Source: White House Photo

In Front of Our Noses: Trump’s Need for Sycophancy

A note on Natalie Harp.

33

Comments

“To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle.”-George Orwell.

For previous entries, click here.

So, a few days ago, Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA) said the following:

Ossoff says that Trump doesn’t want to do his job but wants to “travel with Natalie”

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-08-16T22:23:50.397Z

This is a reference to the fact that one of the aides that Trump took with him on Food Cart One was Natalie Harp, the woman known as The Human Printer because she follows Trump around with a portable printer so that he can have hard copies of articles and social media posts that praise him. She is also likely his main conduit for posting on Truth Social.

Harp first came to my attention back in November of 2024 when the NYT had this story (that I thought I included in a tab-clearing post, but can’t find it): Devoted Aide Who Keeps Good News Flowing Will Follow Trump to the White House.

A 33-year-old former far-right cable host, Ms. Harp is nearly always at Mr. Trump’s side. She has written him a series of devotional letters, including one that said, “You are all that matters to me.” Once, when Mr. Trump was playing golf in Scotland, she ran behind his cart to keep him up to date with positive stories and social media posts.
[…]

She has no official title, but during the campaign, colleagues referred to her as the “human printer” because she followed Mr. Trump around with a portable printer and a battery pack to charge it, so she could hand him information in hard copy, as he prefers.

[…]

In 2023, Ms. Harp sent a series of letters to Mr. Trump that unnerved people around him, according to a half-dozen people with knowledge of them.

“You are all that matters to me,” she wrote in one of the letters, which were seen by The New York Times. The letters’ authenticity was confirmed by two people with direct knowledge of them.

“I don’t ever want to let you down,” Ms. Harp wrote, thanking Mr. Trump for being her “Guardian and Protector in this Life.”

In another letter, she told Mr. Trump that she wanted to get back to “that synergy” she used to have with him, where “we’d talk about everything and nothing.”

“I want to bring you joy,” she wrote, “to feel like we can get through a day without ever having to talk ‘work.’”

At the White House, Ms. Harp is likely to serve a role unlike any presidential adviser in modern history.

Not to get overly technical, but that is all just plain weird. That sounds like poorly written dialog in a teen romance novel, and it does not sound like a healthy situation. It is not healthy for Harp, and it isn’t healthy for Trump.

The whole Ossoff comment has led to a rather remarkable eruption by Trump’s allies who have decided to take a quip and make it part of the news cycle for several days now. But should Harp be off limits for some reason? Especially since what Ossoff said was based in empirical fact?

Some of the critiques have been that there is innuendo in Ossoff’s observation that there is something sexual going on between Trump and Harp. But, of course, that requires others to read a lot into the phrase, “travel with Natalie.” Imagine that anyone could ever even think that Trump, who has cheated on all of his wives, would ever take advantage of a woman who follows him around like a puppy dog and says things like “I want to bring you joy”!

I have no idea if there is some sexual activity taking place, although I would be lying if I said that the thought hadn’t crossed my mind. How could it not, given Trump’s history?

However, that is not why this story matters.

I agree with Paul Waldman at The Cross Section: Yes, We Absolutely Should Talk About Natalie Harp.

There is literally no single person who spends as much time at the side of the president of the United States as her; the idea that it should somehow be off-limits to discuss her role is bonkers. 

[…]

She’s with Trump whether he’s in the White House, travelling to a foreign country, or golfing at one of his clubs, a proximity that has apparently caused a good deal of unease among his other staffers. As Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan report in their book Regime Change, “Trump had taken to telling his staff that Natalie (or ‘Nathalie,’ as he would call her, using a French pronunciation) was the only one who loved him as much as his wife and kids. ‘All of you will go off and make money,’ he would say. ‘She’ll never leave me.’”

Harp is neither a Svengali nor a Rasputin, but in this White House, she’s an incredibly important figure. She is the most important channel through which he receives and distributes information, and because Trump is impulsive, mercurial, and has the emotional regulation of a toddler, the person most responsible for determining his psychological state is central to the work of the administration.

