President Donald J. Trump participates in a working dinner with G7 leaders at the Hotel Royal Evian, Monday, June 15, 2026, during the G7 in Evians-les-Bains, France.
Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok

Trump’s the President and You’re Not

It’s true.

10

Comments

President Donald J. Trump participates in a working dinner with G7 leaders at the Hotel Royal Evian, Monday, June 15, 2026, during the G7 in Evians-les-Bains, France.
Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok

WSJ (“‘I’m the President and You’re Not’: Trump Tests His Power and Frustrates the GOP“):

President Trump has delivered the same retort to political allies who have offered him strategic advice in recent weeks, according to people with knowledge of the conversations: “I’m the president and you’re not.”

While inarguably true, it’s hardly dispositive. While POTUS is the ultimate decider on executive branch policy, the office doesn’t come with a monopoly on knowledge or wisdom. Most Presidents have welcomed counsel to improve decisionmaking.

Seventeen months into his second term, Trump is increasingly relying on his own gut instincts, dismissing the counsel of aides, conservative lawmakers and longtime associates. The result has been a series of decisions that have confounded and frustrated Republicans—heightening fears that voters will punish the GOP in the November elections and testing Trump’s iron grip on the party.

[…]

As he has faced criticism from some in his own party, Trump has made comments in recent weeks that have stunned his political allies, according to people who have spoken to GOP lawmakers and strategists, and provided fodder for Democratic political ads. Trump has said he doesn’t care about the midterm elections. He has played down the effect of high prices on Americans, saying “I love the inflation.” And on Wednesday, he said Iran should be able to keep some of its ballistic missiles after his national security advisers had made destroying Tehran’s ballistic missile capabilities a primary objective of the war.

As I’ve noted before, even a narcissist should care about the midterms. The seemingly inevitable loss of at least one House of Congress will make it next to impossible for him to achieve any of his policy goals in the last two years of his presidency.

White House officials said Trump’s off-the-cuff style is one of his political gifts, arguing that it has helped build a base of support that has stuck with him for a decade. Tump’s team knows that he is the ultimate decider on policy, the officials said.

While it’s not for everybody, it’s doubtless true that his penchant for making every thought public endears him to many. It certainly sets him apart from most politicians.

“No President has worked harder or delivered more than President Trump. The results speak for themselves,” White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales said, pointing to his work on immigration, the economy and national security.

That they do.

Inside the White House, some aides have privately expressed frustrations about Trump’s recent moves. His decision to appoint his housing chief, Bill Pulte, as acting intelligence director, rankled some of the president’s aides, according to people familiar with the matter, many of whom have clashed with Pulte behind the scenes. Trump has in turn expressed frustration with his staff, knocking advisers for discouraging him from talking about his hard-edge immigration policies ahead of the midterms, the people said.

Trump clearly doesn’t care what anyone who doesn’t support him thinks. That likely endears him to his base. But it has to frustrate staffers actually trying to get things done. Not to mention his co-partisans on the Hill.

For much of his second term, Trump has commanded unwavering control over his party, with few GOP politicians publicly raising opposition to his moves. But congressional Republicans, some of whom lost re-election bids after Trump endorsed their opponents, are increasingly offering blunt assessments of Trump’s actions.

“The total control that Trump once had over Congress just isn’t there anymore,” said Ron Bonjean, a former spokesman for House and Senate Republican leadership. “His outspoken dismissal over Republican midterm election hopes and legislative demands that would place them in harm’s way of voters this November has dampened the relationship.”

Quite naturally. Loyalty is ultimately a two-way street.

For months, Trump has resisted warnings from Republicans—and some of his own advisers—that the war was worsening the GOP’s political problems. Voters have expressed alarm in polls at high gas prices, which surged after Iran limited traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

When asked last month about the extent to which Americans’ financial situation motivated him to make a deal to end the war, the president replied: “Not even a little bit.”

“I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation,” he said at the time, drawing criticism from fellow Republicans. “I don’t think about anybody. I think about one thing—we cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon. That’s all.”

He privately told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he didn’t care about the midterms, according to U.S. and Israeli officials, a statement meant to underscore his commitment to the Iran campaign regardless of the political fallout. 

To the extent he cares about US national security, trading his personal popularity and his party’s electoral prospects to advance a longstanding policy goal would be admirable. Alas, he has not achieved that goal.

