has been doing monthly prayer services at the Pentagon, which itself would be a violation of church-and-state separation. He recently said a prayer that was expressly directed to American troops in Iran. I just want to highlight two parts. First, here’s Hegseth quoting King David:

    Pete Hegseth (voiceover): You made my enemies turn their backs to me and those who hated me I destroyed. They cried for help, but there was none to save. They cried to the Lord, but He did not answer them.

    And here’s Hegseth calling for God’s assistance against the enemy:

    Pete Hegseth (voiceover): Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our great nation. Give them wisdom in every decision, endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.

    Sargent: Sarah, two things here. First, note how Hegseth says God didn’t answer the enemy, whereas he apparently does answer Hegseth. Second, note the express claim that God sanctions overwhelming violence. Your thoughts on all that?

    Posner: Hegseth is expressing an extreme version of Christian supremacy, where America, a Christian nation, is entitled, and in fact probably in his mind required by God, to smite America’s enemies—or to smite the enemies of Christianity, even. When we talk about Christian nationalism, this is exactly what we’re talking about.

    But the important thing to remember with Hegseth, in contrast to other versions of Christian nationalism that we see more commonly in the Republican Party, is that his is a very extreme version of Christian supremacy where we Christians are entitled to go out and take dominion over the world, to vanquish enemies, and to do so violently—and even when they do so violently, with the express mandate from God.

    Sargent: Right. He is an adherent of a theology called Christian Reconstructionism. He seems to see biblical law as supreme over the authority of the state. Can you explain what that belief system really is?

    Posner: Christian Reconstructionism holds that biblical law is superior to civil law and that the Bible—biblical law—should govern every aspect of life: your personal life for sure, but also political life, military life.

    So to Hegseth, this biblical law—the interpretation of which would be contested by different scholars or adherents to the Bible—but his version of biblical law is superior to the Pentagon’s own internal military law, American civil law, and also, importantly, when we’re talking about Hegseth and the prosecution of this unjust, illegal war, that it is superior to international law and the rules of engagement in war and military conflicts.

    Sargent: Well, I want to try to connect Hegseth’s conduct of the war to all this right now. Hegseth has been positively oozing with bloodlust and sadism in his public discussions of the war. He openly enthuses about raining, quote-unquote, “death and destruction” from the sky, about liberating the military from stupid rules of engagement, about unleashing maximum lethality, and even about killing “without hesitation”—which I translate as with no moral qualms whatsoever.

    So Sarah, linking all these things up, it seems like Hegseth sees his war as being in accordance with biblical law. Even U.S. law might not be binding on him. And of course international human rights law, which would be way at the very bottom of the totem pole, would certainly not be binding on him. Is that more or less the situation?

    Posner: That is more or less the situation. He sees in the biblical mandates that he reads in his Bible that violence against one’s enemies is not just necessary in the field of battle, but actually desired. Before he became defense secretary, he wrote in a book that he thought the Geneva Conventions were woke bullshit—that was not the exact phrase he used, but that was the intent.

    So to him, biblical law—where he … and the other adherents to this theology see themselves as superior to other religions, to other forms of Christianity—God is commanding them to take dominion not just over America, but over the world. This very much drives his imperialist ideology.

    etc., etc.

    The piece later points out Hegseth actually likes war crimes, affirmatively supports them.

    2
  13. charontwo says:

    @charontwo:

    Pope Leo disagrees:

    Sargent: Right. He has said the enemy will get “no quarter,” which is an explicit threat of a war crime—meaning that the U.S. military should or will kill people who have surrendered. He clearly thinks that’s biblically sanctioned. Now, Pope Leo said on Sunday that God doesn’t accept the prayers of leaders who wage wars. He said: “This is our God, Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war.”

    Pope Leo continued that Jesus “does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them, saying, ‘Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen. Your hands are full of blood.’”

    3
  14. Jay L. Gischer says:

    @Scott: You know, once upon a time, I was a regular on Ta-Nehisi Coates’ blog. There were lots of black folks in the commenting crew. Both they and Coates would give a figurative eyeroll at people exclaiming how racism was over due to Obama getting elected. It was one of the most important things I learned from the Golden Horde.