The issue is Trump and his need for such a person. I have my own concerns about Harp’s mental state, but they are somewhat beside the point.

The point is that Harp’s role provides clear evidence of Trump’s poor mental state and his need for constant affirmation. It provides yet another piece of evidence that he should not be in the position of power that he holds.

It also helps explain how he creates his mind palace wherein everything is fine. The Strait of Hormuz is ever-open, gas prices don’t matter, and the USS Lincoln needs an even longer deployment!

How might any of us behave if someone was following us around all day, putting print-outs of affirmations in our hands all day long while looking at us like she does Trump in practically every photo. See, for example, the one with this piece from the NYT: ‘With All My Heart, Natalie.’ Trump’s Most Devoted Aide Emerges (or any of the ones here).

She rarely speaks on camera and yet she is never not there, ever-present with a wide smile and her eyes fixed on the president.

She is Natalie Harp, the 35-year-old West Wing aide who is the utmost gatekeeper to President Trump, a one-woman conduit of information operating entirely outside the usual chain of command. The public’s interest in Ms. Harp exploded after she was revealed last week to be one of the lucky few who joined the president inside an airplane catering container to be whisked out of Turkey under threat of attack by Iran.

[…]

She is a platinum blonde geyser of positivity, there to buck him up when the going gets rough. She believes, or at least vehemently claims to believe, that he totally won the 2020 election. In the book “Regime Change,” by the New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, Mr. Trump is described as explaining to people that Ms. Harp is the only one who loves him as much as his wife and children. All his other staff will go off and make money, Mr. Trump would say, but Ms. Harp will never leave him.

None of this is healthy, and it is right in front of our faces.

This is what the President of the United States wants and needs.

By the way, the notion that she is young and female makes her off limits for a national conversation is simply ludicrous, if not sexist. She is incredibly close to, and has influence over, the President of the United States. She is young relative to him, but 35 is not a child (indeed, only our current penchant for gerontocracy makes her seem especially young). Her gender is only relevant because of Trump’s own history of sexual dalliance.

Strip it all away, and the following two things make all of this matter.

  1. Definitionally, anyone who has the kind of access that Harp has to POTUS is worthy of public scrutiny.
  2. It matters that the most powerful man in the world needs the kind of constant affirmation that Harp appears to provide.

I would note, yet again, that Trump behaves in ways that none of us would tolerate in an employee, friend, or even family member, and yet he is entrusted with the nuclear codes and makes decisions daily that affect the lives of millions.

Update: Sure, this is normal and the kind of thing that we should expect at the highest levels of government, as reported by CNN: Meet Natalie Harp, the aide so close to Trump she once rode in an SUV trunk to accompany him.

It was October 2023, and Donald Trump was due at a New York City courthouse to fight his latest set of legal troubles. But as the motorcade idled outside his Trump Tower residence, staffers confronted a more immediate problem: There wasn’t room for Harp, the hyper-loyal aide whose devotion to Trump had quickly entrenched her within his orbit.

A screaming match in the lobby ensued, with Harp insisting that Trump had personally asked her to attend the court appearance, two sources familiar with the matter told CNN. Denied a seat but determined not to be left behind, Harp jumped into an SUV trunk, according to the two sources and confirmed by a photo obtained by CNN.

The episode, which has not been previously reported, served as an encapsulation of the role Harp has carved out in recent years as a constant and intensely dedicated presence at Trump’s side. 

33 responses to “In Front of Our Noses: Trump’s Need for Sycophancy”

  1. The entire situation is WEIRD. She’s apparently a cancer survivor, and credits Trump for getting her access to treatment, even though the timeline of this falls apart under scrutiny.

    Yes, it is completely within bounds to ask questions about why a young woman with a very strange job description (what, precisely, is her title?) is constantly at the President’s side. If she, as suspected, is responsible for a number of his wackier Truth Social posts, it means she’s BY HIS SIDE AT NIGHT. The question of whether there’s a physical relationship is (almost) irrelevant.

