Tuesday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum,
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. Scott says:

    So we have two Congressmen (one of each party) resigning due to their scandals.

    Rep. Tony Gonzales to resign from Congress amid backlash over sexual misconduct allegations

    Swalwell to resign from Congress

    It is clear that the balanced dual decision was a political one, not a moral one. Which says a lot about our political leadership regardless of party.

    Which leaves out the real question: Why can’t these assholes have the discipline (and basic morality) to keep their zippers up?

    4
  2. Kylopod says:

    @Scott:

    It is clear that the balanced dual decision was a political one, not a moral one. Which says a lot about our political leadership regardless of party.

    Sort of the sex-scandal-resignation equivalent to the near-simultaneous ratification of Alaska and Hawaii.

    3
  3. Eusebio says:

    @Scott:
    Except that Gonzales’ misconduct came to light months ago.

    So an alternate take is that the Republican controlled House would not vote to expel Gonzales until they had the offsetting vote to expel Swalwell, which was to happen promptly upon Congress reconvening this week.

    With the expulsion writing on the wall, each asshole resigned.

    3
  4. DK says:

    Outrage from MAGA Republicans forced Trump take down his Ai slop depicting a pedophile (himself) as Jesus.

    Dang, cancel culture is out of control. Too bad Trump bowed to the antiwoke mob. This is why Magyar won.

    No wonder Dems keep winning elections in 2025-26, when the right is so condescending, sanctimonious, and humorless. Whatever happened to free speech? Bring back comedy!

    5
  5. becca says:

    @DK: icwhdt. lol.

    1
  6. Gavin says:

    Instead of America “being back,” Trump has crossed the Rubicon by exposing the limits of US power.
    Actual power is being able to get others to do what you want without using force.. and obviously in the case of Iran, nothing was achieved even with the use of force.
    And there’s no going back.
    Great job, Republicans!

    2
  7. gVOR10 says:

    NYT (gift link) did what I would regard as a standard issue editorial on the lessons of Orban’s defeat. A commenter there named “DC” critiqued it beautifully.

    The “first lesson” of having a bold platform for national reconstruction and economic renewal is right on the money.

    But this editorial veers off course when it then says that Bill Clinton was an example of this—economic progressivism and social moderation. Bill Clinton was neoliberal as they come. He “ended welfare as we knew it.” He deregulated everything. Right down to the Commodity Futures Modification Act that caused the Great Recession.

    We don’t need more Clintonianism. We don’t need Conservative Democrats from Arkansas with questionable morality. We are not operating in the shadow of Reagan. And we can’t afford any more Obama style “too-big-to-fail, too-big-to-jail.”

    What American media calls “moderate” means more forever wars in the Middle East, more corporate tax cuts, more deregulation, more rule by the upper 0.1%, more offshoring, and social conservatism. It won’t work anymore.

    The Third Way is not the answer. We need more Lincoln and Roosevelt than Carter and Clinton. We need somebody who will hold the criminals in the Trump Admin accountable and recognize that they destroyed not just the executive branch with Musk, but the legislative branch with McConnell and the judicial branch with Roberts. It’s rotten all the way down and all of it needs to be rebuilt.

    We must become a republic of laws again, in which nobody is above the law, in which there is equality under the law—a republic of, by and for the people, not just the billionaires.

    Being a student of Dr. T, I’m going back to NYT to comment that they didn’t mention the effect of a multi-party system or of our weak parties. The left parties came together to support Magyar. Magyar has been leader of TISZA for two years. Democrats won’t have a leader until a prez candidate has been nominated in ’28.

    Kurt Weyland, in Democracy’s Resilience to Populism’s Threat, opines that presidential systems are more resistant to authoritarians than parliamentary systems. But maybe parliamentary systems have features that make it easier to depose an authoritarian. And let me object to his use of “populism” when he means “fake populism”, the most common kind by far. Dems need to adopt genuine populism.

    1
  8. Kathy says:

    Thus far the Taco blockade has succeeded in allowing the passage of three ships carrying Iranian products, at least two of which are sanctioned.

    “You keep using that word, blockade. I don’t think it means what you think it means.”