    Racism will never be “over”. It’s built on a basic human characteristic: The tendency to categorize people into Us and Them. What we get to do is tinker with the definition of “Us” and “Them”. And we can tinker quite a lot. But that means every generation needs to make this effort. Every generation needs to actively create a world where racism can’t really get much traction. I think that world is possible. I don’t think a world with no racism is possible.

    5
  15. Mr. Prosser says:

    @Scott: The Gulf States battle hymn must be “Onward Christian Soldiers.”

    9
  16. Sleeping Dog says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    The key takeaway regarding the felon’s polling is that the trendline is downward, while his approval may bounce up and down, it never recovers to the prior high. It is a continue drip of support being lost. Now he’s down be approval only being MAGAts and hardcore R’s. Where the likely fracture in his support among the MAGAts will be among young conservatives, who are looking beyond him for their next leader.

    2
  17. Kathy says:

    @CSK:

    I bet they’ll melt them down and recast them as crappy knockoffs of good chocolate.

    1
  18. gVOR10 says:

    I certainly agree with Atrios’ sentiment here,

    I’m scared to mock this, even here on this little blog that our fine president likely does not read, as calling losing the open strait a victory is probably better than the alternative. Let him declare victory and go home.

    Trump Tells Aides He’s Willing to End War Without Reopening Hormuz

    More hope than expectation, I fear.

    2
  19. Sleeping Dog says:

    Several reports this AM that the AC/DC felon is considering walking away from his war and leave the rest of the world the problem of reopening the Strait. Last week Rubio tried to move the Europeans to help by claiming that Iran will collect a toll on ships passing through the Strait, if they don’t help the US open it.

    It’s hard to comprehend how such a desperate threat was expected to be taken seriously. Paying the toll would be cheaper than a war. Of course, Iran and China would use this as an opportunity to break the regime of the petrodollar in oil trading.

    3
  20. Bobert says:

    @Scott:
    But the Texas Oil producers are getting richer by selling domestic oil at global prices!
    Way more profit!

    2
  21. Bobert says:

    @charontwo: Just to throw in my 2 cents FWIW, when will the Christian Nationalists starting quoting from the New Testament, you know the ACTUAL words of Jesus Christ versus what some writer imagined God saying?

    4
  22. Kylopod says:

    @Jay L. Gischer:

    You know, once upon a time, I was a regular on Ta-Nehisi Coates’ blog. There were lots of black folks in the commenting crew. Both they and Coates would give a figurative eyeroll at people exclaiming how racism was over due to Obama getting elected. It was one of the most important things I learned from the Golden Horde.

    First of all, hello from the Horde. I was also one of the regulars. The running joke I remember we had over there was that whenever a public figure would deny racism, we’d say “He lets them use his bathroom”–a reference to an incident in 2009 involving a Louisiana judge’s defense of his actions after he refused to marry an interracial couple.

    With regard to the point about Obama: Shortly after his first election in ’08, there was a Daily Show bit with Larry Wilmore, where he says to Jon, “We’re straight.” Jon replies, “So racism is over?” Larry replies, “I said that we’re straight, not that we’re stupid.”

    5
  23. Sleeping Dog says:

    @Bobert:

    Yes, for so called evangelicals that are trying to live the spirit of Jesus Christ, they do seem to ignore his teachings and you would think they were Jewish, for the amount of time the quote the old testament.

    3
  24. Kathy says:

    @gVOR10:
    @Sleeping Dog:

    Come now. Have you ever seen an infant wipe their own bottom and change their own diaper?

    It’s in their nature to make a mess that others will clean up.

    3
  25. Gregory Lawrence Brown says:

    @CSK:..

    That’s a lot of Chocolate!
    (Smothers Brothers)

    1
  26. Kathy says:

    On today’s substack, Paul Krugman explains oil shipped out of the Gulf before the trump closure of Hormuz, is all near to reaching their destination. After that happens, there will be shortages of crude, as all too little is making its way out now.

    What happens next is uncertain, but oil prices should continue to climb, and EL Taco’s delusions of negotiations will fail to calm down markets.

    He’s alarmed, and says you should be, too.

    I think this is one of those cases where nothing bad ever happens, until something bad happens.

