President Donald Trump delivers remarks to military families at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Friday, February 13, 2026.
Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok

More Bad Numbers for Trump and the GOP

6

Comments

First, from G. Elliott Morris, more poor approval numbers:

In our new poll, 33% of Americans approve of the job Donald Trump is doing as president and 63% disapprove, a net rating of −30 (using unrounded approval figures) and the worst reading in the 16 waves of this poll since May 2025. The previous floor was −26 in April.

One suspects that Natalie is not printing this one out for the boss:

A chart about approval that I think is worth highlighting is the following. It actually gives me some level of solace about the broader electorate, insofar as it lends evidence to the notion that the true MAGA core of the party is far smaller than all Republican voters. Some level of softer approval for Trump is because of the R by his name (the support that gets him to 71% of all Republicans), and is therefore difficult to dislodge in a polarized, binary party system. It does not excuse, in a moral sense, that support (in my view), but it does fit expected patterns of mass behavior. Indeed, there can be no Blue wave if some number of Republican-leaning voters don’t do some combination of switching their vote or staying home out of lack of support for the party.

It is further evidence to me that we desperately need reforms that would incentivize the two parties to split into purer parties that would allow the isolation of more extreme elements of our politics so that they could not take over one party, and by extension the whole of the federal government. If more normie conservatives had somewhere to go these days (instead of to the “enemy, ” i.e., the Dems), they would take their voters elsewhere.

In terms of voter intent, registered voters give Democrats a 9-point edge, and likely voters 10 points:

The newest YouGov poll shows even worse generic numbers for the GOP:

If this trend holds (or gets worse for Republicans, which is possible), then there will be a serious pro-D wave in November, despite the notoriously poor competitiveness in our system. This kind of environment is what makes things like a Talarico win in Texas more than a pipe dream and why even places like Iowa and Kansas are possible flips (the own-goal on diesel prices by the Trump administration is just beyond amazing).

It is also the case that it is increasingly likely that a lot of GOP mid-term gerrymanders may turn to dummymanders (in TX and FL especially) since the map-drawers based their strategies on Trump margins in 2024, which was a substantially more favorable environment for them than is currently true. Watch Hispanic voters in particular in those places.

6 responses to “More Bad Numbers for Trump and the GOP”

  1. It’s hard to fix a broken system when people are spoon fed the notion since elementary school that their system is the best possible one.

    2
  2. We need to flip four seats to take the Senate. Democrats currently lead in Ohio, North Carolina, Texas, Maine, Alaska, and are within the MOE in Kansas and Iowa.

    Nebraska is another long-shot. The 2 most recent polls – both a month old – have it 4 points Red in one and 4 points Blue in the other.

    A lot of those Blue leads are thin and the GOP slime machine is getting better financing. However, if the election were held today we’d flip 5. After Fetterman defects we’d have just the bare 4 necessary for control. Texas and Alaska are pretty hard Red, so let’s hope the polls are right, because if we lose one, we’re probably cooked. We are a long way from the point where we should feel confident.

    But, if we wanted to be wildly optimistic and engage in a waking wet dream, we could flip 8 seats. At that point the GOP won’t even accept Fetterman and he may decide not to flip, or may resign. Either way, we’d have a majority that would probably carry us through 2028.

    1. After Fetterman defects we’d have just the bare 4 necessary for control

      Fetterman won’t defect to be in the minority.

      I don’t think he would defect in any case, as there’s more cachet in being a “reasonable Democrat” on Fox than a turncoat. You only get to cash the party-switch chip in once, but you can milk being a Sinema or Manchin for ages.

      5
    2. Texas and Alaska are pretty hard Red

      Peltola already won statewide in Alaska twice, four years ago, in a much worse environment for Dems. Beto O’Rourke in 2018 came within three points of winning in Texas, and unlike Talarico he was never leading in the polls; indeed, he significantly outperformed the polls (where RCP had Cruz up by 7 points in its final average; he went on to win by just 2.5).

      Hamilton leading or barely trailing in Kansas in recent polls is a much bigger shocker–I don’t think anyone had that on their bingo card. (Just for the record, Kansas hasn’t elected a Dem to the Senate since 1932–the longest streak for either party.) But don’t underestimate the impact of farmers getting fucked by Trump’s tariffs and the Iran war.

      2
    3. @Michael Reynolds

      the GOP slime machine is getting better financing.

      A legit concern, but on the optimistic side of the coin, there is no amount of money equal to the value of all of those signs across those farm states with diesel over $6/gallon (and trending upward for the foreseeable future).

      1

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.