The conventional wisdom is that poor countries are often at greater risk for developing some form of terrorism than rich countries. For example, this idea was put forward by Colin Powell,
Powell said “every day terrorists have fewer silent helpers … more outspoken adversaries, [and] more brave nations and individuals willing to stand up to them willing to confront the savagery and the hatred and nihilism that define terrorism.”
Daily, he said, the United States works with its friends and allies in the Middle East and beyond “to advance reforms that will eliminate the frustration, the injustice, the poverty, [and] the despair that gives rise to ideas of mass destruction.”
Delivering the keynote address at the 60th anniversary dinner of Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies, Powell said, “We understand the policy logic of encouraging good governance, of poverty alleviation, of fighting disease — so that societies won’t stagnate or implode, so states won’t fail.”
And this can also be seen on the Left as well.
Q. Is there any possibility that the Bush Administration will attempt to alter U.S. policy in the Middle East and elsewhere, so that more terrorists don’t grow out of the soil of mass poverty, lack of hope, dictatorial regimes and Western slights to their religion?
But is poverty a main driver behind terrorism? The short answer appears to be no. Over at Deinonychus antirrhopus you can find a slightly longer answer.
