President Donald J. Trump holds a cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room Wednesday, May 27, 2026
Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok

In Front of Our Noses: “I can do whatever I want, if I want.”

More vile nonsense from the current occupant of the White House.

10

Comments

“To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle.”

-George Orwell.

The following is really a core example of why I created this series in the first place. The following statement is simply abhorrent and should be utterly unacceptable for the president of a liberal democracy to utter. It is gross and dictatorial. It is not, despite his claims, the kind of thing that a person who is respectful of the office says.

It is tiresome, shameful, and exhausting, but it needs to be seen, recorded, and remembered, and not just passed by as “Trump being Trump.” This is just another reminder, in a series of daily (if not hourly) reminders, that he never should have been president once, let alone twice.

Trump: "I could've done very bad things to Hillary Clinton. I could've done very very bad things to Joe Biden. I could've done very bad things to Barack Hussein Obama … I can do whatever I want, if I want."

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-10-07T17:44:12.919Z

And let’s be clear: yes, he could have used the power of his office to harass the persons listed. That’s the bad thing he could have done: abused his office to punish his enemies, as dictators often do.

To actually prosecute someone requires that they actually commit crimes, which is why he was indicted: there was ample evidence of criminality. He was almost certainly saved from being convicted in federal court because the Biden administration was too slow, a morally corrupt judge, Aileen Cannon, blocked an obvious case from going forward, and because SCOTUS eventually decided to bestow king-like power on the president.

If this administration had even a weak basis for pursuing a criminal case (like, I dunno, posting a photo of some seashells in the shape of “86 47”) it would have done so.

And let’s not forget, Trump is a convicted felon on 34 counts.

10 responses to “In Front of Our Noses: “I can do whatever I want, if I want.””

  1. If he were not in a position of power, he would be pathetic and pitiful. He has said that he is a great athlete and the best baseball player in New York City. He never played at a level higher than high school. Al Bundy actually did score those four touchdowns. The reason that he didn’t harm the people mentioned is that he couldn’t. Jeanne Pirro dropped the reflecting pool case against David Hearn because it was obvious bullshit. Trump’s cases against the mentioned are obvious nothing burgers like his baseball career, and even the most sycophantic officials won’t touch them.
    He is the kind of old guy who we pray not to be seated near at Thanksgiving.

  2. He may mean the fascist ruling by the fixer court that gives him criminal immunity for official acts would, let’s say, let him get Clinton or Obama killed, beaten up, or disappeared, if he wanted to. And the courts couldn’t touch him, even after he’s out of power.

    He’d pardon the perpetrators, if it comes to that (and they can afford to pay him). And I don’t doubt he’s find volunteers for such things.

    I’m less sure what the public reaction would be, especially among whatever non MAGAt republicans may still exist.

    1
    1. Sadly, this is not an implausible scenario.

      1
  3. The regime is fixated on themes of power, struggle and nationalism. In his latest speech, Rubio asserted that:

    “Under President Trump, the United States has made its choice. We choose the unapologetic pursuit of national power, to take back control of our critical supply chains, to reindustrialize our economy, to rebuild our defense, to fight for dominance of the technologies and industries of the future.”

    He deplored the fact that “The word nationalism became a dirty word”. “The story of our civilization is the greatest story ever known to man,” he went on, “and it began here [in Greece] with the first men and women of the West.”

    It’s hard to know what to make of this blustering he-man rhetoric. Perhaps it’s all just kayfabe for the home audience, impressed that Rubio is such a “statesman”. But to the extent it represents some sort of ideology, it’s a hot mess. “The story of our civilisation” is a story of religious fanaticism, empires rising and falling accompanied by constant death and destruction, the oppression of the weak by the strong, gross inequality, rule by hereditary monarchies frequently disrupted by rebellion and civil war, all culminating in the triumph of colonialism in the service of unbridled capitalism. It was only when the evils of nationalism were made obvious by the horrors of 150 years of frightful wars beginning shortly after the French Revolution that humanity hit the pause button, understanding that if “the story of our civilisation” continued along the same path, the final chapter was going be very very unpleasant indeed.