    5
  27. a country lawyer says:

    A Federal Judge in Washington has issued a preliminary injunction halting construction of Trump’s ballroom.
    Link

    2
  28. Gustopher says:

    @gVOR10:

    No more corporatists? How’s he going to fund the Republican Party?

    Corporations and corporatists are different things.

    A corporation is a legal entity that allows investors to pool capital, and limits their liability to the sum of their investment.

    A corporatist is a Jew.

    Hope that helps!

    5
  29. Jay L. Gischer says:

    @Kylopod: I recognized your handle from those days. Good times!

  30. Gustopher says:

    @Sleeping Dog: This is probably the best course of action at this point, so I assume Trump won’t actually do it.

    2
  31. CSK says:

    @a country lawyer:

    I imagine there will be vast quantities of ketchup hurled at the walls this evening.

    1
  32. Gustopher says:

    The Supreme Court has ruled 8-1 that a ban on conversion therapy is a violation of a therapist’s first amendment rights, rejecting the argument that therapy is medical treatment which can and should be regulated.

    Ineffective treatment that tortures the patient is a-ok!

    No word on whether a therapist can counsel their patient and tell them to kill the president or something, or whether requiring a doctor to tell you if they find you have cancer would violate the doctor’s rights.

    It’s 8-1, so there may be more to it than that, but on the face of it, it seems very bad.

    I’m thinking of children who cannot consent to this abuse, and who can be sent for this abuse by their parents over kid’s objections.

    Adults who want to be abused? — there are probably more fun ways, but I’m not going to yuck someone’s yum.

    5
  33. Gustopher says:

    @CSK: or ketchup thrown at the gaping hole in the wall…

  34. JohnSF says:

    @Scott:

    Gulf States Urge United States Fight Iran to the Last American.

    A bit unfair; the Gulf states did not ask for this war.
    It seems what they had been told to expect was just a repeat of the limited strikes of last summer; then Israel and the US suddently went to a full-on “regime kill” operation.
    And in response Iran started pounding them, and closed the Straits.

    If the US walks away now, leaving Iran in control at Hormuz, their position is a nightmare. So naturally they are hoping that somehow the US can get them out of the midden the US has dropped them in. It seems rather likely that the US cannot, whether the US attempts either to walk away now, or Trump tries an inadequate esaclation to a limited ground operation.

    So the outcome of all this may be Iran as emerging hegemon of the Gulf, and the the US being squeezed out. Trump and Netanyahu end up screwing everyone, including the US, Israel, and themselves.

    4
  35. dazedandconfused says:

    @Scott:

    My Congressman, Adam Smith, who is a pretty smart cookie on military affairs, is saying the Gulfies are asking for that but when asked t0 specify exactly what that would look like have no clear idea, just like most everybody else. I suspect they are going to be disappointed as well.

    3
  36. JohnSF says:

    @Sleeping Dog:

    …Rubio tried to move the Europeans to help by claiming that Iran will collect a toll on ships passing through the Strait.

    And Trump has said similarly:

    “All of those countries that can’t get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormuz, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, I have a suggestion for you: Number 1, buy from the U.S., we have plenty, and Number 2, build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just TAKE IT,”
    “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us,”

    And Hegseth:

    “The president was clear this morning in his Truth that there are countries around the world who ought to be prepared to step up on this critical waterway as well,”
    “Last time I checked, there was supposed to be a big, bad Royal Navy that could be prepared to do things like that,”
    “As far as NATO, that’s a decision that will be left to the president, but a lot has been laid bare, you don’t have much of an alliance if you have countries that are not willing to stand with you when you need them.”

    Yes, well, that’s a pig that’s not going to be flying anywhere.
    No US allies, not UK , nor European, nor Japan, nor any others, are going to stick warships in the Straits as Hormuz as missile sponges.
    Sod that.

    And sod still more any idea of a NATO expeditionary land force at the Straits.
    We have little problem called Russia on our doorstep, and even had we not, little inclination to see our military getting killed to save Trump’s blushes.
    The Iranian surcharges will be of little weight in that scale.
    And most European now see US membership of NATO as a dead-letter anyway, at least under Trump (or Vance, going forward.)

    Seeing as only about 5% of Gulf oil goes to Europe (little more than the 4% that goes to the US) those most concerned will be China, India, Pakistan, Japan, and other Asian countries.

