Wednesday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science and former College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter and/or BlueSky.

Comments

  1. Scott's avatar Scott says:

    Still utterly corrupt.

    Trump to Drop $1.8 Billion Fund in IRS Deal, Keeps Tax Probe Ban

    The Trump administration is moving to drop controversial plans for a $1.8 billion fund to pay victims of alleged government “weaponization,” but will still provide immunity from any probes into the president’s past tax filings under a deal agreed to last month.

    Representative Rosa DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat, blasted that aspect of the agreement. “You just gave the president’s family tax immunity to the tune of about $100 million,” she said.

    6
  2. Scott's avatar Scott says:

    A long article on the intersection of the Iran War, international finance, and digital currency. A lot I still do not understand. But I feel we need to.

    The Toll Booth at the Throat of World Trade

    3
  3. Jen's avatar Jen says:

    @Scott: Absolutely corrupt. However, I’m not sure this will fly. When the agreement first came out, one of the lawyers I follow on BlueSky noted that the agreement did not have a severability clause in it. I have no idea if that matters for this exact scenario, but it is telling that they didn’t remember to include something so very basic.

    3
  4. Charley in Cleveland's avatar Charley in Cleveland says:

    @Jen: The whole thing was/is legally suspect, from the settlement that sprang forth from the fear the judge was on the verge of dismissing this frivolous, sanction-worthy fraud upon the court, to Blanche adding the part about current and future IRS immunity for Trump and the Trump Org. Blanche’s law license should be yanked, and the lawyers who represented the IRS should, at a minimum, be sanctioned.

    4
  5. CSK's avatar CSK says:

    Scott Pelley has been fired by CBS.

  6. Jen's avatar Jen says:

    I just read someone on BlueSky who referred to Trump as The Count of Mostly Crisco and this is going to make me giggle all day.

    I accept the light where I can find it.

    7
  7. CSK's avatar CSK says:

    @Jen:

    Priceless.

    3
  8. Sleeping Dog's avatar Sleeping Dog says:

    Fat in a can.

    2
  9. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    Taco trade opportunity? More madness from the orange toddler? Clueless “policy” from shitty people with shitty values?

    All of the above.

    …tariffs of between 10% and 12.5% on 60 trading partners including the UK, the EU and Australia over alleged forced labour failures…

    2
  10. Gustopher's avatar Gustopher says:

    @Scott: It’s a shame the fund is gone, since I really wanted Kilmer Abrego Garcia to apply for relief — he even has a judge finding that the DoJ was engaged in malicious prosecution.

    Meanwhile, there is this:
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/03/columbia-jewish-faculty-protests-settlement-fund

    1
  11. Kurtz's avatar Kurtz says:

    @Kathy:

    And yet, Trump and others continue extensive, deep connections with Dubai.

    1
  12. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    I guess this means Mitch would vote to confirm Pulte, followed by an explanation on why Pulte is unqualified.

    Ok, since he voted against confirming Gabard, this is most unfair. But I don’t owe Mitch any fairness.

    2
  13. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    This is how the press should call out El Taco’s blatant lies.

    Headline: Trump(sic) tells blatant lies about Iran nuclear deal struck during Obama administration, claiming it ‘gave them a nuclear weapon’

    Here’s the start of the text of the JCPOA (emphasis added):

    The E3/EU+3 (China, France, Germany, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States, with the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy) and the Islamic Republic of Iran welcome this historic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which will ensure that Iran’s nuclear programme will be exclusively peaceful, and mark a fundamental shift in their approach to this issue. They anticipate that full implementation of this JCPOA will positively contribute to regional and international peace and security. Iran reaffirms that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek, develop or acquire any nuclear weapons.

    I think I’ll negotiate a deal with the US, whereby I promise never to try to acquire a trillion dollars.

    1
  14. Charley in Cleveland's avatar Charley in Cleveland says:

    @Kathy: SCOTUS failed to spell it out so a 4 year old could understand: THE PRESIDENT CAN’T LEVY TARIFFS. ONLY CONGRESS CAN DO THAT.

    See Art. 1. sec 8, US Constitution. A pretextual “national emergency” doesn’t cut it. Where’s Congress? Where’s the effin’ media?

    2
  15. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    @Charley in Cleveland:

    Congress is braving the orange tantrum by removing the $1 billion provision for the hitler bunker for the Epstein ballroom. This makes them the bravest congress ever!!1111!!

    The press is probably learning how best to kiss the orange ass.

