Democrats Optimistic One Month Before Midterms

If the polls are to believed, a blowout is coming.

11

Comments

NYT (“Senate Races in Republican States Tilt Toward Democrats, Polls Find“):

A month before the midterm elections, Democrats have opened leads or battled their way to ties or near-ties in five reliably Republican states where they are trying to flip Senate seats to win control of the chamber, according to new New York Times/Siena University polls.

Democrats lead among likely voters in the Senate races in Texas and Alaska, two states that consistently vote Republican, the polls found. They have an edge in Ohio, which has been tilting rightward for years. Republicans have a slim edge in Iowa, and Democrats are neck-and-neck with Republicans in Kansas, which has not voted for a Democratic senator since 1932.

President Trump’s deep unpopularity, disapproval of the Iran war and frustration over high gas prices and the cost of living are reshaping the electoral landscape, the polls found.

Taken together, the new polls suggest that the Democrats have multiple paths to retake the Senate majority, despite a challenging map that had favored Republicans going into the midterms. To win Senate control, Democrats need to flip four Republican-held seats while holding on to their current seats in three battleground states, a difficult task.

Here’s a graphic look at the key races:

Bar graph displaying voter preferences for U.S. Senate candidates in five states: Texas, Alaska, Ohio, Iowa, and Kansas, with percentages for each candidate and margins of error.

That Democrats are not only competitive but have consistently led in Alaska and Texas suggests either a wave election or serious systematic polling bias. Because it’s not just the NYT/Sienna poll. As Nate Cohn (“Democrats May Have Found the Recipe for Flipping Red-State Senate Seats“) notes, it’s pretty much every poll:

Poll results for Democrats in five states won by Trump showing competitive races. Includes polling data for Alaska, Iowa, Ohio, Kansas, and Texas.

The fact that Republicans have all but conceded North Carolina is strong evidence they think the polls are accurate.

Still, Cohn is cautious:

This is an extraordinary run of polls for Democrats, most of all in Texas and Alaska. The Times/Siena polls — and others over the last month — show Democrats building a consistent and potentially meaningful lead in both states. If Democrats won Texas and Alaska, held their own seats and added North Carolina, as expected, they would need to win only one more Republican-held state, whether in Maine, Ohio, Iowa or Kansas, or elsewhere.

Of course, leading polls in September is not the same thing as winning in November — especially in Republican-leaning states, where polls have often overestimated Democrats. And even if they’re not overestimating them this time, Republicans need only to win back reliably Republican voters over the next month to prevail. This is harder than it sounds in this political environment, but it would not be a surprise if they did so. Republicans will have the financial resources they need to make their case.

Nonetheless, just about everything has gone right for the Democrats so far. They enter the final month of the campaign in a better position than anyone would have imagined when the year began. While the story varies somewhat by state, Democrats are cooking with the same recipe across all five contests: At a time when Mr. Trump is very unpopular, Democrats have nominated popular, relatively moderate candidates against surprisingly unpopular Republicans.

The other NYT report notes that

It is a striking transformation in five states Mr. Trump won every time he was on the ballot. In Ohio, which he carried with 55 percent of the vote in 2024, only 38 percent now approve of Mr. Trump’s job performance, down from 44 percent in June.

Soaring gas prices, which were driven above $4 a gallon by the Iran war, have continued to hurt the president’s popularity, particularly in the Midwest. About half of Republicans in Iowa and Ohio said that they disapproved of Mr. Trump’s handling of gas prices. Across all five states, Democrats are now more trusted than Republicans to handle the cost of living — reversing the advantage Mr. Trump had on the issue in those states just two years ago.

The combination of a bad economy and a demoralized base is usually bad news for the President’s party. But the Democrats’ challenge in flipping so many seats is daunting. It’s not inconceivable that the polls are just way off.

We’re exactly a month out from the election, so we’ll know soon enough.

11 responses to “Democrats Optimistic One Month Before Midterms”

  1. The experts seem to have lost the ability to poll, so I’m staying neutral until it is done

    2
  2. Revisiting a pet peeve, the shaded bars in the chart are statistical margin of error. Which is only one of the potential sources of error.

  3. I think looking at the margins of error here its too close to call. Probably going to be a turnout election and not sure polls are as good for those.

    Steve

  4. BTW, I despise Cohn’s headline: “Democrats May Have Found the Recipe for Flipping Red-State Senate Seats.”

    “Recipe” connotes a process that is replicable at will. But unless the suggestion is that the Dems can go down to the store and buy ingredients like a highly unpopular president, and specifically one that foolishly drives up unleaded and diesel prices, then there is no red-state recipe here.

    Yes, the Dems have some great candidates this cycle, but the main reasons a blue wave is possible are due to factors well outside of any recipe.

    Also: as good a choice as Talarico was, the Dems didn’t order up the ingredient of Ken Paxton as their opponent.

    2
    1. @sltaylor I don’t know if Cohn writes his own headlines, but his “recipe” is an unpopular president + quality, centrist candidates. Unspoken is poor opposition candidates in several cases.

  5. I don’t subscribe to Drezner’s Substack so I couldn’t read all of this. He notes that despite the good polling, Democrats fear doom in three categories.
    – Polling Mirage Doomsday. Fear the polling is biased.
    – Bounceback Doomsday. The fear the scales can still tip the other way.
    – Fascism Always Wins Doomsday. Fear the GOPs will block everything good.

    Personally, the polls may be wrong, but we seem safe for at least the House. I fear Trump is planning some October Surprise, but being Trump, I expect it to be something stupid. OTOH, gas locally just went under $4.

    But I do fear the “Fascism” thing. Fascism doesn’t always win. Long term, never. But the box-of-rocks electorate will expect improvement. And with the filibuster and the veto, I’m not hopeful for much except endless investigations not leading to convictions before ’29. And I don’t expect the defeat to be bad enough to drive GOP reform. I would love for someone to talk me out of this.

    1
    1. Re October surprises… Earlier this week they dispatched a third carrier and second amphibious assault group for the Middle East. Kharg Island? The Houthis at Bab al-Mandab? Bombing Iran’s electric grid into rubble? Or merely trying to avoid another Lincoln fiasco?

      1. Kharg is pointless; the US Navy can interdict in the Arabian Sea anyway.
        Decisive ground ops at Hormuz and/or Mandab would require a lot more, and are high-risk in the extreme.
        The rulers of Iran really don’t give a shit about the people of Iran as such, so “economic” strikes are also pointless.

        But given Trump is an idiot, and Hegseth a silly sycophant, who knows what fresh folly might be forthcoming?

  6. I’ve tempered my optimism, primarily for two reasons:
    (1) the unrelenting Republican onslaught to redistrict and suppress voting processes, and (2) polling margin of error – I now believe that MOE normally thought to be 4-5 percent, might be higher, perhaps in the 7-8 percent range (depending of course)

    1. I’ve come across some Americans who know a lot more about it than I do (systematic gerrymandering is a an alien thing to us) who reckon the Republican redistricting may in several cases rebound on them.
      Because it often means they have spread their vote probability to capture maximums on marginal wins; but that in turn means that if the voting turns against them enough, they have sacrificed safe districts.

      How valid this argument is, damfino.

  7. I’d just note that a lot of signifiers are pointing to a Democrat surge.
    But nonetheless, the polling mostly remains within “margin of error” ranges, though all pointing in and moving in directions favourable to the Democrats.

    I’d be interested to see relative breakdowns of propensity to vote by party, and by independents depending on possible vote, in the key states.

    imho, as the prices issues are now vanishingly unlikely to ebb before November, that’s the bruise the Dems should keep on punching, relentlessly.