Trump and AI

Keep in mind who we are dealing with here.

13

Comments

The story that James noted this morning about the AI Force and whatnot made me think of an anecdote from the book Regime Change that Jonathan Swann recounted on The Bulwark Daily podcast recently.

From the raw transcript (ums and mis-transcribed words and all) is the story (with some emphases by me):

he had never, he really knew nothing about AI, um, and really hadn’t ever interacted with it to any meaningful extent until the 2024 campaign. And what we describe in, in regime change is this scene in Vegas, um, where the open AI executives meet with Trump in this hotel. And he’s with his team and they give him this demo of ChatGBT. And he’s like, he’s really tired. It’s the end of the day. He’s like been campaigning. He’s kind of exhausted. And they put it up on the screen and his eyes kind of like, he’s like, you know, it’s this sort of magic. Yeah. And they start putting in prompts. And from memory, one of them was like, They got the ChatGPT. Remember, this is 2024. ChatGPT was not that great in 2024. They get ChatGPT to turn an executive order on AI into poetry, into a poem.

And Trump sits there and goes, man, this is beautiful. He’s like, he’s reading the poem.

He goes, the poet, these words, they’re so beautiful.

[…]

He was just thunderstruck. It was like he was reading Wordsworth or something. And he turns to one of his A’s, he’s like, you know, this is And he went from being uninterested, tired, whatever, to immediately asking, you know, it was like zero to a hundred. He immediately started asking these executives, what do we need to do? What are the obstacles to you guys growing? How much energy do you need? What regulations can we get rid of? He went from sort of Extremely skeptical, asking them questions…

While I suppose that Trump has nefarious goals when it comes to AI, I am actually more persuaded that he got excited about a chatbot turning an EO into a poem.

There is also the fact that Trump and his allies are heavily invested in AI-related stocks.

Plus, Swann makes a good case that Trump is looking for a way to show industrial growth in rural America, as he has promised, and data centers fit the bill in his mind.

Again, Swann.

if you think back to the first term, his whole promise was, I’m going to bring back Sort of Norman Rockwell America and these old heavy industries. I’m going to bring back the coal mining jobs.

I’m going to, you’re going to see an industrial revolution in America. Obviously that didn’t happen. He obviously pretended it happened, but it didn’t happen. And he knows on some level this is not going to happen. And what we had been hearing from people around him is that when he started to hear these investment figures from people like Zuckerberg and these others, you know, I’m going to invest a trillion dollars, hundreds of billions of dollars. In his mind, this became the new, the way to create a new golden age in America.

Each time he would look at the valuation of Nvidia, it seemed to have gained a new trillion. And Trump himself is a shareholder, by the way, in Nvidia. So he became seduced by these figures. Johnson Huang, who had never really had much of a Washington presence, realized Trump is a personalist leader. You need to engage directly.

He started to call him. He started to drop in at Mar-a-Lago. Zuckerberg is on the phone with him. So they all play the game. And you’re seeing the effects of that now.

The last point about personal relationship also resonates.

I think Trump is going all-in on AI is a combo of liking things like EO poems (and AI slop of him as a muscle-man, or Green Lantern, or whatever), his portfolio, and getting played by tech CEOs.

You know, as a Very Stable Genius does.

13 responses to “Trump and AI”

  1. I really want to know which EO it was, and I want the poem form.

    Since this was while he was campaigning, I would assume that it was either from the first term or one of his day 1 EOs. Possibly Birthright Citizenship, to keep his attention, rendered in rhyming couplets like an insane, racist* Dr. Seuss.

    As far as a new golden age goes, AI images are often very yellow, and one of the common descriptions of a lot of AI is that it has been run through the “piss filter”.

    The right-wing does love AI. I wonder if it because it cannot create anything new, and is always harkening back to an earlier era, or whether they cannot see how soulless it is because they also lack souls?

    ——
    *: more racist. Dr. Suess had a few very racist bits here and there.

    1. The right-wing does love AI. I wonder if it because it cannot create anything new, and is always harkening back to an earlier era, or whether they cannot see how soulless it is because they also lack souls?

      I made the point the other day that I really do think the main thing motivating Trump’s attitude toward AI right now is the pro-Trump muscle memes. (I didn’t know about the EO story when I wrote that, but it merely reinforces the point.) The main reason the plutocrats like AI is because of the promise of replacing human workers with machines, and that may be part of what motivates Trump as well. But in the past he’s at least had the sense to pretend to support popular positions against the plutocrats, even as he pursues their agenda in practice. I just think that as his brain increasingly turns to mush, the North Korean-style dictator worship (or his own version of it, which seems rooted most of all in macho ’80s Chuck Norris fodder) is all that commands his attention, and the AI meme generators have become, to quote Game of Thrones, his favorite toy.

      1
  2. Johnson Huang, who had never really had much of a Washington presence, realized Trump is a personalist leader.

    Whoa, daddy! At a time in history when terms like “unhoused,” “birthing person,” and “heteronormative” can get the right all worked up about wokism, it is impressive to see “personalist leader” dropped so as not to trigger any readers who prefer that over being called a dictator.

    4
    1. FWIW, in polisci, a personalistic ruler is specific kind of authoritarian. One could also be a technocratic dictator or an ideological one.

      1. (Or even some combination thereof—a full answer would be longer, of course)

      2. Nevertheless, at a time when liberals are deemed over the top when they call Republicans fascists and racists when they do fascist and racists things, using personalist leader instead of authoritarian or technocratic dictator strikes me as overly polite. Polisci academics mileage may vary.

        1
        1. @Scott F.: Fair enough and trust me, I think that the mainstream press is too easy on him. In this case, I think that the term is accurate and illustrates rather than obscures. Trump treats the office and the federal government like it is his personal property (see, e.g., the ballroom, the arch, etc.)

      3. Thanks. Good info! For me, the distinction between undesirable authoritarian policy and undesirable pro-democratic policy (to go a different direction than Scott F. above) isn’t significant to make enough difference in my view, but I don’t recommend Manichean theory as a tool for others to use, either. Multiple sorts of authoritarianism is interesting as an intellectual tool for those who want such tools all the same.

  3. Fatso thinks it’s some guy named “ AL”

    1
  4. From a severely practical point of view, I imagine Bessent has told Trump the AI bubble is the only thing holding up the stock market. And Trump hates seeing the markets take a dive.

    1. Last time I looked at my accounts it didn’t seem to be holding up the stock market very well.

  5. Artificial Intelligence encounters Authentic Idiocy.

  6. I have a program in mind for economic development in rural areas. But it doesn’t mean giant corporations putting sites down. It’s the opposite. Giant corporations are bad for rural areas, not good.

    What we need is more businesses like those businesses that make and sell things on Etsy. Or run YouTube channels, or make podcasts. Or make everyday stuff that can be shipped easily.

    The thing rural areas have is cheap land. We should be making use of it. We should be decentralizing. Not building data centers.