    On other things, I asked Gemini to do a short synopsis of the Rama books. If I were to grade it, I’d give it a C, maybe a D. It got the gist right, bur omitted a lot of information. It also made some strange errors, like calling a solar survey ship a starship, referring to the Octospiders as “musical” (spoiler alert: they lack a sense of hearing).

    When I corrected some errors, it made new ones. Same when I corrected the new errors. In its typical sycophantic way, it praised me for knowing the books well.

    So, more errors, making things up, and trying to flatter me, gets it an F.

  16. gVOR10's avatar gVOR10 says:

    Over at LGM Paul Campos cites some interesting, and kind of hopeful, pieces. He quotes Seva Gunitsky,

    The central technology of autocratic rule is not repression but administration. … consistently firing your subordinates triples your probability of losing power while reshuffling them lowers it by two-thirds. …Trump, for example, is by training and instinct a dismissal leader. “You’re fired” became an early catchphrase for a reason. The cases examined here suggest such regimes don’t put down institutional roots, and quickly decline. The bad news is they do a lot of damage on the way down.

    Ned Resinkoff,

    I would like to suggest that Trumpism is best understood as a species of what I’m going to call hyperfascism. By “hyperfascism,” I don’t mean “superfascism” or anything like that. Instead, I’m using the hyper- prefix in a way similar to how Baudrillard deploys it in his definition of hyperreality as a sort of representation that is more “real” than whatever it was originally meant to represent. (He uses Disneyland as an example of the paradigmatic hyperreal space.) … Make no mistake: hyperfascism is still fascism. But it is a shallow sort of fascism, obsessed with outward appearances and completely uninterested in everything else. It is as if the architects of the Trump regime had cribbed their entire governing agenda from cheap cyberpunk thrillers about fascist dystopias.

    And Paul Krugman,

    Donald Trump will never admit that his gratuitous Iran war has been a total disaster. But the debacle has clearly broken him. So we are now saddled with a president who has given up governing, but will maintain his grip on power wherever he can. And his power will be exclusively focused on rage and revenge.

    Campos concludes,

    We will see, but we may have ultimately caught a tremendous break because Donald Trump is very old, very lazy, very stupid, deeply impulsive and disorganized, and basically good at nothing other than grifting America’s bottomless strategic reserve of complete morons, while doing his ninth-rate fascism as standup schtick for the cameras.

    I hope these guys are right. It’s always seemed like Trump’s only saving grace is his incompetence. And the incompetence inherent in an authoritarian regime.

    1
  17. dazedandconfused's avatar dazedandconfused says:

    @Kathy: I’ve been wondering if the laws coming into existence which ban teens and pre-teens from social media might one day be extended to banning elderly people who are obviously suffering from dementia from social media as well. It would seem a step which can’t come soon enough…

    2
  18. Gavin's avatar Gavin says:

    It’s fun to watch AIPAC repeatedly step on rakes trying to find something, anything that will stop Platner.
    I refuse to live in a world where there’s different standards for Republicans and Democrats. Fact: Susan Collins married her husband [and had an extramarital affair w him for many years] before he had divorced his wife who was in the middle of dying from cancer. Given that, the most recent So-Called Scandal of Platner consensually sexting six women is… not exactly the hit piece they think it is. It is, however, telling that many Democrats including several Biden staffers would rather lose to Collins than sit on their hands and simply not emit random nonsense about Platner. It’s also telling that the Democrats all out in front of this most recent silliness are as if by magic the very ones most in the tank for both Israel and Trump. Fetterman might as well shift to R before his term is up because he has negative chances of getting re-elected.
    Also, if Platner had ever been a Nazi then why are Republicans protesting outside his office? If this was actually true, maga would support him. It’s almost like everything Republicans say is hypocritical.

    1
  19. Kathy's avatar Kathy says:

    @dazedandconfused:

    In an aviation podcast, of all places, one the hosts came up with an additional idea for why it’s positive to ban children and teens from data mining apps. Namely that we all did stupid things growing up, but were not able to post them in fakebook or xitter and have them follow us like a blight the rest of our lives.

    It would be good to ban or restrict LLM use, but that’s going to be harder. They’re already being pushed for education. I suppose that could work, if used properly. I’ve found talking at an AI can help me focus my ideas. Essentially it’s talking to myself and getting some web-scraped data along.

    Also sometimes I get bored at work, and it’s something to do…

  20. Eusebio's avatar Eusebio says:

    Trump is planning to nominate Todd Blanche as Attorney General, according to multiple news outlets. From ABC News,

    …during a dinner Wednesday evening, announced his intent to nominate acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to the post permanently, according to two sources at the dinner with the president.