nterim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro gives remarks after her swearing-in ceremony, Wednesday, May 28, 2025, in the Oval Office
Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian

Trump Furious Charges Against Accused Reflecting Pool Saboteurs Dropped

Will no one rid him of these troublesome vandals?

13

Comments

AP (“Trump says Pirro ‘folded like an umbrella’ in bid to drop Reflecting Pool vandalism charges“):

President Donald Trump said Monday that U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro “choked” and “folded like an umbrella” in moving to drop charges against a former Olympian accused of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Speaking at an unrelated Oval Office event, Trump ducked questions about whether he’d fire Pirro, a former Fox News host and longtime ally he handpicked as top federal prosecutor in the nation’s capital. But the president kept up his drumbeat of sharp criticism, saying he remained disappointed by her assessment that damage to the Reflecting Pool was the result of shoddy construction, not vandalism.

“Frankly, I think she choked because the judge was really vicious. Instead of going after the people that did it, the judge went after her and went after her department, and I guess she choked,” Trump said in response to a reporter’s question after he signed an executive order for military spouses. “I don’t know what the hell happened.”

The move to dismiss charges against David Hearn was an embarrassing setback for the Justice Department and marked a rare moment during Trump’s second term of an aide or political appointee openly defying him.

After initially posting on social media over the weekend, “I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro,” Trump was still fuming two days later, insisting for several minutes that vandalism had marred the troubled project.

“I was disappointed with Jeanine Pirro, really disappointed,” the president said Monday.

[…]

The president further used his Monday comments to distance himself from the troubled project, which he had touted as part of his overarching efforts to spruce up the nation’s capital.

Trump said in April that he had consulted with a trio of firms that had worked on swimming pools at his properties and that the one he picked for the Reflecting Pool project had done work at his golf course in Northern Virginia. That firm was Virginia-based Atlantic Industrial Coatings, which was awarded a $14.7 million no-bid contract to repaint and waterproof its concrete floor.

“I have a guy who’s unbelievable at doing swimming pools,” Trump said then. “He looked at it. He called me up. He said, ‘Sir, we can do something on it.’”

But the president insisted Monday that “I didn’t know the contractor” and for the first time hinted that he wasn’t pleased by the work that was done to get the Reflecting Pool ready in time for Independence Day celebrations.

“I’m not saying I was 100% thrilled with the contractor, but the contractor was rushing. We wanted to get it open for July 4th,” he said.

NYT (“Pirro Meets With Trump at the White House After He Said She ‘Choked’ in Reflecting Pool Case“):

President Trump met with Jeanine Pirro at the White House on Monday, hours after saying that she had “choked” when she concluded that the damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was not the work of vandals, as the president has claimed.

Ms. Pirro, the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., arrived at the White House on Monday afternoon and was taken to meet with Mr. Trump in the Oval Office, according to two people with knowledge of the meeting. She was not fired by Mr. Trump, nor did she offer her resignation in that meeting, according to two people briefed on the outcome.

Doug Burgum, the interior secretary, was also at the White House when she arrived. Mr. Burgum has in recent days joined Mr. Trump in railing against Ms. Pirro’s decision to drop charges against David Hearn, a former Olympic canoeist who was accused of pulling up a two-square-foot piece of the pool’s lining. Both men assert that the damage to the pool has been the work of vandals and not “the result of a botched installation and not vandalism,” as Ms. Pirro indicated in a Friday court filing.

The decision to drop the charges set Ms. Pirro — a longtime ally and loyal appointee of a president — on a collision course with Mr. Trump, who has made sure to inflict consequences on people within his orbit who contradict his claims. In her filing, Ms. Pirro openly undermined Mr. Trump’s narrative that the Reflecting Pool’s peeling liner was caused by people slashing its coating with knives.

[…]

In her filing, Ms. Pirro sought to dismiss a felony charge against Mr. Hearn. She said that her prosecutors had been misled by the Interior Department, which had awarded a no-bid contract to a first-time government contractor to repair the landmark.

In other words, Ms. Pirro’s filing confirmed what Mr. Trump had dismissed for weeks when he tried to convince the public that any problems that crept up during the renovations — from algae blooms to peeling liner — were a result of vandalism and not shoddy contract work.

Prosecutors in Washington are also dropping charges against three more defendants who had been accused of vandalizing the Reflecting Pool. Along with Mr. Hearn, prosecutors moved to drop charges against three others: Justin Carreno, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Cameron Thiers, who all were charged with destruction of property less than $1,000.