    Perhaps Rubio, Vance and others in the regime who talk like this are genuinely ignorant of the history they claim to understand. Perhaps they do understand it, but like countless demagogues before them, they think they can use a great myths’n’legends version of history to justify their own agenda. Whatever the case, it’s a new element in the MAGA movement. Trump has never shown the slightest interest in or knowledge of history, but his successors seem determined to place the movement he founded in the mainstream of European nationalist political theory.

    3
    1. @Ken_L: And the crazy thing, to make it all worse: Trump is giving away the basis of our power by pursuing his stupid nationalism.

      2
    2. The historical ignorance of some US Right advocates of both “Western Civilization” and American nationalism is notable.

      For instance, Classical Greece, though conscious of a cultural identity as Hellenic, were about as far as can be imagined from any “national” cohesion in the modern sense.
      Or from a lot of what might be regarded as definitional modern “Western” values.

      I’m probably a lot more of “traditionalist Western Civilizationist” than many hereabouts.
      But it’s important to be clear about the realities: for much of history, the lot of the majority of the populations of that civilisation were of subordination, unfreedom, disease, poverty and precarity.
      And that was in good times.
      In cases like the Thirty Years War, the Hundred Years War etc etc the plight of many was horrendous.

      It was only post-c.1800 that the material and social lot of the mass of people began to really improve.
      And the political consequences of that were not a generalised distribution of benefit, but of political and national consequences that led to ever more destructive conflict.
      Driven both by nationalism and by reactionary conservatism (which was frequently anti-nationalist) and by variants of social revolution addicted to violence and concepts of total authority.

      It was only after WW2 that Europe finally turned its back on these various destructive impulses. And recent politics indicates, that as ever with human beings, the change is imperfect.

      A sensible American might do better to reflect on how the US, within limits (race being the major one) often managed to follow a more hopeful path by having a society and polity rather less based on class confrontation and having a basic tendency to legal equity and inherent personal freedoms, and democratic/republican rules based governance.

      In this respect, the examples of persons like Lincoln, both Roosevelt’s, etc might be considered.
      In such comparisons, President Trump does not seem to come out well.

      So Mr Rubio might take a moment to consider if it is not himself, and those he associates with, who are the real antagonists of the best in the traditions of modern Western Civilization.

  4. “I can do whatever I want, if I want.”

    So then why hasn’t President Trump lowered prices on day one as promised, ended Putin’s Ukraine warmongering by phone call on day one as promised, reopened the Strait of Hormuz and regime changed Iran, sent the DOGE refund checks, sent the $5k midterm bribe checks, repealed and replaced Obamacare with his beautiful heaithcare plan we’ve waited on for 10 years, passed his SAVE America vote suppression act, fixed the Reflecting Pool he made worse, built his Epstein Memorial Ballroom, and sent the $2k tariff dividend checks?

    What’s the holdup?

    3
    1. MAGA:
      “He’d have done all that and more, if it wasn’t for the libs, the Deep State and the Euroweenies! Anyway, he has done lots, and the fake news media are just lying about it! Iran is defeated! There is no inflation! The economy is booming! AI is bounteous!JUST BELIEVE!”

  5. Just Another Ex-Republican Avatar
    Just Another Ex-Republican

    Patriotism (good): “Our country – may she always be in the right; but right or wrong, our country” – Stephen Decatur 1816, offered as a toast

    Nationalism (bad): “My country, right or wrong” – offered as a defense, an excuse, or to attack someone as disloyal, and in denial that sometimes, my country (or tribe, or party, or team) is not actually in the right.

    Sad but not surprising to add Rubio to those unable to differentiate between Patriotism and Nationalism.

    1
  6. As I’ve said before, I’m a bit averse to comparisons to fascism re Trump and MAGA.

    But there is one notable parallel here: the vaunted American system of “checks and balances”, of the countervailing power of Congress, Courts, and States, is NOT rising up on an institutional basis to say “No! This is wrong, unacceptable, and intolerable, and must cease.”

    The counter-argument is that, so long as they at least quietly preserve their presumed powers, and the federal and state official structures remain as “rules bound”, the rhetoric of trump is unimportant.

    However, this overlooks that in mass-democratic polity, being able to say such things without overt refutation shifts the bases of argument and expectation.

    See also Hegseth’s recent address.

    If Republicans were not so paralysed by terror of the MAGA-fied base, they might have the basic sense of self-interest to see how ceding such arguments might come back to haunt them if ever a populist-left Democrat became president.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.