    2
  9. charontwo says:

    Here is Parker Molloy with a detailed breakdown/analysis of J D Vance’ team strategy to falsely portray him as a war skeptic so as to position him for future political campaigns.

    Parker Molloy

    If you’ve been following the news lately, you’ve noticed that the vice president of the United States has a reputation to protect.

    Tyler Pager wrote in the New York Times that JD Vance “tried and failed to end a war he opposed.” Natalie Allison in the Washington Post called him the administration’s “foremost war skeptic.” NBC News went with “How JD Vance, skeptical of Trump’s war with Iran, came to lead the peace talks.” CNN headlined its story “How JD Vance went from well-known foreign war skeptic to the public face of peace talks with Iran.” Politico, back in March, reported that unnamed administration officials had described Vance as the “skeptical” voice in the White House on Iran strikes.

    [ bunch of embeds] then,

    Five outlets. Same story. A man at the center of an administration that’s spent six weeks bombing Iran is, somehow, the one who didn’t really want any of this. Privately opposed. On a plane to Islamabad now to clean up a mess he didn’t make.

    Read enough of these in a row, and a couple of things start to feel off.

    First, almost none of what the reporters are telling you about Vance’s private views is sourced to anyone willing to put their name on it. Every “privately opposed,” every “worried about success,” every “tried to talk Trump out of it” traces back to “a senior administration official” or “people familiar with his thinking.” Second, none of it matches anything Vance has been saying in public, on camera, for the last year. What it matches is what a 2028 Republican primary campaign would want the press to be writing about its candidate right now, while an unpopular Middle East war is tanking his numbers with voters he’ll need in 2028.

    Reporters know this, which makes publishing this narrative clearly being pushed by Team Vance that much more pathetic.

    [….]

    So how does a man who publicly described Trump’s bombing of Iran as “remarkable restraint” get transformed, a year later, into the administration’s foremost war skeptic? You take dictation from people who won’t put their names on what they’re saying.

    Count the anonymous sources. Marc Caputo and Barak Ravid at Axios: “a senior administration official,” “a source close to Vance.” Diana Nerozzi and Eli Stokols at Politico: “a senior Trump official” and “a person familiar with Vance’s thinking.” Adam Cancryn, Alayna Treene, and Kevin Liptak at CNN: “multiple people familiar with the matter.” The Reuters piece has four bylines and cites “one regional official and four people familiar with the talks.” Tyler Pager’s NYT piece quotes The Atlantic quoting somebody else. Unnamed sources all the way down.

    […]

    Then came the Iraq War. The single most durable lesson of American politics in the last quarter century is that tying yourself to an unpopular Middle East war is a career-ender unless you can document, on the record, that you didn’t really support it. Hillary Clinton’s 2002 Senate vote haunted her through two Democratic primary runs. Barack Obama beat her in 2008 largely because he could say he’d opposed the war from the start. Every ambitious politician watching took notes.

    Vance, who is ambitious, took notes too. The skeptic narrative is his Iraq War inoculation, and the press is helping him build it in real time.

    And the reporters aren’t even hiding the political angle. Reuters says Vance “stands to benefit politically if talks succeed.” CNN mentions his “political trajectory ahead of a 2028 contest.” The WaPo piece buries the polling down in the story: the Iran war is deeply unpopular with the general public and broadly supported by Republican voters. That’s the gap the skeptic-but-loyal framing is engineered to bridge. Republicans get the loyalty. General election voters get the reservations. The press gets to write both versions of the man at the same time and call it journalism.

    There is a lot more, above are relatively brief excerpts.

    3
  10. Jen says:

    Back home after returning from the wedding weekend. We said goodbye to our pup on April 8, before heading out of town. The vet said that our dog’s symptoms sounded a lot like kidney failure, and that we were within days, maybe a week, of a situation where we could have needed to make an emergency call. Instead, it was a calm, quiet goodbye. I cannot say enough good things about Lap of Love, particularly if you have a bigger/more anxious dog (ours was both).

    The house is very still.

    7
  11. Scott says:

    @Jen: So sorry for your loss. Having been there I realize the decisions can be agonizing. Never heard of Lap of Love but I will keep it in mind when it is time for my pets.