    And, the coordinated response by high-ranking Republicans (take a look here) is just plain strange. It’s like they know that this young woman is serving the role as the President’s security blankie, and they don’t want to see what happens if he’s forced to reduce her access to him, or something. Or, they know how important she is to his ego, so they are all collectively defending her to curry favor with him.

    WEIRD WEIRD WEIRD.

    4
    1. dazedandconfused Avatar
      dazedandconfused

      Nauseating but not all that weird. Kissinger’s Observation applies: “Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac”, she’s his Eva Braun.

      1
      1. I worked in a state legislature, and witnessed plenty of much younger women around elected men. I’m fully aware of the power dynamic you’re referencing.

        That’s not what I think is weird. Her language is obsessive. This strays into stalker territory, or it would if Trump didn’t crave exactly this type of worship. THAT’S what is weird.

        5
        1. dazedandconfused Avatar
          dazedandconfused

          To me it’s not all that weird, really. Highly likely it’s the first time in his absurdly transactional life that he felt someone loved him for more than his money and status. He said she doesn’t want him for his money and, for him, that’s all but certainly a first. He even publicly said she loves him more than his wife and kids do.

  2. I would love to hear Melania’s thoughts on this relationship….Melania? Are ya there? Great comment I saw about the possibility of there being a sexual relationship between the two was “at Trump’s age, it would be like shooting pool with a rope” lol. Now back to the unserious administration and it’s DC/Marvel universe of characters and weirdos.

    1. The trophy wife probably think “better her than me.”

      We can’t say whether there’s a sexual relationship between the two, but we can look for evidence of massive shipments of viagra to DC or Mar a Lardo. We can also state there’s a perverted relationship between the two.

      2
  3. Minor quibble: It’s Harp, not Harper. The auto-incorrect really messed up.

    It seems kings still need a groom of the stool.

  4. Kathy beat me to it. Dr. Taylor, how do you quote several articles identifying her last name as “Harp” and repeatedly call her “Harper”? No a big deal, but kind of distracting.

    1. @Kathy and @Joe I would love to blame autocorrect, but I simply got it in my head that her name was “Harper” and kept typing “Harper.”

      How could I quote several articles identifying her as Harp and still type Harper?

      Quite easily, I assure you.

      2
  5. Harp is neither a Svengali nor a Rasputin

    Certainly not, but she might easily turn into Annie Wilkes. (Some of us might eve…
    nope, not gonna go there. 🙁 )

    Eeeewwww… really creepy. Stalker-ish.

  6. It provides yet another piece of evidence that he should not be in the position of power that he holds.

    Better start working on Disconnected Voter 2.0 then. He’s gonna be making the key decisions here on out, unfortunately.

    1. I always have some hope that someone who needs to see this will. But I know that the odds aren’t great.

      I do know that readers do sometimes share these posts with their MAGA friends and family.

      Hope springs eternal. But I also think basic documentation of these things is still worthwhile.

      1
  7. Kudos to Jon Ossoff by the way.

    A benign, albeit insinuating, reference to a sycophant laid in amongst a litany of allegations of Trump’s corruption of, disinterest in, and unfitness for his office that then takes on a life of its own to run for days. More of this please!!!

    I’m convinced that the most likely way Trump leaves office will be via a debilitating apoplectic fit brought on by some personal insult to Trump that gets through his layers and layers of ego defense mechanisms. You just know there’s been ketchup on the walls of the WH dining room in recent days.

    5
  8. I checked over at Lucianne.com, which is MAGA Central, and found that there hasn’t been a mention of Natalie Harp on the site since 2024, and that was only briefly in a Daily Mail article about Trump’s entourage of “stunning” women. The next references to her date back to one in 2021, one in 2020, and one in 2019.

    I assume MAGA is deeply confounded and embarrassed by Harp’s constant presence in Trump’s life–it sort of undercuts their image of him as a loving, faithful husband, a devoted father, and devout Christian. So they do what they always do in any situation that reflects badly on Trump: They ignore it.

