
Comments
Categories
Tags
The truth is, Mr. Dill, that words have meanings. Just becasue some people think that the military is composed of faceless, interchangeable “soldiers” does not make it so.
Naming the US Solder the Person of the year does not make them either faceless or interchangeable to me. Nor does it, in my view, constitute an attempt to only honor the Army footsoldier. I can understand and appreciate the attempt to place credit where credit is due, without trying to read more into it.
In another twist of irony, LGF points out Time’s inconsistency in naming the Person of the Year while one of its reporters hang out with the very same people who want to KILL those same “Persons” of the Year.
Is this what they mean by “fair and balanced” reporting?