    There are whole load of major strategic/political implications of all this that may play out.

    3
  37. Jay L. Gischer says:

    @Gustopher: What the therapist in question claims she wants to do is to help people cope with living as straight people while having desires that are, er, undesirable. She explicitly denies trying to make them into heterosexuals or completely erase those desires.

    I can see why this is a bit nuts, but I don’t think it’s conversion therapy.

    AND, in the country I would like to live in, I don’t really see why a government shouldn’t be required to demonstrate a compelling interest in any law they set down. “Demonstrate a compelling interest” is legal speak for “tell us why this is any of your business”. This seems to me like it ought to be a conservative position, which is why I often get mistaken for a conservative, I guess.

    Furthermore, strict scrutiny would definitively and immediately void all the laws on the books prohibiting gender-affirming care. Except that the current court is sticking it’s fingers in its ears and saying, “LALALA I’m not listening”. I think that Sotomayor and Kagan are playing a long game, thinking that affirming a strict scrutiny standard is probably for the best in the long run. The more contradictions get into the judicial record, the easier it is to overturn some of them.

    Unpleasant as it is, I can live with this a lot more than with some of their recent decisions.

    3
  38. JohnSF says:

    One indicator of how pissed off European public opinion is.
    The far-right AfD part in Germany, that JD Vance was courting last spring, has just come out calling for the removal of US bases from Germany.
    The thing the MAGA right tends to forget about European right populist-nationalists is that they are nationalists. Who have a condiderable heritage of disdain for all Americans of any sort.
    If they have any inclinations to internationalism, its very much in a European context.
    Whose basic assumptions are rather different to those of the American right (though these days that’s a bit of an ideological mash-up).

    3
  39. Kathy says:

    @JohnSF:

    El Taco divides his time speaking on Europe in two ways: 1) we don’t need them, 2) they’re SOBs for not letting us use bases on their territory we need so much for this warexursionnotwarmilitaryoperationregimechangenegotiationoilgrab.

    At some point Europe may just decide it wants to keep the Germans in, the Russians down, and the Americans out.

    3
  40. dazedandconfused says:

    @JohnSF:

    All this is scaring the east Asians, including Australia, spitless. There is now a strong incentive for the industrial Asian nations to ally with China, the only rational super-power left, for collective oil security.

    3
  41. JohnSF says:

    @Kathy:
    The daft thing is, most have been permitting base use.
    The B-52’s and B-1’s are sortieing out of Fairford and Lakenheath in the UK.
    Rammstein in Germany is the CENTCOM HQ that is managing US operations.
    The USS Ford was at Souda Bay in Greece for repairs, and is now at Split, in Croatia, for ongoing repair/resupply and shore leave.
    etc etc

    Other US allies (Turkey, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Canada, etc) have also refused to have anything to do with this farce.
    But the administration and MAGA are spitting venom almost exclusively at Europe, for some reason.
    I have to suspect it’s some odd quirk of MAGA politics, maybe even psychology.
    Did Europe beat them up at school, grab their lunch money and steal their girlfriend, or something?
    It’s just a bit of a weird focus, almost an obsession; that somehow modern Europe is their antithesis?

    Another thing is the repeated MAGA claim that “Europe has open borders!” when it most certainly does not. Internal “free movement” and “borderless zone” applies only internally, but MAGA seem unable to grasp the distinction. (As did many Brexiters, tbf).
    Or the repeated claims that “Muslims are taking over Europe!” when the overall percentage is 6%.
    (Varying: Bosnia and Albania are Muslim-majority, and have been for centuries)

    It’s as if Europe is somehow a caricature projection of various MAGA complexes and paranoias.

    While the adminstration is saying in effect:“We want nothing to do with European alliances any more, you ingrates. But only after we have no immediate need for your bases, obvs.”

    It’s all a rather sorry and squalid end for the Atlantic Alliance.

    7
  42. JohnSF says:

    @dazedandconfused:

    There is now a strong incentive for the industrial Asian nations to ally with China, the only rational super-power left, for collective oil security.

    Exactly.

