Kevin begins a post on intellectual honesty and the WMD debate with two separate distractors that will almost certainly take over his comment section, rather than discussion of the substance of the post:
Here are a few touchstones for determining if someone is an intellectual crank: belief in astrology, creationism, or the gold standard.
Whaddya wanna bet that defenders of creationism and/or the gold standard will outweigh WMD discussion? And then, to add fuel to the fire, we get
And here’s one for intellectual consistency and honesty: believing that between Bill Clinton (Lewinskygate) and Ronald Reagan (Iran/Contra), either both or neither deserved to be impeached.
Heh.
