Monday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. Charley in Cleveland's avatar Charley in Cleveland says:

    “Michelle Obama is a man” shouted on the White House lawn in a ring sponsored by Bud Light only available on Larry Ellison’s Paramount Plus. What a way to celebrate America 250 and the twilight of liberal democracy.

    – as noted by Tim Miller of the Bulwark – who watches the Trump crap so we don’t have to. Another gladiator gave Trump (and the bro-infested crowd) a Nazi salute. This is what happens when an 80 year old mental patient is POTUS.

    ReplyReply
    7
  2. Kingdaddy's avatar Kingdaddy says:

    Did anyone else watch the Indivisibles “Rise Up And Sing Out” concert/gabfest that was supposed to be the counter-programming to the ‘Murica 250 Thunderdome atrocity?

    I’d love to hear the backstory on why the Indivisibles organized this tepid affair instead of No Kings rallies.

    ReplyReply
    2
  3. Kingdaddy's avatar Kingdaddy says:

    A good piece in The New Republic about why the regime can’t leave Kilmar Abrego Garcia alone:

    If he’s become a fixation of the federal government, it’s not really because of anything he personally did. Instead, he has become this idée fixe because of something that was done to him. Or, if you prefer, he’s now famous for what his travails have come to represent: The Millerite campaign of savagery is indiscriminate, it is sloppy, and the government is, in fact, making serious mistakes that enormously impact people’s lives. He is a living, high-stakes symbol of Trumpian misrule and this administration’s need to break its opponents on the rack of authoritarianism.

    ReplyReply
    4
  4. Scott's avatar Scott says:

    Just another outrage. Also known as Day 506 of the Trump Administration.

    Outrage as Trump deploys ‘honor guards’ at UFC event

    A wave of anger erupted online this weekend after U.S. military honor guards were spotted taking part in the run-up to President Donald Trump’s UFC spectacle at the Lincoln Memorial.

    The footage was real. According to the Daily Beast, several U.S. military honor guards appeared on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial during the UFC Freedom 250 press conference on June 12, as fighters strode past Abraham Lincoln’s statue — a Getty Images photo confirmed the service members’ presence at the commercial event.

    ReplyReply
    1
  5. Scott's avatar Scott says:

    @Scott: My objection is the corrupt use of the military for political and personal gain. Here is a better and broader observation by Lt Gen Mark Hertling (Ret.) at the Bulwark.

    Sentinels at the Bacchanal

    OVER THE WEEKEND, military service members participated in the public spectacle in Washington that blended politics, entertainment, celebrity, and national symbolism. This was not just a matter of military musicians (in this case, the Marine Band and Army Band), a flyover (in this case, both the Thunderbirds and the Blue Angels), and a joint color guard representing each service branch presenting the flag. There were also officers serving as aides to VIPs, standing in formation and escorting civilians. There were members of the National Guard providing site security alongside various federal civilian police. And there were invited service members participating in the main event on the South Lawn of the White House.

    Seeing these images, I was reminded of a speech that, even though it was delivered nearly forty years ago, captured the essence of the scene and what was troubling about watching this event and seeing the military’s participation in it.

    The speaker was the late Tom Wolfe, the novelist and cultural critic famed for picking up on trends long before others did.

    Wolfe’s core argument was that America was gradually becoming a society in which fewer citizens had direct experience with military service. The all-volunteer force was still relatively young, and Wolfe believed its long-term effects might not yet be fully understood. As fewer Americans served, he predicted, the military might increasingly become a profession apart, populated by people who willingly embraced concepts such as duty, sacrifice, discipline, and service to something larger than themselves. Meanwhile, he continued, the broader culture would continue moving toward greater individual freedom, personal fulfillment, and self-aggrandizement. Neither development was necessarily bad, he mused, as one existed to protect the other. But Wolfe believed the separation between the two worlds would become increasingly noticeable.

    Those in the military, Wolfe said, would likely become “sentinels at the bacchanal” and “armed monks at the orgy.”

    What Wolfe understood, and what many Americans still struggle to understand, is that the military’s role in a constitutional republic is fundamentally different from that of any other institution. The military exists to defend the nation, but it does so by standing apart from the nation’s political and cultural struggles. Its purpose is not to determine the outcome of those struggles, its purpose is to ensure they can occur freely.

    A sentinel stands watch over the feast. He does not organize it nor judge its worth. He does not determine the menu. He does not decide who attends. He does not settle arguments among the guests. He does not determine what values should guide the gathering. Those responsibilities belong to the participants themselves.

    The temptation to surround political causes, cultural movements, or public spectacles with military symbolism may provide short-term advantage, but it comes at a long-term cost.

    If the citizens become comfortable with the sentinels becoming guests at the feast, or if those sentinels willingly participate, many in the republic may begin to lose confidence that anyone is still guarding the gates.

