President Donald J. Trump hosts a Rose Garden Dinner for America’s hunters and fishermen while announcing new Executive Orders, Thursday, September 17, 2026.
Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian

Trump: Losing Los Angeles or San Diego ‘Small Price to Pay’ for Iran War

17

Comments

LAT (“Trump suggests letting Iran ‘take out’ Los Angeles and San Diego at campaign rally“):

President Trump, speaking at a campaign rally Monday, suggested Iran could “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego — a comment that was possibly in jest but brought a quick reaction from leaders in California.

Trump said he wanted to “see a tremendous victory” in the November election, “’cause it verifies all the things we did. And again, remember, with the war it’s just artificial, it’s a little bit high.”

“It’s a small price to pay for keeping the world safe, keeping our country safe,” he continued. “They can take out a city, let ’em take out Los Angeles, let ’em take out San Diego. This is a very small price to pay.”

The crowd cheered.

[…]

Trump made the remarks during a rambling speech in which he said gas prices would be lower soon, touted his ouster of Venezuela’s dictator and made attacks on news outlets.

He was in Grand Island, Neb., encouraging residents of the deep-red state to vote as if he were on the ballot.

Trump is famously jocular and free-wheeling in his stump speeches. I’ve seen various clips of the “They can take out a city, let ’em take out Los Angeles, let ’em take out San Diego. This is a very small price to pay” sequence, such as this one from CNN. He doesn’t seem to be joking. He’s not smiling.

Thankfully, Iran does not yet have nuclear weapons, let alone the capacity to “take out” a major city on the West Coast. But, for the record, the deaths of 4 million Los Angelenos would be a very high price, indeed, to stop Iran from obtaining the ability to do that.

17 responses to “Trump: Losing Los Angeles or San Diego ‘Small Price to Pay’ for Iran War”

  1. Among other things, Trump and his audience probably fail to realize how much of the consumer goods purchased in the western half of the country come through the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. And how the transportation system has been heavily optimized to move goods from those ports and not others. With pretty high probability, that shirt that was sewn in Vietnam and sold in Des Moines entered the country through LA/Long Beach.

    Of course, as I’ve long said, Trump really dislikes, even hates, almost all of the country west of the Mississippi River. During his first term, he had visited six foreign countries before he set foot west of the Mississippi. I’m sure he’s finding his current need to campaign there unpleasant.

    1. The odd thing being, a lot of MAGA seem to hate anything east of the Mississippi, and north of the Ohio.
      As Trump was in Nebraska, that indicates he might not despise everything west of the Mis.

      But I’ve a sneaking suspicion he rather despises his base anyway.

      1. Your suspicion is correct. Trump despises the rubes who worship him. He yearns to be one of the elite, who, in turn, despise him.

  2. …the deaths of 4 million Los Angelenos would be a very high price, indeed, to stop Iran from obtaining the ability to do that.

    As I noted yesterday, there is no indication that this war-of-choice with Iran has, or will, stymie their nuclear ambitions. In fact it has probably made their attainment of nuclear weapons more likely.

    2
  3. In fact it has probably made their attainment of nuclear weapons more likely.

    And Saudi Arabia and Germany(1) and anyone else who has noticed we don’t fwck with nuclear powers and/or used to think they were covered by the U. S. nuclear umbrella. One doubts Hegseth and Trump understand non-proliferation. Rubio probably does, but for political gain he’s happy not to.

    (1) Anybody but me remember “Telefunken H bomb”?

    1. It’s an oft-forgotten thing, but before the 1968 Non-Proliferation treaty, a lot of countries were very seriously pursuing nuclear options.
      Italy, Sweden, Switzerland, Brazil and South Africa all had serious programmes.
      Canada, Australia and Turkey were certainly thinking about such options.
      And Japan probably was as well.

      The US dual-track of “nuclear sharing” and “extended deterrence” and international non-proliferation agreements headed off a lot of that.
      However, if the US combines unreliability as an ally with insouciance about the consequences, then a lot of countries are liable to take such option plans out of the filing cabinets and dust them off.

  4. Charley in Cleveland Avatar
    Charley in Cleveland

    An 80 year old, physically exhausted, and mentally impaired guy who is asked to speak publicly every day is going to say some stupid sh*t. He gets in trouble when he goes off the teleprompter, and he goes off the prompter because he reads at a 4th grade level AND (per longtime speculation) he can’t see the words clearly because he is too vain to wear reading glasses. It’s more fun to riff. That said, his extemporaneous remarks underscore how uninformed he is on virtually all topics, and how bigoted and close-minded he is as a matter of course.

    3
  5. How would the Ellison’s feel if they paid $110 billion for a piece of fallout and contaminated dirt?

  6. Meh, he just loves to say crowd-pleasing over-the-top stuff, and the people who go to his rallies love it when he does it. It’s “authentic”. He’s just joking around, to them.

    I think we should crack a joke about terrorists taking out Miami or NYC, and see if he responds. “You can dish it out, but you can’t take it” is an old schoolyard refrain, and I think it would land.

    1
  7. dazedandconfused Avatar
    dazedandconfused

    If anyone wants to mud-wrestle a pig, “Mar A Lago would be a much nicer price to pay.”

    1
  8. Being stupid and increasingly lacking any “inner editor” probably account for it.
    That, and an audience willing to cheer almost anything that “pwns the libs”.

  9. Good luck to Republicans running in California this year, they’re gonna need it.

    1
    1. The odd thing being, I can remember (despite being a Brit who has never been there, lol 😉 ) when California was a stronghold of competitive Republican conservatives.
      eg Nixon and Reagan.
      And Los Angeles one the main centres of “modernist conservatism”.

      1. @JohnSF Republicans won the presidential vote there in 1952, 1956, 1960, 1968, 1972, 1976, 1980, 1984, and 1988. Democrats have won every contest since.

    2. From what I read here and there the national Republicans are suddenly spending significant amounts of money in three of the Colorado Congressional districts — the 3rd, the 5th, and the 8th — where the incumbent is a Republican. The 8th is competitive, and the 3rd has chosen a Democrat during a wave year, but the 5th? That’s Colorado Springs, with a ton of military personnel and the Focus on the Family bunch of churches.

  10. To be honest, from the quotes and commentary I’ve seen I have no idea what Trump was trying to say. Which, given that it happens regularly, seems to me to be the main story here.

    1
    1. Trump is often the modern equivalent of the Oracle of Delphi, assuming a really stupid Oracle.