On the Number of Parties 4: The Oddity of Two, Part 3 (Thinking About Just Two)
A post about thinking in a comparative way.
A post about thinking in a comparative way.
The primary calendar debate shows, yet again, that parties don’t fully control candidate selection.
Spoiler alert: the GOP has already failed this test multiple times.
The margins for 2024 are likely to be slim. But that hides a larger story.
American parties are coordination problems with shared branding.
The nature of American political reporting distorts our perception of reality.
With record-low poll numbers, the grass roots wants someone new on the ticket next time.
Ezra Klein discusses the dynamics of American conservatism in historical perspective. Plus, he helps illustrate a key problem that we have in thinking about American politics (IMHO).
More on primaries with a foray into Madison and the general politics of power-seekers and incentives.
Our representation problems are far, far more about structure than they are about the messaging of the parties.
Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans truly represent most Americans. Fixing that is exceedingly unlikely.
It seems that some Americans are relocating to be with people who share their social and cultural views.
In their censure of Cheney and Kinzinger the GOP wants to rewrite history.
A bloc of moderates is not coming to a Senate near you.
A pretty good President has numbers comparable to his historically bad predecessor.
Counting is not necessarily as straightforward as it may seem.