10 responses to “Trump’s the President and You’re Not”

  1. Charley in Cleveland Avatar
    Charley in Cleveland

    “When someone tells you who they are…believe them.” Trump has made it clear, with words and deeds, that he doesn’t care about anything or anyone other than himself. His narcissism is both blatant and crippling, and bad for the country and the world, not to mention for the political future of his spineless enablers in Congress.

    17
  2. “Trump’s the President and You’re Not”

    Neither is Chevy Chase (showing my age)

    3
  3. Kind of amazing the damage done by Obama ridiculing the thin-skinned fat man.
    World history changed by a WHCD. Stunning.

    5
  4. While inarguably true, it’s hardly dispositive. While POTUS is the ultimate decider on executive branch policy, the office doesn’t come with a monopoly on knowledge or wisdom. Most Presidents have welcomed counsel to improve decisionmaking.

    I’ve known some Trumpian people over the years, unfortunately (for my mental health) and fortunately (as a learning experience). One was a CEO who was allergic to data. Unfortunately, I was in a leadership position, a direct report, that required data to get my job done. Any effort to present him with these data inspired him to deflect, interrupt, deny, and generally bob and weave. He was clearly threatened, not just by people on his leadership team who knew things (not just me), but by information in general. He had preferences, and anything else in the known universe was a threat to those decisions, his position, and who knows, probably his self-image.

    The brittleness, the real lack of confidence, the childishness of people like this is astonishing, and blazingly obvious. And yet, they manage to bluster their way into positions of responsibility far too often.

    It’s not just an American problem, but I wonder whether Americans are more susceptible to tolerating, or embracing, people like these than the citizens of other countries. On average, how many Trumps, or Musks, or Kennedys, or Weisses, et al. do you find in France, Japan, Canada, or Mexico?

    2
  5. I have been saying since Trump I that a significant problem (hardly the only one) with Trump’s hyper-personalized management style is that it is not scalable because no decision gets made or position gets maintained unless he makes it or holds it. This might work in his grifty little personal businesses, but you cannot run a major organization, let alone a national government, through a single human being (assuming he is, in fact, a human being).

    8
  6. To the extent he cares about US national security, trading his personal popularity and his party’s electoral prospects to advance a longstanding policy goal would be admirable. Alas, he has not achieved that goal.

    I think he has advanced several longstanding policy goals of Iran, if that helps.

    4
  7. James:

    “As I’ve noted before, even a narcissist should care about the midterms. The seemingly inevitable loss of at least one House of Congress will make it next to impossible for him to achieve any of his policy goals in the last two years of his presidency.”

    He can get a lot done, just by doing it.

    1
  8. We’re living in the Total Perspective Vortex custom tailored for ol’ 45/47.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaphod_Beeblebrox#Achievements

    and ‘As a character’ below.

    1
  9. As I’ve noted before, even a narcissist should care about the midterms. The seemingly inevitable loss of at least one House of Congress will make it next to impossible for him to achieve any of his policy goals in the last two years of his presidency.

    Sheeeeeit, you think Clay Davis Donald Trump gives a damn about policy?

    To the extent he cares about policy, he will find a way to do it with the executive tools at his disposal.

    He cares about one thing: image. Everything else is in service to that. I get the impression that for Trump, money is more unit of score than it is utility.

    Like Greg Roy, he has an unrefined palate; unlike Greg Roy he has been wealthy long enough to learn what non-burnt steak without ketchup tastes like.

    Like it was for Walter White, money may have been the objective for Trump at the beginning, but at some point, it became little more than a signifier.

    He has found ways to get paid without Congress. He has found ways to be at the center of public spectacles, paid for by the federal budget. And to whatever extent he does care about policy, his admin has found ways to take action without legislative approval or delegation even if those actions are extra- or illegal.

    Why would he care about the midterms? I suspect he would not even care enough to take substantive action to nullify midterm results favorable to Dems. He only did in 2020 because he was on the ballot.

    But to go through that over the midterms? Nah, too much work. He would just shitpost about it.

    3
  10. @Barry_D: As someone observed in the Open Forum, Trump has policy goals?

    @Joe:

    This might work in his grifty little personal businesses

    I always suspected his underlings ran his grifty little personal business. The accountant, what was his name, Weiselberg(?), and others, while wetting their own beaks*. “Sir, we need your unique business skills on a critical problem, could you maybe take Melania and go to Italy to select just the right marble? Take a month, maybe two, if you need it. only you have the discernment to select just the right marble so that you’ll be proud to put your name on your new tower.”

    * You don’t really think he went to jail rather than testify under oath about Trump’s finances out of loyalty to Trump, do you?

    1