    1
    1. Thank you for reading Lucianne. I used to occasionally read Lucianne and American Thinker (sic) and The Righting in my effort to understand. I seem to get a lot less spam if I avoid them.

      1
      1. You’re quite welcome. I read Lucianne.com as a public service, so the folks here at OTB don’t have to do so. 😀

        4
  9. Charley in Cleveland Avatar
    Charley in Cleveland

    I love the fact that the Wingnut reaction was steeped in (imagined) innuendo. Ossoff did NOT accuse anyone of adultery, he merely noted that rather than doing his job, among other things (designing ballrooms, gilding the Oval office), Trump “wants to travel with Natalie.” For clowns like Steven “Odd Job” Cheung and Newt Effin’ Gingrich to say Ossoff was impugning “a young woman’s reputation” is beyond laughable. And Dr. T knocks it out of the park with this:

    I would note, yet again, that Trump behaves in ways that none of us would tolerate in an employee, friend, or even family member, and yet he is entrusted with the nuclear codes and makes decisions daily that affect the lives of millions.

    3
  10. A long, detailed piece about Harp:

    https://statuskuo.substack.com/p/more-than-just-a-human-printer?r=2jh99&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

    Also, a conclusion from The Bulwark:

    MAGA responded by going into high dudgeon and being outraged that Ossoff would dare suggest Trump was banging his human printer. But Ossoff didn’t suggest that. He was pointing to the much weirder, unstable, and dangerous reality:

    The president of the United States has an in-house stalker and he relies on this unhinged woman to an extent that is both hilarious and terrifying.

    Trump’s defenders are eager to pretend that Ossoff was suggesting an affair between Trump and Harp because the reality of the relationship is so much worse. It’s like a flashing neon arrow pointing at the Twenty-fifth Amendment.

    https://www.thebulwark.com/p/trumps-human-printer-is-cray-cray

    2
  11. Over at Digby’s Tom Sullivan calls her Trump’s Emotional Support Staffer Human binkie works pretty good too.

  12. Harry Kirschner Avatar
    Harry Kirschner

    Direct access like this to the president requires security vetting. How in hell did she pass that? Mental stability is a criterion.

    1. The president, or El Taco, can order clearances issued.

      He did this with his son in law last time. I suppose his favorite butt plug rates no less high.

      Remember, too, he wanted the SS not to check for weapons when his horde was gathering at the Ellipse Jan 6th.

      I hear stalkers often attempt to kill the ones they stalk. No reason to bring this up at all.

      1
  13. Harry Kirschner Avatar
    Harry Kirschner

    Family is one thing but clearing this whackjob is another. He is also fickle. It will be interesting to see what happens when he moves on.

  14. This is a reference to the fact that one of the aides that Trump took with him on Food Cart One was Natalie Harp, the woman known as The Human Printer because she follows Trump around with a portable printer so that he can have hard copies of articles and social media posts that praise him. She is also likely his main conduit for posting on Truth Social.

    MAGA media guys like Scott Jennings are already accusing Ossoff of sexism, and are demanding that he apologize. Yeah, no.

    This is such a transparently phony kabuki. These are the same people who accused Kamala Harris of sleeping her way to the top, all the while ignoring the First Lady’s immigrant background and nascent career as a ‘model.’

    3
  15. Let me see if I have this straight:

    The party that expresses unceasing concern and directs vicious vitriol at unelected bureaucrats also finds it necessary to defend an unelected aide against a trumped up slight even though that aide is the actual author of some number of social media posts on the sitting President’s social media account.

    If those posts were the usual pol-consultant-speak for domestic policy and reflected the careful craft mindful of the intricacies of international diplomacy, it would be less concerning.

    But Trump sells early access to posts on his social media accounts for financial firms. His account hosts erratic posts that impact international conflicts and high-stakes negotiations. His account attacks high-profile public figures in various private sectors along with elected officials and sitting judges.

