Official White House Photo

The Destroyer

Trump and the Kennedy Center.

19

Comments

Via The Atlantic: A Shouting Match and an Ultimatum at the Kennedy Center.

Donald Trump has given the federal judiciary an ultimatum: Let him put his name on the Kennedy Center, or he won’t save it.

As incredible as that would sound in a normal timeline, we all know that this is exactly how the current POTUS behaves.

Indeed, let’s go to the source:

Allow me to highlight the following: “The closing will take place immediately, however, the Renovation and Reconstruction, which is a very large and complex job, cannot begin until such time as the D.C. Circuit rules on the Board’s approved name.”

The name, in question, is Trump’s.

Let us be clear: Trump caused the current financial crisis for the Center by first taking it over and chasing away performers who would have generated revenue, and then by closing it entirely in a fit of pique over the naming issue.

Back to The Atlantic:

That threat came after a federal judge, Christopher Cooper, today blocked yet another effort to add the president’s name to the building. Moments later, Trump virtually joined a Kennedy Center board meeting, at which he slammed Cooper’s decision and lashed out at Representative Joyce Beatty—the ex officio board member challenging his overhaul of the institution in court—according to a person with knowledge of the meeting, who spoke with me on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal proceedings.

It’s a good thing that he doesn’t have more important things to attend to, like a failing war in Iran and a trade war with Canada, to name but two things that are radically more important than the Kennedy Center (but, I would hasten to add, are of a theme with the title of this post).

After months defined by empty theaters and canceled shows, the Kennedy Center has become a shadow of the premier performance venue it was just more than a year ago. A Washington Post report this week revealed that the center’s finances are on the brink of collapse and that it could face bankruptcy. But while the institution has diminished, its leaders—and Trump’s allies on the board—have continued to push his plans forward, repackaging their oft-repeated claim that the only way to save it from financial ruin ahead of a two-year renovation is to emblazon it with Trump’s name. The crisis at the Kennedy Center is entangled in a larger effort by Trump to control what Washington looks like—a fight that has taken on higher stakes as his administration evades federal procedures designed to protect historic places from the whims of any one president.

All accurate, but I think it soft-pedals the fact that the canceled shows and empty theaters are directly Trump’s fault and that the board is, with one exception, a Trump-selected set of cronies.

The only thing that I have seen that isn’t directly Trump’s fault is a collapsed ceiling due to a storm earlier this month. But, of course, if the board had been focused on doing its job instead of Trump’s whims, the ceiling might have been attended to.

To keep Trump’s plans for the center alive, the board has already appealed today’s ruling against adding his name to the facade, and Beatty revealed in a court filing to Cooper that leaders had been weighing 10 different ways in which Trump’s name could be added back to the center’s edifice. “The Board seeks to provide multiple options so that President Trump can be legally and appropriately recognized and acknowledged on the facade of the Kennedy Center so that he agrees to carry the burden of managing the renovation and provides the Center with a much required financial rescue,” a resolution that the board had prepared for this week read, though it was later dropped from the board’s agenda so trustees could focus exclusively on closure.

The obsession over putting his name on the building (as well as the utter obsequiousness of the board) is, quite frankly, nauseating.

But, of course, who could have predicted that a name whose main business for the last several decades is putting his name on things would behave this way? I mean, where are we, North Korea?

I would note that, yet again, Trump is ignoring Congress. The AP write-up puts it more succinctly than does The Atlantic:

In a social media post, Trump said the closure was needed for safety repairs. But he said the repairs, which Congress has allocated $257 million to cover, would only happen if the board was allowed to move forward with plans to add his name to the building. A federal judge has twice said that can’t happen without the approval of Congress.

Let’s be clear: he has done deliberate and significant damage to the Center, and is now refusing to use money that had been appropriated to attend to needed repairs because he insists his name should be on the building.

You know, normal president stuff.

Like the Reflecting Pool, this is by no means the most important story about the Trump administration, but it nonetheless is quite illustrative of his naked egoism and his skills in destruction, even as he makes it sound like he is a master builder.

For a timeline of Trump’s destructive involvement with the Kennedy Center, see the following from Broadway World: Inside the Kennedy Center Upheaval: A Complete Timeline.

19 responses to “The Destroyer”

  1. “If I can’t have it, nobody will have it.”

    It’s the classic attitude of the guy who kills his wife and children after she wanted a divorce.

    He’s going to do it to the country, too.

    4
  2. The appropriate descriptor probably begins sounding like “master”.