    ReplyReply
    5
  6. Charley in Cleveland's avatar Charley in Cleveland says:

    @Scott: Not only would this tacky, low brow presentation be deemed abhorrent under a normal administration, this blatantly commercial event is yet another emoluments clause violation. Trump continues to monetize the presidency*, and feels free to lend the prestige of a military honor guard to enhance the events of his corporate cronies.

    *Does anyone really believe Budweiser and Paramount + didn’t wet Trump’s beak?

    ReplyReply
    4
  7. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    On better things, I got the new laptop set up, and the old all in one serves perfectly well as 24″ monitor. It took like five minutes to do the physical setup*, plus like 12 hours of procrastination…

    Then it took several hours to download everything from the cloud to the drive. To me, the cloud is backup, not storage. All my important files are in my PC at all times.

    At that, I may wind up getting a monitor anyway. One reason is that the sound takes a moment to sync when you do things like start a video. But I can live with that. The other reason is the all in one has to be turned on. It stays in the welcome screen and doesn’t load windows, but I wonder at how much power it consumes. If it’s too high, I’ll know when the next electric bill comes in. If so, it might make more sense to spend money on a dedicated monitor. We’ll see.

    *And after getting a laptop stand (to keep the machine cool; as the vents are on the bottom of the laptop), an HDMI cable, and a USB hub. Last, I noticed only when setting up it has no ethernet port. So I’ll also need an ethernet to USB C converter.

    ReplyReply
    1
  8. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    @Charley in Cleveland:

    If the Taco SS (aka ICE/CBP) doesn’t steal the midterms, I expect we’ll learn how much the Taco crime family has gotten in kickbacks.

    ReplyReply
    4
  9. CSK's avatar CSK says:

    Trump plans to celebrate our nation’s 250th birthday by hosting “the most spectacular TRUMP RALLY of them all.”

    When? July 4, of course.

    Where? In front of the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial. Where else?

    ReplyReply
    1
  10. CSK's avatar CSK says:

    “Trump’s Iran deal is a giant bag of dog shit.” — Jonathan V. Last, The Bulwark

    ReplyReply
    3
  11. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    Luigi Mangione’s become quite popular.

    This is one way revolutions get started. Not by the act itself, but by the support the perpetrator can garner.

    I’m not predicting a revolution or civil war, but the way healthcare is out of reach for many, and how even something relatively minor like a broken limb can end up in massive debt, is creating a very large group of very fed-up people.

    ReplyReply
    4
  12. Jen's avatar Jen says:

    I admit this is petty, but what on earth is going on with Calista Gingrich’s hair?
    https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3modhywjh342n

    ReplyReply
    1
  13. CSK's avatar CSK says:

    @Jen:

    Beats me, but that’s one weird-looking chapeau she’s wearing.

    ReplyReply
    2
  14. Sleeping Dog's avatar Sleeping Dog says:

    @Jen:

    Must be using the felon’s stylist. Sure is weird.

    ReplyReply
    2
  15. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    @Jen:
    @CSK:
    @Sleeping Dog:

    It is rather bizarre, and doesn’t seem to be part of her head. It looks more like something she’s wearing, and not as one wears a wig.

    ReplyReply
  16. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    I don’t get it. the fixer court rejected an appeal against a New York law that allows lawsuits against gun manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers.

    Good news, I suppose, but I’m confused.

    ReplyReply
  17. dazedandconfused's avatar dazedandconfused says:

    @Jen:

    Wind got to it a bit, it normally looks like this.

    ReplyReply
    3
  18. Richard Gardner's avatar Richard Gardner says:

    B-52 Bomber crash on takeoff at Edwards AFB in California. Press conference at 4:15 PDT. Crew of 5 plus possible test engineers. “Initial indications are that the crash was not survivable.” Official link

    ReplyReply
    1
  19. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    @Richard Gardner:

    CNN has more

    One thing I deeply dislike about aviation is the sanitized terms often used, like this one. “Indications are the crash was not survivable” really means the crash was fatal.

    A crash right after takeoff means lots of fuel, if not full tanks. This leads to massive, very hot fire, after explosions.

    What the Air Force should have done like 30 years ago was retire the B-52 and gotten a similarly capable replacement. the design is form the 50s, and the last production model came out in the early 60s. It’s been re-engined and has had its avionics and other systems updated more than a bad release of Windows.

    ReplyReply
    1
  20. charontwo's avatar charontwo says:

    @Richard Gardner:

    8 fatalities on board. Planes being tested have more people on board, very long ago I had a ride on a B-52H when it was the newest model being performance tested.

    That would have been 1961 or maybe 1960, the H model was the upgrade to fan jets.

    ReplyReply

Speak Your Mind

*