    3
  12. dazedandconfused says:

    About these ships leaking through the blockade:

    I recall something from the Somalian pirates situation, a Chinese* ship was attacked but it did not go at all well for the attackers. Seems the Chinese pay their crews after a successful trip, something goes wrong and the crew gets screwed just like the owners, so when the Somalians boarded the ship the crew fought like bloody hell, barricading themselves in the aft super structure, made Molotov’s (it wasn’t a tanker), and multiple improvised weapons. Took about half a day but the Somalians gave up, probably because they ran out of ammo. Only had one mag apiece for their AKs -by the look of it. From the few video clips one of the crew made with his cell phone, the fierceness displayed by the captain and crew was quite remarkable.

    Anywho, it is likely the US Navy took note, as it was about the only ship the Somalians boarded but failed to take over, and thinks it likely that if called on to stop a Chinese tanker may ignore it, and it will be necessary to fire on the vessel to stop it.

    They can disable it with careful fire at the rudder, but then they have a loaded tanker in need of a tow. Very difficult, takes ocean going tugs with appropriate towing gear. Furthermore an act of war on China, if so flagged. A failed interdiction? Awkward. A bluff called.

    *The ship was flagged Indonesian, but was Chinese owned and completely Chinese crewed,

    2
  13. charontwo says:

    It isn’t just helium, bromine is also critical for memory chip etching.

    There is a high bromine concentration in the Dead Sea, so Israel supplies almost the entire world market. Iran missiles are a threat to that.

    War on the Rocks

    The U.S.-Israeli war with Iran, now in an unstable ceasefire, has exposed a structural failure in the global semiconductor memory supply chain, and it is not the one analysts seem to be tracking. The story receiving attention is helium: Qatar’s Ras Laffan facility went offline, a 45-day inventory clock started running, and spot prices doubled within days. The story receiving almost no attention is bromine, and it is potentially the more dangerous one. Bromine is the raw material from which specialized chemical suppliers produce semiconductor-grade hydrogen bromide gas, the etch chemical that South Korean fabs use to carve the transistor structures in every Dynamic Random-Access Memory (DRAM) and NAND flash chip on earth. A DRAM chip powers active computation and loses its contents the moment power cuts. A NAND chip retains data without power and underlies every form of digital storage. Together they underpin every modern computing device, from the phone in your pocket to the data center running your AI applications.

    South Korea sources 97.5 percent of its bromine imports from Israel. Beyond that vulnerable concentration, converting bromine into semiconductor-grade hydrogen bromide gas requires dedicated purification infrastructure, and producers outside Israel are already fully committed to existing customers and stretched too thin to absorb additional demand. Building new conversion capacity takes years of permitting, equipment procurement, and fabrication qualification.

    1
  14. JohnSF says:

    @Kathy:
    @dazedandconfused:
    “I saw three ships go sailing by, go sailing by…”

    I’m still scratching my head and waiting to what the hell is actually going on with the “counter blockade”.
    Some reports are ships are turning back to the Gulf, others they are sailing on, other that some are, some aren’t.

    My personal guessology is Trump is, as ever, trying for “multiple murky options”
    1) Internal economic crisis leads Iran to back down due.
    Unlikely
    2) Economic crisis leads “neutrals”, esp China to pressure Iran to back down.
    Also unlikely.
    3) Economic crisis forces some permutation of “US allies” to send forces to the Straits to fight Iran.
    Not a hope in hell, Donnie boy.
    4) TACO again. Trump does a performative “counter blockade” then pivots back to talks before the markets go sideways. This seems to be how the markets are betting; and I suspect what Iran, and everyone else, expects.

    Trump’s problem is that his words now have very little credibility with anyone.
    And that a counter-blockade simply does not remove his base problems of facing unacceptable domestic economic damage if the Straits are closed, the dire situation of the GCC likewise, and having no military means to secure the Straits.

    On to the next iteration of the spiral of stupid, I suppose.

    1
  15. becca says:

    @Jen: I have had you in my thoughts every day. Thank you for letting us know. Warmth and comfort to you and Andrew.

    2
  16. Daryl says:

    Can someone, anyone, explain how US National Security was threatened by Iran? Anyone? Bueller?
    https://x.com/atrupar/status/2044026611209527431?s=20

    2
  17. JohnSF says:

    Meanwhile, Tump insults Meloni.