    Some possible consequences going forward (this is all highly specualtive, of course):
    – The GCC terminates defence agreements with the US under Iranian pressure (possibly apart from Saudi Arabia?)
    – China increases its influence in the Gulf region bothe via Iran anad as a “broker” between Iran and Arabians.
    – The flow of petrotrade in dollars steadily declines as flows focus on Asia via purchasing and shipment security cooperation.
    – China, India and others work out an Asian modus vivendi re Iran to ensure oil flow and Iran not getting to big for its boots.
    – Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, India, Pakistan are increasingly inclined, perhaps, to detente with China and among each other to guarantee hydrocarbon flows.
    – China rapidly builds pipelines for Russian oil and gas as an insurance policy, as well as increasing its non-carbon sources.
    – NATO becomes effectively defunct; Europe combines moves for strategic autonomy with possible overtures to China as a restrainer of Russia.
    – The slow decline of the petrodollar leads to less demand for US Treasuries; higher bond rates increase debt service costs, and make deficits more problematic; deficit contraints make US politics even more zero sum.
    – Israel sees the “Abraham Accords” blow away like dust on the desert wind; attempts at local domination increase both Arab and European annoyance. (Possible collapse of Netanyahu/Likud political position as alternative, but don’t bet heavily on that.)
    – Turkey attempts to shore up its position in Middle East/Arabia as an alternative pillar to Iran and a possible partner for any “Asian coalition” in the Gulf.

    3
  43. Gregory Lawrence Brown says:

    Ladies and Gentlemen
    The Rolling Stones
    But it’s all right, I’m jumpin’ jack flash
    It’s a gas, gas, gas

    All seven gas stations in Sleepytown that were holding at $3.999/gal of regular unleaded for about a week are now charging $4.299/gal. A 30¢/gal increase. No discounts applied.

    2
  44. Kathy says:

    @JohnSF:

    Ayn Rand liked to bash Europe a lot.

    Did Europe beat them up at school, grab their lunch money and steal their girlfriend, or something?

    Overall Europe has a free enterprise economic base with more regulation and a broader welfare state. Also far less corruption, and prefers using soft power. Guns are not as freely available.

    It’s unamerican, and rather successful.

    That might be it. Or maybe the mere fact that the Euro is worth more than the Dollar.

    3
  45. Kathy says:

    El Taco went and signed an executive order to restrict mail in voting.

    This is the kind of thing that needs to be fast-tracked on an emergency basis to the fixer court, though I’ve no idea what mental pretzels Uncle Thomas, Scalito, and the other four will conjure in order not to strike it down.

    2
  46. steve222 says:

    It should be noted that when the US was attacked Europe (NATO) responded strongly in our support. Nothing in NATO about starting wars of choice.

    Steve

    2
  47. DK says:

    @Kathy:

    This is the kind of thing that needs to be fast-tracked on an emergency basis to the fixer court

    California will disregard it, dead letter style.

    3
  48. steve222 says:

    I have been following several long running discussions on smartphones and their effects on teens. A recurring theme is that the suicide rate has increased among teen girls. What is rarely mentioned is that rates also increased among boys and in raw numbers the boys’ rate is 3 times that of girls. I cant tell if this is just because people dont know or if it’s a concerted attempt to blame girls/women for being overly emotional, weak and more susceptible than boys to peer pressure. I think the latter.

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/freedom-to-learn/202309/dramatic-changes-in-teen-suicide-rates-over-seven-decades

    1
  49. Michael Reynolds says:

    @JohnSF:
    In every point there’s the tacit assumption that the US is finished as a world power. And it’s a very good list. Not a happy list, but a good one.

    Did I just hear that the US demanded Poland ship all its Patriots to the Gulf? That can’t be right, can it? Trump and Hegseth have really lost their fucking minds now.

    2
  50. Michael Reynolds says:

    @JohnSF:

    But the administration and MAGA are spitting venom almost exclusively at Europe, for some reason.

    Americans feel inferior to Europeans in many ways. You’re White people with really old stuff and museums. Also you’re thin, while we use Ozempic to chase donuts, and you’re vaguely effeminate, by which we mean sophisticated and don’t even have guns. You can summarize the American attitude toward Europe as, “You guys think you’re so cool, well you’re not.”

    Basically I’m saying we just want your love, your admiration, your gratitude, and the surrender of your independent national wills to a child-raping psychopath supported entirely by morons and parasites.

    4