Photo by SLT

The Message is Mixed (To Put it Kindly)

Vance on war aims.

7

Comments

Via NBC News: Low oil prices now ‘goal No. 1’ in Iran war, Vance says, as U.S. threatens new economic pressure.

Keeping gas prices low is now the United States’ “goal No. 1” in the Iran war, Vice President JD Vance has said, as Washington threatened an indefinite naval blockade and signaled it would soon intensify economic pressure on Tehran.

The comments appeared to be the latest shift in the public rationale for the conflict, with Vance ranking Iran’s nuclear ambitions second.

No, the comment was definitely “the latest shift in public rationale for the conflict.” The press needs to do better. Ain’t no “appeared” about it.

“I know that oil is down today and it’s way down from the highs in the early days of the conflict,” Vance told Fox News on Thursday, before the latest uptick. “That’s goal No. 1 — keep oil and gas cheap for Americans all over our country.”

He added that “obviously goal No. 2 is ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon.” Tehran insists it has no desire to develop one.

Of course, this is where it is incumbent on me to provide the following (via Gasbuddy), which shows, of course, that gas prices spiked because of the war of choice launched by Trump. Yes, lower than peak, but still considerably higher than when the whole thing started. I would provide the date it all started, but I am pretty sure it is pretty damn obvious when the bombing began on the chart below.

The NBC piece does conclude with the following:

The international oil benchmark of Brent Crude sits just above $87 dollars a barrel, 45% higher than it was in January. The average price for a gallon of gas in the U.S. is now higher than $4; before the conflict it was lower than $3.

Meanwhile, Trump himself has not gotten the memo on what the new priority is, I guess.

Trump: For you to pay a tiny, little bit more for your gas, just remember it's so that an evil country cannot have a nuclear weapon. Remember that when you have to pay a little bit more. You're at $4. It's okay. I'll never apologize. I did the right thing.

Rachel Bitecofer (@rachelbitecofer.bsky.social) 2026-08-14T20:38:55.350Z

The degree to which he keeps providing commercial fodder for the midterms is stunning, TBH.

To recap: we had a deal in place that was forestalling nuclear development, and Trump tore it up. Gas prices were far lower than they are now until Trump launched this war. Further, the Strait of Hormuz was open for international navigation until Trump launched this war.

Well, at least the old regime is gone (nope!), our allies are all safer (oops!), and Iran now has a diminished incentive to pursue nukes (well…).

But this sure sounds like it will work!

Bessent dismisses Democratic criticisms of Trump's floundering war of choice against Iran: "They're uninformed, deranged, and have no idea what they're talking about"

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-08-14T15:10:35.735Z

I know I feel better now!

7 responses to “The Message is Mixed (To Put it Kindly)”

  1. They’re uninformed, deranged, and have no idea what they’re talking about – Scott Bessent, above, on Democrats.

    Every accusation.

    4
  2. “obviously goal No. 2 is ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon.”

    Captain Obviously strikes again. I don’t know if it’s a crutch, a tell, or what, but Vance often drops in an obviously. It seems to be compensation for a statement that might come off as lacking conviction or sounding like an afterthought.

  3. The degree to which he keeps providing commercial fodder for the midterms is stunning, TBH.

    He’s not going to concede anything after the midterms, so he thinks “why bother?” Any blue wave will be dismissed as rigged, any Republican win down to county dog catcher will be trumpeted as vindication, and Democratic control of both houses (god willing) will be preordained as weaponization of politics against America’s Best POTUS Eva! And the press won’t call all that BS on its face.

    It’s not a bad plan if history is any indication.

    2
    1. Trump could, of course, be convinced in his mare’s nest of a mind that he will find a way to suspend and/or rig the mid-terms, so why worry about them? He’s been spending time lately with people who actively worked to overturn the 2020 election, so who knows what he thinks might be possible.

  4. Trump: For you to pay a tiny, little bit more for your gas, just remember it’s so that an evil country cannot have a nuclear weapon. Remember that when you have to pay a little bit more. You’re at $4. It’s okay. I’ll never apologize. I did the right thing

    1) over 25% more is NOT in any way a “tiny little bit.”
    2) there is zero chance that Fatso will achieve anything nearly as effective as the JPCOA in preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.
    These are just facts.

    1
  5. dazedandconfused Avatar
    dazedandconfused

    Vance’s comment crept me out in another way. I got the feeling he’s trying to explore the process of gaslighting things around to this being a “war to lower gas prices”. Typical of BS, it contains a single rotten grain of truth: Opening the strait would lower gas prices. Trump would escalate the crap out of this war if convinced it would make him more popular.

    Lotsa luck getting a population made sick and tired of endless ME wars in the last few decades to get behind another, JD…

  6. The U.S. Energy Information Administration publishes weekly the average price for ‘U.S. Regular All Formulations Retail Gasoline’. It was above $4 for 23 weeks of Biden’s four-year presidency. In 19 months of Trump’s second term, it’s been above $4 for 15 weeks in total. The reflexive “Whaddabout Biden!” MAGA response to complaints about high fuel prices is fast approaching its use-by date.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.