John Allen of the National Catholic Reporter has perhaps the best summary of the papabili. Here’s his list, in alphabetical order:
Ennio Antonelli, Italian
Francis Arinze, Nigeria
Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Argentina
Dario Castrillón Hoyos, Colombia
Godfried Danneels, Belgium
Julius Darmaatmadja, Indonesia
Ivan Dias, India
Claudio Hummes, Brazil
Lubomyr Husar, Ukraine
Walter Kasper, German
Nicolás de Jesús López RodrÃguez, Dominican Republic
Wilfrid Fox Napier, South Africa
Jaime Lucas Ortega y Alamino, Cuba
Marc Ouellet, Canada
Giovanni Battista Re, Italy
Norberto Rivera Carrera, Mexico
Oscar Andrés RodrÃguez Maradiaga, Honduras
Angelo Scola, Italy
Christoph Schönborn, Austria
Dionigi Tettamanzi, Italy
But while Allen, like other journalists, provide many interesting biographical tidbits (for instance, novelist Gabriel GarcÃa Márquez once described Hoyos as “this rustic man with the profile of an eagle”), we learn very little about their philosophies and theological positions. It’s natural, of course, for the press to stick with basic profiles. Still, the public in general and Catholics in particular deserve more information, especially since religious stances can easily be mischaracterized or oversimplified.
So, in the following days, I’ll be examining the leading candidates in greater detail. Because I have other obligations to fulfill, I’ll restrict my research to the six men in this Reuter’s list: Arinze, Bergoglio, Castrillón Hoyos, Danneels, Dias, and Hummes. If time permits, I’ll throw in an Italian or two. If there’s reader demand for certain figures, I’ll consider making other additions. But I’ll start here.
Stay tuned.