Norman L. Eisen, one of Mr. Hearn’s attorneys, said in a statement released shortly after the filing that the charges against Mr. Hearn amounted to abuse of government power.

This is a classic case of “He said, she said.”

On the one hand, we can believe a former Olympian was riding around on his bicycle with a knife, plotting to do damage to the Reflecting Pool. And three other people, acting alone or in concert, were also out to damage the Reflecting Pool. Which, so far as I know, has not been so attacked in its previous century-plus history.

On the other hand, we can believe that Trump’s pool guy—whom he has never met!—botched a job he was wholly unqualified to do while under orders to rush to complete it by July 4th.

It’s 50-50, really.

13 responses to “Trump Furious Charges Against Accused Reflecting Pool Saboteurs Dropped”

  1. Fatso would put a man in jail for up to ten years before he’ll admit he was wrong (lying).

    4
    1. Turns out Fox News hosts don’t make competent Cabinet members. I’m looking at you, Whiskey Pete.

      1
  2. Maybe MAGA people will start to notice the difference between just saying shit on TV or the internet versus having to prove it in court with evidence and stuff?

    I know, I know…..

    3
  3. Charley in Cleveland Avatar
    Charley in Cleveland

    What a perfect opportunity for the media to note that the President of the United States lives inside a dome of delusion that cannot be penetrated by facts, reason, or logic. It’s not just the Reflecting Pool, it’s tariffs, Iran, the 2020 election, and Oval Office grifting. He concocts his own reality and cannot be dislodged from it. Where’s Jake Tapper when the sitting president is OBVIOUSLY in the throes of a mental crisis?

    2
    1. I regularly see pundits, often clueless centrist Dems, asking why we’re paying attention to this relatively unimportant story. The story lives because, as you enumerate, it encapsulates Trump’s multiple pathologies in a simple, readily understood, story. And it’s not ideological. I haven’t seen even the most rabid MAGA say the Reflecting Pool should be destroyed. Yet.

      1
  4. It would be nice if they showed any of the evidence from the “moving cameras” they claim to have.

    1. Oh they did! Trump released a four minute video of people walking around the pool, and occasionally stopping, looking down, and trying to pull up bits of liner that were loose. As Hearn allegedly did.

      But as Pirro admitted in her court filing, this wasn’t causing any damage to the liner, which had delaminated because of faulty workmanship.

      1
  5. I find this completely fascinating, simply because Pirro threw Trump under the boss, seemingly without telling him first. Which means that she weighed the possible outcomes and chose pissing off Trump as the least bad. Not sure what that means, but I doubt she would have done that even a few months ago

    1
    1. @MarkedMan As much of a Fox News hack as she became, she had a pretty significant legal career as a judge and prosecutor. I can’t imagine filing blatantly absurd briefs with a federal judge is on her BINGO card.

      1
      1. I can’t imagine filing blatantly absurd briefs with a federal judge is on her BINGO card

        Perhaps. But she could have just quit. And it’s not like she hasn’t been filing all kinds of absurd stuff up until now. I’m getting a whiff of planning for life after Trump.

        3
      2. My money: something grossly false was presented in the indictment documents or proceedings, probably based on what Trump said. Trash spewed for reporters that’s contradicted by documentation is really really hard to square with a judge. Pirro is not the brightest, but she surely knows she couldn’t just tweet through that.

  6. The charges were dismissed WITHOUT prejudice, meaning they can be refiled.
    The defense has moved to have them dismissed WITH prejudice.
    I can’t wait to see what they go after once that administrative chore is taken care of.

  7. “Frankly, I think she choked because the judge was really vicious. Instead of going after the people that did it, the judge went after her and went after her department, and I guess she choked,” Trump said in response to a reporter’s question after he signed an executive order for military spouses. “I don’t know what the hell happened.”

    Don’t fall for the sleight of hand, folks. Immediately, the discussion goes to Pirro’s fitness as a U.S. Attorney, her future in the position, her potential animosity with SecInterior Burgum, and a retelling of the Reflecting Pool Vandals BS. Yet, Trump ONCE AGAIN has impugned the integrity of a federal judge with zero evidence (“really vicious,” how?), while simultaneously advancing his persistent fiction of lawfare where legal outcomes are predetermined based on the political and personal predilections of the judiciary. And the WH press corp doesn’t push back in the slightest.

    So we see another example of the delusional, capricious, doltish Dumpster in Chief, but the Trumpist faithful see another example of the Deep State thwarting the country’s One Honest Arbiter of Truth – Dear Leader Donald J. Trump. The damage this evil man is doing to the very idea of a lawful society is immeasurable.

    2

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.