    Not to mention that these same media figures and political professionals have zero problem attacking Greta Thurnberg, even when she was a child. They made degrading, sexist comments about AOC when she was in her 20s. And they outright claim that Harris slept her way to office. Sure, the latter two are/were elected officials, but political staffers and operatives are also fair game.

    Oh, and there is that pesky Max Miller situation.

    These people have zero moral or intellectual integrity whatsoever.

    To wit:

    @jen

    That Bluesky link contains a Jack Posobiec post that ends with:

    “Survival of the fighters, not survival of the fittest”

    Aren’t these the same people who defend the US as a meritocracy that filters out those unfit for success? I mean, I understand they love to prattle on about the importance of grit, but that sentence reflects places that above actual merit.

    2
  16. The man has a type. If he’s banging his portable printer or not, is almost irrelevant when compared to the fact that there very clear Mara Lago type that women in his orbit need to contort themselves to in order to advance their careers, often with surgery.

    There’s no way she or any other woman that close to the President could get fat and keep her job. And, similarly, Pete Hegseth only got his job because of the President’s unspoken homoerotic fantasies. (To be fair to the Predator in chief, he does allow a much wider physical variety of men to be in top positions, even if he does buy them all shoes… and I think JD Vance is in Trump cosplay with that specific suit and tie color in the photo)

    Also, I understand that fascism is an aesthetic movement, but can we at least get better aesthetics? It’s all so very trashy in this iteration. From gold paint to lip filler it’s all so tacky,

  17. Some of the critiques have been that there is innuendo in Ossoff’s observation that there is something sexual going on between Trump and Harp.

    Ridiculous.
    That fat fucker can’t get it up.

  18. The right-wing freakout over a fairly innocuous (and accurate) observation is…curious.

    It’s either manufactured (standard distraction) or Republicans actually believe there is value in defending this strange setup.

    Oh, and she is currently drawing a salary of $150K. Her titles are Special Assistant to the President, and Executive Assistant to the President. According to the NYT, she never takes a day off, not even Sunday, and she works out of the Oval Office.

    1
    1. She also seems to work out his bedroom, given the frenzy of shitposting that spews from it in the wee hours.

  19. Them having sex would be the least objectionable thing about this.

    Given that she texts for him, and given that much of his policy is delivered via texts, it is entirely possible that American policy is written by her.

    3
    1. Them having sex would be the least objectionable thing about this.

      Tell Bill Clinton that 😉

  20. It’s obviously a romantic relationship, just not a physical one. MAGAts, being obsessed with people’s sexual orientations and practices, reflexively assumed Ossoff meant Trump was banging her. Given his age and health, I doubt he’d be capable.

    I’ve often thought that if Trump hadn’t won office, he’d be on his fourth or fifth trophy wife by now. The “beautiful young women” he gets to employ with other people’s money are the next best thing.

    The most concerning aspect of the relationship is that apparently Harp gets to decide what printed media Trump gets to see. Reportedly she regards Gateway Pundit as a sound news source and often runs off posts for Trump to read. We may have the explanation for the distorted way Trump views the world, a combination of inexplicable ignorance and bizarre conspiracy narratives. Harp’s social media printouts may have replaced his daily intelligence briefing.

    3
    1. “Harp’s social media printouts may have replaced his daily intelligence briefing.”

      So, can we call the printouts the daily stupidity briefing?

      3
  21. She’s a daily caretaker of an elderly man, and it’s simpler to hide the fact if she’s paid $150,000 a year to as a special assistant on the taxpayers’ tab. Melania, one presumes, doesn’t want the job that first wives have often performed (e. g., Eleanor and FDR).

    But make no mistake, caretakers are very much in a position to influence their clients. We deserve to know more, including how much she shapes daily policy decisions and communications.

    Being a companion for an elderly person is really being a surrogate to assist with all aspects of daily living–and in this case–serving as POTUS. Harp may also be especially needed in highly stressful situations such as the catering cart scenario to keep Trump calm.

    Trump used his sons and daughter much the same way in his first presidency.

    I just hope that the world holds together until Trump is no longer president. Scarier every day.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.