Citing this NYT account [AP-no RSS] of early Marine success in battling Sadr’s militia in Fallajuh, Matthew Yglesias praises the skill of the Marines but wonders,
Were we coming to Iraq in order to seize and permanently control it’s territory, then killing a bunch of armed people and basically putting the town on lockdown would be a reasonable objective.
***
The local population isn’t going to hate us less after we’ve demolished several square blocks of it, killed their local heroic resistance fighters, and taken down a few people’s sisters, wives, and children to boot. So then the Marines go back to their barracks and things start up again. Right?
Establishing minimal levels of law and order is pretty much a threshhold requirement for the rest of the mission. One hopes that the supply of people willing to kill Marines or die trying is rather finite. Further, there’s reason to think that killing insurgents–while doing our level best to protect noncombatants–will sap the hostile will of other would-be insurgents.