    “I’m shocked at her. I thought she had courage, but I was wrong,”
    “Giorgia Meloni doesn’t want to help us in the war. I’m shocked,”
    “Do people like the fact that your president isn’t doing anything to get the oil [in Iran]? Does she like it? I can’t imagine.”

    Setting aside Meloni being prime minister, not president, if I were Trump I’d avoid being alone with her absent Secret Service, lol.
    She may be small, but she can glare daggers in the authentic Italian manner.

    And insulting the Pope is not very popular in Italy?
    Who’da thunk?

    1
  18. Kathy says:

    @JohnSF:

    I think gasoline has greater thermal absorption than water*. That’s why it’s the preferred substance in the Taco so-called administration to put out fires.

    I’ve given up expecting a rational explanation, even a grossly mistaken one, from a fundamentally irrational actor.

    take the tariffs (seriously, please take them away). Can they be used to help incentivize domestic manufacturing? Conceivably so. But 1) not all on their own, and 2) not if you tariff raw materials and intermediate goods along with finished goods. No country produces everything the industries within it need to make stuff. Some things perforce need to be imported.

    *I just made that up. But thermal absorption is a real thing.

    2
  19. JohnSF says:

    @Daryl:
    I believe the standard response is “nukes!”, “terrorists!” “terrorists with nukes!”
    “They chant Death to America!” “They attacked our Embassy!”

    2
  20. JohnSF says:

    @gVOR10:
    The key thing to rmember about Magyar is he’s basically a pretty normal right-of-centre European politician; a Christrian Democrat/EPP type, as re Merz or Von Der Leyen or Tusk, etc.
    A bit to the right of Macron, and to the left of Meloni.
    And, ironically, that’s how Orban and Fidesz started out.
    Fidesz was kicked out the EU EPP group in 2019, iirc.

    So, a Domocrat/Tisza comparison is really rather misleading: it’s more as if in the US a large part of the Republican party revolted against Trump because of blatant corruption and malfeasance, and economic failure, and the Dems stood aside.
    But it doesn’t really work, because of the Hungarian parliamentary system 😉

    The really intersting thing is, in Hungary, the gerrymandered “favouring Fidesz” constituencies blew up in Orban’s face because the rural conservative voter base was so pissed off that absent a left-party competitor, Tisza just swept the board and got a larger seat return than share of vote. c 54% of votes, c 70% of seats.
    Parlty due to an 80% turnout, and seconde prefrences and “surplus votes” (its complicated, lol)
    Oopsie, Orban. lol

    I have difficulty, for a whole bunch of reasons, imagining anything similar happening in the US.

    2
  21. JohnSF says:

    @Jen:
    It’s a hard thing, when it becomes unavoidable not to do what has to be done.
    Sound like the Lap of Love might make it bit easier.
    I hope so.
    My condolences.

    2
  22. Kathy says:

    @JohnSF:

    .. it’s more as if in the US a large part of the Republican party revolted against Trump(sic) because of blatant corruption and malfeasance, and economic failure,..

    Ironically, that would make them less revolting 😀

    2
  23. dazedandconfused says:

    @JohnSF: Latest reports are the tankers that cleared the strait east-bound all turned back after being confronted several hundred klicks SE in the Arabian Sea. The US Navy is keeping out of Iran’s assumed missile range.

    It may be the Chinese have decided for the moment not to force the issue, knowing how unstable Trump decisions are, but if all Gulf oil is cut off from the world something’s gotta give. India, Australia, Japan, South Korea are a small part of the list of nations that will be practically without any oil in just a month or two. I suspect their collective outrage will force Trump’s hand before the KSA and the Gulfies run out of cash or the IRGC out of honey-badger…and the Iranians know it.

    However, what seems even more likely to force Trump off this decision bef0re all the above will be US gas prices, which will skyrocket as a true crisis approaches. The US is perhaps just another $2.00 a gallon away from “revolution” and the Chinese and Iranians are probably betting on that too.

    1
  24. Kathy says:

    The Worst of the Worst

    A French woman, 86 years old, was arrested, handcuffed, and locked up by ICE.

    1