  3. When Trump first came on the Presidential stage I had debates here with people who, however much they disliked him, insisted he was a great businessman. No matter how much some of us pointed out that he took over a gigantic real estate empire from his father, worth billions in today’s dollars, and lost it all in one incredibly stupid business venture after another, there were those who still insisted that whatever happened in the past, he was a billionaire (BTW, no, he wasn’t’. He played one on TV) and so that demonstrated business genius.

    A side note to all of this was that virtually all of his revenue in 2015 and for many years before came from simply licensing his name. He couldn’t make money from anything real (i.e. not a con) he was involved in because he was and always had been incredibly incompetent. Everything he took an active role in ended up destroyed and often disappeared entirely, and a large part of the reason for that is that he refuses to listen and can’t get along with anyone. Everything he touch ended up with public shouting matches where he blasted his heretofore partners as losers, then they took him to court where he would lose.

    As I said then and continue to say, the most important thing to know about Trump is that he is a moron

    5
    1. Every now and again I think the New York City real estate industry must be a real set of losers if Trump could operate in it. Then I remember that he was sinking in a sea of sharks.

      The Trump Org must have been much like the Trump admin, Trump giving mindless orders to a staff of guys sucking up to him and keeping the thing barely afloat while pursuing their own agendas. I wonder how much they ripped off Trump.

      1. the New York City real estate industry must be a real set of losers if Trump could operate in it

        That’s the whole point. Trump couldn’t operate in it. His father built the empire. Trump put it up as collateral for his casinos, the football league, Trump airlines, etc, and then lost it all. The only thing he semi-retained was a part of Trump Tower. I say a part, because most of it was sold piece by piece. For example, a good portion of the hotel there is a sort of hotel room time share thing.

        After all that the NY real estate market considered him a joke. They never did another deal with him

        2
    2. @MarkedMan

      When Trump first came on the Presidential stage I had debates here with people who, however much they disliked him, insisted he was a great businessman.

      I suspect all of those people no longer read the site.

      1
      1. It’s why I miss Drew. It would be fun to make him defend the corruption and incompetence.

        1
  4. This is not the first time I see a toddler threaten to hold his breath until he dies.

    3
    1. More like starve some pets.

  5. I’ll point out that one of the administration’s lawyers floated the idea that the building may need to be razed, and that an amphitheater would be easier to maintain.

    My honest question: if the administration decides to East Wing this property, is there any way to stop it/him?

    It is astonishing to me that one man can wreak so much havoc.

    1
    1. It may require people lying down in front of bulldozers.

      This is a time for some major civil disobedience. I think it would be interesting for some monied arts lovers – and they are out there – to front the cash for all the renovations and start hiring the contractors. Make the Kennedy board stop them from doing the work.

      1
    2. I don’t think there will be any meaningful effort to stop him until he destroys something people care about. I have no idea what people care about at this point. Not the White House apparently.

      Stone Mountain? Our struggling healthcare system? 101 Dalmatians?

  6. You know what’s interesting? Republicans control both chambers. I would think that they could add in a bit about Trump’s name and fundraising in some continuing resolution.

    Why hasn’t Trump tried to strongarm Congress on this?

    1
    1. How do we know he hasn’t? I’ll agree that it seems unlikely based on how things are playing out and how spineless Congress is, though.

      But we may be in a fight of small insults.

    2. A Republicans-only continuing resolution has to pass the Senate under reconciliation rules. The Senate Parliamentarian will almost certain hold that a Kennedy Center name change isn’t allowed under those rules. A simple majority could say the Parliamentarian is wrong, but that’s effectively the same as ending the filibuster. Thune doesn’t have the votes to end the filibuster, certainly not over some Trump ego exercise.

      1. Fair bet the R-congress critters don’t want a public s-fight over one of Trump’s vanity projects at the moment, and if Trump has asked he was politely told “after the elections”. Hard to imagine good press coming from that.

        1
  7. Liberals create. Conservatives destroy.

    There are very few conservatives in any creative art. Not none, but not many, and almost always third rate or washed up. Kevin Sorbo? Rob Schneider? Dean Cain? It’s why they hate Hollywood so much: they’re eunuchs at the orgy.

    1
  8. For a guy obsessed with gold, he sure has the opposite of the Midas touch.

    1
  9. Sadly, I think he’s calculated that the majority of his supporters don’t care about the Kennedy Center. They don’t live anywhere near DC, so don’t see it as a major cultural institution. And they probably think it’s simply another facility for the liberal elite to be smug about. They don’t understand how important the events there are for the larger cultural life of the country, and how those same artists and shows make their own lives more interesting by performing near them when they tour. They just see him as fighting those same liberals—I wonder if they’d feel the same way if he tore up, say, a NASCAR track. But at this point, they’re so totally in the tank for him that I bet even that wouldn’t matter.